Good news? I'm not sure - not sure I believe it either.
4 May 2012 Last updated at 00:50
RBS repays £163bn emergency loans
Royal Bank of Scotland is to say that as of next week, it will have repaid all the £163bn of emergency loans it received from UK and US taxpayers, BBC business editor Robert Peston says.
The announcement is expected when the bank reports its first-quarter results on Friday.
The government still owns 82% of shares in the bank.
Lloyds has also said it will have repaid all its emergency borrowing from UK taxpayers by the end of the year.
Lloyds' borrowing peaked at £157bn...
...In total, RBS received:
£75bn from the credit guarantee scheme - bonds issued by banks that are guaranteed against default by the Treasury and the Bank of England's special liquidity scheme
£36.6bn in emergency liquidity assistance from the Bank of England
$84.5bn (£52.4bn in today's money) from the US Federal Reserve
So its peak disclosed borrowing from government-backed schemes was £163.84bn - all of which will be repaid as of next week.
It also paid the UK Treasury between £1bn and £1.5bn in fees for the credit guarantee scheme, making the taxpayer a profit on that particular intervention.
RBS is still receiving some central bank support via the 10bn euros of cheap three-year loans from the European Central Bank's long-term refinancing operation (LTRO).
It can't just be as simple as that, can it? Full repayment, and everybody's magically reimbursed? I don't think so somehow. An interesting wrinkle in the independence debate, though, insofar as RBS is relevant to it.
Stephen Morgan wrote:No, if Scotland had been the horribly abusive drunk bossing us about and stealing all our money it would have been a far more accurate analogy.
Nah mate, if the UK had been the horribly abusive drunk bossing Scotland, England, NI, and Wales around and stealing all their money it would be accurate. The UK is just an older and sometimes even stupider version of the EU.
Stephen Morgan wrote:However, if you're the wife then after the divorce you can have custody over Northern Ireland. You raised it, anyway.
If Martin McGuiness is to be believed (a risky proposition, that) NI may well be moving toward a position of (full) Home Rule. I was very surprised by some of his recent chatter at the London School of Economics, especially about Ian Paisley: -
The Deputy First Minister also called into question the continuing value of the Northern Ireland Office and the continuation of the position of The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland quoting what Ian Paisley had said to him at their first meeting:
‘Martin, we can rule ourselves, we do not need these direct-rule ministers coming over here telling us what to do.’
“And I agree with him!” Mr. McGuinness told his audience at the LSE adding that the transfer of remaining powers “would be a massive vote of confidence in our political institutions and the Peace Process, as well as a massive saving to the Exchequer.
Can't be right, surely... Ian Paisley's for full self-government in NI? What did all those folk have to die for then? Jesus.
Stephen Morgan wrote:Yes, the Scottish Raj has been very bad for the rest of us.
If you mean the likes of Liam Fox, Werrity, Gove, John Reid, Jim Murphy, George Robertson, Gordon Brown, Lord Foulkes, Lord Forsyth, Sir Malcolm Rifkind, etc. then of course I hate them all too, and fully agree that their criminal activities and political "ideals" have been bad for all of us.
But I have one more reason to hate them than you do - they're Unionists.
