Wombaticus Rex » Fri Jun 21, 2013 6:53 pm wrote:Reality Sandwich is a great look for you, man, I hope this gets you a lot more exposure -- and I also hope that "a lot more exposure" turns out to be a good thing.
I wanted to highlight this because it was an excellent & concise summary:
My take on Strieber is that his accounts are profoundly personal accounts which he has given universal significance, thereby inadvertently obscuring their actual meaning. "The Prisoner of Infinity" is an attempt to find that hidden meaning, and if it succeeds, I am aware that it could prove painful for Strieber, and be experienced by him (and others) as invasive.
Is pointing out that the Emperor is really naked invasive? It depends on whose point of view you take. The thing with reality is that it doesn't have much respect for our illusions, including, or especially, the illusion of privacy (discreet ego existence). From the point of view of the unconscious, privacy is just a polite word for secrecy, or denial. And secrets are toxic.
I was very skeptical at the outset of your project but I have been consistently impressed with your actual work. I think you've created something valuable.
Thanks Wombat. This is meaningful to me to hear. I have found that part of sharing this writing has involved explaining it, or framing it, to get over or around the obstacles of people's assumptions or misunderstanding about it and this has meant going deeper into the material itself - so that, as I kind of intuited from the get-go, it's been a reader-participation project.
I've written for RS on and off for a few years (other pieces here:
http://auticulture.com/multimedia/articles/), it's probably far from a perfect fit (I've had my share of hostile feedback, esp. for my piece on psychedelics), but I'm not sure what if anything would be a fit for me anyway.
As for "exposure," yeah, and I dunno. I guess I try to see it like this - if and when I put something out there that's really useful to others in some way then it will get passed around. What I've found out with this current piece is that it may be too "effective" for its own good - at least one of my readers has been so triggered by the material that he's having a hard time continuing, even though he wants to.
Ditto for me, this project seems to have knocked me for six. If the premise is at all true, or real, then it's approaching the very thing that none of us wants to see or to look at. My foolhardy goal has been to do that and somehow make it entertaining! Hell, Poe, Dostoyevsky, and David Lynch did it!
Guess the trick is to make it fiction?
It is a lot easier to fool people than show them how they have been fooled.