Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Marine Sargeant/Military Veteran Scolds, Shames NYPD For Beating Unarmed Protesters
Marine Sgt. Shamar Thomas, of Roosevelt, NY, exercises his first amendment right to tell the NYPD to stop beating unarmed people who are exercising their first amendment rights.
Laodicean wrote:Marine Sargeant/Military Veteran Scolds, Shames NYPD For Beating Unarmed Protesters
Marine Sgt. Shamar Thomas, of Roosevelt, NY, exercises his first amendment right to tell the NYPD to stop beating unarmed people who are exercising their first amendment rights.
http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/ar ... rotesters/
Jeff wrote:A wonderful speech by Malcolm Azania, broadcaster, activist and former NDP candidate, at Occupy Edmonton.
We are not leaderless, we just don't need bosses.
"The most reliable way to predict the future is to create it."
Five Lessons 'Occupy Wall Street' Protesters Could Learn About Finding a Job from 'I Love Lucy'
By Cal Thomas
Published October 16, 2011
FoxNews.com
This weekend TV-lovers everywhere will celebrate the diamond anniversary of "I Love Lucy." The iconic television show continues to entertain and even teach audiences a few life lessons 60 years after it was born.
In fact, "Lucy" offers several life lessons for the "Occupy Wall Street" protesters. Here are five lessons "Lucy" teaches all of us about how to find a job:
1) Have a sense of humor. Lucy didn't take herself too seriously and you shouldn't, either.
2) Take a job, any job. Lucy stomped on grapes, she worked in a chocolate factory and even tried to act as the spokesperson for "Vitameatavegimin."
3) Loyalty to something higher than yourself. Lucy was devoted to her husband and to her neighbors, the Mertzes
4) Live within your means. Lucy and Ricky were Middle Class in the '50s. Their little one-bedroom apartment was perfectly adequate for their needs.
5) Though she never succeeded in show business (her character, that is) she never stopped trying. That's a life lesson for the Wall Street protestors and every other American who seems to have forgotten that persistence, more than talent and education, wins the day.
Yeah, but...Bruce Dazzling wrote:The looks on the Pinkerton's faces were priceless.
Perelandra wrote:Yeah, but...Bruce Dazzling wrote:The looks on the Pinkerton's faces were priceless.
"This is the US of A, why are you hurting people? If you wanna go kill and hurt people, go to Iraq".
Perelandra wrote:Yeah, but...Bruce Dazzling wrote:The looks on the Pinkerton's faces were priceless.
"This is the US of A, why are you hurting people? If you wanna go kill and hurt people, go to Iraq".
Bruce Dazzling wrote:Perelandra wrote:Yeah, but...Bruce Dazzling wrote:The looks on the Pinkerton's faces were priceless.
"This is the US of A, why are you hurting people? If you wanna go kill and hurt people, go to Iraq".
Word.
I have a sneaking suspicion that Sgt. Thomas may be open to a discussion of the part he played in a corporate war, though.
At least I hope he would be.
In the meantime, I'm glad that someone intimidated the intimidators for a change. And he did it simply with words.
82_28 wrote:Perelandra wrote:Yeah, but...Bruce Dazzling wrote:The looks on the Pinkerton's faces were priceless.
"This is the US of A, why are you hurting people? If you wanna go kill and hurt people, go to Iraq".
Agreed, but he may have been speaking down to the cops' level too, in words and emotions they could understand as opposed to anti-war talking points.
There is no honor in this!
Canadian_watcher wrote:Bruce Dazzling wrote:Perelandra wrote:Yeah, but...Bruce Dazzling wrote:The looks on the Pinkerton's faces were priceless.
"This is the US of A, why are you hurting people? If you wanna go kill and hurt people, go to Iraq".
Word.
I have a sneaking suspicion that Sgt. Thomas may be open to a discussion of the part he played in a corporate war, though.
At least I hope he would be.
In the meantime, I'm glad that someone intimidated the intimidators for a change. And he did it simply with words.
simply with words? You don't think that his gigantic physical presence had anything to do with it? I couldn't have gotten away with hollering at "law enforcement" for that period of time.
Chris Hedges wrote:There is no danger that the protesters who have occupied squares, parks and plazas across the nation in defiance of the corporate state will be co-opted by the Democratic Party or groups like MoveOn.
Here Are Occupy Wall Street's Plans For A National Convention That Could Change The Face Of America
It's in the works. A massive Occupy Wall Street gathering with delegates from all over the country. And if these plans are carried out, Occupy Wall Street will be a major force to be reckoned with on Election Day 2012.
The date? July 4, 2012.
Put aside questions of whether or not the movement will survive that long. Imagine that they do, because they have no doubt.
If only our economy had that kind of confidence.
Discussions on how to proceed will begin tomorrow at a massive General Assembly at 7 PM. Here's how they describe what they're about to do:
....the election of delegates and holding of a national general assembly or convention on July 4, 2012 must be organized. No calls for violence. No calls for the violent overthrow of the government.
...Once organized and the delegates have been elected by direct ballot in all 435 districts. They must demand that our elected leaders take action. If they do not take action within one year of the demand, we will demand their mass resignations and that new elections be held so we can take back our democracy from the corporations and those who BUY power and influence with MONEY. Yes this includes unions and lobbyists.
The Citizens United case must be reversed...
More concrete, long-term measures can also be found on their website in a document called The Steps to Non-Violent Revolution and the Convening of a National General Assembly. There are ten of them, and the most amazing thing about them, is that they outline a democratic plan to decide on a platform of reforms supported by occupations across the entire country leading right up to the 2012 election.
Perhaps Occupy Wall Street only thought of doing this now, but I sincerely doubt it.
Basically, if this is carried out, Occupy Wall Street could shift the course of American politics at its highest levels.
Here are the steps:
1. The Occupy Wall Street movement, through the local general assembly, should elect an executive committee comprised of 11 people or some other odd number of people that is manageable for meetings. Ideally this committee should represent each city in the U.S. that is being occupied.
2. The executive committee will then attend to local issues such as obtaining permits, paying for public sanitation and dealing with the media. More important, the executive committee shall plan and organize the election of the 870 delegates to a National General Assembly between now and July 4, 2012.
3. As stated in the 99% declaration, each of the 435 congressional districts will form an election committee to prepare ballots and invite citizens in those districts to run as delegates to a National General Assembly in Philadelphia beginning on July 4, 2012 and convening until October 2012.
4. Each of the 435 congressional districts will elect one man and one woman to attend the National General Assembly. The vote will be by direct democratic ballot regardless of voter registration status as long as the voter has reached the age of 18 and is a US citizen. This is not a sexist provision. Women are dramatically under-represented in politics even though they comprise more than 50% of the U.S. population.
5. The executive committee will act as a central point to solve problems, raise money to pay for the expenses of the election of the National General Assembly and make sure all 870 delegates are elected prior to the meeting on July 4th.
6. The executive committee would also arrange a venue in Philadelphia to accommodate the delegates attending the National General Assembly where the declaration of values, petition of grievances and platform would be proposed, debated, voted on and approved. The delegates would also elect a chair from their own ranks to run the meetings of the congress and break any tie votes. We will also need the expertise of a gifted parliamentarian to keep the meetings moving smoothly and efficiently.
7. The final declaration, platform and petition of grievances, after being voted upon by the 870 delegates to the National General Assembly would be formally presented by the 870 delegates to all three branches of government and all candidates running for federal public office in November 2012. Thus, the delegates would meet from July 4, 2012 to sometime in early to late October 2012.
8. The delegates to the National General Assembly would then vote on a time period, presently suggested as one year, to give the newly elected government in November an opportunity to redress the petition of grievances. This is our right as a People under the First Amendment.
9. If the government fails to redress the petition of grievances and drastically change the path this country is on, the delegates will demand the resignation and recall of all members of congress, the president and even the Supreme Court and call for new elections by, of and for the PEOPLE with 99 days of the resignation demand.
10. There will NEVER be any call for violence by the delegates even if the government refuses to redress the grievances and new elections are called for by the delegates. Nor will any delegate agree to take any money, job promise, or gifts from corporations, unions or any other private source. Any money donated or raised by the executive committee may only be used for publicizing the vote, the National General Assembly, and for travel expenses and accommodation at the National General Assembly ONLY. All books and records will be published openly online so that everyone may see how much money is raised and how the money is spent each month. There will be no money allowed to "purchase" delegate votes as we have in the current government. No corporate "sponsorship".
Very ambitious, we'll see how it goes.
A Declaration, Petition for the Redress of Grievances and Action Plan- An OWS Working Group >
Who are we?
Many people have asked, who is behind this declaration and plan of action? We are a group of college students and pro bono lawyers who met when the students got arrested in NYC. Since then, we have established an Occupy Wall Street "Working Group" to prepare a proposal to elect an Executive Committee for the purpose of organizing an election of a National General Assembly to vote on a formal petition of grievances. This is only a proposal and sample list of just demands on the government. Only a duly elected body can legitimize a list of demands from the People.
The Constitution provides for a petition of a list of grievances to present to the government. It is our opinion that such a petition needs to be presented well BEFORE the 2012 election. That is why we call for a National General Assembly attended by 870 delegates in Philadelphia on July 4, 2012.
In short, we believe that the time has come to harness the momentum of this movement and direct it at constructive goals to make change; the foremost of which is getting money out of federal politics once and for all. All politicians in this country should immediately take a pledge to refuse all sources of private campaign contributions which we view as legalized bribery.
It is clear that Congress and the President cannot regulate themselves so WE THE PEOPLE must demand that they stop taking money in exchange for votes and influence.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 176 guests