"End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:36 pm

Image
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby JackRiddler » Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:58 pm

Age of Flash: I can no longer Wall Street Journal articles on any of my browsers - cannot update because my machine is obsolete! So I'll have to go with these excerpts from a DU thread.

And wow:


Wed Sep 26, 2012, 03:53 PM

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014246137

Germany to Tap Brakes On High-Speed Trading

Source: Wall St. Journal


BERLIN—Germany is set to advance a bill Wednesday imposing a spate of new rules on high-frequency trading, escalating Europe's sweeping response to concerns that speedy traders have brought instability to the markets.

The measure seeks to require traders to register with Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority, collect fees from those who use high-speed trading systems excessively, and force stock markets to install circuit breakers that can interrupt trading if a problem is detected.

...

These include the requirement for orders to rest on the exchange order book for a minimum of half a second—an eternity for firms accustomed to trading in millionths of a second—before they can be canceled or modified, and penalties for high cancellation rates.

On Aug. 1, France introduced a high-frequency trading tax as one of the three levies that comprise its financial-transaction-tax package.


Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087 ... 38944.html

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby justdrew » Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:44 pm

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman on Monday filed a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase for alleged fraud relating to mortgage-backed securities, a type of investment that consists of mortgage loans that have been pooled together.

The case is the first brought by a White House task force called the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group against a major bank. President Barack Obama formed the group in January to investigate fraud in the mortgage-backed securities market.

The task force alleged that the bank “kept investors in the dark” regarding the quality of the loans it packaged into mortgage-backed securities. The bank failed to disclose problems with the mortgage-backed securities with its investors, such as the fact that the loans had been made to borrowers who “were highly likely to default,” according to the lawsuit.

The billions of dollars worth of subprime securities were issued by Bear Stearns before they were purchased by JPMorgan in 2008.

“We’re disappointed that the NYAG decided to pursue its civil action without ever offering us an opportunity to rebut the claims and without developing a full record — instead relying on recycled claims already made by private plaintiffs,” Joe Evangelisti, a JPMorgan spokesman, told Bloomberg.

The crash of the mortgage-backed securities has been blamed for the global financial crisis of 2008.

Raw Story (http://s.tt/1oSHY)
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby Peachtree Pam » Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:00 pm

Just found this transcript of an hour long interview of Max Kaiser on Guns and Butter with Bonnie Faulkner. It is too long to paste but he says he thinks the world financial collapse will be around April 2013 when income tax is posted and the receipts are very low. Another catalyst may be Japan which he says is under the thumb of US to buy US debt, but can no longer do so. It is a very interesting interview - he says Corzone is a "made man" and will never be prosecuted and that Facebook was a classic pump and dump. Here is the link:

http://mediaroots.org/max-keiser-predic ... l-2013.php
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby coffin_dodger » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:40 am

Well.. I'm stunned.

After 5 years of studying finance and participating in blogs like ZH (fringe) Market Ticker (fringe with guns and anger) and FT Alphaville (msm), something weird has happened.

FT Alphaville, a bastion of the mainstream financial press has published an article that acknowledges the problem and puts it in a way that everyone can understand.

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/10/09/1200681/welcome-to-the-desert-of-the-real-a-postmodern-economy/

Extract: "His point seems to be that it’s not just a question of the old rules changing. More that we may be standing on the edge of a paradigm shift so unexpected that nobody has yet been able to imagine it. A shift, we dare say, that could take conventional business and investment practice and spin it on its head entirely."

At last, someone in the msm has stuck their neck out. And it involves The Matrix. Sweet.
User avatar
coffin_dodger
 
Posts: 2216
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:05 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (14)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:20 am

Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:28 pm



As does the CFO, without explanation, the day after an excellent earnings report.

So the rest of the board figured out that these great numbers are faked and they're all about to be fucked? That's my working hypothesis. A tad hopeful, I suppose.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:53 pm

Christopher Cole's riff on the "Desert of the Real" is echoing other luminaries who have been speaking plainly & starkly, most especially Bill Gross and Jim Rogers.

In related news, holy shit, Sorkin has working overtime to polish some very expensive shoes...his piece in the NYT today about the Lamentations and Suffering of Jamie Dimon was the most audacious slice of pure poodle poop since....oh yeah, since yesterday's NYT, which claimed that HFT is trending downwards, which damn near gave me an aneurysm of pure cognitive dissonance. (Word to Golem XVI and "The Big Lie" for giving me a spatial metaphor to prevent such depressurization injuries when interacting with mainstream media.)

The NYT's HFT piece is a remarkable example of lying by omission -- only by leaving out the fact that 1) velocity and volume are plummeting and 2) the percentage of total market activity represented by HFT is going up, can you really make this case. In other words, HFT by volume is increasing, but since the profit margins are being reduced by the death of the overall markets, you can safely claim HFT is "slowing down" - so long as you never really qualify that.

From a purely rhetorical perspective, young eager Nathaniel Popper did an outstanding propaganda job. It's exactly the kind of "counter-intuitive" horseshit that The Atlantic has built an empire on: merely interesting twaddle you can have a sophisticated conversation about with pretty much anyone else you meet, so long as they don't know shit about shit.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby JackRiddler » Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:26 am

Wombaticus Rex wrote:merely interesting twaddle you can have a sophisticated conversation about with pretty much anyone else you meet, so long as they don't know shit about shit.


WOW!
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby smiths » Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:37 am

The Dark Age of Money: Milton Friedman and the Rise of Monetary Fascism
JAMES C. KENNEDY, October 24, 2012
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/10/24/ ... -of-money/

If you often wonder why ‘free market capitalism’ feels like it is failing despite universal assurances from economists and political pundits that it is working as intended, your intuition is correct. Free market capitalism has become a thing of the past. In truth free market capitalism has been replaced by something that is truly anti-free market and anti-capitalistic. The diversion operates in plain sight.

Beginning sometime around 1970 the U.S. and most of the ‘free world’ have diverged from traditional “free market capitalism” to something different. Today the U.S. and much of the world’s economies are operating under what I call Monetary Fascism: a system where financial interests control the State for the advancement of the financial class. This is markedly different from traditional Fascism: a system where State and industry work together for the advancement of the State.

Monetary Fascism was created and propagated through the Chicago School of Economics. Milton Friedman’s collective works constitute the foundation of Monetary Fascism. Knowing that the term ’Fascism’ was universally unpopular; Friedman and the Chicago School of Economics masquerade these works as ‘Capitalism’ and ’Free Market’ economics.

The foundation of Friedman’s corrupting principle is that the investor (money to be more precise) has no duty, obligation or covenant to anyone or anything. Friedman’s ‘Market’ is not subject to ‘any’ human standard of morality, political limitations or national interests. Money is free to act without bounds or conventions. Nothing is prohibited as long as the market can provide a “clearing price”.

The fundamental difference between Adam Smith’s free market capitalism and Friedman’s ‘free market capitalism’ is that Friedman’s is a hyper extractive model, the kind that creates and maintains Third-World-Countries and Banana-Republics, without geo-political borders.

If you say that this is nothing new, you miss the point. Friedman does not differentiate between some third world country and his own. The ultimate difference is that Friedman has created a model that sanctions and promotes the exploitation of his own country, in fact every country, for the benefit of the investor, money the uber-wealthy. He dressed up this noxious ideology as ‘free market capitalism’ and then convinced most of the world to embrace it as their economic salvation.

As improbable as it sounds, this ideology has the near-universal support of most economists, the media, universities, the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury, nearly every member of The U.S. Congress and most everyone you know. Today Friedman’s ideology is accepted, to some degree, by nearly every country in the world. But ultimately this exploitive model is not sustainable at any level, or for anyone or any nation.

The ultimate difference between Friedman’s ideology and Smith is simply this: Smith was in fact a Mercantilist. True, he opposed the custom of hording gold and other Mercantilist practices, but ultimately he was a Mercantilist. Smith promoted “free trade” with the goal of improving the English merchant’s advantage, and thus the State’s. Nothing expresses this more clearly that the title of his book An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Mercantilism is based on the relative wealth of one Nation State over the other, not the plunder of the State and it’s peoples for the benefit of the individual.

Smith believed in the power of the State and recognized that it was only by the power of the State that free enterprise could succeed and thrive. In a world without the State, he sided with Lock, “life was brutish and short”. Consequently one had obligations to the State and the people who make up the state: the working man.

According to Smith every butcher, baker, craftsman and merchant would seek out his own self-interest and that economic advantage would ultimately benefit his fellow Englishman and the Crown. Smith’s arguments against some precepts of Mercantilism were intended to give the English tradesman a greater advantage, nothing more. The intended effect was to enrich one’s State above all others as an alternative to the primitive act of war, the traditional means to National enrichment. Smith viewed things as a zero sum game. And as England was the undisputed master of global exploitation at this time, exploitation of other Nations was fair game.

However, according to Economist David Ricardo trade between nations of relative economic parity result in what he termed “Comparative Advantage”. Comparative Advantage is based on specialization: Germany builds machine equipment, Italy does leather goods, France produces cheese, wine and literature. When these nations trade with each other all parties enjoyed a net gain as a result of specialization and non-duplication of resources.

Of course this does not work when first world nations off-shore factories and jobs into subsistence-based economies (the term “comparative” is no longer germane). Off-shoring into non-comparative economies is purely extractive because all of the gains are ‘privatized and are no longer correlated to national interests. Non-Comparative off-shoring undermines both the host and source/flagship nation.

The financial entity is able to extract environmental, capital, tax and infrastructure concessions from the host nation. If the host nation ever seeks to renegotiate its position with the financial entity the entity can enlist the powers of its flagship nation (i.e. State Department). This type of intervention can be very costly to the flagship nation and end very tragically for the host nation. Under Monetary Fascism the financial entity maintains out-sized rents from the host nation by utilizing the state as its enforcement agent, while maximizing tax avoidance via off-shore corporations (and other gimmicks).

Free market capitalism, as conceived by Smith, was Nationalistic in nature and as the Nation State became wealthier, so did its people and industry. This relationship required shared obligations and shared rewards between the State and its people.

Traditional Fascism, as conceived by Mussolini or Hitler, had an aggressive Nationalistic disposition where the State promoted Industry above all others in order to strengthen the State relative to its perceived rivals. Hitler and Mussolini believed that as the State lifted industry, industry lifted the people – dignity and pride in one’s nation were foundational principles.

Monetary Fascism, as conceived by Friedman, uses the powers of the state to put the interest of money and the financial class above and beyond all other forms of industry (and other stake holders) and the state itself.

In democracies and first world nations this is achieved through lobbying, campaign donations, financial incentives, revolving door regulators and through other means. As such, the state is coopted into altering regulations / legislation, diverting investigations / prosecutions or creating tax loopholes for the benefit of the financial class/ industry. Ultimately these actions undermine states sovereignty.

For the rest of the world state interests and sovereignty are undermined through the IMF, The World Bank and other global monetary agencies.

Monetary Fascism has a strong preference for political rather than capital investments. These investments are designed to sustain and support the preferences and activities of the financial class as it manipulates and create ever larger out-sized rent opportunities or constructs risk-diverting transactions that aggregate a ‘risk-arbitrage premium’ to one side of a transaction and transfers all future losses to the other.

On a global basis Friedman’s ideas heavily influence international treaties on taxation and capital flows with the single minded goal of freeing capital from any obligation to the host or origin country. These agreements have essentially created a virtual nation, or non-nation, of money that is ultimately beyond the reach of the conventional Nation State. Friedman’s ‘invisible hand’ is free to extract the wealth of any corporation or Nation without any reciprocal obligations.

The Serene Insurrection of Money

All economic theories are devised to fill a need; to justify public and / or private actions. With the rapidly growing profits to the financial class during the divestment era, beginning in the early 1970s and continuing today, they needed some ideological justification for what they were doing (selling out America’s future and destroying corporations and jobs for quick profits) so they found and embraced Monetary Fascism. In fact, they found each other: Friedman was just ‘fulfilling a need in the market place’. Friedman simply created a new ideology that justified what the financial class was doing.

Rationalizing the divestment of an entire economy is morally deplorable, but it also offered “out-sized” profit opportunities on a massive scale. Seeking relevance in this sweeping tide of economic-cannibalism other academics rushed into the water. None bothered to consider the long term consequences that would result from the wholesale dismemberment of our industrial economy. Instead academics suddenly ‘discovered’ an implausible utopian future that would be sustained by the creative powers of finance and trading our industrial heritage for a service economy.

Shocking? – no, the academic promotion of concepts, theories, historical narratives and the state of ‘fact’ and ‘science’ are increasingly available to the highest bidder. Custom realities are also made-to-order ad nausea from within our Nation’s many tax exempt ‘think tanks’ that attempt to define public debate and guide public policy for the benefit of their patrons.

Milton Friedman and the Chicago School of economics claimed to have refined and developed modern, scientific tools of ‘free market capitalism’, capable of unlocking ever greater rewards from Adam Smith’s simple, primitive concept of free markets. Monetary Fascism was rapidly adopted because western culture recognizes the tremendous historical contributions of traditional free market capitalism and wanted to participate in the promise of these enhanced rewards.

In truth, it was nothing more than a cloak of deception – providing cover for the unscrupulous behavior of investment bankers, corporate raiders, speculators, off-shore corporation, debt mongers and bubble pushers (typically one and the same). The enhanced rewards came from the pilfering of capital investments and technology from generations past, the liquidation of employees and off-shoring of production, the pilfering of pension accounts and the termination or spin-out of R&D departments and option packages to executives and directors that focused on short term stock price targets.

Bell Labs, once part of AT&T, laid the foundation for all modern telecommunication and electronics technology today was morphed into Lucent Technology. Lucent quickly looted the legacy portfolio of Bell Laboratories to enrich themselves and shareholders, leaving a worthless shell that was eventually merged with Alcatel.

Wall Street Investment Bankers, leveraged buyout firms and hedge funds became the Paladin Knights of the ’free market’ whose allegiance was to the ‘noble shareholder’, markets and liquidity. In truth the shareholder was/is nothing more than a nameless, faceless transient in an endless pursuit of ever larger ‘outsized returns’. Traditional capital formation was replaced with financial schemes designed to acquire existing asset for liquidation, management and directors traded long term management discipline for short term performance and accounting gimmicks tied to stock and option pricing. With most of the IPO capital used to pay for the exit of early investors, the stock market has become nothing more than a series of game theory type exit strategies. The equity markets are a failed forum for the creation of productive or capital intensive projects. See Failed Capital Markets.

However, the larger system failure at the nation and global level stems from the perversion of the public and private debt market. This was made possible through massive decade’s long deregulation and the post 2008 financial crisis.

The entire 2008 financial crisis lies at the feet of The U.S. Congress. When The U.S. Congress repealed the Glass Steagall Act, passed in response to the Great Depression, they eliminated any meaningful financial oversight within the Banking and Investment Banking industry.

Why did the U.S. Congress change the law that protects our economy from a second 1930s type depression? Simple, it was campaign contributions (shit-loads of cash, considered bribes or worse in the private sector), filling the top post in the Fed, Treasury and the Administration with top level executives from Goldman and the like and the prospects of private sector jobs in the financial industry for pliable regulators, retired Members of The U.S. Congress and former Presidents.

It was from the decades-long cash infused orgy of conflicted interest that Congress finally entrusted the financial industry with “self-regulation.” If you believe the rhetorical record, deregulation was intended to unleash the ‘wealth creating powers’ of these new financial instruments created through the pure genius of the investment bankers.

Alan Greenspan and others saw no limits to the potential economic contributions of the financial markets – if they could only be freed of unnecessary and burdensome regulations.

This wanton deregulation allowed the financial industry to create trillions of dollars in unregulated CMOs and CDSs (CMO: Collateralized Mortgage Obligations – packages of high risk mortgages that were rated AAA & CDS: Credit Default Swaps – bogus insurance on junk paper like CMOs) and other complex derivatives, hypothecated derivatives, synthetic derivatives, even hypothecated synthetic derivatives and the ‘black pools’ of unregulated capital that created and priced these complex financial instruments.

This resulted in the unprecedented and unsustainable accumulation of debt and related derivative instruments, literally in the hundreds of trillions of dollars, dwarfing global GDP by a number of factors, controlled by unregulated and uninhibited bankers. Ultimately it has cost most nations their sovereignty.

Monetary Sovereignty and the Death of Nations

Friedman’s model of wealth extraction has been in conflict with the traditional Nation State and the concept of State sovereignty from inception.

Great, you say! The state is evil and must be replaced with something new. Beware of this thinking. The evils of the state are nothing when compared to the money-counter. The State must answer to the public, or at least the mob. The money-counter only answers to his insatiable desire for more and more money.

Friedman’s ideology undermines State sovereignty by initially delinking the aggregation of wealth from the interest of the state. As wealth accumulates it is then used to alter political outcomes, tax avoidance and financial regulations for the benefit of the wealthy. Throughout history the State has always jealously protected its sovereignty. So how did this ideology survive and eventually overtake the State.

Easy, they co-opt everyone. First the academics and think tanks then one political party after the other. The media was consumed and consolidated by large corporate conglomerates who quickly enforced their own interest’s at the editor and programmer’s desk. Then they locked in the entire public through 401(k)s and savings plans. Even the unemployed and the unemployable qualified for credit cards, new cars and even homes. At the national and global level they expanded public and private debt everywhere. They made everyone feel richer for a short time. At the same time the financial industry off-shored, liquidated, crowded out and displaced the traditional industry of our economy.

With the introduction of Monetary Fascism financial actives as a percentage of GDP grew from less than 5% in 1969 to more than 22% of GDP by 2008. Over the same period U.S. manufacturing as a percentage of GDP declined from more than 26% to just 12%. Using historical measures 2008 GDP for the manufacturing sector would be considerably less than 10%. Only the federal government was consuming a larger portion of GDP at 35%.

Taking the number one spot in the U.S. economy, the finance industry has become the most influential player in government. But the real power behind the finance industry is much deeper than just the political access that campaign donations buy, the financial industry has wide and deep influence throughout government policy via the Federal Reserve, Treasury, Fannie May, Freddie Mac, the FDIC, key advisory rolls in the Administration, Members of Congress, political appointments within the SEC,

CFTC, and membership on The Council on Foreign Relations and participation in global organizations like the G8, G20, Basil Accords, IMF and World Bank.

Through their unparalleled influence over the Administration, Congressional Finance Committees and the Federal Reserve they gained full control over the regulators. In fact, it was the Allen Greenspan, Tim Geithner (Federal Reserve) Robert Rubin, and Larry Summers (the Administration) and others who silence ‘Rouge Regulators’ who attempted to alert The U.S. Congress to the potential risks of deregulation, dark pools and derivatives. Greenspan, Summers, Rubin and others essentially staged a soviet era show trial against Brooksley Born and others, designed to send the message to any would-be-regulators that the rules no longer apply to the financial class. It worked.

Once they controlled the regulators and the key members of the Congressional Finance Committee they were free to alter accounting standards, create complex financial vehicles, and leverage risk in derivatives while real losses accumulated to staggering and globally disruptive levels. They hypothecated CMOs and even synthetic CMOs to unsupportable levels, papering over any potentially observable warning signs with zero-collateral CDSs.

The real risks to global finance were hidden in the derivative instruments related to the massive debt portfolios controlled by the “Too Big To Fail” banks with unprecedented political power. These banks were not subject to any measurable regulatory restriction. Point of fact, Goldman Sachs and others were able to morph into traditional Prime-Banks overnight, with the blessing of their regulators, instantaneously gaining unlimited access to the Discount Window. The act is so egregious that the public is incapable of cognition, while the media, academics and think tanks collectively remain silent.

Unlimited access to the Discount Window was not enough. Investment Banks and the overall financial industry enjoy unlimited government largess in the form of Quantitative Easing, immunity from prosecution, as it relates to fraudulent financial instruments such as CMOs, CDSs & assorted derivatives, front running client accounts, pilfering of client accounts, wholesale asset sweeps from failed banks to failing banks and even the wholesale world-wide manipulation of LIBOR.

The final act of treachery was delivered by the U.S. Supreme Court who imbued ‘money’ with a voice and electoral powers. This decision treated each and every single dollar in circulation as a prospective voter. In the hands of an ordinary citizen the dollar’s ultimate voice is limited to $2,500 per person per candidate. But in the hands of a corporate controlled Super-PAC the dollar’s voice is virtually unlimited.

The Financial Sector invested more than $5 billion in campaign contributions and lobbyists from 1998 to 2008. As if $5 billion was not sufficient, the new Supreme Court Ruling and the creation of Super PACs will create a financial Tsunami Effect on politics.

Super PACs may raise and spend unlimited sums of money from individuals, corporations, associations, and other interest groups to “overtly” advocate for political candidates. A recent example of how disruptive this is demonstrated by Sheldon Adelson and his wife’s $10 million contribution to Newt Gingrich. The Aelson’s ‘legal’ Super PAC contributions were able to keep ‘their candidate’ in the Republican Primary single handedly. Gingrich had no meaningful support beyond this single patron. Democracy? Representative government?

This decision effectively abolished our representative form of government. Again, this act of treachery did not spark any meaningful discussions from academics, constitutional scholars, think tanks, civil rights groups or the media. Why? They have all been co-opted.

Today the power of the State blindly serves the interest of these banks at the expense of all others. I am not claiming that this needs to be a preconceived conspiracy. To the contrary, the outcome was inevitable. Without any restraints most growth oriented systems, such as a virus, tend towards uninhibited growth. With no means of restraint, equilibrium becomes impossible. The single-minded focus on the growth of money compromises all other systems in the economy.

Any U.S. political leader who puts forward a Nationalist agenda is pillared as an opponent of ‘free trade’ and a danger to ‘free markets’. A perfect example is the U.S. Congressional and Administrative reaction to traditional Industrial Policy initiatives. The universal reaction is to characterize any U.S. Industrial Policy initiatives as “anti-free trade” and un-American. This is wrong on both counts: Adam Smith’s entire argument about free trade was intended to enhance England’s Industrial Policy. It is also a fact that the U.S.’s industrial greatness was rooted in 200 years of government directed, supported or sponsored Industrial Policy.

The press and pundits also contribute to this reversal of reality when they recently questioned Obama’s commitment to capitalism and free trade because he criticized Mitt Romney’s “Off-Shoring” of U.S. jobs as the head of Bain Capital. According to the press and pundits off-shoring is a foundational principle of ‘free markets’, but off-shoring has no basis whatsoever in Smith’s free markets. Off-shoring as we now employ it technically does not fit with Riccardo either, as Riccardo’s arguments of Comparative Advantage pre-suppose reciprocation of trade between relatively equal partners.

Historically governments would use tariffs or other measures to balance out large deviations between un-equal or undesirable trading partners. Today corporations and the financial industry pocket these out-sized ‘comparative disparities’. Eventually this results in wide spread unemployment and dislocation inside the flagship/host-country and all of these accumulated costs simply become a burden of the state.

This is nothing more than arbitraging disparity and transferring the resulting collateral costs to the state. As the unemployment and dislocation costs to the state threaten the asymmetric relationship between the state and the financial class, the financial class promotes austerity through its various think tanks, financially sponsored academics and loyalist inside Congress and the Administration.

Outside the U.S. it is the IMF, the World Bank and various international trade and financial trade and monetary agencies including the EU that promote austerity.

Today the financial and banking class enforces this ideology through the media and government with the same ruthlessness of the Church during the Dark Ages: to question is to be a heretic. It is a much more sinister form of excommunication for any public figure who does not accept or property articulate his allegiance to Friedman’s poisoned ideology.

Consequently, it is a sad fact that both Democrats and Republican Members of Congress wear Monetary Fascism on their sleeves – out of conviction or fear. Both parties have become slaves to this deadly ideology.

Global Contagion

Challenging Monetary Fascism is much more dangerous for political leaders representing countries outside the G-20. Populist leaders who put forward Nationalist policies are automatically in violation of one or more international ‘free trade’ agreements. Non-conformity with these agreements ultimately results in trade sanctions, IMF or World Bank imposed austerity, or worse…

Friedman’s ideology is global and his rules of ‘free trade’ are deeply integrated into the laws of international trade. All of our Nation’s international treaties on trade and banking are a series of interlocking agreements that force all nations to subvert their sovereignty and conform to Monetary Fascism. It is a global pandemic built on a world-wide transmission system with universal powers of enforcement. Sovereign Nations comply or they lose their credit rating. Considering the world wide mass escalation of debt to GDP for most western nations, a small increase in the cost of borrowing would easily result in default and bankruptcy.

Today, Nation States face nothing less than financial Armageddon – the Sampson Option, if they do not comply with the demands of the global banking industry. And it is with this weapon that the Financial Class has come to dominate the State.

Forget Al Qaeda, the only legitimate threat to U.S. and international security is the financial class. They have created Weapons of Mass Financial Destruction (Financial WMDs) and they stand ready to take down the world economy. They are more dangerous than any ‘terrorist group’, or even all of the ‘terrorist groups combined.

Exaggeration – consider what Friedman’s ‘free market’ banking system has done to Iceland, Ireland, Spain, Greece, Estonia, etc. How many western nations has Islam overthrown? Not one, and by comparison that should scare you.

Money has become the state and the traditional state is forced to serve money’s interests. Everywhere the Financial Class is openly lording over sovereign nations. Ireland, Greece and Spain are subject to ultimatums and remember Hank Paulson’s $700 billion extortion from the U.S. Congress. The $700 billion was just the wedge. Thanks to unlimited access to the Discount Window, Quantitative Easing and other taxpayer funded debt-swap bailouts the total transfers to the financial industry exceeded $16 trillion as of July 2010 according to a Federal Reserve Audit. All of this was dumped on the taxpayer and it is still growing.

Why must the people of Ireland or Iceland accept the losses of the private banking sector as a public obligation? Why must Greece accept austerity because its politician’s entered into a series of deals structured by Goldman Sachs specifically designed to deceive its EU partners? If Goldman Sachs authored documents with the intent of fraud then Goldman Sachs is required to bear the losses and prosecution. The taxpayer had no hand in this.

It is breathtaking. Within the last 40 years ‘money’ has gained total control of each and every one of us. Generations to come will enter this world burdened with the debts of their fathers. It is inescapable and ubiquitous. More than just a spider’s web, or a money-sucking vampire squid, it is a global pandemic that infects our very DNA. It is the Original Sin of money – subject to compound interest, converted into a derivative, hypothecated and rolled into a CMO and then leveraged through CDSs.

The uber-wealthy will continue to aggregate wealth. The banking system will continue to make ‘risk free bets,’ booking gains and shifting the losses to the public. As these losses accumulate on the public balance sheet the state will be forced to seek austerity measures from the public. As austerity and debt levels increase the global economy will continue ‘circling of the bowl’ with increasing speed until we suddenly plunge into the vortex.

All Bow to the Welfare Queen

Total governmental transfers and assumed liabilities related to U.S. financial institutions since 2008 exceed the entire history of all social welfare programs for all free world economies collectively since Bismarck (do the numbers, its true).

So, how is it that history’s biggest welfare queen can demand that the rest of human society be forced to take responsibility for its prolific reproduction of trillions of dollars in derivatives and other financial abominations in the name of ‘free markets’? Easy, your government has surrendered its National Sovereignty. Representative government has ended. The public’s misconception and blind acceptance of Friedman’s ideology as a legitimate form of capitalism is precisely what makes Monetary Fascism immune from any true political recourse.

It is the classic case of failing to properly identify the true nature and source of a contagious epidemic. This is the hidden strength of Monetary Fascism. Failure to identify the source of the disease or its mode of transmission assures continued contagion, misdiagnosis and mistreatment.

The public’s support for Friedman’s poisoned system is based on the past success of true capitalism and free markets as surmised by Smith. Most U.S. Citizens desperately want to regain our Nation’s former prestige. Because they cannot differentiate Smith’s system from Friedman’s they see government restrictions on business, taxes and capital flows as the obstacle to achieving our previous economic greatness. The public can be counted on to demand even greater deregulation, undermining their relevance in the system and our Nation’s economy and sovereignty.

Whole industries have long ago disappeared. Friedman’s Monetary Fascism has burnt through most of what remains of the middle class. Seeking fuel, the fire has spread to the upper middle class and the lower middle class. Small businesses and Unions are consumed in the flame. Even the ranks of the finance industry were offered up to the god of money. Tens of thousands of recently dispossessed upper middle class and the lower ranks of the wealthy find themselves without meaningful work and dark prospects. All of these people have passed through the bowels of Monetary Fascism, yet they stand up and defend ‘free markets’ so that they can be consumed once again as this raging fire seeks new fuel.

The only rational defense is for people everywhere to denounce Friedman’s ideology in all public policy debates and academia, and to articulate the true principles of Adam Smith.

Ending the tyranny of Monetary Fascism begins with the wide spread recognition that it is the anti-theses of capitalism, free markets, individual self-determination and national sovereignty. However, it is truly unstoppable as long as the world continues to view it as the embodiment of Adam Smith’s “free market capitalism”.

Until then, the plunder will continue, lives will be discarded the angry mob will continues to grow. As we approach critical mass the fear is setting in. The remaining upper middle class and middle class fear losing what they have, while the recently disenfranchised desperately cling to their faith in Friedman’s ‘free markets’ in the hopes of redemption. The faithful double down on their own demise, while the ranks of the dispossessed swell. Every one of us has become a bit player in our own tragedy.

We are at the end of human evolution, we have become chattel. We are conditioned to the service of those with money, who only seek to enlarge their store of money, to beget money, for money’s sake and nothing more. The future is grim.

The predictable long term outcome is a steep decline into a very dark Monetary Feudalism.

When asked in an interview what humanities’ future looked like, Eric Blair, better known as George Orwell, said “Imagine a boot smashing a human face forever.”

Welcome to the Dark Age of Money.
the question is why, who, why, what, why, when, why and why again?
User avatar
smiths
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 am
Location: perth, western australia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby Elvis » Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:08 am

Max Kaiser wrote:Facebook was a classic pump and dump.


Does anyone know, is it possible to learn whether or not Goldman Sachs "shorted" Facebook stock or is otherwise benefitting from the FB stock clunker?

I find it hard to believe they'd invest $500M in FB without having a handle on what would happen.
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7562
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:08 pm

M Keiser interviews N Foss "Ongoing Global Deb Deflation and what´s next for EU and US"
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:59 pm

I hate it when the Debs deflate! :partyhat
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby compared2what? » Fri Nov 09, 2012 8:00 pm

A start, as per your request here:

JackR wrote:Why don't you repost all this on the Wall Street thread, and I'll follow suit? Since it's not quite in the right monster thread any more, I hope you'll agree. Pretty please.

________________

JackRiddler wrote:
compared2what? wrote:It was those Fed-held mortgage securities I was really trying to check, though. I didn't want to have been harder on her than she deserved in the event that they weren't agency-backed. But that's exactly what they are -- straight-up Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac issue, implicitly guaranteed by the government ever since the New Deal brought it into being.


Fannie/Freddie, which operated as private shareholder companies prior to their failure, and the Fed have both taken over prodigious quantities of MBS paper originally issued by Wall Street banks (i.e., not originated by Fannie/Freddie). While these represent assets, it is unclear what their real value is and in cases of mortgage default realizing that value means foreclosure and eviction -- with potentials for unintended consequences such as depressing the market and further dropping the value, as well as spreading poverty and desperation with its impact on the economy. Can you check those numbers -- how much of current "Fannie/Freddie" and "Fed" holdings is actually originally Wall Street MBS?


Well....As I already said, it's not easy to answer that question simply. However, assuming that you intend "originally Wall Street MBS" to mean "pools of irresponsible and/or predatory and/or very-high-risk mortgages originally securitized by private banks/lenders that should never have gotten a credit rating at all," the best I can do is:

WRT the prodigiousness, by my estimate, based on non-partisan-reports-to-congress-type sources, the private-market stuff that Fannie/Freddie sucked up so rapidly during the late Bush-era buying spree that preceded the late Bush-era takeover amounted to about 12 percent of the mortgages they were holding or guaranteeing when they went into conservatorship.

WRT value....I guess I'm not sure what you're getting at. They're securities. Their value fluctuates. However, fwiw, as best as I can make out, virtually nothing that they ever dealt in at any point was the kind of categorically toxic and/or worthless subprime crap that broke both the market and the economy. The only person who seriously argues otherwise appears to be Peter J. Wallison of the American Enterprise Institute, the highlight of whose shameful life as an apparatchik so far has either been (a) fucking up the Financial Crisis Inquiry Committee, onto which he slithered courtesy of John Boehner; or (b) not getting indicted for manipulating Reagan's testimony as White House counsel to the Tower Commission back in the Iran-Contra day.

You remember him, right? And what he stands for? I'm sure you do. And that being the case, I have another question for you. By what incredible coincidence do you figure that a flunky for the elites like Wallison and a public-interest truth-teller like Prins both took a look at the collapse/bail-out and ended up standing for unqualified hostility towards Dodd-Frank/government spending (on the one hand) and an equally unqualified refusal to acknowledge the concept of undertaxation (on the other)?

Because their differences are purely rhetorical. When you get right down to it.



Technically, that is debt. But I'd hate to see how she characterized the Social Security program if she thinks it's either fair or accurate to call the Fed's holding of them a public liability that benefits banksters and just leave it at that.


Well she hasn't done that yet.


I say again that if she didn't, I don't see how or where. Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac are/were problematic, trouble-ridden enterprises in all the utterly predictable public/private hybrid ways. And what should be done about them in the long term is a real question. But that has no bearing one way or the other on whether it was fair and accurate of Prins not to differentiate between private-label-backed securities and government-backed securities when describing the Fed's acquisition of something she characterizes exclusively as burdensome-to-the-public but beneficial-to-Wall-Street debt.

...

I don't know, man. I guess I look forward to being rebutted on that one. Because I was just trying to be mild with that not-fair-or-accurate language. It's actually utter bullshit to portray any of the stuff that the government did to shore up the GSEs in those terms. And that's true irrespective of how truly politically and morally abhorrent it is that all of it was designed to be market-friendly, and none of it was designed to provide relief to homeowners. The only realistically available alternative at the time would have been letting them go under. And letting them go under would have had catastrophic consequences beyond reckoning for just about everyone. For the 99 percent, basically.

I curse that reality, personally. So if I'm right in assuming that you do too, here's another question for you: Why doesn't Prins?

The Fed didn't fucking set the interest rate at zero as a matter of monetary policy in order to create jobs. It's at zero because it can't go lower. And they're desperately trying to raise it. That's why they're buying shit.


It's at zero to stabilize the banking system, in part by allowing them to borrow at zero and buy bonds (such as Treasuries) at higher-than zero. Essentially a publicly subsidized arbitrage for Wall Street.


Yeah, well. Another reality I curse is that I live in a world where nobody's finances are stable when the banking system's finances aren't. It pisses me off that I do, in fact. That sure as hell doesn't require me to root for every/any alternative scenario that someone who purports to share my anger decides to dangle in front of me, though. On the contrary. Because an unscrupulous person might try to persuade me that putting some Glass-Steagal lipstick on Grover Norquist's agenda somehow made it into something that rewarded the many and punished the few. Rather than the reverse. Just for example.

IOW: Yes. It does stabilize the banking system. It is a publicly subsidized arbitrage for Wall Street. And on its own, that's all it is. So anyone who tried to represent it as something that was likely to be job-creative and recovery-triggering when not accompanied by a fiscal policy of massive WPA-style spending (aka "debt") would be lying.

About the most that could be said in favor of that claim is that it's less vile, destructive and dishonest than representing the reduction of government debt during a recession as something that was any more fucking likely to be in the public interest if it included letting the banking system collapse than if it didn't. Because it wouldn't. It would be austerity-plus-hell. And if that's not exactly what Prin is recommending, why the fuck does she go so far out of her way to put those tax-revenue figures in context-free and specious terms? Why doesn't she pipe up in favor of something with a little more regulatory bite than Glass-Steagal? Why doesn't she advocate for justice rather than vengeance in this here little throw-down between the people and the banks?

Etc. She's just proposing austerity but avoiding the term and pretending it's something else. Is my point.

Also, technically it is untrue that it can't go lower. One possibility (not currently in view) is in fact to set negative interest rates on select debt instruments held by public institutions, gradually relieving and reducing the debt burden on the people.


I believe you. But apart from that, I don't know enough about it to comment. How select do they have to be in order for that not to be inflationary? Or....You know. What are the risks and trade-offs and other, assorted considerations?
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "End of Wall Street Boom" - Must-read history

Postby compared2what? » Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:16 pm

Quite apart from which:

Nomi Prins wrote:Before the campaign contributors lavished billions of dollars on their favorite candidate; and long after they toast their winner or drink to forget their loser, Wall Street was already primed to continue its reign over the economy.

For, after three debates (well, four), when it comes to banking, finance, and the ongoing subsidization of Wall Street, both presidential candidates and their parties’ attitudes toward the banking sector is similar – i.e. it must be preserved – as is – at all costs, rhetoric to the contrary, aside.

Obama hasn’t brought ‘sweeping reform’ upon the Establishment Banks, nor does Romney need to exude deregulatory babble, because nothing structurally substantive has been done to harness the biggest banks of the financial sector, enabled, as they are, by entities from the SEC to the Fed to the Treasury Department to the White House.


Right.

Well. Although it's really not easy to get a whole lot less informative or meaningful than that, I have to admit that adding "Help me, Glass-Steagall! You're my only hope!" does it.

To give credit where due.

In addition, though much is made of each candidates' tax plans, and the related math that doesn’t add up (for both presidential candidates), the bottom line is, Obama hasn’t explained exactly WHY there’s $5 trillion more in debt during his presidency, nor has Romney explained HOW to get a $5 trillion savings.


Okay, JackR.

Unless she doesn't know how to read or count, that's just the very fucking definition of a statement in which every word is a lie, including "and" and "the," From start to finish.

If you don't think she's either too ignorant to take seriously or too mendacious to trust, why not?
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Political

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests