Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
semper occultus wrote:yes...but what was wrong with the documentary ?!....( it was Channel 4 btw )
3+2+2 = 7 per Albert Clark Stevens, Cyclopedia of Fraternities
ConcreteJungle wrote:Hate to poop on your party pooping, but if he was holding the pyramid at an angle that is exactly how it would look. seeing how he is sitting on a bed him holding it perfectly in line to the angle of the camera lens, which seems to be facing downwards, means it is pretty unlikely for it to happen. The book underneath has the same perspective as well, just further proof.
Harvey wrote:ConcreteJungle wrote:Hate to poop on your party pooping, but if he was holding the pyramid at an angle that is exactly how it would look. seeing how he is sitting on a bed him holding it perfectly in line to the angle of the camera lens, which seems to be facing downwards, means it is pretty unlikely for it to happen. The book underneath has the same perspective as well, just further proof.
Hate to re-poop on all that, (and the resolution is too low to prove anything either way) but as a rule of thumb, if it looks wrong, it probably is.
The top B&W image is how the perspective appears going from point to point of the base, clearly the perspective lines are wrong.
Below that is how it should appear and you can see that in order for it to do so, the diagram has to clip the edges of the pyramid. But let's not re-route a good thread and just agree to disagree.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
8bitagent wrote:Has anyone read the actual "Men Who Stared At Goats" book? Not the lame-o movie or the half assed BBC documentary.
Gets into this odd world of UFO-occult military-9/11 training-psychic remote viewer death cult and torture gulag stuff.
semper occultus wrote:yes...but what was wrong with the documentary ?!....( it was Channel 4 btw )
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests