Handsome B. Wonderful wrote:JackRiddler wrote:I'm sure terror futures is still happening in some form somewhere.
I really thoight it was going to happen at the London olympics. But nothing happened. It seemed to be more symbolic or ritualistic?
I never really understood 9/11 as an inside job from a purely logistical viewpoint or militaristic one. Simply because it didn't make sense. Yes it led to an invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. Money was made and oil was begotten and the opium flowed. But, there was something more elusive about what happened on Sept. 11, 2001 that was more than prosaic. There did seem to be a more esoteric meaning behind it. Reading S.K. Bain's book really opened it up to me. It helped me understand it more, even if Bain doesn't really make a point, it does help me make more sense out of it.
I began to think that the "inside job" posit regarding 9/11 was in itself kind of a cover or distraction. People who aggressively push the CIA/Silverstein/Cheney/Bush/Pentagon planners orchestrated 9/11 often can't seem to explain Bojinka, WTC 1993, the killing of Rabbi Meir Khahane, Dar-es-Salaam/Nairobi, USS Cole, Ramzi Yousef. I mean so, like Rumsfeld and Bush concocted 9/11 in some bunker, made sure al-Gore lost and then in nine months somehow made 9/11 happen...with jihadis in "will" videos taking credit? The Inside Job(tm) theory makes no sense. I know if I was behind the event I wouldn't want Rumsfeld or those clowns in on it.
So was it clown robber #1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 behind the robbery of Gotham's bank?
It's just a little scary thinking who the joker may be. If you have a sick sense of humor, just think of 9/11 as a really avant garde performance art piece. When you place your hand on one of the twisted husks of the columns, often on display in podunk traveling state fairs or exhibits, you can almost glimpse a sense of the dread and horror.
Not sure if Dubya is worked through or just has moments of scary cogency, but this could not be truer.
- George W Bush, 2001The hijackers were instruments of evil who died in vain. Behind them is a cult of evil that seeks to harm the innocent and thrives on human suffering. Theirs is the worst kind of cruelty, the cruelty that is fed, not weakened, by tears. Theirs is the worst kind of violence, pure malice while daring to claim the authority of God. We cannot fully understand the designs and power of evil; it is enough to know that evil, like a goodness, exists. And in the terrorists evil has found a willing servant." The cruelty that is "fed, not weakened, by tears
The holocaust, WW2, 9/11, the endless horror show in Iraq. There's clear political and human hands behind these things. But if one say, got off or fed on death and chaos for death and chaos sake...well
these sort of events would be like a kid in a candy store.