8bitagent wrote:All I know is, if Sandy Hook was a black op, why would they have a guy doing a really bad acting job?
A very good and obvious question. I've already asked it myself, as have many other people on this thread and elsewhere. You ask the question because you are, like most people, a fairly sane, decent and honest human being, as opposed to a professional organiser or perpetrator of black ops.
However: Since everyone and his dog clearly feels free to worm his way into THE MIND OF ADAM LANZA, THE EVIL AUTISTIC WEIRDO LONER MASS-MURDERER, and since it's by now been established beyond all reasonable doubt* by the telly and the tabloids and the serious press that HE DUNNIT, perhaps you'll allow me to speculate for a moment on what it
might be like to be an untouchable and anonymous organiser of black ops for the US government.
A possible answer to your question (and mine): They do it because they can. Because it's their idea of fun.** Because (this at least is uncontroversial) the perpetrators of any such crimes are heartless psychopaths. Perhaps, then, they -- or at least some of them -- get a thrill out of testing the waters and seeing how far they can go. Perhaps it's even of practical use to them, as an opportunity for research on a global scale. Or perhaps by now, since 9/11 at the very latest, they are perfectly confident that they can get away with literally anything, however absurd, brutal, implausible, unproven, or indeed blatantly dishonest and demonstrably untrue.
All this (perhaps) because they know -- through experience -- that any decent human being, however critical of his government and however suspicious of his nation's intelligence agencies, will be repelled by anything that smacks even vaguely of disrespecting the victims and will find it practically impossible to even countenance the thought that if Sandy Hook was a black op, they would either
dare to have a guy doing "a really bad acting job"***, or be so
incompetent as to let the cat out of the bag on CNN.
But that's all speculation, and in the worst possible taste, of course. As opposed to referring to Adam Lanza as "the killer" at length, in print and on TV, while offering reams of po-faced crackerbarrel psychology (and sociology) as to why He Dunnit.
That's in
good taste.
*
What are you, a conspiracy nut?**
It's not unheard of for powerful people to get a thrill out of their own power and ruthlessness. It's not unheard of for brutal murderers to disrespect their victims and repeatedly taunt the public. Jack the Ripper, for instance, demonstrably did just that. And he was just one sadist among too many to list, and certainly not the most powerful or destructive one in history.***
It wasn't in fact "a really bad acting job". If it was (by any chance) an acting job, then he performed it highly competently, if you happen to like that kind of thing.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966
TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC