yathrib wrote:I don't think Moore's comment qualifies as analysis at all; it is a pretty good description of the conduct of the LAPD and others in their handling of evidence, etc. IMO. Do you disagree that OJ was framed, or that he was guilty? The material presented, if valid, suggests that he might not be. I've mostly accepted the "O.J. was guilty" line, but I've also had reservations about it, because so many other things that "everybody knows" turn out to be not so clear cut, esp. when there are seemingly ironclad rules against bringing up any doubts.
I do think OJ was framed, I am not convinced of his guilt from what I've read to date (I was in the beginning, but I was just going by the media). Okay maybe it was just a comment from Moore, not analysis... Sorry.







