Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
FourthBase wrote:elfismiles wrote:UM Coach: Bomb Sniffing Dogs Were at Start, Finish Lines for “Drill”
University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, who was near the finish line of the Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, said he thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.
“They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about,” Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15. “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”
Stevenson had just finished the marathon. His wife had been sitting in one of the seating sections where an explosion went off, but thankfully she left her seat and was walking to meet up with him.
“There was just smoke, another explosion went off,” Stevenson said. “We all started running. There were people crying.”
Stevenson said there was no question in his mind that this was an intentional act.
Local 15 News is talking with more locals who were taking part in the run. Tune in for live coverage beginning at 5 p.m.
http://www.local15tv.com/news/local/sto ... SDJEA.cspx
Is there any doubt that in a week or a month there'll be Herald and Globe headlines about multiple warnings that went ignored for one reason or another? Either some Ibsen-esque Enemy of the People reason, or something more sinister.
Dead 8-year-old. Motherfuckers. They won't get away with this one. Whoever they are.
Joe Hillshoist wrote:FourthBase wrote:elfismiles wrote:UM Coach: Bomb Sniffing Dogs Were at Start, Finish Lines for “Drill”
University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, who was near the finish line of the Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, said he thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.
“They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about,” Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15. “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”
Stevenson had just finished the marathon. His wife had been sitting in one of the seating sections where an explosion went off, but thankfully she left her seat and was walking to meet up with him.
“There was just smoke, another explosion went off,” Stevenson said. “We all started running. There were people crying.”
Stevenson said there was no question in his mind that this was an intentional act.
Local 15 News is talking with more locals who were taking part in the run. Tune in for live coverage beginning at 5 p.m.
http://www.local15tv.com/news/local/sto ... SDJEA.cspx
Is there any doubt that in a week or a month there'll be Herald and Globe headlines about multiple warnings that went ignored for one reason or another? Either some Ibsen-esque Enemy of the People reason, or something more sinister.
Dead 8-year-old. Motherfuckers. They won't get away with this one. Whoever they are.
If the cops and others were investigating threats of bombs at the Boston Marathon wouldn't they always say the sniffer dogs were part of a drill? Just to stop people freaking out. I think in this case its actually reasonable to assume that bomb sniffing dogs were there in response to a warning, or an investigation or something else, not because one was ignored.
wordspeak2 wrote:I stand corrected- there was the Oklahoma City bombing, the reddest of all red states.
So some of my Facebook friends are saying There are always bomb dogs at the Boston Marathon, lots of them. I'm like: OK, so why didn't they catch this bomb only yards from the finish line then? Right?
8bitagent wrote:The style of the attack has all the hallmarks of an Eric Rudolf white militant type of attack, coupled with the date being so close to 4/19.
8bitagent wrote:The style of the attack has all the hallmarks of an Eric Rudolf white militant type of attack, coupled with the date being so close to 4/19.I agree.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
Confirmation bias (also called confirmatory bias or myside bias) is a tendency of people to favor information that confirms their beliefs or hypotheses.[Note 1][1] People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. For example, in reading about current political issues, people usually prefer sources that affirm their existing attitudes. They also tend to interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting their existing position. Biased search, interpretation and memory have been invoked to explain attitude polarization (when a disagreement becomes more extreme even though the different parties are exposed to the same evidence), belief perseverance (when beliefs persist after the evidence for them is shown to be false), the irrational primacy effect (a greater reliance on information encountered early in a series) and illusory correlation (when people falsely perceive an association between two events or situations).
General Patton wrote:Well, the suspect they are looking for was a black male who dropped a backpack before the blast, so it has all of the telltale signs of a white nationalist false flag attack. What the police haven't realized is that the neo-nazis likely painted their faces black before dropping it, as the majority of terrorist actions in the US can be clearly traced back to a few ideological groups with clearly stated goals. The police and FBI simply don't have our level of parapolitical training so that they can deduce this without the aid of an event timeline, an analysis of competing hypothesis, background intelligence, SIGINT or statements from the victims.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
Confirmation bias (also called confirmatory bias or myside bias) is a tendency of people to favor information that confirms their beliefs or hypotheses.[Note 1][1] People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. For example, in reading about current political issues, people usually prefer sources that affirm their existing attitudes. They also tend to interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting their existing position. Biased search, interpretation and memory have been invoked to explain attitude polarization (when a disagreement becomes more extreme even though the different parties are exposed to the same evidence), belief perseverance (when beliefs persist after the evidence for them is shown to be false), the irrational primacy effect (a greater reliance on information encountered early in a series) and illusory correlation (when people falsely perceive an association between two events or situations).
I'm laughing at you and you deserve it.
A Costa Mesa, California neighborhood had to be evacuated Sunday night after a resident allegedly killed himself with a homemade bomb.
KTLA-TV reported on Monday that authorities found the unidentified man laying on his front lawn earlier in the evening, but refused medical attention and went back inside his home.
“Neighbors were trying to convince him to go to the hospital,” one resident, Laurie Raphoon, told KNBC-TV. “An hour or two later we heard an explosion.”
Costa Mesa police said the blast happened around 8 p.m. Sunday night. Residents in 16 homes nearby were evacuated. The man was found lying dead in his doorway.
Other neighbors told KCBS-TV the victim was in his late 40s or early 50s.
Both nearby authorities and the FBI investigated the scene and reportedly found other explosive devices in the home.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests