US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijackers

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijackers

Postby Nordic » Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:30 am

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/07/ ... rican.html

Co-Chair of 9/11 Inquiry: American Government Covered Up State Assistance to Hijackers


It's front page news today that the new Secretary of Defense - Leon Panetta - said that American soldiers are in Iraq because of 9/11, even though AFP notes:

That was one of the justifications for the 2003 US-led invasion, but the argument has since been widely dismissed.
(see this for details).


It is also front page news today that:

Journalists at Rupert Murdoch’s now-shuttered News of the World paper tried to access the mobile phones of 9/11 victims, a former New York City police officer claimed on Monday.
But a more important story is that the co-chair of the Congressional Joint 9/11 Inquiry - Bob Graham - today alleged a cover up by the U.S. government of state assistance to the 9/11 hijackers.
Graham is no flake. He was a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence for 10 years (including 18 months as chairman), member of the CIA External Advisory Board, chairman of the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, 18-year U.S. senator, two-term governor of Florida, co-chair of the national commission on the BP oil spill, and member of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.


Graham writes today in the Daily Beast:

The first two hijackers who entered the United States did so through Los Angeles International Airport in mid-January 2000. Within days they were urged by a shadowy man, already described in an FBI report as an “agent” of the Saudi government, to relocate to San Diego with promises of extensive support—promises on which he promptly delivered.

The agent’s cover was as a ghost employee of a contractor to an agency of the Saudi government—paid a salary and allowances but never expected to show up and work. His real job was to monitor Saudi youth in San Diego getting an education to ensure they were not also plotting the overthrow of the monarchy.

When the two future hijackers reached San Diego, the agent’s allowances were substantially increased. Upon their arrival the agent secured and paid for an apartment. He arranged flight lessons. He introduced them to a tight circle of Muslims, primarily Saudis, who offered additional support.

Yet the support being funneled to the two visitors proved insufficient for their decidedly non-Islamic tastes—alcohol, strip clubs, even a desired, though unfulfilled, marriage to a stripper. The agent then tapped another source of funds: a welfare account maintained for the benefit of Saudis in need by the wife of the kingdom’s ambassador to the United States.

That is some of what we do know, and we got a sufficient glimpse to know what we didn’t know. Still unanswered after nearly 10 years are the questions of the full extent of the Saudi pre-9/11 involvement: Did any or all of the other 17 receive support from Saudi interests? Why would Saudi Arabia do this? Do the Saudis have the will and capability to aid future attacks against the United States? And most important: Why the cover-up by our government?

I have attempted to address these questions in the final report of the congressional commission and the nonfiction book Intelligence Matters, published in 2004. Each was censored by authorities in the intelligence community, particularly on the role of the Saudis in 9/11.

***

Why would the Saudis have given substantial assistance to at least two of the hijackers, and possibly all 19? The answer I have come to is survival—survival of the state and survival of the House of Saud.


This is stunning. Graham is saying - and actually has said for years - that the Saudis were involved in 9/11, but the U.S. government has been censoring this fact.

But it doesn't end there.

As I noted last year:

Investigators for the Congressional [9/11] Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House.

As the New York Times notes:
Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who is a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused the White House on Tuesday of covering up evidence . . .
* * *

The accusation stems from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's refusal to allow investigators for a Congressional inquiry and the independent Sept. 11 commission to interview an informant, Abdussattar Shaikh, who had been the landlord in San Diego of two Sept. 11 hijackers.

In his book "Intelligence Matters," Mr. Graham, the co-chairman of the Congressional inquiry with Representative Porter J. Goss, Republican of Florida, said an F.B.I. official wrote them in November 2002 and said "the administration would not sanction a staff interview with the source.'' On Tuesday, Mr. Graham called the letter "a smoking gun" and said, "The reason for this cover-up goes right to the White House."


And see this Newsweek article.

The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission also described numerous obstructions of justice by the government into the 9/11 inquiry.

As I also pointed out last year, Graham - as well as the co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission - found that witnesses were also intimidated into being quiet:

As I detailed previously, both the Joint Intelligence Committee and 9/11 Commission investigations into 9/11 had government "minders" intimidating witnesses into not saying anything the government didn't like.

You may assume that the issue of "minders" is overblown, and is not really that important.

But, as the New York Times noted in 2003:

The panel [i.e. the 9/11 Commission] also said the failure of the Bush administration to allow officials to be interviewed without the presence of government colleagues could impede its investigation, with the commission's chairman suggesting today that the situation amounted to "intimidation" of the witnesses.

***
[9/11 Commission co-chairs] Mr. Kean and Mr. Hamilton suggested that the Justice Department was behind a directive barring intelligence officials from being interviewed by the panel without the presence of agency colleagues.

At a news conference, Mr. Kean described the presence of "minders" at the interviews as a form of intimidation. "I think the commission feels unanimously that it's some intimidation to have somebody sitting behind you all the time who you either work for or works for your agency," he said. "You might get less testimony than you would."

"We would rather interview these people without minders or without agency people there," he said.

And as I previously noted, a recently released 9/11 Commission memo complains that:

Minders “answer[ed] questions directed at witnesses;”
Minders acted as “monitors, reporting to their respective agencies on Commission staffs lines of inquiry and witnesses’ verbatim responses.” The staff thought this “conveys to witnesses that their superiors will review their statements and may engage in retribution;” and
Minders “positioned themselves physically and have conducted themselves in a manner that we believe intimidates witnesses from giving full and candid responses to our questions.”
Still think this isn't an important issue?

Senator Bob Graham, former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and chair of the Joint Inquiry of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees into 9/11, said in 2005:

The [9/11] commission's findings were based on an interview with al-Bayoumi in Saudi Arabia with Saudi Arabian officials present. "He had no motivation to speak truthfully as to his role," he said.
When government officials are present, it creates conditions where the witness "has no motivation to speak truthfully."

Bottom Line: The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission, Tom Keane and Lee Hamilton, and chair of the the Joint Inquiry of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees into 9/11, Bob Graham, said that minders obstructed the investigation into 9/11.

In his Daily Beast article today, Graham also goes into more detail regarding the American cover up of 9/11:
The most perplexing unanswered question remains: Why would the United States engage in a cover-up? Many have pointed to the special personal friendship between the royal family and the highest levels of our national government. The fact that the Saudis were allowed to fly a planeload of their elite home from the United States in the days immediately after 9/11, when all other commercial aviation was grounded, is often cited as support for that position. In fact, all that actions such as this do is make America’s post-9/11 reaction to the Saudis even more mysterious.

Secrets deemed this critical by both governments are bound to be buried under many layers of official protection and unofficial obfuscation. The actions since 9/11 are a perverted application of Winston Churchill’s truism on the Allies’ plans to end World War II: “In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.”

How far has the American cover up gone?

Here are some hints:

The 9/11 Commission's co-chairs said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements (free subscription required)

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said "We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting"

9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up"

9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . ." He also says that it might take "a permanent 9/11 commission" to end the remaining mysteries of September 11.

And the Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) - who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry - recently said "At some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened". He also said "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true." And he said: "It's almost a culture of concealment, for lack of a better word. There were interviews made at the FAA's New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed. The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way things happened"

A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern) said “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”

The Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 - 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College from 1986 - 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said "The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup"

The Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government Accountability Office said that President Bush did not respond to unprecedented warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up instead of accepting responsibility

Whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg says that the government has ordered the media not to cover 9/11

Other than that, the American government has been totally forthcoming ...
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14206
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby 2012 Countdown » Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:51 am

nothing to add, but want to send this up to the top for more exposure.
George Carlin ~ "Its called 'The American Dream', because you have to be asleep to believe it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
User avatar
2012 Countdown
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:27 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby operator kos » Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:10 pm

Yeah, but "9/11 was planned broadly by PNAC and carried out by patsies from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, the United Arab Emirates with the guidance of agents from the CIA, FBI, Mossad, ISI, and Saudi Intelligence*" just doesn't have the same ring to it as "9/11 was an Inside Job".

*may be missing a few there
User avatar
operator kos
 
Posts: 1288
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby Nordic » Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:52 pm

it seems interesting to me that bob graham might be taking it as far as he can without being suicided or otherwise silenced.

i always thought he night be one to let loose with some incriminating details.

he seems to be doing that now, in an extremely limited fashion, but critics will of course say that he has an agenda to sell his book.

fiction might be where it's at, to get at the truth. there's richard clarke now, too. (i haven't actually read any of his books, just speculating here). and john lecarre has written books with a frightening ring of truth to them as to how the world really works behind the scenes.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14206
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby 8bitagent » Tue Jul 12, 2011 5:45 pm

I respect truthers who think this is a "limited hangout", but when you do good research into real politik facts into 9/11, it's clear what a massive role the Saudi government played. From the fake VIsa express program out of Jeddah, to the coddling and handling of the hijackers from January 2000 to a hotel the night before the 9/11 attacks itself. Many neighbors even saw wealthy Arab dignitaries in limos and benz continually at the San Diego and Virginia homes of the hijackers.
And it wasnt just the Bush regime...a lot of research shows the Clinton administration was further deep into the 9/11 game, despite the limited truther hangout of "neocons did 9/11".

And what about Israel? Netanyahu continually has bragged how great 9/11 was for Israel. We have the Israeli spy kids admitting on Israeli tv they were there to "document" the event.
We have teams of roving white vans in NYC and NJ on sept 11th. Mass communication infiltration with defense building spying in 2000/2001. You had Israeli agents living next door/blocks away from the hijackers in Florida, as well as the B-Thing Art Collective guys who penetrated the WTC in 2000 living with Israeli spies next to the hijackers in Florida(including one living next to a Hezbollah front software company in Dallas)


And look at all the facts surrounding Anwar Awlaki. Fox News actually did a great documentary two months ago on how deep Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11, the deep US coverup by Bush,
and how deep Anwar Awlaki was to the operation:


They even mention a number of times how Anwar seemed to be protected by Washington officials even as the FBI wanted him, and how a few months after 9/11 Anwar Awlaki was invoted to a special luncheon with Pentagon big wigs. Even tho since 1999 he was a known top recruiter/spiritual person for bin Laden

And remember this bombshell folks?

CBS News reports: Bin Laden's Top Financier Ran Company Whose High Level Software Was On Every Single US Agency Computer on 9/11:


People think the global elite are just rich old white guys. And while there is now a schism going on, with China and their oil agenda and Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have long
played a role in stringpulling al Qaeda for globalist interests.

To me it was never that "al Qaeda and bin Laden were framed" as Loose Change presents. There was no "false flag". al Qaeda is a brainwashed tool the elite(whom control America) loves to use...even though their time is about up. We seem to be moving to bigger and dangerous foes, like nation states.

(I default to articles like this: http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2011 ... -pakistan/ )

Looks like the days of ISI being the elite's and the US' pawn are ending as well
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12240
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby 8bitagent » Tue Jul 12, 2011 5:53 pm

operator kos wrote:Yeah, but "9/11 was planned broadly by PNAC and carried out by patsies from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, the United Arab Emirates with the guidance of agents from the CIA, FBI, Mossad, ISI, and Saudi Intelligence*" just doesn't have the same ring to it as "9/11 was an Inside Job".

*may be missing a few there



The Planned By PNAC thing never made sense to me. I would even so so far as to say while Wolfy and the boys may have had a heads up(hence Wolfy's smug little grin during his June 2001 west point speech about pearl harbor's 60th anniversary) that they were far outside the inner ring of 9/11. I mean you can clearly see the arteries and backbone of 9/11 go way into the Clinton era with Serbia/Bosnia jihad support, drug running, Meir Khahane/Blind Sheikh/WTC/Al Kifah/Wadidh el Hage and Bojinka. Peter Lance has written some pretty incriminating and insightful books on this stuff
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12240
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby operator kos » Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:35 pm

8bitagent wrote:The Planned By PNAC thing never made sense to me. I would even so so far as to say while Wolfy and the boys may have had a heads up(hence Wolfy's smug little grin during his June 2001 west point speech about pearl harbor's 60th anniversary) that they were far outside the inner ring of 9/11. I mean you can clearly see the arteries and backbone of 9/11 go way into the Clinton era with Serbia/Bosnia jihad support, drug running, Meir Khahane/Blind Sheikh/WTC/Al Kifah/Wadidh el Hage and Bojinka. Peter Lance has written some pretty incriminating and insightful books on this stuff


Well sure, but the main players in PNAC were in positions of power long before Bush came into office.
User avatar
operator kos
 
Posts: 1288
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby 8bitagent » Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:56 pm

operator kos wrote:
8bitagent wrote:The Planned By PNAC thing never made sense to me. I would even so so far as to say while Wolfy and the boys may have had a heads up(hence Wolfy's smug little grin during his June 2001 west point speech about pearl harbor's 60th anniversary) that they were far outside the inner ring of 9/11. I mean you can clearly see the arteries and backbone of 9/11 go way into the Clinton era with Serbia/Bosnia jihad support, drug running, Meir Khahane/Blind Sheikh/WTC/Al Kifah/Wadidh el Hage and Bojinka. Peter Lance has written some pretty incriminating and insightful books on this stuff


Well sure, but the main players in PNAC were in positions of power long before Bush came into office.


Oh definitely. Ever see The Power of Nightmares 3 hour documentary? Was surprised how well it covered the rise of the neocon history into power. Strangely they never seemed all too interest in religious right stuff except to exploit it for votes. Never seemed to push social conservatism either.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12240
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:10 am

8bitagent wrote:.....
And remember this bombshell folks?

CBS News reports: Bin Laden's Top Financier Ran Company Whose High Level Software Was On Every Single US Agency Computer on 9/11:
.....


WTF, 8bit? Remember? CBS = CIA.
And you want to use CBS as a source for the P-Tech hoax?

"OMG! al-Queda infiltrated the USG's computers!!"
HA...ha....ha.
Remember the PROMIS cover-up? How many birdz with one disinfo stone called "P-tech?"

Get the disinfo meme-reversal meant to reinforce the cover story? C'mon.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby thatsmystory » Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:03 am

The fiction/real world composite:

1)Graham explains that the reason the Saudi royal family gave Bin Laden access to their network of agents in the US was because they were afraid he would foment a rebellion. However the royal family was unaware of al Qaeda's plans as no explanation was required of Bin Laden.

The Saudis are known for tolerating dissent? Like in Bahrain? Bin Laden and al Qaeda are deemed powerful enough to possibly topple the royal family but they needed Saudi government help in the US? The Saudi government would never think of killing Bin Laden and blaming Israel or the US? There is no such thing as a covert operation?

Once Bin Laden successfully blackmailed the royal family they didn't ask him why he was sending recruits to the US? Does this make any sense?

2)The given reason for the 9/11 cover-up was to conceal a corrupt Saudi/US deal unrelated to 9/11.

What about concealing a corrupt Saudi/US deal directly related to 9/11?

3)The reason for the 9/11 intelligence failure is mainly attributed to a lack of intelligence community communication.

What about the obstructed investigations? Where do those fit in to the bureaucratic inefficiency?
thatsmystory
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:13 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby thatsmystory » Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:15 am

8bitagent wrote:And look at all the facts surrounding Anwar Awlaki. Fox News actually did a great documentary two months ago on how deep Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11, the deep US coverup by Bush, and how deep Anwar Awlaki was to the operation:

They even mention a number of times how Anwar seemed to be protected by Washington officials even as the FBI wanted him, and how a few months after 9/11 Anwar Awlaki was invoted to a special luncheon with Pentagon big wigs. Even tho since 1999 he was a known top recruiter/spiritual person for bin Laden


I read Catherine Herridge's (the FOX special was based on her reporting) book The Next Wave. For sure there was a lot of fearmongering. Based on her book Awlaki comes across as another Ali Mohamed. A "triple agent." Just as Mohamed had FBI agent John Zent facilitating his travel, Awlaki had FBI agent Wade Ammerman. His one comment was something like "People don't want me to talk about this." No kidding. Awlaki just kept fooling US intelligence while mysteriously being protected at the same time. According to the book Awlaki's Pentagon appearance was a luncheon speech intended to foster more understanding of Islam as opposed to some sort of covert meeting.
thatsmystory
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:13 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby Stephen Morgan » Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:55 am

Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:
8bitagent wrote:.....
And remember this bombshell folks?

CBS News reports: Bin Laden's Top Financier Ran Company Whose High Level Software Was On Every Single US Agency Computer on 9/11:
.....


WTF, 8bit? Remember? CBS = CIA.
And you want to use CBS as a source for the P-Tech hoax?


ABC = CIA. ABC aired footage on 9/11 showing the sky behind the twin towers to be blue, when even the ancient Greeks knew the sky to be bronze. Clearly this was an attempt to slip the blue-sky meme, commonly "blue sky thinking" into the cultural mainstream, at the same time a book was coming out about blues legend Robert Johnson and his deal to sell his soul to the devil in exchange for musical talent. How many people were distracted by the major terrorist attack from the two purpose of that footage, meme reversal?

Remember that the warmongering CIA History Channel made a programme called "The Men Who Shot Kennedy", which included footage of another man called Johnson to hijack the Johnson keyword.

Wake up people.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Jul 13, 2011 4:07 am

Stephen Morgan wrote:
Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:
8bitagent wrote:.....
And remember this bombshell folks?

CBS News reports: Bin Laden's Top Financier Ran Company Whose High Level Software Was On Every Single US Agency Computer on 9/11:
.....


WTF, 8bit? Remember? CBS = CIA.
And you want to use CBS as a source for the P-Tech hoax?


ABC = CIA. ABC aired footage on 9/11 showing the sky behind the twin towers to be blue, when even the ancient Greeks knew the sky to be bronze. Clearly this was an attempt to slip the blue-sky meme, commonly "blue sky thinking" into the cultural mainstream, at the same time a book was coming out about blues legend Robert Johnson and his deal to sell his soul to the devil in exchange for musical talent. How many people were distracted by the major terrorist attack from the two purpose of that footage, meme reversal?

Remember that the warmongering CIA History Channel made a programme called "The Men Who Shot Kennedy", which included footage of another man called Johnson to hijack the Johnson keyword.

Wake up people.



How is Hugh not into esoteric synchronicities? He puts it down as woo but totally uses the same logic.

(gabby) DEE (loughner) LEE Plaza. Its dallas all over again(hat tip to the brilliant aferrismoon latest blog)
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12240
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Government Covered Up State Assistance to 9/11 Hijack

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Jul 13, 2011 4:12 am

thatsmystory wrote:The fiction/real world composite:

1)Graham explains that the reason the Saudi royal family gave Bin Laden access to their network of agents in the US was because they were afraid he would foment a rebellion. However the royal family was unaware of al Qaeda's plans as no explanation was required of Bin Laden.

The Saudis are known for tolerating dissent? Like in Bahrain? Bin Laden and al Qaeda are deemed powerful enough to possibly topple the royal family but they needed Saudi government help in the US? The Saudi government would never think of killing Bin Laden and blaming Israel or the US? There is no such thing as a covert operation?

Once Bin Laden successfully blackmailed the royal family they didn't ask him why he was sending recruits to the US? Does this make any sense?

2)The given reason for the 9/11 cover-up was to conceal a corrupt Saudi/US deal unrelated to 9/11.

What about concealing a corrupt Saudi/US deal directly related to 9/11?

3)The reason for the 9/11 intelligence failure is mainly attributed to a lack of intelligence community communication.

What about the obstructed investigations? Where do those fit in to the bureaucratic inefficiency?



Haha for real. The old "Ok, yes. The US covered up Saudi's possible role in 9/11...but it was only so they didnt have pie on their face since weve been buddies with the Sauds. And Saudis only supported the hijackers and al Qaeda cause they were scared of them!" fallback

Though, what is up with the 2002 Fox News report putting Israel and 9/11 in the same breath? Remember, conspiracies of Jews/Israel were the first to be floated out...even though there are very real links between Israel and 9/11.

Also "Saudis put pressure on washington" is the fallback media meme to EVERYTHING. Bin Laden investigations, USS Cole investigations, Anwar Awlaki freeing, Vulgar Betrayal, etc

Lets face it. ten years on, it's just running in circles. Mobius strip

CIA - ISI - Saudi - Mossad - and repeat. Goes nowhere. All misdirection...meanwhile god knows what the next game will be since they seem to be almost done with their al qaeda action figure toys.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12240
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests