slimmouse wrote:Bruce Dazzling wrote:slimmouse wrote:
Icke believes that the Rothschilds are one facet of the spider. And since his books if anyone dare read them anymore, (given the AD cartoon show), are chocked full of evidence to support this claim based on years of research, then I aint gonna argue.
I did actually write about that. But deleted it, since in a five minute video its impossible to mention the years of facts and research in his books which lead Icke to reach those conclusions, and which by all apparent standards is off topic. Which is proabably why you went there.
Since Icke keeps coming up, I'd like to propose a little exercise:
I'm going to pick one conclusion that he presented in this video and I'd like you, slimmouse, to cite his source (from one of his books that you've mentioned) that backs it up."This hand, called The house of Rothschild, takes the money from the United States and hands it to this hand, called Israel of the House of Rothschild and says thank you very much."
That's it. Just show me the source Icke uses to validate the above statement.
OK bruce. You show me who hands over the money and who recieves it, and what form it takes ?. Show me how these decisions to hand over the money are arrived at, and who funds those making the decisions ?
I can offer you all the evidence you like for what happens to those who dont approve it. Thats as much proof as I need.
IM sure we can distill it down with your help.
And if you cant be arsed with all of that, dont complain at what Icke has written about for years, based on years of research, without reading some first.
I have a pretty good Idea how it works, and Ive got a pretty good Idea Ickes on the money.
AD or Icke LOL !!!
You seem to be the one who "can't be arsed," slimmouse.
I asked you one simple question. All you needed to do was to produce one source backing up one of Icke's claims from the video. I even narrowed it down for you by picking one of the claims, and amazingly, you seem to think that being rude and claiming that you and Icke have "a pretty good idea how it works" is a sufficient answer.
I don't need to be arsed, as I'm not making any claims. It's not my job to prove a negative, it's your job (and Icke's) to prove a positive, and in this case, you and Icke need to support this claim:
"This hand, called The house of Rothschild, takes the money from the United States and hands it to this hand, called Israel of the House of Rothschild and says thank you very much."
If you can't back up the claim with a source, then maybe you should rethink the claim instead of getting pissy with me. This is research 101.
Edited to add a colon.