4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby JackRiddler » Thu May 26, 2011 12:59 pm

.

I know Breitbart was on Maher a couple of weeks ago.

Doesn't matter what lies and deceptions this crew engages in and gets caught at, it seems, they get a legitimate platform and their victims don't get equivalent response. Here's the latest:


http://counterpunch.org/tierney05252011.html

May 25, 2011

Another Breitbart Hit Job
Attacking the Memory of Workers' Struggle


By BRIAN TIERNEY

If you thought the bipartisan crusade against workers to roll back union rights would be enough to soften the saber rattling of corporate class warfare, think again.

Not content with the legislative assault on workers' rights in states like Wisconsin, Ohio and beyond, the corporate ideologues on the far right of the budget-cutting and union-busting onslaught are also going after the very history of labor struggle.

A reminder of the academic front in the war on working people was played out over the past several weeks at the University of Missouri where two labor relations professors nearly lost their jobs thanks to a right-wing smear campaign that involved an invasion of privacy and some crafty video editing.

Video footage of Judy Ancel, director of the Institute for Labor Studies at the university, and her colleague Don Giljum jointly teaching a class on labor relations was distorted in order to pull this out-of-context quote from the mouth of Ancel: "Violence is a tactic, and it's to be used when appropriate – the appropriate tactic."

Leaving aside the fact that this quote would be utterly uncontroversial had Ancel been teaching a class on, say, U.S. foreign policy instead of labor relations, the reality was that this was not what she said at all.

The footage was obtained from the university's video interconnect system, which allowed Ancel and Giljum to teach the course to two classes located on two separate University of Missouri campuses in Kansas City and St. Louis. And that video fell into the hands of none other than Andrew Breitbart, the right-wing blogger who has made a career out of defaming apparently anyone to the left of Sean Hannity.

"I was just appalled," Ancel told Amy Goodman on Democracy Now!, describing her reaction to the video. "I knew it was me speaking, but it wasn't saying what I had said in class."

After posting it on his BigGovernment.com website, Breitbart's hit job made the rounds on conservative blogs and talk radio, prompting a visceral right-wing campaign demanding the termination of the two professors along with the entire labor studies program.

The intense pressure nearly forced university officials to accept Giljum's conditional resignation offer. But the university reversed course when it came to light that the video was doctored.

"The excerpts that were made public…were definitely taken out of context, with their meaning highly distorted through splicing and editing from different times within a class period and across multiple class periods," the university said in a statement.

Ancel's quote about violence in the BigGovernment.com video left out the fact that she was herself paraphrasing a statement made by someone interviewed in a film that she screened in her class.

"[H]e represented the kind of thinking that went into the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and then later…he said violence is a tactic, and it's to be used when it's appropriate – the appropriate tactic," the professor told her students.

The video's distortion of Giljum's remarks in class included statements acknowledging the violence in U.S. labor history and expressing his view that violence and "industrial sabotage" may have had their place at certain times.

Again, that statement left out Giljum's comments that followed immediately afterward in which he said, "It [violence] certainly makes you feel a hell of a lot better sometimes. But beyond that, I'm not sure that, as a tactic today, the type of violence or reaction to violence we had back then would be called for here. I think it would do more harm than good."

Before these distortions were exposed, the right was up in arms. Missouri's Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder was interviewed on a Tea Party radio program saying, "They [the professors] sit around…matter-of-factly discussing violent overthrow of the capitalist order or the existing order, the workers taking to the streets and committing violent acts of industrial sabotage."

In other words, these seditious labor professors were teaching students about the actual historical facts of labor history in the U.S.

On one level, this was just another sleazy attack by Breitbart and his cohorts. Recent attacks like this one involved edited videos to disparage ACORN, Shirley Sherrod, Planned Parenthood and NPR – attacks that revealed the vile racism, Islamophobia, and anti-women bigotry that are the bread and butter of right-wing attack dogs like Breitbart and his ilk.

But this story also points to the more entrenched history of blacking out labor history in education. Last year Texas conservatives managed to rewrite history as they revised social studies curriculum that would affect the content of textbooks used in high schools throughout the country. As historian Eric Foner noted at the time:

Judging from the updated social studies curriculum, conservatives want students to come away from a Texas education with a favorable impression of: women who adhere to traditional gender roles, the Confederacy, some parts of the Constitution, capitalism, the military and religion. They do not think students should learn about women who demanded greater equality; other parts of the Constitution; slavery, Reconstruction and the unequal treatment of nonwhites generally; environmentalists; labor unions; federal economic regulation; or foreigners.

Over the past several decades, numerous studies of the treatment of labor history in U.S. textbooks have found coverage to be woefully inadequate to the point of glossing over the subject altogether. In particular, various studies in the 1990s and a more recent report by the American Labor Studies Center found that textbooks generally omitted the role that the labor movement played in the Civil Rights Movement and labor's efforts against discrimination against women and other oppressed groups in the workplace.

An American Labor Studies Center report in 2009 surveyed textbooks published by the four largest textbook companies and observed that labor's role in social progress is given little mention, and major strikes are almost routinely treated as "costly failures, as violent, as lacking public support and backfiring against unions." The often violent role of employers in strikes is also given short shrift, if it is covered at all.

Few people will remember having learned very much about U.S. labor history in their high school curriculum. What is considered essential U.S. history in most textbooks excludes the fact that fundamental rights like the right to collective bargaining, the eight-hour workday and the weekend were all things that had to be vigorously fought for, and those fights often entailed a great deal of violence for the simple reason that businesses and government forces would not give in to workers' demands without a fight.

Academia in higher education has sometimes had a reputation of being immune to conservative impulses the permeate other areas of the education system, but this has become less true over the past several decades with the upsurge of robust and well-funded conservative activism on campuses.

Led by conservatives like David Horowitz, author of The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America, ultraconservative student groups on campuses around the country have been propped up to combat what they see as the entrenched left-wing radicalism and anti-American thought that dominates academia.

Horowitz's MacCarthyite witch hunts have gone after the careers of many professors, condemning their "leftist indoctrination" in the classroom. Ironically, this attack on academic freedom by Horowitz and others on the right is seen by them as an effort to defend what they call "academic freedom," or what others would describe as conservative indoctrination.

Unsurprisingly, the notorious billionaire Koch brothers – known for bankrolling the tea party movement and state-led attacks on public sector workers – are also pushing their right-wing corporate agenda on college campuses. In 2008 the economics department at Florida State University accepted a $1.5 million grant from a Koch-run foundation in exchange for giving Charles Koch the right to essentially conduct ideological screening in selecting professors.

And as Think Progress reported earlier this month, Koch also virtually owns George Mason University in Virginia through grants and think tanks within that school. Koch has poured huge sums of money into West Virginia University, Brown University, Troy University, and Utah State University in order to push conservative curriculum and other projects.

It was against this backdrop that Professors Ancel and Giljum found themselves in the crosshairs of the anti-worker war against academic freedom and labor history.

Two days after the video was posted on Brietbart's website, Giljum, who also has worked for 27 years as the business agent for the International Operating Engineers Local 148, received a call from the international union president demanding his resignation. Although Giljum was planning to retire in May anyway, he complied and resigned several days before he was set to retire.

As Ancel explained in the interview on Democracy Now!, "We never were teaching violence in the classroom…We were talking about the violence in labor history, which is extreme in the U.S., and we were talking about the fact that, in many situations, there is violence, and it's mostly directed at the workers."

Ancel also pointed out the importance of the timing of this attack. The uproar around the professors at the University of Missouri coincided with efforts in the state to push right-to-work bills and other anti-worker legislation.

Indeed, this was not an isolated assault on academic freedom – it was an attack on labor education in the context of the wider offensive against public sector employees.

"I'm a pubic employee. I work for a public university," Ancel told Amy Goodman. "The labor education programs throughout the country are almost entirely in public universities. And of course they're going to attack the most vulnerable parts of those universities."

Breitbart himself made his intentions clear in April when he announced on Fox News that "We are going to take on education next, go after the teachers and the union organizers."

This most recent attack in Missouri comes on the heels of another anti-labor effort against academics in March when the conservative Mackinac Center for Public Policy made requests for the public disclosure of private faculty emails at the Labor Studies Departments at Michigan State University and Wayne State University. The Republican Party in Wisconsin made similar requests regarding labor professors' emails at the University of Wisconsin. Conservatives were seeking access to emails containing terms such as "Wisconsin," "Scott Walker," "collective bargaining," "rally," and "union." Also fitting into this pattern of attacks on labor history are the efforts of Maine's governor to remove a labor-themed mural in the lobby of Maine's Department of Labor.

The message of all of these anti-worker campaigns is clear: the right does not only want full ownership of our labor – they want the rights to our collective memory as well.

Knowledge about labor history among students is crucial at a time when heightened attacks on workers and unions are taking place throughout the country, including on college campuses. The vindication of Ancel and Giljum was due in part to the fact that their students organized in their defense, writing letters of support and using other means to pressure the university.

In the midst of the war on labor education, students on campuses throughout the country have been engaged in solidarity struggles with workers at their schools who face brutal working conditions, hostile management and anti-union activity. Over the last two months, student activists – many of whom are affiliated nationally with United Students Against Sweatshops – have staged sit-ins at the University of Washington, Cornell University, the University of Texas, Rutgers University, Emory University, Northeastern University, Tulane University, the University of Wisconsin, Ohio State University, and the College of William and Mary.

Twenty-five students were arrested after occupying the president's office at the University of Washington earlier this month; they were demanding that the university end its contract with campus food-services provider Sodexo, a company that has a reputation of worker abuse. Other student-labor solidarity actions since April have taken place at the University of Chicago and at the University of Maryland where revelations have surfaced about rampant worker abuse, including sexual assault, racism, management intimidation and other abuses that have led to campus workers referring to their workplace as "the plantation."

These campus struggles raise the urgency of protecting and expanding the academy as a place for teaching and learning the history of labor and workers' struggle in this country. At a time when workers and unions are under attack, budgets for the poor are being slashed and politicians are recruited by Wall Street to safeguard the wealth of a few, our history of class consciousness and militancy is itself a dangerous weapon against the ruling class.

This is why, as we struggle to make our own history now – defending and advancing our rights and power as workers and other oppressed groups – we must defend the academics who are dedicated to teaching the instructive history of past struggle, especially when they are entrapped in the anti-education dragnet of the right.

In A Peoples History of the United States, the late social justice historian Howard Zinn wrote, "The memory of oppressed people is one thing that cannot be taken away, and for such people, with such memories, revolt is always an inch below the surface."

Today, there are in fact concerted efforts being made to rob workers of our past. A fight needs to be waged to defend our memory.


Brian Tierney is a labor journalist in Washington, DC. Read more of his work at Subterranean Dispatches, where this article first appeared.

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby JackRiddler » Sat May 28, 2011 7:22 pm


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/27/us/27veritas.html

The Internal Revenue Service has granted nonprofit status to the group that brought down two senior executives at NPR and dealt a death blow to the community organizing group Acorn with videos of its employees giving tax advice to people claiming to be a pimp and prostitute.

Project Veritas, a group founded by the videographer James O’Keefe, received the status from the I.R.S. in April, according to documents gathered by The Chronicle of Philanthropy through a Freedom of Information Act request.

“It will help us expand as an organization and institution,” Mr. O’Keefe said in an interview on Thursday.

He said the money saved with the status would help Project Veritas train and equip “an army” of citizen journalists to carry out its mission: “to investigate and expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud and other misconduct in both public and private institutions in order to achieve a more ethical and transparent society.”

SNIP

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby crikkett » Sun May 29, 2011 11:01 am

^^^ I sure do hope that O'Keefe has just been given enough rope with which to hang himself.
crikkett
 
Posts: 2206
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:03 pm
Blog: View Blog (5)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby Nordic » Sun May 29, 2011 2:13 pm

crikkett wrote:^^^ I sure do hope that O'Keefe has just been given enough rope with which to hang himself.



You mean like Glen Beck? Who is now a very very wealthy man?
:wink:
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby eyeno » Sun May 29, 2011 3:54 pm

Nordic wrote:
crikkett wrote:^^^ I sure do hope that O'Keefe has just been given enough rope with which to hang himself.



You mean like Glen Beck? Who is now a very very wealthy man?
:wink:


but, but, but, Beck is my hero!!!



green means sarcasm on this board! (right?...errr left?) words are so dangerous. Maybe I should say green means incorrect?
User avatar
eyeno
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby JackRiddler » Tue May 31, 2011 8:35 pm

barracuda wrote:Image

Speculation And Sloppy Reporting On Both Sides Of ‘Weinergate’

by Tommy Christopher | 8:27 pm, May 30th, 2011

The unfolding scandal involving what Rep. Anthony Weiner calls a hack of his social media accounts has proven to be a roiling petri dish of new media sickness, as the rush to judgment has overshadowed the fair presentation of the facts. The initial rush to convict Rep. Weiner of tweeting a naughty picture to a follower in Seattle has led to equally irresponsible suggestions that Andrew Breitbart and his staff engineered a “hoax,” and sloppy reporting of the facts, all around.

Much of this story involves circumstantial evidence, much of which can be interpreted in contradictory ways. But the facts that are available are that a picture of an underwear-clad penis was sent, via Anthony Weiner’s Twitter account, to a 21 year-old student named Gennette Nicole Cordova in a publicly-viewable message. The message contained a link to Congressman Weiner’s YFrog account.

Congressman Weiner has maintained that his social media accounts were hacked, and Ms. Cordova issued a statement which supports his assertion:

Since I had dealt with this person and his cohorts before I assumed that the tweet and the picture were their latest attempts at defaming the Congressman and harassing his supporters.

She doesn’t explicitly endorse a “hacking” theory (as she mentioned later on Twitter), but her statement indicates that she believed the message not to be genuine. She went on to say that “there have never been any inappropriate exchanges between Anthony Weiner and myself.”

Her statement echoed her real-time response to the retweeting of the photo.

That’s the sum total of the firsthand information available. We can see the tweets, and the picture, and we have statements from the only two known direct participants.

Beyond that, though, there are facts that can be interpreted as supporting Rep. Weiner’s account, or as casting doubt on it, or both. Pointing out those facts is perfectly fine, but speculation surrounding them has led to a shifting narrative, and to unreasonable narrative leaps.

For example, some have expressed doubt that Rep. Weiner could have had both his YFrog account, Twitter account, and Facebook account simultaneously hacked. But as Caleb Howe (a conservative from Redstate.com) points out on Twitter:

    Haven’t seen it mentioned, but wouldn’t have to hack twitter/facebook to post from yfrog. Only have to hack yfrog. It’s authorized to tweet.

Some speculation has centered around Rep. Weiner’s actions after the alleged hack. People have pointed to the swift deletion of the photos in Rep. Weiner’s YFrog account as suggestive of his guilt, when that could easily have been the work of the alleged hacker, and is also a perfectly reasonable reaction for an innocent person to have.

The same is true of his tweets since the alleged hack. His reaction has been consistent with his quirky personality, and with a politician trying not to let a prejudicial sex smear become a big deal. On the other hand, his reaction is consistent with someone trying to downplay wrongdoing and avert attention. It’s not very useful as evidence, one way or the other.

Some have fairly wondered whether Rep. Weiner had reported the hack to the authorities, which he apparently is in the process of doing. Others have pointed to the slow pace of information from Weiner’s office as suggestive of guilt. Both are fair points, but not without also noting that this occurred near midnight at the beginning of Memorial Day weekend, a time when information-gathering is typically slower.

It’s also worth noting that there has been no confirmation that Weiner did not report the hack. It is possible he did, and was instructed not to divulge that. Based on his spokesman’s statement today, though, that doesn’t seem likely.

By far, the most damning piece of circumstantial evidence against the idea of a hack is the tweet that Weiner sent early Friday evening, referencing the time difference in Seattle, which Ms. Cordova then retweeted. From Big Government:

Here’s s a transcript of the Tweet in question:

    Heading to 30 Rock to chat with Rachel at 9. #Thats545InSeattleIThink
    about 17 hours ago via TweetDeck
    Retweeted by 18 people

That is some coincidence, to be sure, and one that hasn’t been explained by Weiner or Ms. Cordova, and it was the piece of circumstantiality that gave me the most pause. The tweet itself isn’t that difficult to explain, if anyone could get to ask Weiner to his face about it. For example, Weiner is a famously ardent Yankees fan, and his beloved team was playing in Seattle on Friday. Cordova’s retweet would be the natural reaction of a fan to a mention of her hometown.

Combined with the tweet of the underwear pic several hours later, though, it is a damning coincidence, though still only circumstantial. However, if you accept the idea that Weiner was hacked, the timing can make more sense. For example, if someone monitored his Twitter feed fanatically, and kept close tabs on who he followed, and spoke feverishly of an impending sex photo scandal involving a northeastern Democrat, Gennette Nicole Cordova would be a natural selection to receive the hacked tweet.

As it happens, the man who was the one and only person to directly retweet the offending picture, Dan Wolfe (aka @patriotusa76) was part of a group that did just that, and Gennette Nicole Cordova was one of their targets. They descended upon several young women who received mutual follows from Rep. Weiner, harassing one of them (a 16 year-old) right off of Twitter. They also tweeted a nonstop stream of venom at Rep. Weiner, much of it involving sexual innuendo about the Congressman.

Additionally, when Wolfe retweeted the photo, but failed to get a screen capture of the tweet. In their original report, Big Government reasonably used a screencap from the Congressional Twitter archive, which doesn’t show how the tweet was sent (phone/web/etc). A real-time screen capture would have that information, and might have suggested Weiner’s innocence or guilt. Weiner’s tweets that night were sent via Tweetdeck. A real screenshot of the original tweet, had it said “sent via YFrog,” would stick out like a sore thumb.

None of this proves that Wolfe hacked Weiner, but it certainly illustrates the very real possibility that someone could have. If this group can show this level of obsession with Weiner, it is not a stretch to believe that someone could learn enough about him to crack his YFrog password. Anyone who follows Wolfe or his clique would have also seen their interactions with Ms. Cordova. Her retweet could have been a waited-for opportunity.

Of course, there is as much actual proof of this as there is that Weiner wasn’t hacked. However, when someone’s life and reputation are on the line, red flags like these shouldn’t be ignored. The presumption of innocence should be that much stronger.

When we first reported on Wolfe’s activity, he wasn’t available for comment, but he has since denied being the alleged hacker in question (an accusation, for the record, that we never made):

    Have you been contacted by any law enforcement officers or agents whatsoever?

    His answer:

    No one. Nada. I keep saying bring it on. I have nothing to hide. Not my IP nothing to hide at all.

    No one from law enforcement contacted the number one suspect in the hacking case of the decade? No one? No one at all?

    Not a single LEO?

    No, Wolfe told me repeatedly. And then he went further. Here are his tweets, my Columbo-like questions omitted, as well as answer-beginnings to those questions:

    I keep saying I would love an investigation because I know the outcome. It won’t be me.
    I hope he comes after me. Look up my IP. Nothing to hide here.

    I’d voluntarily hand anything they want over. Check me and my IP. Anything. I did not post that tweet. Weiner did it.

    It could be solved in minutes why is no one but me asking for authorities?

    At this point I’m seriously wondering if I can call the authorities myself and ask for investigation.

    Whatever it takes to get it started. Fine with me. I just want it investigated. Someone please?

For what it’s worth, Ms. Cordova herself is inclined to believe Wolfe, as she tweeted earlier:

    @patriotusa76 I’m sorry for saying your twitter name to nydn. You are a very annoying human being but I dont think you’re behind this.

On the flip side, there have been suggestions, and out right accusations, that this “hoax” was engineered by Andrew Breitbart and/or his staff of editors. We debunked some of this earlier, but it bears repeating that there is no credible evidence of this. While we may disagree about the way in which this story should be presented and pursued, there is no basis for such an accusation. Overzealous? Yes. Fabricators? No. It is also worth noting that they have acted far more responsibly than other right-wing blogs, taking pains to protect the identities of participants, where appropriate, and clearly separating fact from allegation.

There have also been unsavory suggestions about my involvement in this story, including one that I wrote Miss Cordova’s statement for her. While completely false, I mention it because her statement was sharply written, and I would have hated not to get credit for a line like this:

    The point I am trying to make is that, contrary to the impression that I apparently gave from my tweet, I am not his girlfriend. Nor am I the wife, girlfriend or mistress of Barack Obama, Ray Allen or Cristiano Ronaldo, despite the fact that I have made similar assertions about them via Twitter.

The tide of this story has begun to swing in Rep. Weiner’s favor, for the time being, but once the weekend is over, and the cable news machine revs up, it’s anyone’s ballgame.


Links in original.




Breitbart is pushing it -- making it likelier this fight ends in death for one of them.


http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/ ... ite-young/

Breitbart: Weiner having relationships with ‘girls that are quite young’
Posted on 05.31.11
By David Edwards
Categories: Featured, Nation

Conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart appeared on CNN Tuesday where he implied Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) had been engaged in inappropriate relationships with multiple young women.

Breitbart said that Dan Wolfe, the source for a lewd picture that allegedly appeared on Weiner’s Twitter account, had been tracking the congressman.

“I don’t know him that well, he has been monitoring relationships that Congressman Weiner has been having with women, young women, who claimed to have relationships with him,” Breitbart explained. “I’m not saying what type of relationships, but people that @RepWeiner follows. Girls that are quite young — younger than the girl in question here — talk openly about Rep. Weiner, who he follows these girls.”

Following Breitbart’s interview, CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin told host Randi Kaye that he regretted the network allowed Breitbart to make those claims.

“What Andrew Breitbart was insinuating about [Weiner] with young girls and stuff is outrageous,” Toobin said. “And frankly, it’s too bad that he got to say that stuff on CNN.”

Watch this video from CNN’s Newsroom, broadcast May 31, 2011.

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby JackRiddler » Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:26 am

.

My post on the "Weinergate" thread:

.

"Weinergate"? Barracuda, for shame. Why are you headlining this thread with the right-wing corporate media brandname for the fake story du jour? This is about Breitbart fabricating and the corporate media obediently constructing the personal destruction of a politician perceived as "liberal." In this case, they're not even bothering to accuse him of anything illegal or all that terrible. It's enough that his name sounds like a dick.

I'm surprised at the credibility any of you are granting to this story as anything other than the latest hit-job out of the Breitbart factory, once again receiving astronomically disproportionate credence and coverage from the corporate media despite the ample experience everyone now has with Breitbart.

You've now seen the Breitbart circle in action with their doctored video defamations of ACORN, Sherrod Brown and the NPR fundraising official. All of these were immediately obvious as fabrications and then proven to be fabrications beyond doubt. You also know about the O'Keefe gang's attempts to bug Sen. Landrieu's office phones and to lure the CNN reporter into his Rape Boat. Other examples in this series of deceptions and attacks came up in the long-running thread on Breitbart and O'Keefe at viewtopic.php?f=8&t=26855. This is what Breitbart and his circle do. They are explicitly and proudly engaged in conducting hit jobs on the public images of those they designate as "liberal" leaders and therefore fair targets. You know the goddamn M.O. It starts with standard right-wing reptile-brain appeals. Targets are selected to symbolize the hated "liberals" and they are reduced to ascribed (not inherent) personal attributes taken from the pool of reptile-brain prejudices. The pre-wash usually goes on for months. ACORN are a hoard of dark-skinned petty criminals stealing an election so that they can freeload off the taxpayers. Sherrod Brown and some other Obama appointees are black, so they hate Whitey. The NPR guy is an urban elite who hates "conservatives." Then the hit arrives, tailored to the reptile-brain predjudice.

The moment you hear that Breitbart is breaking the "story," the only reasonable default assumption becomes that it is a lie, because that's what the record tells you. Imagine you had watched professional wrestling for several years and suddenly started wondering if the last fight you saw was not a scripted performance but a real fight. Imagine you just deconstructed a dozen Bush regime lies about WMD but then take the newest announcement about hidden stores of anthrax in the mirrored bedrooms of his palace as though it should initially be assumed true.

I mean, come on, Weiner's Wiener? Really? Can it be more obvious, than to take the reptile brain response to the mere sound of a hated person's name and use that in an attack that the dumbest moron will never again forget? (Obama. Hm. Sounds foreign! Hillary. Must be a lesbian!) Do you have to be Hugh to get it?

Weiner is the head of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, charismatic and good-looking (in a politician way) and well-spoken, combative and clever, considered a candidate for higher offices. Last month he called for Medicare for All. Last week he called on Justice Thomas to recuse himself from a health-care case because his wife is a lobbyist for one of the parties in the case. These are the real stories about Weiner, and they got zero corporate media coverage. But wait a minute, Weiner's name sounds like a dick and here's a picture of a dick! Case closed! Another sicko! Everyone n ow knows exactly how the picture could have been sent without Weiner knowing it, but he's insufficiently vigorous in denying that it's his dick! Can you prove it's not your dick! Ha! Finished! Destroyed!


http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/sus ... print.html

Susan Milligan
Media Behaving Inexcusably on Weiner Twitter Photo


By Susan Milligan

Posted: June 2, 2011

Imagine this scenario: A youngish, recently married, female member of Congress learns that someone has sent a tweet to a fraternity house-follower of someone alleged to be her, allegedly from her own Twitter account. Her face is not in the grainy photo, but her breasts are, covered up by a lacy bra. It’s a provocative photo, one that is embarrassing to the congresswoman. She has no idea who would have done such a thing or why.

She gets the photo deleted, but when she comes back to work, she is surrounded by hounding reporters. Did she send the photo? Are those her breasts? If she really didn’t really send a sexy picture of herself to some college guys, why doesn’t she demand a police investigation? Is that reticence not proof of some guilt on her part?

Had that episode indeed happened to a woman, undoubtedly there would be an outcry. The media would be accused of blaming the victim. She would be defended as an upstanding member of Congress whose only crime was being ambitious and a bit in-your-face. But the scenario involved a male member of Congress, and New York congressman Anthony Weiner is enduring a radically different media reaction.

Here’s what we know: Someone tweeted an intimate photo, allegedly of Weiner, in his underpants. Yes, his name is Weiner—and yes, it’s pronounced WEE-ner. Ho, ho, ho. The woman who received the tweet says she does not know him; he says he does not know her. He says someone hacked into his Twitter account to pull a prank. He immediately deleted the tweet as soon as he became aware of it.

Unfortunately, it did not end there. The media demanded to know: Were those his private parts beneath the fabric of the underpants? Weiner—perhaps too honestly—rhetorically shrugged, saying he could not say with "certitude" that it was not a photo of him. That was the congressman’s mistake, although it was an understandable one in our YouTube, tweet-crazy, cell phone camera-stalking world. He should have paused, displaying an appropriately appalled face, and told the voyeurs--oops, I mean, media representatives--that it was none of anyone’s damn business whether he or anyone close to him had taken an intimate photo of him. But he frankly held open the possibility that someone had done so, and then the media went into overdrive.

On Capitol Hill, Weiner was swarmed by reporters in the Speaker’s Lobby. Never mind the looming financial crisis that could come from the failure to raise the debt ceiling. Or the massive debt itself. Or the GOP presidential campaign announcements. Or entitlement reform. No, the questions were shot at Weiner with an accusatory tone generally reserved for prosecutors interrogating serial killers: Was that, well, HIM, or rather, HIS, in those underpants? Is there a possibility some such photo of him exists, asked another reporter? Why hadn’t Weiner demanded a full investigation and prosecution of the crime, asked another? Weiner—who had gamely agreed to answer questions about something extremely personal—tried fervently to get an answer out before someone launched another rhetorical torpedo at him. It wasn’t a press availability; it was a mob. One half expected one of those present to demand that Weiner unzip.

Weiner’s used to the jokes about his name, undoubtedly having heard them since the sixth grade. As he pointed out, maybe if his name were "hamburger," the photo might have been different. He’s joked quite hilariously himself about his moniker, rhetorically asking Speaker John Boehner (who pronounces his name BAY-nor) why he doesn’t just embrace the name, and call himself BOH-ner. After all, Weiner said in a very amusing address at a press dinner, he doesn’t try to pass himself off as WAY-ner.

And true, Weiner’s demeanor can be a bit aggressive, even as it is bitingly funny. He’s like Capitol Hill’s answer to Larry David—clever, smart, ambitious, and edgy. Actually, he’s pretty … pretty… pretty… edgy. He dishes it out on the House floor, and he’s always been able to take whatever is thrown back at him.

But the behavior of much of the media toward Weiner is inexcusable. If he harassed a woman by sending her an inappropriate photo, that is indeed worth looking into. But no one, including the woman in question, has alleged such a thing, and it’s doubtful someone as savvy as Weiner would do something so supremely stupid, anyway. Weiner has declared himself a victim of Twitter invasion, and certainly, he’s a victim of an outrageous invasion of privacy. If someone (His wife? An old girlfriend? Himself?) took a photo of him in his skivvies, that’s his private business. And if a woman had been violated in such a way, her underwear photo sent to a Twitter follower, she would rightly be afforded sympathy, accompanied by outrage for the person who humiliated her. Weiner deserves the same consideration.

No matter how he pronounces his name.






The Jig Is Up: Yfrog Disables E-mail Upload Service; Anthony Weiner Stands Vindicated

by
phenry


The blog Cannonfire, which closed the case yesterday on the so-called "Weinergate" affair when it demonstrated conclusively how anyone could use a simple technique to publish any picture they wanted to another person's Twitter stream, now reports that yfrog.com has disabled the e-mail service that enables such exploits, thereby acknowledging the existence of a security problem and tacitly acknowledging that it has been abused. In short, it is no longer possible for a reasonable person to believe that Rep. Weiner was not framed by an outside party.


I can't quote Cannonfire because literally his last 10 articles are about this and mostly long.
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/

Suffice to say he does exhaustive work covering every angle of the story but most importantly in showing how easy it is to upload images to someone's Twitter account via nothing more than an e-mail to yfrog, with the upshot that yfrog suspended the feature the day after his demonstration. He and the Kos diarists phenry and scattered wind have done a lot of digging to figure out the roles and expose some correspondence and planning of various underlings in this affair, including Browne (who's been stalking his hated image of Weiner online for months) and a John Mack.

Continuing with phenry's account:

To make a long story much shorter than it deserves: Every Twitter user who uses yfrog to store photos for posts (I'll be cold in my grave before I ever call them "tweets") is given an e-mail address in the form [account_name].xxxxx@yfrog.com, where xxxxx is a short string of alphanumeric characters. Any time an e-mail message with an attached photo is sent to this address, the photo is automatically uploaded to yfrog.com under the recipient's account and posted to the recipient's Twitter feed as a publicly viewable message. Both the yfrog photo and the Twitter post would appear to have been posted by the e-mail recipient, and there would be no apparent connection to the e-mail sender.

The Cannonfire post explained clearly how one would do this, and blogger Joseph Cannon kindly established a Twitter account, @gdowson153, for use in demonstrating how the exploit works. Never one for believing others about something I can easily verify myself, I sent a picture I created to gdowson153.gudom@yfrog.com, the upload address for the gdowson153 account. You can see the picture at yfrog.com here, and the resulting automatic Twitter post here. I never had access to gdowson153's password or any information related to this account other than the above e-mail address. Many others were inspired to try the same technique, resulting in a humorous parade of random images posted to the gdowson153 Twitter account. (For a nice illustrated tour through this exploit, see Dreggas' valuable diary here.)

How might one obtain the secret e-mail address required to upload photos to another person's account? There are a number of possible ways. To a non-technical person, it might not be evident that this address should not be shared. If someone sent a photo to their upload address and CCed someone else in the same message, or forwarded a message from their Sent folder to another party, the address would be visible to anyone receiving the message. A potentially more likely approach, explored by Rachel Maddow's blog yesterday, would be to simply brute-force it. There are approximately 11.9 million possible combinations of five or fewer Latin letters—a lot for a human to work through, to be sure, but computers are very very good at doing repetitive tasks fairly quickly. One could easily set up a spambot to send messages to every possible e-mail address in question until finding the one that works. The whole process could be done in several hours. (Edit: The number of possible "words" that must be tried is apparently much, much smaller than 11.9 million. For details, see this post from the still-hard-to-believe-how-rehabilitated-they-look-today Little Green Footballs blog.)

Shortly after this technique was revealed, it seems, Yfrog disabled the upload e-mail service.

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby justdrew » Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:32 pm

Anonymous: James O’Keefe lives with his parents

A group of hacktivists associated with “Anonymous” and the AntiSec movement on Wednesday published the personal information of conservative prankster James O’Keefe online.

Going by the name CabinCr3w, the group announced it had published details relating to his age, home address, probation officer, education, family, and work because he worked with conservative Andrew Breitbart and was trying to belittle the “Occupy Wall Street” protest.

The group noted that O’Keefe now lives with his parents because of parole restrictions and successfully led a campaign to ban Lucky Charms cereal from his school cafeteria because it stereotyped Irish people.

He pleaded guilty to entering property belonging to the United States under false pretenses in May and was sentenced to three years of probation. O’Keefe and three of his comrades were arrested after posing as telephone workers and entering Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu’s New Orleans office.

CabinCr3w has aligned itself with the ongoing “Occupy Wall Street” protest and previously published the personal information of numerous employees of the financial giant Goldman Sachs, including CEO Lloyd Blankfein. CabinCr3w also released personal information of a New York police officer who was seen in videos pepper spraying female protesters.

In the video that provoked CabinCr3w, O’Keefe posed as a Wall Street banker and walked amongst the crowd at the weeks-long “Occupy Wall Street” demonstration. The majority of the video is dedicated to a person at the protest who hopes O’Keefe will make an odd investment in his “Constitutional World Federation.”


Likely violated terms of parole w/trip to OWS—

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/10/james_okeefe_spokesman_says_probation_officer_approved_his_occupy_wall_street_visit.php

a judge never approved his trip across the Hudson River and out of the state of New Jersey, where he lives with his parents. A judge has regularly approved all of his trips since he-


http://cabincr3w.tumblr.com/
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:36 am

.

Yowch! I see above I got burned on the Weiner story.

But here's the latest: O'Keefe caught up in conspiracy to commit voter fraud! You know, the kind of voter fraud that is extremely rare and irrelevant but the Republicans pretend fixes elections. His patsy-accomplices are caught, demonstrating that photo ID is not necessary to prevent this form of fraud, and that it can't possibly fix elections. It gets better:


http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.c ... hp?ref=fpb

Election Law Experts Say James O’Keefe Allies Could Face Charges Over Voter Fraud Stunt

Ryan J. Reilly January 11, 2012, 3:05 PM 14731 356

Update, Jan. 1 5:00PM: Mark Zuckerman, a federal prosecutor in the New Hampshire U.S. Attorney’s Office, told TPM he recently became aware of the Project Veritas video and was reviewing it but hadn’t formed any opinion on whether it presented an issue.


It was one of the few — if not the only — coordinated efforts to attempt in-person voter fraud, and it was pulled off by affiliates of conservative activist James O’Keefe at polling places in New Hampshire Tuesday night. All of it part of an attempt to prove the need for voter ID laws that voting rights experts say have a unfair impact on minority voters.

Now election law experts tell TPM that O’Keefe’s allies could face criminal charges on both the federal and state level for procuring ballots under false names, and that his undercover sting doesn’t demonstrate a need for voter ID laws at all.

Federal law bans not only the casting of, but the “procurement” of ballots “that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held.”

Hamline University law professor David Schultz told TPM that there’s “no doubt” that O’Keefe’s accomplices violated the law.

“In either case, if they were intentionally going in and trying to fraudulently obtain a ballot, they violated the law,” Schultz said. “So right off the bat, what they did violated the law.”

Election law expert Rick Hasen, who writes the Election Law Blog, joked in an email to TPM that O’Keefe’s team should “next show how easy it is to rob a bank with a plastic gun.”

“Who in their right mind would risk a felony conviction for this? And who would be able to do this in large enough numbers to (1) affect the outcome of the election and (2) remain undetected?” Hasen wrote.


Other election experts agreed that the video doesn’t change the substance of the debate over whether the minimal threat of in-person voter fraud is worth the impact that such laws can have on minority and poor voters.

“The fact that activists can engage in a stunt is not a reason for reform,” Samuel Issacharoff, a professor of constitutional law at New York University Law School, told TPM. “It means nothing. Why would anybody want to do this? It proves that they don’t update their dead voter information as quickly as they might, but so what? To pull this off on a large scale, you’d need coordination, and presumably somebody would have heard about it.”

Someone did, in fact, catch on to the scheme when a man dressed in a suit and tie tried to vote as a dead man known to the poll watcher. The man left before police arrived and said the poll watcher would “soon find out” why he tried to vote under a fake name, the Boston Herald reported Tuesday night.

Henry Brady of the University of California told TPM that O’Keefe’s video showed that what he did was “possible” but said that was never really a question. He also said that other techniques short of voter ID — like asking voters to sign a roll when they receive their ballot — would stop the type of fraud O’Keefe’s allies were attempting.

“Yes, this shows it’s possible to do what they did but you have to ask yourself… how many illegal immigrants would risk a jail term to vote illegally?” Brady said. “What they didn’t tell us, were they ever stopped and asked what’s going on here.”

John Samples of Cato told TPM that this would be a political issue and that O’Keefe was “pushing on an open door” because voter ID is politically popular. But he questioned whether it was worth the risk for O’Keefe.

“This is illegal, right? This is fraud and you would think he would actually get into trouble for doing this,” Samples told TPM.

Samples said that O’Keefe’s video could have an impact in the political fight over voter ID laws but “in the judicial fights — and the fight amongst wonks — it wouldn’t change much. The big question for policy always was what was the extent of it, and this doesn’t solve that question.”

The video, first obtained by the Daily Caller, is embedded below.

© 2011 TPM Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-uVhhIlPk0

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:38 am


#FutureOkeefeStings

markfollman Mark Follman
I handed out dozens of pot cookies to 3rd graders, exposing the dangers of the medical marijuana industry #FutureOkeefeStings

(snip)

d_pardee Darren Pardee
O'Keefe shows how easy it would be for a terrorist to blow up a bridge by blowing up a bridge. #FutureOKeefeStings


(snip)

pandagon Jesse Taylor
O'Keefe exposes the credit industry by opening up $100,000 in credit cards using orphans' identities. #FutureOKeefeStings


We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby compared2what? » Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:36 am

But....He's still on probation for the attempted wire-tapping thing. You'd think the terms of that would be broken by his conspiring to commit voter fraud, wouldn't you? And he definitely was a conspirator, his interviews make that clear. Besides, it was a Project Veritas stunt, and that's his shop, he runs it.

I've never understood what the point of his hijinks was anyway, though. It seems to me like they just demonstrate that they had to make shit up in order to have something to back up what would otherwise be purely rhetorical claims.
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby Nordic » Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:52 am

compared2what? wrote:I've never understood what the point of his hijinks was anyway, though.



Really?
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby compared2what? » Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:11 am

No, not really. More like "stupid way to put what I meant." Sorry.
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:02 am

compared2what? wrote:But....He's still on probation for the attempted wire-tapping thing. You'd think the terms of that would be broken by his conspiring to commit voter fraud, wouldn't you? And he definitely was a conspirator, his interviews make that clear. Besides, it was a Project Veritas stunt, and that's his shop, he runs it.

I've never understood what the point of his hijinks was anyway, though. It seems to me like they just demonstrate that they had to make shit up in order to have something to back up what would otherwise be purely rhetorical claims.


As you then say, not the best way to put it. These "hijinks" are unscrupulous actions out of the CIA and Nixon handbooks for political sabotage, usually criminal or intentionally pushing the legal envelope. The choice of targets is obvious. You're right that in each case O'Keefe & Co. make shit up to back up otherwise insupportable claims, thus exposing these claims as factually insupportable. But in the real world it can have enormous repercussions, like the destruction of ACORN. (Enormous. Seriously. Don't need to tell you, but (M)WPDGI and most RIers think illegal actions that may swing the next election are not a big deal.)

Compared to that - ACORN is gone and the story is dead, as far as the media are concerned - what does it matter that the initiating action by O'Keefe against ACORN is thoroughly exposed and documented as a fraud? It should matter, to him.

I see one key question here: Where does his protection come from? Following the lenient treatment for the Landrieu break-in, he went straight back to plotting more acts of sabotage. If he isn't indicted now, after a confessed conspiracy to commit voter fraud (whatever the rationale), then he must have protection. He seems to be relying on more than the possible reluctance of some prosecutors to go after a white right-wing ideologue who is practicing sabotage against targets perceived as leftist.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator's office

Postby compared2what? » Thu Jan 12, 2012 4:28 pm

JackRiddler wrote:
I see one key question here: Where does his protection come from? Following the lenient treatment for the Landrieu break-in, he went straight back to plotting more acts of sabotage. If he isn't indicted now, after a confessed conspiracy to commit voter fraud (whatever the rationale), then he must have protection. He seems to be relying on more than the possible reluctance of some prosecutors to go after a white right-wing ideologue who is practicing sabotage against targets perceived as leftist.

.


^^

That's more along the lines of what I was thinking when I somehow said the unutterably stupid thing that I said.

I assume that he's an operative, but there's something about him in that role that makes me wonder I-don't-know-what. I just have trouble drawing a bead on what manner of creature he is, I guess. Or something like that.

Fascinating, I know.
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests