thatsmystory wrote:8bitagent wrote:whoah, what podcast was that one? I listened to most the emory spitfire and 4 a closer look ones on 9/11
Richard Clarke: CIA covered up ties to 9/11 hijackersWho is Rich Blee podcast8bitagent wrote:There was this strange period in 2011 when Fox News was doing all this really good 9/11 truth reporting, still cant explain that one. But next to Press for Truth and Core of Corruption, this Fox News documentary is one of the best 9/11 Truther docs I ever have seen
Catherine Herridge is their terrorism reporter. She has covered the al-Awlaki story for years. Here is the latest:
The FBI suspected within days of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks that the American Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki may have purchased tickets for some of the hijackers for air travel in advance of the attacks, according to newly released documents reviewed exclusively by Fox News.
The purpose of these flights remains unclear, but the 9/11 Commission report later noted that the hijackers had used flights in the lead-up to the attacks to test security and surveillance.
The heavily redacted records – obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of information Act request – suggest the FBI held evidence tying the American-born cleric to the hijackers just 16 days after the attack that killed nearly 3,000 Americans.
“We have FBI documents showing that the FBI knew that al-Awlaki had bought three tickets for three of the hijackers to fly into Florida and into Las Vegas, including the lead hijacker, Mohammad Atta,” Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, told Fox News.
Exclusive: Cleric may have booked pre-9/11 flights for hijackers, FBI documents show
1) The FBI is playing sick games made possible by their abuse of secrecy powers. They caution Judicial Watch on drawing improper conclusions on the redacted portions as the redactions make the context of the ticket purchases difficult to understand. No shit. That is by design.
2) Was Al-Awlaki an FBI asset? Did he function in a similar manner as al-Bayoumi evidently did for the Saudi GID and help the hijackers? The context of his murder changes if he was an (former) asset with dirt on the FBI.
3) What reason is there to trust the FBI on al Qaeda related cases? As far as I can determine Dina Corsi is currently the deputy director for counterintelligence. Corsi played a crucial role in obstructing al Qaeda investigations before 9/11.
Nice find! Wow, even I missed this. People talk a lot about "smoking guns", WTC7, etc. To me the most explosive smoking guns are precisely all of this Saudi, Awlaki, money trail type stuff.
This is court of law, direct linkage sort of stuff.
What the fuck was Awlaki doing at the Pentagon in March of 2002 if the FBI had become aware of his ties to bin Laden in 1999? There was clear evidence that he took two of the hijackers
to a Muslim area of Falls Church Virginia, and put them up near a Halal butcher shop that was also a WAMY(bin Laden family funded) front. According to the Fox News documentary,
Awlaki had been in contact with Ramzi bin alshidh in Germany via phone, which I wouldnt doubt. I read awhile back it was partially Saudi pressure that forced the FBI to release Awlaki in 2002.
The "Vegas mystery" that's "eluded investigators" may be a red herring, or there could be something there. Remember that in March 2001, one week after John O'neil attended a counter terrorism conference in Madrid, three of the hijackers appeared at the same hotel.
Remember too, that RIGHT when Abu Gharib had reached critical mass, the Nick Berg event happened and shocked the world. A man who had somehow been in contact with, and had data on alleged "20th hijacker" Zacharious Moussoui, who also was in contact and had software from the co-pilot of the Paul Wellstone crash plane. A man who was living with a man(Mujahid Menepta) connected to WTC, OKC and 9/11. A man seen with Mohameed Atta, and I believe Nawaf al Hamzi before he made it out to Falls Church.
It's shocking no plucky FBI or CIA agent played puzzle pieces and thought "what in the bloody hell is going on?" This fictitious siren in Zero Dark Theory is some sort of Colombo, yet why are conspiracy nerds like ourselves more in tune with all of these disparate layers?
This to me remains the most shocking, damning and smoking gun piece revealed since 9/11 itselfhttp://rawstory.com/news/2008/FBI_docum ... _0228.htmlhttp://www.historycommons.org/news.jsp? ... 393703-423My guess? British BAE defense money found its way into the hands of key 9/11 hijackers and material support via the Saudis, as well as slush funds from powerful UAE/Dubai elites. The ISI link may be a red herring, though there may be something there. Either way I see 9/11 as a globalist op to trick America into war using brainwashed jihadis as the fall guy.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me