Chavez ponders if US gave Latin American leaders cancer

[eyeno]

With so many published studies of cancer treatments that actually do work, and you know these top dogs have access to them, I wonder what is up with this. 1 out of 3 or 4 people are slated for cancer death in our lifetime but you notice that the top people seldom die of it. 1 out of 3 or 4 people is a LOT.

We seldom hear of people at the top dying of cancer. I've studied this until I am blue in the face and the number of cancer treatments that work are so many that it staggers the imagination. But, according to my studies, there are methods to give people fast acting cancer for which there is no treatment. It gets you, and it gets you so fast that you don't have time to find the right treatment.

But I don't understand why somebody in his position is not using liposomal vitamic c, curcumin, bromelain, etc...The list is too long. Maybe he is using them, and 'something' got to him that he can't shake off. All it takes is to 'touch' something you should not touch, eat one thing you should not eat, and bamm you're gone.

edited, too much information

[slomo]

With so many published studies of cancer treatments that actually do work, and you know these top dogs have access to them, I wonder what is up with this. 1 out of 3 or 4 people are slated for cancer death in our lifetime but you notice that the top people seldom die of it. 1 out of 3 or 4 people is a LOT.

We seldom hear of people at the top dying of cancer. I've studied this until I am blue in the face and the number of cancer treatments that work are so many that it staggers the imagination. But, according to my studies, there are methods to give people fast acting cancer for which there is no treatment. It gets you, and it gets you so fast that you don't have time to find the right treatment.

But I don't understand why somebody in his position is not using liposomal vitamic c, curcumin, bromelain, etc...The list is too long. Maybe he is using them, and 'something' got to him that he can't shake off. All it takes is to 'touch' something you should not touch, eat one thing you should not eat, and bamm you're gone.

edited, too much information

There is probably a publication bias. People don't announce their health problems unless they absolutely have to.

But, yes, it has occurred to me that some of the occult goals of cancer epidemiology, coming perhaps as research agendas from high up the institutional ladder, are perhaps more about figuring out how to cause cancer than about figuring out how to prevent or cure it. It's just a random thought, a transient idea, nothing more.... Power to heal must always entail also the power to destroy.

[Stephen Morgan]

They did it to Mae Brussels.

[MinM]

WikiLeaks has been tweeting that it was about to release some “extraordinary news”. Shortly thereafter, the WikiLeaks Twitter account posted that it just released, “The Global Intelligence Files. Over 5 million emails”.

Update: Since the first press release tweet, WikiLeaks also tweeted: “WikiLeaks GIFiles: Yes Men press release.”

Along with that, was a link to a press release:


LONDON—Today, Monday 27 February, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files – more than five million emails from the Texas-headquartered “global intelligence” company Stratfor. The emails date from between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal’s Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defense Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor’s web of informers, pay-off structure, payment-laundering techniques and psychological methods, for example:

“[Y]ou have to take control of him. Control means financial, sexual or psychological control… This is intended to start our conversation on your next phase” – CEO George Friedman to Stratfor analyst Reva Bhalla on 6 December 2011, on how to exploit an Israeli intelligence informant providing information on the medical condition of the President of Venezuala, Hugo Chavez...

http://www.webpronews.com/wikileaks-pub ... ls-2012-02

[wordspeak2]

So.. Stratfor is connected to an Israeli intelligence operation to take down Chavez by means of his health or sexual seduction or anything else dirty they can think of? Makes sense... one big global capitalist intelligence network. Thanks, Wikileaks.
I mean, it doesn't look like they're going to get him out at the ballot box.
"A January study by polling firm International Consulting Services (ICS) has shown that 53% of Venezuelans think that the kind of socialism promoted by the current president Hugo Chavez is a political and economic system that guarantees the development of the country. Meanwhile, the same polling organisation found if the 7 October presidential elections were held tomorrow Chavez would be re-elected with 58.2% of the vote." http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/6814

Meanwhile, msm reports today that the FARC in Colombia is going to free certain hostages and stop using kidnapping as a political tactic. Sounds like a good move to me.... The left is Colombia is very fractured, and I would support any way to bring the FARC closer to the aboveground left, especially in Bogota.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/fe ... e-captives

As an aside, one of the few things that I've faulted Chavez for recently was his complicity in turning over FARC members that were on the Venezuelan side of the border to Colombian intelligence. That happened several months ago... I think he was trying to make peace, but don't spit on your allies, bro.
So much pressure on one person, though. May more leaders with anywhere near the charisma of Hugo step up in Venezuela. Please.

[American Dream]

http://www.antifascistencyclopedia.com/?p=55844

Cancer the Secret Weapon?

By Charles Kong Soo

Trinidad Guardian, February 27, 2012



It was a case destined for the X-Files and conspiracy theorists alike, when Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez speculated that the US might have developed a way to weaponise cancer, after several Latin American leaders were diagnosed with the disease. The list includes former Argentine president, Nestor Kirchner (colon cancer) Brazil’s president Dilma Rousseff (lymphoma cancer), her predecessor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (throat cancer), Chavez (undisclosed), former Cuban president Fidel Castro (stomach cancer) Bolivian president, Evo Morales (nasal cancer) and Paraguayan president Fernando Lugo (lymphoma cancer). What do they have in common besides cancer? All of them are left-wing leaders. Coincidence? In his December 28, 2011 end-of-year address to the Venezuelan military, Chavez hinted that the US might have found a way to give Latin American leaders cancer.

“Would it be so strange that they’ve invented the technology to spread cancer and we won’t know about it for 50 years?” Chavez asked. “It is very hard to explain, even with the law of probabilities, what has been happening to some leaders in Latin America. It’s at the very least strange,” he said. Chavez said he received warning from Cuba’s former leader Fidel Castro, who has survived hundreds of unsuccessful assassination attempts. “Fidel always told me, ‘Chavez take care. These people have developed technology. You are very careless. Take care what you eayy what they give you to eat … a little needle and they inject you with I don’t know what’,” he said.

Unsolved mysteries



Sounds far-fetched? WikiLeaks reported that in 2008 the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) asked its embassy in Paraguay to collect all biometric data, including the DNA of all four presidential candidates. Right here in the Caribbean conspiracy theorists believe that the CIA also had a hand in the deaths of T&T’s own civil rights activist and Pan-Africanist Kwame Ture, Jamaica’s legendary reggae icon Bob Marley and Dominican Prime Minister Rosie Douglas. During the United States Senate Select Committee’s investigation into CIA’s assassination plots on foreign leaders in 1975 it was revealed that the agency had developed a poison dart gun that caused heart attacks and cancer.

The gun fired a frozen liquid poison-tipped dart, the width of a human hair and a quarter of an inch long, that could penetrate clothing, was almost undetectable and left no trace in a victim’s body.

Kwame Ture or Stokely Carmichael, the radical former Black Panther leader who inaugurated the Black Power Movement of the 1960s went to his death claiming that the CIA had poisoned him with cancer. Ture died of prostate cancer at the age of 57 in 1998. His friend, multi-media artist and activist Wayne “Rafiki” Morris, said Ture said “without equivocation” that the CIA gave him cancer. “I knew Kwame from 1976 and for all the time I knew him he never drank or smoked cigarettes,” Morris said. “He was a very good swimmer and exercised regularly, he didn’t have any medical condition and was very conscious of his health.”

If the shoe fits…
Bob Marley died of melanoma cancer in 1981. He was 36-years-old. The official report is he contracted cancer after injuring his toe which never healed while playing football in 1977. The conspiracy theorists allege that Marley was given a pair of boots with a piece of copper wire inside that was coated with a carcinogenic substance that pricked his big toe by Carl Colby, son of the late CIA director William Colby. There is an eerie similarity between Marley and Castro involving poisoned shoes. Cuban ambassador to T&T, Humberto Rivero said the CIA and Cuban exiles tried more than 600 attempts to kill Castro from exploding cigars, injecting him with cancer, to a wet suit lined with poison. In the case of Marley the CIA allegedly used cancer in his shoes, for Castro they placed the highly toxic poison thallium salts in his shoes. After only eight months being elected as Prime Minister of Dominica, radical politician Rosie Douglas was found dead on the floor of his residence in 2000.

The cause of death was listed as a result of a massive heart attack. His heart was twice its normal size. Just like Ture and Marley, he exercised regularly. Douglas’ eldest son, Cabral insisted that his father had been murdered and also hinted at the involvement of the CIA. Moshood Abiola, the man widely believed to have won the 1993 elections in Nigeria, was reported to have died of a heart attack after he was given a cocktail which expanded his heart to twice its size in 1998. Jack Ruby, the assassin who killed US president John Kennedy’s alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald, died from lung cancer in 1967. What was strange was the cancer cells were not the type that originate in the respiratory system. He told his family that he was injected with cancer cells in prison when he was treated with shots for a cold. He died just before he was to testify before Congress.

Lockerbie bomber, Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, developed terminal cancer. The leader of Canada’s left-leaning Opposition party, the New Democratic Party (NDP), Jack Layton died of an undisclosed form of cancer in 2011. It will appear that having leftist tendencies are hazardous to a person’s health. From 1953 the Russians were using microwaves to attack the US embassy staff in Moscow, Russia. One third of the staff eventually died of cancer from this microwave irradiation. Imagine how advanced and sophisticated assassination technology has become today.

http://www.guardian.co.tt/lifestyle/201 ... ret-weapon



ALSO SEE: Dr. Mary’s Monkey, by Edward T. Haslam … http://dillsnapcogitation.wordpress.com ... s-project/

“ International Cable: Chavez Thinks the CIA Gave Other Leftists) Cancer” http://torontostandard.com/article/inte ... s-cancer-2

[wordspeak2]

Today I learned- from the Guardian, no less- that Stokely Carmichael was convinced the CIA gave him cancer.
I'd love to read that "Dr. Mary's Monkey" book. Has anyone here read it?

[cptmarginal]

Argentine President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner undergoes brain surgery

Argentine President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner underwent a successful surgical procedure Tuesday to remove a blood clot close to her brain as her enforced absence threatens to generate political uncertainty in the country she has dominated for years.

“The operation went very well,” Alfredo Scoccimarro, her spokesman, told well-wishers outside the Favaloro Foundation clinic in Buenos Aires. “The president is in her room. She is in very good spirits. She said hello to everyone.”

The surgery, designed to drain blood and relieve pressure inside Fernández’s skull after a head injury that the government has not described, comes at a particularly challenging time for the 60-year-old populist leader.

According to Argentine media reports, Fernández will need weeks, perhaps months, to recuperate. That will probably leave the reins of government in the hands of Vice President Amado Boudou, although he is under investigation over allegations of corruption and illegal enrichment and is deeply unpopular.

“What happens is that he’s [an acting] president who lacks legitimacy because he’s a man who’s being questioned about corruption,” Ricardo Gil Lavedra, an opposition congressman, said by phone from Buenos Aires. “So this is not the best person to take charge of the government at this time.”

Scoccimarro, the presidential spokesman, did not respond to a phone call or an e-mail seeking comment.

Fernández will be unable to campaign ahead of midterm elections set for Oct. 27. Her Peronist party and its allies face an uphill battle to retain control of the National Congress. That control has made it easier for the government to enact unorthodox economic policies that rely on generous state spending and heavy state intervention.

Argentina also suffered a reversal Monday when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal by its government in its fight to avoid paying bondholders more than a decade after the country defaulted on its $100 billion debt, the world’s largest in history. Earlier, a lower U.S. court had ruled that Argentina must fully pay those creditors who had refused to take part in a debt restructuring that doled out 25 to 29 cents to the dollar.

That setback comes on top of efforts to cope with a 25 percent inflation rate and tight currency controls that have angered Argentines. Fernández, who was reelected in a landslide in 2011, has seen her approval rating fall to 33.5 percent.

“A number of problems are reaching the boiling point,” said Arturo Porzecanski, a professor of international economics at American University who closely follows Argentina.

“It ain’t Venezuela yet,” he added, referring to that oil-rich country’s dysfunctional economy, “but the unhappiness with her reflects real discontent with the economy and with all kinds of other things.”

A former senator, Fernández became prominent as her husband and predecessor as president, the late Nestor Kirchner, guided Argentina out of its economic morass after the debt default. Buoyed by China’s seemingly insatiable appetite for soy and other agricultural products, the Argentine economy grew fast, with Kirchner and then Fernández, who succeeded him in 2007, directing the windfall to social programs and subsidies.

But in Fernández’s second term, the economy has struggled as state intervention squelched investment and China’s slowdown depressed demand for Argentine products. Her government has also fought off disgruntled creditors demanding payment, causing friction with the Obama administration.

Economists predict that Argentina will grow a scant 3 percent this year, far below the 9 percent that buoyed Fernández in 2010. The forecast for next year is worse, less than 2 percent, said Dante Sica, director of the Abeceb consultancy in Buenos Aires.

“We are entering a cycle of low growth and high inflation,” Sica said. “Seven of 10 Argentines are now against the government. And I think it’s because of the economic deterioration and the lower expectations.”

The government is also almost sure to face an emboldened opposition after some of the president’s closest allies were defeated in August primaries. The ruling coalition is now bracing for a loss of influence in the upcoming congressional elections.

“They will continue being the first minority, but they won’t be the majority, so it will be a much more balanced congress,” said Lavedra, the opposition lawmaker, referring to the Oct. 27 vote.

Meanwhile, the support that some government officials once thought they had to push through a constitutional referendum measure allowing Fernández to run for a third term has evaporated. Porzecanski said it all shows how quickly a politician can lose influence in Argentina.

“The Argentine people are very fickle,” the American University professor said. “They love you one moment, hate you the next. And this is exactly what is happening to her.”

I chose the Washington Post version of this because it can be helpful to use US mainstream media rhetoric as a barometer on the topic of left-wing governments. Without knowing anything substantial about Argentine politics, and before even reading her Wikipedia entry, I guessed that she was a Chavez ally immediately upon skimming a couple of news items on her surgery