How Absurd: 8 Crazy Reactions, Ridiculous Conclusions, and

[Canadian_watcher]

when in Rome.

stay classy.

hey at least i didn't write an article detailing ridiculous nonsense about how the victims of a massacre were actually the perpetrators.

neither did I.
and neither did anyone else. I do not think anyone is saying that the people in the pictures were the people who planned this event. It could easily have been two events - one just for the pictures.

I'd love it if you'd answer the questions I've asked regarding whether or not we'd ever be able to tell if the government *did* employ crisis actors at the scene of a world event.

[Canadian_watcher]

reposting, since there's a lot of post sliding happening.

SERIOUS QUESTION:

should any of you have the parts to answer:

Ready? here it is:

Let's say that the government sunk so low as to stage an event and employ people to play victims. Or maybe blackmail them into it, or let them out of jail early for it or whatever.

How would we ever know?

[barracuda]

I disagree. femoral arteries completely severed. ain't much the body can do about that.

The femoral artery is located in the thigh, not the lower leg. More hand holding.

[ShinShinKid]

[barracuda]

Yes, that's right. and he owns a media effects company.

here it is

http://www.christianwilliams.us/About-Me

I'd like to know why you think he runs a "media effects company", seeing that your link here directs me to the website of an art director. Do you really not know the difference, or are you simply re-imagining his work to suit yourself?

[Canadian_watcher]

the blood in the original picture that I was actually asking about. Distraction, misdirection.

Pretty obviously, the blood was underneath Christian Williams.

Here is a photo from after Jeff is taken away. And how is C Williams so clean in the photo? and why does the black girl look to be in pretty much the exact same state as she was in the earlier photos, but Williams is like, chillin'?

[barracuda]

Funny, I see large pools of blood in that photo.

[barracuda]

And how is C Williams so clean in the photo? and why does the black girl look to be in pretty much the exact same state as she was in the earlier photos, but Williams is like, chillin'?

He must have shifted his position at some point between the two snapshots. How very suspicious.

[Canadian_watcher]

Yes, that's right. and he owns a media effects company.

here it is

http://www.christianwilliams.us/About-Me

I'd like to know why you think he runs a "media effects company", seeing that your link here directs me to the website of an art director. Do you really not know the difference, or are you simply re-imagining his work to suit yourself?

click some of the links, man. there's like a hundred of them across the top of the page. Hand holding? yeah.

[Canadian_watcher]

anyway, my guns need polishing. I'ma gunna go do thet.

[barracuda]

click some of the links, man. there's link a hundred of them across the top of the page. Hand holding? yeah.

I clicked lots of them. I saw art direction of advertising campaigns. Maybe you can point me to one of his "effects" projects that has some bearing on the fakery you claim.

[OP ED]

when in Rome.

stay classy.

hey at least i didn't write an article detailing ridiculous nonsense about how the victims of a massacre were actually the perpetrators.

neither did I.
and neither did anyone else. I do not think anyone is saying that the people in the pictures were the people who planned this event. It could easily have been two events - one just for the pictures.

I'd love it if you'd answer the questions I've asked regarding whether or not we'd ever be able to tell if the government *did* employ crisis actors at the scene of a world event.

well, um, actually HE DID WRITE AN ARTICLE SAYING EXACTLY THAT.

[for the record]

the fact that he doesn't believe those people were victims doesn't change the fact that if he's wrong, then he's dehumanizing the victims of a massacre meanwhile blaming them for "faking it" or whatever he's selling. [a book, probably]

two events? what?

you do realize that we're talking about a massively public event where there were literally hundreds of cameras on the scene when it happened...?

could we tell if they emplyed "crisis actors" at the scene of a world event?

if they were actual people with lives and family members and stuff, people who'd know if they were already amputees and stuff, then, yeah, probably we could.

although i personally find the idea ludicrous. as if the goverments of the world are somehow now too kind-hearted to blow up actual people, now they have to go to the trouble of blowing up fake people?

that's just weird.

[barracuda]

anyway, my guns need polishing.

Nice euphemism you've got there. I'll have to try that one sometime.

[Canadian_watcher]

well, um, actually HE DID WRITE AN ARTICLE SAYING EXACTLY THAT.

[for the record]

the fact that he doesn't believe those people were victims doesn't change the fact that if he's wrong, then he's dehumanizing the victims of a massacre meanwhile blaming them for "faking it" or whatever he's selling. [a book, probably]

quite. thank you.

two events? what?

you do realize that we're talking about a massively public event where there were literally hundreds of cameras on the scene when it happened...?

sort of like at the JFK assassination - but didn't the feds grab most of those? I wish wish wish I could find more footage from just, say, FIVE more of those 'hundreds of cameras' that were on the scene. But I can't. I'm sure it would help but seriously, I cannot find hardly anything. it's okay though, because as the FBI says, there's no need to look at any other pictures other than the ones they think are good.

Not to mention that there might have been TWO EVENTS. You should think about it, it's hardly outlandish.

could we tell if they emplyed "crisis actors" at the scene of a world event?

if they were actual people with lives and family members and stuff, people who'd know if they were already amputees and stuff, then, yeah, probably we could.

But not if we didn't look in to it. Right?

as if the goverments of the world are somehow now too kind-hearted to blow up actual people, now they have to go to the trouble of blowing up fake people?

exactly, but they ARE control freaks. And it's easier to have an event where either part of it is stages, or you post-production merge two separate events (photographically) in order to control the message and get the proper heartwrenching narrative, right?

[Canadian_watcher]

okay now seriously, I gots beer to drank and guns to clean. I'll be back sometime in the future.