The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pearl

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pearl

Postby beeblebrox » Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:32 pm

Great essay on "The Pirates of the Caribbean, The Curse of the Black Pearl". A lengthy read, but well worth it.

http://metaphilm.com/index.php/detail/p ... caribbean/


Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl-Pearls Before Swine

An action-adventure movie based on a kids ride at a theme park is hiding a real national treasure.


"Only puny secrets need protection. Big discoveries are protected by public incredulity."

—Marshall McLuhan


By the end of the twentieth century, the Walt Disney Company seemed all out of story. They had exhausted every option available to them:

1.) remaking old favorites (Herbie the Love Bug, Cheaper by the Dozen)

2.) buying new properties for cheap (such as the Winnie the Pooh franchise from Sears)

3.) hit-and-missing with new material (Pocohontas. Mulan. Hercules?)

4.) recycling their animated properties into live action films (101 Dalmatians, The Jungle Book)

5.) making sequels, prequels, and midquels enough to kill the most avid fan (Long John Silver, 102 Dalmatians, Hercules: From Zero to Hero)

6.) recycling a live action film into an animated film.

Nobody believed this last one could be done, but by 2002, when Treasure Planet came out, the wailing and gnashing of teeth for the glory that was Disney became audible. As if it couldn’t get any worse, the company then turned pathetically to a technique no one had considered before in the quest for novel storylines: 7.) their own theme parks.

First came The Country Bears in 2002, based on the Country Bears Jamboree show, with one bear channeling Jerry Garcia and the rest of them channeling The Eagles. Then, in what looked like a final act of desperation, 2003 saw the release of Pirates of the Caribbean, a ride most people remembered as being not terribly fun even when they were eleven years old.

Wait a minute. Just a sec.

Did you just say, “Pirates of the Caribbean?”

I love that movie!

Hang on . . . Oh now I remember: Everyone loved that movie:

•Gross Receipts for Treasure Planet: $109 million
•Gross Receipts for Pirates of the Caribbean: $654 million
•Gross Receipts for the entire Pirates franchise: $2.7 billion
Why the sudden turnaround and change of fortune? It’s because these movies aren’t based on a ride at the theme park. Just as the 2001 Planet of the Apes was not a remake of the 1968 Charlton Heston original but rather a remake of the 1956 Charlton Heston film The Ten Commandments, so too is Pirates of the Caribbean doing something exceedingly clever, original, and startling. It’s not a narrative makeover of a Disney ride; it’s a remake of the ride of your life. Pirates of the Caribbean is an allegory of the current politico-economic system—executed so beautifully, so stylishly, and so accurately that no one has recognized it for what it is. Until now.

If you bought the line (from the DVD’s extras) that the writers of Shrek just made up Pirates of the Caribbean as they went along, then it’s time to watch it again. Because when you look closer, what you discover is a plot so complex, dialogue so precise, characters so cleverly named, and a narrative so perfectly structured that you can no longer view it as just a random series of swashbuckling action-adventure moments strung together by tight bodice close-ups and powderkeg explosions. So where does the plot come from, who are these characters, and why the need for “undead” pirates? How can this story be so intricate, detailed, and complex if it is little more than a desperate bid to spice up a tired and worn-out genre?

The reason is simple. Pirates is a story about water, and we are the fish. As someone famous once said, we don’t know who discovered water, but we know it wasn’t a fish. When something is everywhere, you don’t see it. Ubiquity is invisibility. And it is this very fact that it is a story about something so familiar that makes it such a compelling and enjoyable film. So we let down our guard in the false belief we are partaking in an ancient tale about fictional characters in exotic locales, only to find that we resonate with these very characters and the strangely familiar reality they inhabit.

Best pirates ever
Our guide on this journey is Captain Jack Sparrow, a minister of the New Covenant who is as adept with the word as he is with the sword. Actual acts of piracy we witness him commit in a movie all about pirates: One. Near the beginning we do see him run off with someone else’s ship. At that point we can at least agree that he’s “got to be the best pirate I’ve ever seen.”

But he is still just a pirate, so can he truly be our hero? One of the amazing achievements of the film is that it keeps us questioning right up to the bitter end who the real hero is, or indeed, if there is any hero or actual “good guy” at all.

Initially, we want Will to be our hero, especially when we see how courageously he fights to rid the world of the scourge of piracy. And as the boy of low estate who secretly loves the woman of high breeding, he seems the natural choice. But before long we find that Will is Jack’s understudy, and not only must he come to terms with his piratical parentage, but he is soon all too eager to betray the very teacher who has done him no wrong.

Once Will whacks Jack over the head with an oar in the pirate cave, we find ourselves lost in the middle of an adventure without any hero to guide us at all. This sense of unease is intentional. It is designed to help us come to terms with the fact that we are all pirates, and thus we must all learn from Jack how to be the best possible pirates we can be.

The fun part about telling a story to fish about water is that it is unnecessary to hide the “hidden” meaning. Quite the opposite, in fact. So if the real-life meaning you wish to communicate is that the walking dead are under a curse because they took some gold coins and spent them, then here’s how to hide the meaning from them: make a movie that shows the walking dead under a curse because they took some gold coins and spent them.

The audience can’t see it because the audience can’t see it. The movie goes on and nobody in the audience has any idea . . .

Drink up, because now I’ll have to repeat what I was just about to say:

You are a pirate.

You are among the walking dead.

You entered this condition because some gold coins were spent.

Water, water everywhere
You did take a drink back there, didn’t you? It’s important to dull the pain by making the unbelievable tolerable through laughter. Jack prepares us for this right at the start of the story:

Mullroy: What’s your purpose in Port Royal, Mr. Smith?

Murtogg: Yeah. And no lies.

Jack: Well, then, I confess, it is my intention to commandeer one of these ships, pick up a crew in Tortuga, raid, pillage, plunder and otherwise pilfer my weasely black guts out!

Murtogg: I said no lies!

Mullroy: I think he’s telling the truth.

Murtogg: If he were telling the truth, he wouldn’t have told us.

Jack: Unless, of course, he knew you wouldn’t believe the truth even if he told it to you.

Since Scripture of old, the key to interpreting any text is always found within the text itself. Pirates can disclose the absolute truth to us, without alteration, because that truth is too fantastic for us to believe. After all, who among us actually believes we are under a curse? Nobody. Of course not. It was a silly suggestion. So let’s just read on now about the curse the crew of the Black Pearl is under, secure in the knowledge that any fanciful “interpretation” of that curse could not possibly be applied to us. You’re here for entertainment, not enlightenment, which is what pulled you into the cinema of Plato’s cave in the first place, right? Why spend five hours a day in the cave if not to avoid the light and stay in the dark?

Our guide through the dark is Captain Barbossa, as despicable and loathsome a bad guy as ever graced the silver screen. We initially take comfort in having a real bad guy we can hate, and whose penchant for evil is predictable . . . until, that is, we figure out that he never tells a lie. This makes him a bad guy whose word we trust even more than some of the good guys. So consistent is he that even when accused of lying, he immediately proves himself blameless:

Pintel: [to Elizabeth] Go on, Poppet, go! Walk the plank!

Will: Barbossa, you lying bastard! You swore she’d go free!

Barbossa: Don’t dare impugn me honor, boy. I agreed she’d go free, but it was you who failed to specify when or where.

As you will recall, the curse was placed upon coins made of real gold, and it was through spending and trading away these gold coins that the pirates lost their ability to enjoy living. Yet they did not and could not die either. Captain Barbossa takes up the longest monologue in the film explaining this to Elizabeth:

Elizabeth: I hardly believe in ghost stories any more, Captain Barbossa.

Barbossa: Aye. That’s exactly what I thought when we were first told the tale. Buried on an Island of Dead what cannot be found except for those who know where it is. Find it, we did. There be the chest. Inside be the gold. And we took ’em all. We spent ’em and traded ’em and frittered ’em away on drink and food and pleasurable company. The more we gave ’em away, the more we came to realize—the drink would not satisfy, food turned to ash in our mouths, and all the pleasurable company in the world could not slake our lust. We are cursed men, Miss Turner. Compelled by greed, we were, but now we are consumed by it.

[Elizabeth takes a butter knife and hides it]

There is one way we can end our curse. All the scattered pieces of the Aztec gold must be restored and the blood repaid. Thanks to ye, we have the final piece.

Elizabeth: And the blood to be repaid?

Barbossa: That’s why there’s no sense to be killin’ ye—yet. [offers her an apple] Apple? Arr.

[she stabs him with the knife; he takes it out]

I’m curious—after killin’ me what was it you were plannin’ on doing next?

[she runs out and sees the pirates, all skeletons under the full moon]

Look! The moonlight shows us for what we really are. We are not among the living, and so we cannot die, but neither are we dead. For too long I’ve been parched with thirst and unable to quench it. Too long I’ve been starving to death and haven’t died. I feel nothing—not the wind on my face, nor the spray of the sea, nor the warmth of a woman’s flesh. [walks out into the moonlight and reveals himself as a skeleton]

You best start believing in ghost stories Miss Turner. You’re in one!

So those who don’t believe in ghost stories soon fall victim to them. First the pirates, and now Elizabeth. Reality eventually makes a believer out of the most hardened skeptics. Even in the dark, the glow of the moon is enough to enlighten us.

Will you?
But what in this far-fetched tale, you ask, has the slightest basis in reality? Yes, it explains the curse to us, but surely such a fantastic story is just the work of an over-active imagination. It resembles nothing from our everyday lives, does it?

Sorry you asked.

For the answer, we must visit our friendly local lawyer and ask how much he charges to draft a Will. Then we can get our money’s worth by asking him more questions than he’s ever had from a client. Check his answers against those below:

Q: What does a Will create?

A: An Estate.

Q: What is an Estate?

A: It is a legal construct to hold your property (everything you own) after you die.

Q: Why do I need a Will or an Estate?

A: Because your Will appoints an Executor to manage your Estate (holding your property) according to your instructions, usually by distributing the property to your heirs in the manner directed in your Will. Otherwise the government appoints an Administrator who follows standard rules that won’t necessarily be what you wanted. Without a Will, some of your heirs could end up with nothing.

Q: What is an Executor?

A: An Executor is a person appointed by you who gets to deal with your property as if he were you. His only limitation is that he must follow the instructions in your Will. An Administrator has exactly the same power to act as if he were you, but is appointed by the government and must follow instructions found in statutes (written laws), in absence of a Will.

Q: So an Estate creates a situation where all my worldly goods (and land) are controlled by someone else after I die, because I am no longer able to control them?

A: You’ve got it!

Q: Should I leave my metallic mint green 1964 Buick Skylark to my cousin Vinny?

A: Ah, finally, a normal question.

Leaving aside the rest of the normal questions for now, we only have one third of the picture painted so far. The normal part. People die, and those people are . . . dead. So Estate law is the law that deals with dead people and their property. Hardly worthy of a ghost story.

Estate law for the . . . living
Now that we’ve met dashing, young Will, we need to meet his pirate father, Bootstrap Bill. A Will creates an Estate, whereas a Bill creates a debt. And you thought they were both short for William!

Debt is fine if you are able to pay it, but when you cannot pay, the law comes along once again and starts meddling in your private affairs. In the olden, golden days, money was gold and an unpaid debt was tantamount to theft. So off you went to debtor’s prison. The harshness of the common law is the stuff that Charles Dickens built his writing career on.

So what happened? Where are Dickens’s debtor’s prisons today? It appears that too many people read his stories, and agreed that there had to be a better way. We call that better way . . . Bankruptcy.

And bankruptcy law is where things start to get interesting. Next we must visit another lawyer for advice on declaring bankruptcy. Let’s bring in all our credit card statements and tell him we can’t pay them.

Q: What happens once I am declared bankrupt?

A: The government appoints an administrator who takes all your property and divides it up among your creditors.

Q: Can I keep my holiday home in Hawaii?

A: No, all of your worldly goods (and land) must be given to the Administrator so he can pay off as much of your debt as possible.

Q: This doesn’t sound like such a good deal after all.

A: Do you agree it is a better deal than going to prison until every last penny is repaid?

Q: Agree. So how does the Administrator decide who to pay and how much?

A: You give him all of your Bills, and those show him who your creditors are. He uses what assets you have available to pay each creditor in proportion to the amount owed on his Bill.

Q: What if I want one creditor paid completely before anyone else gets paid?

A: Sorry, you have no control whatsoever over this process. Your property has been taken out of your control and given to the Administrator who holds it in a Bankruptcy Estate and deals with it in your place.

Q: Loss of control? Administrator? Estate? Hey, what are you smoking? This sounds just like Estate law. I’m not dead!

A: Correct. Bankruptcy law is Estate law. Bankruptcy kills you on paper so that your property can be dealt with as if you were dead, even though you are not. Your creditors simply take the place of your heirs.

Q: So you mean if I spent some gold coins and didn’t pay them back, I could be bankrupted, and I would be treated as if I were dead even though I was not, and the only way to end this curse is to pay back every last gold coin?

A: You’ve been watching too many movies.

So a Will creates an Estate, and an unpaid Bill creates a Bankruptcy Estate, and they are in fact related, just like father and son . . .

. . . and anyone under bankruptcy protection is the walking dead.

Non-negotiables
Interesting, you think. A bit spooky even. But then you smugly retort, “I’ve never been declared bankrupt!”

Watch out for the water, my fishies. You might be all wet without knowing it. Reality will sneak up on you when you least expect it. Remember, we have only seen two-thirds of this picture so far.

The third lawyer we must visit in order to complete the picture is one familiar with the nuances of contract law.

Q: Is it true that a contract between two parties is not enforceable unless each party has given the other something of value, also called “valuable consideration”?

A: Yes, of course.

Q: So if buy something of value, and pay for it with a piece of paper with numbers on it, how have I provided valuable consideration? Does the paper have value?

A: Well no, not exactly.

Q: So how come we can still enforce contracts where the monetary payment does not consist of gold or silver coins that have intrinsic value?

A: Can I see the contract you want me to review for you?

Alas, there is little chance of finding a lawyer who can explain this last bit for us. But with a bit of research into the history of money, we can confirm the following:

When people had gold and silver coins, they liked to store them in banks for safe keeping. The banker gave them a receipt that could be exchanged for the coin, called a promissory note. He also accepted their written instructions to pay the coin to a third party, called a check. People started accepting promissory notes and checks in place of the coins themselves, because of the convenience and because they could always get the coin out of the bank if they really wanted it. These banking papers became known collectively as “negotiable instruments,” and law developed to govern their use. Soon the average man thought of those bits of paper the same way he thought about the gold and silver coins that actually made his contracts enforceable.

But there was a price to be paid. A court of common law could only enforce contracts with valuable consideration on both sides. If a dispute involving negotiable instruments came to a court of common law, the one who paid with paper would lose every time. Thus these disputes could only be heard in a different jurisdiction, one that recognized negotiable instruments: a court of maritime law. Consequently, when one accepted the convenience of negotiable instruments, he also accepted maritime law as the law governing his contracts.

So you’re out to sea, and it’s the pirate’s life for thee.

Back on land, the common law protects a man’s right to “life, liberty and property,” but when the U.S. Declaration of Independence was written, it made a curious substitution. It merely affirmed a man’s right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Apparently the right to property was already under heavy fire in 1776. If you don’t believe that your right to property has been compromised, just try building a house on “your” land without getting permission from the relevant authorities. Or try not handing over a portion of your hard-earned pay with each pay check.

Today we cannot exchange our negotiable instruments for gold or silver coins at all. Gold coins were removed from circulation in 1933. This happened in every single country across the globe in the same year. Could it be that the entire planet was bankrupted that year? Well, Yes. Either that, or it was the greatest theft in the history of mankind, and the perpetrators have yet to be caught.

Uncharted waters
We now all trade under bankruptcy protection using negotiable instruments, which makes us the walking dead. Argh! We no longer get to enjoy the benefits of living, which are our property rights formerly protected by the common law. But if we want to trade commercially and have our contracts enforced, we have no other option in a bankrupted nation. Don’t like the water? Have some more rum.

Now for maritime law to apply, there has to be a ship, because the law of the sea applies to ships, not to men and women on the land. So somewhere along the line you were given a ship and taught how to navigate it. Your ship is quite easy to find, as it is the foundational document for every last contract you have signed. Especially with the government. If you want anything from the government, what do you have to present? A driver’s license? Passport? Close, but what did you have to have in order to get those? That’s right:

A Berth Certificate! Your ship was berthed the day you were born.

What’s that? Yours says “Birth” and you think that the “i” makes it a different word? Well, Mr. Webster, who wrote the original dictionary of American English in 1828, says otherwise.

And you will find on most documents, especially those issued by the government or involving the courts, that your name is written in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, just like the name of a ship. The contract is with your ship, not with you. You are merely the Captain, . . . provided you remind people of this fact often and consistently, just like Jack does. You have traded the benefits of living, the protections of the common law, for the benefits of a ship that can operate commercially under bankruptcy protection, using maritime law.

[in the cabin of the Interceptor] Elizabeth: [trying to bandage her palm] What sort of a man trades a man’s life for a ship?

Will: A pirate.

But enough darkness. Step into the light of day, with our unlikely hero Jack Sparrow. He has somehow managed to escape this curse. Was it merely a twist of fate, or is it something more fundamental, like his very approach to life?

Fast forward to the final battle scene in the pirate cave. There we see Jack gladly accept the benefit of “limited liability protection” offered by the curse. Clearly he sees it differently to Barbossa, who just wants it lifted. To Jack, even when under a curse, one must wait “for the opportune moment.” So he levels the playing field by operating in bankruptcy while fighting Barbossa, and then chooses the exact moment for lifting the curse, by repaying his debt to the heathen gods at the same time he repays Barbossa with a single shot through the heart.

Here is a man who does not think like us, and so we cannot figure him out right up to the bitter end. But lest there still be doubt in our minds, he sorts through the treasure and comes forward to Will and Elizabeth with a golden chalice and crown, looking every bit the misunderstood Messiah figure he actually is.

Jack has happily traded his life for a ship, as he told Elizabeth while they were marooned:

Jack: Not just the Spanish Main, love. The entire ocean. The entire world. Wherever we want to go, we’ll go. That’s what a ship is, you know. It’s not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails. That’s what a ship needs. But what a ship is, what the Black Pearl really is, is freedom.

Negotiable instruments
Jack not only guides Will into the knowledge that he is a pirate. He teaches him how to be a “good” pirate—and in the process he teaches us as well. We too, learn that we are pirates, no matter how strongly we deny it. If we stop denying that reality we can learn from Jack how to be the best pirates we can be.

A good pirate knows that everything is negotiable. We watch as again and again Jack successfully negotiates his way out of seemingly impossible predicaments. To do this, one must have courage, confidence, and knowledge of the cards one holds that the other side desperately needs. A sword is useful, but knowledge is power, and so it is always his words that cause Jack to prevail in the end.

A good pirate lives by The Code. But he also knows there is a higher moral code that cannot be breached in the name of “keeping to The Code”. So written rules are good, as far as they go. But in the end, they are just guidelines.

A good pirate must be a man of his word. This is a point Jack makes leading into his final battle with Barbossa, and one that we finally believe, having seen that he never did give Will, or any of us, a reason not to trust him.

Barbossa: I must admit, Jack , I thought I had ye figured. But it turns out that you’re a hard man to predict.

Jack: Me? I’m dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It’s the honest ones you want to watch out for, because you can never predict when they’re going to do something incredibly . . . stupid. [unsheathes a pirate’s sword and throws it to Will; Jack starts fighting with Barbossa]

Barbossa: You’re off the edge of the map, mate. Here there be monsters.

And finally, a good pirate must never steal. Getting stuff for free is not a problem, but stealing is out. Remember Jack’s one act of piracy? According to him, it was not stealing at all:

Will: [Looking at the Interceptor] We’re going to steal the ship?

[Looks over to the Dauntless, where Jack is looking] That ship?

Jack: Commandeer. We’re going to commandeer that ship [pointing towards the Interceptor]. Nautical term.

What looks like piracy to us is not piracy to Jack. And yes, the word used does change everything. But let’s pick up this lesson at Tortuga, whilst meeting Jack’s new crew.

Anna Maria: You stole my boat!

Jack: Actually, . . . [Receives a second slap to the face]. Borrowed. Borrowed without permission. But with every intention of bringing it back.

Let’s end for now with the first time we met Jack Sparrow, and what he did that gave us the mistaken first impression that he was nothing more than a common, petty scallywag.

Upon entering Port Royale, he is immediately accosted by a bureaucrat who demands contract terms from him. It is a dubious contract at best, as Jack’s boat is now at the bottom of the harbor. But Jack does not argue. Instead, he negotiates the terms, and is even willing to pay more.

Harbormaster: [to Jack] What? Hey. Hold up, there, you! It’s a shilling to tie up your boat at the dock. [they both look at the sunken boat] And I shall need to know your name.

Jack: [hands him three shillings] What d’ye say to three shillings, and we forget the name?

Harbormaster: Welcome to Port Royal, Mr. Smith. [Jack walks past the Harbormaster’s podium, sees the Harbormaster’s money pouch and takes it]

If we listen carefully while Jack shakes it, we will hear [clink, clink] that there are almost certainly three shillings in that purse he lifted off the Harbormaster’s podium. So Jack has not stolen at all. He has merely balanced the books. The transaction cost him nothing. Is this the reason he did not argue? Did he know all along that it would work out this way?

Is it the theme and purpose of the Pirates movies to show us a world where everything is free? And if this is a movie about water, are we fishies already swimming in it, having never realized that all we need is right here, all around us, in limitless supply?

Drink up, me hearties, Yo Ho! :::

Snodgrass made a decision ten years ago to live as if everything was free, even if it wasn’t. As a consequence of the problem of too-much-time-on-his-hands that this created, he frittered his days away reading legal tomes and watching children’s movies.

His first epiphany came when he thought, “Hey, this is just like The Matrix”, while reading a legal treatise on jurisdiction.” Initially scared to watch Pirates because of the skeletons, he relented after he found that he had learned less about money from all his law books than a close friend knew after a few viewings of Curse of the Black Pearl.

beeblebrox
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:52 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:01 am

Muddled attempt at decoding military psyops. An effort at least.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:44 am

Understanding law and the words of law, there are two things this planet has: water and earth, water and land. Consequently, there are two kinds of law - the law of the land and the law of water. You've heard the term 'law of the land' but in point of fact, that's precisely what this term means because it is the people who live on land, and that is opposed to something else, called the ‘law of the high seas’ or the law of water and you need to understand the difference. The law of the land is the law of the culture that lives on the land and consequently, the law of the land is different in every country...

However, there is a higher law that dominates the entire world... it's called the law of the water or the law of the high seas. The law of water is referred to as the law of money... Anytime you're doing banking or using money, you are now under the law of water, maritime admiralty... it began in the land of Canaan (an ancient term for a region roughly corresponding to present-day Israel, the West Bank, western Jordan, southern and coastal Syria and Lebanon continuing up until the border of modern Turkey). The Canaanites were Phoenician... Phoenician bloodline... in the ancient Phoenician language, "Canaan" meant "merchant banker". The word "merchant" comes from "mer" for the sea, for water, as in 'mermaid'... The law of water is the law of banking and money, as opposed to the law of the custom of the people or the law of the land.

The Statue of Liberty must be put on water; it could not be put on American land, as such. It had to be put in a harbour because it's not the Statue of Freedom; it's a Statue of Liberty. Liberty is what a sailor gets when he pulls into port on ship, he gets liberty - he's not free. So America is not the "land of the free in the home of the brave". We are not free or brave, period. We are not free; this is not a free country.

Let me give you an example of how this law of the water works. Why is it that you have to go to court? You go to court because you play basketball and tennis on a court. You play with a racket, why, because that's what it is - it's a racket. They do not pick words by chance. These words are very serious. They do not use words and terms with no avail. These words are very important. What's the idea of going to court? It's a game, like basketball, the whole idea in a court is to put the ball in the other guys court... and consequently it's a ball game and the judge is wearing a black robe, so he is the referee... the judge is a referee between two teams. The judge rules from the bench. "Bench" in Latin is a bank, therefore, the judge rules for the bank. Where do you find banks? You find banks on both sides of a river and what does a river bank do? It controls the direction of the current-sea…, the juice. Consequently, your money is currency because it's the flow, the cash flow.

I'll give you an example how this works. When a ship pulls into a harbour, all ships are referred to as female... airships, rocket ships, sailing ships are always female. Why? There's a very good reason... maritime, admiralty law says all ships are female because they're carrying items for money and so consequently, they are under maritime, admiralty law. Admiralty is where we get admiral - admiral of the navy.

When a ship pulls into harbour, it parks at the dock and the captain has to provide, for the port authorities, a Certificate of Manifest... each of the ship's items has come off water. Every ship has a captain and "captain" comes from the word "capital", so the captain represents the capital or money that's on board the ship.

The ship is sitting in its berth.... when a ship docks, it sits in its berth. Now, when you were born, your mother's water broke and when your mother's water broke, you came out and this is why you have to have a birth certificate because you are a maritime admiralty product, under international law. Your mother delivered you - that's why if you go to Sears.com and order a product, they will 'ship it to you' - they will deliver it and that's why you were in your delivery room - your mother was delivering a product. Maritime admiralty - you came down your mother's birth canal. All these words are maritime admiralty banking words and therefore, if you understand lawyers, judges, courts and government, they are all under international maritime admiralty law.

There has never existed a country, on the face of the earth, in the history of the world, in which the people rose up and demanded their right to be free, never. The concept of human, spiritual, intellectual and physical freedom is a concept that has never ever existed on earth. The only one time it came into existence was in the founding of America, when it was understood that we were sovereigns and that we owned our bodies and consequently, since 1868, we're now under international maritime admiralty law.

Think about this - in cowboy and Indian movies... when cowboys would ride into town, they'd get of their horse and they were wearing guns. How comes they could walk into a bar and if two guys got into an argument, they could go out on the street and draw on each other and draw on each other outside the sheriff’s office and the sheriff would do nothing. The reason why is because before 1868, all Americans were considered sovereigns and that's one of the nice things about being a sovereign, you have the right to be yourself.

In 1868, there was a corporation founded and in that particular company, the founders of that company called it the "United States Corporation" and they stipulated that anybody who would be a member of that corporation or worked for that corporation, would be called, not an employee but a "citizen". So today, if you are asked, ‘are you a citizen of the United States’, what you think you're being asked is, 'are you lawfully in this country to do business?' but that's not lawfully, what's being asked. They didn't ask you if you are an American, lawfully, they asked you a specific question... are you, of your own volition, out of your own mouth testifying that you are a citizen of the United States because in that way, citizen of the United States means you are an employee of a foreign corporation, operating under international maritime law. So today, the President of United States is the President of a privately owned company. The company is called "United States" and the word "President", is always the word used in corporate law - banks have Presidents, all companies have Presidents. President Bush is not the President of America. President Bush is the president of a privately owned company, privately owned out of England. We need to understand words and terms and they have been used to trick and enslave you..


Jordan Maxwell
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby beeblebrox » Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:28 pm

Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:Muddled attempt at decoding military psyops. An effort at least.


Man, you have got military psyops on the brain. :)

I suppose the article could be construed in that way, but I was more interested in the Jordan Maxwell stuff that seemslikeadream alluded to.
beeblebrox
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:52 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby Occult Means Hidden » Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:46 pm

essay wrote:Q: So how come we can still enforce contracts where the monetary payment does not consist of gold or silver coins that have intrinsic value?




I'm going to come out of my 2 month hibernation to say, "no, no, no". Gold has no intrinsic value. It can't be eaten, it can't be dwelt in, it can't be drank, it can't be worn, it can't provide stimulation other than a bright little sparkle. It's just like the paper they mock. It has value only because we agree it has value. In a human economy there is only human intrinsic value. Human intelligence and labor. Human attributes that the communists were the first to honestly recognize.

beeblebrox wrote:Man, you have got military psyops on the brain.



To say the least.
Rage against the ever vicious downward spiral.
Time to get back to basics. [url=http://zmag.org/zmi/readlabor.htm]Worker Control of Industry![/url]
User avatar
Occult Means Hidden
 
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 1:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby Nordic » Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:05 pm

Occult Means Hidden wrote:
essay wrote:Q: So how come we can still enforce contracts where the monetary payment does not consist of gold or silver coins that have intrinsic value?




I'm going to come out of my 2 month hibernation to say, "no, no, no". Gold has no intrinsic value. It can't be eaten, it can't be dwelt in, it can't be drank, it can't be worn, it can't provide stimulation other than a bright little sparkle. It's just like the paper they mock. It has value only because we agree it has value. In a human economy there is only human intrinsic value. Human intelligence and labor. Human attributes that the communists were the first to honestly recognize.

beeblebrox wrote:Man, you have got military psyops on the brain.



To say the least.



Gold can most certainly be worn! And it actually has value, by your definition, as a medium for art -- sculpture, ornamentation, and the beauty of it in this regard is that its wonderfully malleable, uniquely beautiful, and never ever gets old, oxidizes, and decays. Its also the best conductor of electricity there is, so its pretty special in that regard. Gold didn't become so valuable by accident -- its an extremeluy special substance!
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby Occult Means Hidden » Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:48 pm

I don't doubt that it is unique! But all substances have unique properties. None of these listed are things I can use as a baseline for life. Conducting electricity is almost the exception to what it's normally used for, despite its ability. I've seen art made of trash and dirt as beautiful as anything else! Beauty is subjective anyhow and the inability to rust has little practical value considering how weak/ relatively soft gold is.

But I digress. . .
Rage against the ever vicious downward spiral.
Time to get back to basics. [url=http://zmag.org/zmi/readlabor.htm]Worker Control of Industry![/url]
User avatar
Occult Means Hidden
 
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 1:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby Occult Means Hidden » Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:59 pm

Also if gold vanished from the Earth tomorrow I would hardly notice. Some computer chips may not work, but they can be replaced with other conducting material and methods. Nothing I own is gold. Nothing I value is gold. Why build an economy on something so readily able to trade in exchange for actual value items during desperate times? Dying of heat in the Sahara and I will give the world's gold supply for a chance to rest in the shade for five minutes.

People are the most valuable entity. In every sense. In every way.
Rage against the ever vicious downward spiral.
Time to get back to basics. [url=http://zmag.org/zmi/readlabor.htm]Worker Control of Industry![/url]
User avatar
Occult Means Hidden
 
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 1:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby jingofever » Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:01 pm

Occult Means Hidden wrote:It can't be eaten

Edible gold leaf.

Occult Means Hidden wrote:it can't be dwelt in

Chester Lampwick's solid gold house:
Image

Occult Means Hidden wrote:it can't be drank

Goldschläger?
User avatar
jingofever
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby smoking since 1879 » Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:19 pm

Occult Means Hidden wrote:Also if gold vanished from the Earth tomorrow I would hardly notice. Some computer chips may not work, but they can be replaced with other conducting material and methods. Nothing I own is gold. Nothing I value is gold. Why build an economy on something so readily able to trade in exchange for actual value items during desperate times? Dying of heat in the Sahara and I will give the world's gold supply for a chance to rest in the shade for five minutes.

People are the most valuable entity. In every sense. In every way.


sorry to burst your bubble dude. but the way the world is set up, gold is the store of wealth amongst the 0.001% of parasites that run this place, and to them, people don't mean shit.
"Now that the assertive, the self-aggrandising, the arrogant and the self-opinionated have allowed their obnoxious foolishness to beggar us all I see no reason in listening to their drivelling nonsense any more." Stanilic
smoking since 1879
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: CZ
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby Occult Means Hidden » Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:18 pm

Smoking! That's interesting you put it that way, but i have to disagree completely. Gold means nothing to them. By definition, society's value isn't even pegged to gold anymore since the installation of a fiat value regime. These parasites you speak of have amassed their power by controlling people. By denying people their value.

Gold is for the rats that are interested in shiny objects. It's a successful coup of the mind having people fight amongst themselves for scraps of money when they already posses the means of social value - themselves!
Rage against the ever vicious downward spiral.
Time to get back to basics. [url=http://zmag.org/zmi/readlabor.htm]Worker Control of Industry![/url]
User avatar
Occult Means Hidden
 
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 1:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby beeblebrox » Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:32 pm

Occult Means Hidden wrote:
essay wrote:Q: So how come we can still enforce contracts where the monetary payment does not consist of gold or silver coins that have intrinsic value?




I'm going to come out of my 2 month hibernation to say, "no, no, no". Gold has no intrinsic value. It can't be eaten, it can't be dwelt in, it can't be drank, it can't be worn, it can't provide stimulation other than a bright little sparkle. It's just like the paper they mock. It has value only because we agree it has value. In a human economy there is only human intrinsic value. Human intelligence and labor. Human attributes that the communists were the first to honestly recognize.



I can't really disagree with anything you've said, in this post or any of your subsequent posts in this thread, about gold having no real value in relation to human life, but I think it is tangential to the point the author of the article in the OP was trying to make, that the switch from gold to paper money had significant legal ramnifications.

When people had gold and silver coins, they liked to store them in banks for safe keeping. The banker gave them a receipt that could be exchanged for the coin, called a promissory note. He also accepted their written instructions to pay the coin to a third party, called a check. People started accepting promissory notes and checks in place of the coins themselves, because of the convenience and because they could always get the coin out of the bank if they really wanted it. These banking papers became known collectively as “negotiable instruments,” and law developed to govern their use. Soon the average man thought of those bits of paper the same way he thought about the gold and silver coins that actually made his contracts enforceable.

But there was a price to be paid. A court of common law could only enforce contracts with valuable consideration on both sides. If a dispute involving negotiable instruments came to a court of common law, the one who paid with paper would lose every time. Thus these disputes could only be heard in a different jurisdiction, one that recognized negotiable instruments: a court of maritime law. Consequently, when one accepted the convenience of negotiable instruments, he also accepted maritime law as the law governing his contracts.

So you’re out to sea, and it’s the pirate’s life for thee.

Back on land, the common law protects a man’s right to “life, liberty and property,” but when the U.S. Declaration of Independence was written, it made a curious substitution. It merely affirmed a man’s right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Apparently the right to property was already under heavy fire in 1776. If you don’t believe that your right to property has been compromised, just try building a house on “your” land without getting permission from the relevant authorities. Or try not handing over a portion of your hard-earned pay with each pay check.

Today we cannot exchange our negotiable instruments for gold or silver coins at all. Gold coins were removed from circulation in 1933. This happened in every single country across the globe in the same year. Could it be that the entire planet was bankrupted that year? Well, Yes. Either that, or it was the greatest theft in the history of mankind, and the perpetrators have yet to be caught.
beeblebrox
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:52 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:30 am

A Disney product is a CIA-Pentagon product. Since WWII. Even before.

TWA 800 was 'accidentally' shot down during NATO navy exercises off NYCity on July 16, 1996.
It was a SPARROW missile from a Canadian destroyer, the Charlottetown.

Hence the always drunken SPARROW character who indeed does fire a cannon at the wrong target while fighting the "kraken."

Then there's "pearl." A counter-association with the let-it-happen-on-purpose of Pearl Harbor.
Then there's the misogyny, racism, and superstition that fuels militarism. s. o.p.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby compared2what? » Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:30 am

It sli into that was cute, sort of silence. Some people just need 100,000 frog dicks in amazement at everything. I bless them with the roach infestation prevent this factuloidism. He was so much Mom never been seven egg of ashen grey stuff you know? When I never be an unrelenting microcosmos. I suppose. If it’s everywhere. You know how well experienced in any drum beat. I thought she just the Russian’s program for the raw primordia gives birth to talk about not the raw primordia gives birth to show what promised to get back through the raw primordia.
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The hidden truth behind POTC The Curse of the Black Pear

Postby compared2what? » Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:31 am

Sorry. But you guys were making a little too much sense for me.
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 123 guests