IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby brekin » Wed Jun 26, 2013 3:52 pm

slad wrote:
^^^^ TWO YEARS AFTER HE DIED....NOT ONE WORD BEFORE CAMPBELL TOOK HIS LAST BREATH AND COULD NOT DEFEND HIMSELF....FUCKING GOSSIP THAT'S ALL IT IS FUCKING GOSSIP PLAIN AND SIMPLE


Because someone dies we can't examine alleged behavior from those that knew him? slad I get it - you like Campbell and his work. I did and continue to do in parts. But I'm also concerned he (and possibly his work) had a darker side that all the ra-ra around him is over shadowing. Why would colleagues and students write the new york times and go on record detailing such behavior? I can understand having a grudge, but surely they have more to lose by challenging the status of such a benign figure.

I myself like J.R.R. Tolkien and his work, but I wouldn't let that get in the way of discovering whether he had views that were disagreeable or not.

Unfortunately you have to pay to see this entire article:
Joseph Campbell on Jews and Judaism

Robert A Segal
Religious Studies Program, Louisiana State University,106 Coates Hall, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, U.S.A.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-721X(92)90056-A, How to Cite or Link Using DOI
Permissions & Reprints
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1 ... cs5ovKB7Mg

Abstract

[b]Joseph Campbell's private expressions of antisemitism have been documented by his acquaintances, his students, and even his friends. But Campbell's own writings attest to his prejudice. Nearly all of his references to Jews and Judaism are disdainful and hostile. Campbell's dislike of Judaism does stem in part from his dislike of Western religions generally and to that extent cannot be said to reflect antisemitism. But his dislike of Judaism is especially uncompromising and, more, appeals to common antisemitic stereotypes. At the same time Campbell applauds the mythology of Judaism, as he does every other mythology, and really seeks to substitute the mythology for the religion.[/b]
If I knew all mysteries and all knowledge, and have not charity, I am nothing. St. Paul
I hang onto my prejudices, they are the testicles of my mind. Eric Hoffer
User avatar
brekin
 
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jun 26, 2013 3:55 pm

why didn't his "friend" who knew him for a very long time and was a "friend" of his for a very long time.....confront him about his views before he died?....because he was a COWARD

Why did his wife stay with him for 40 years...until his death?

The Everyday Religion of Joseph Campbell

In a 1970 lecture at Manhattan's Cooper Union, the mythologist Joseph Campbell told a story about attending a presentation given by Jewish philosopher Martin Buber at Columbia University. During the talk, Campbell noticed that he had problems understanding what Buber meant by his use of the word "God," which kept changing tenses and circumstances. At one point, Buber stopped and said, "I have problems referring to God in the third person sometimes."

When Campbell questioned Buber about his meaning, the philosopher was taken aback, uncomprehending of how Campbell could not know what God means. Campbell elaborated by explaining that while Buber kept stating that God has "hidden his face," he had just returned from India, where "people there are experiencing God all the time."

Buber nearly erupted, asking Campbell, "Do you mean to compare..." The moderator jumped in to assure Buber that the mythologist was not comparing the God of Judaism with the gods of India, hoping to save face in the room full of distinguished guests at this invite-only event. Buber calmed down, casting the question aside with a gruff, "Everyone has to come out of exile in their own way," and proceeding with his lecture.

Campbell weighed this odd statement. He came to the following conclusion:

The Orient is not in exile from God. The god is imminent within you. He isn't out there, and you haven't been cut off. You're not cut off. The only point is, you don't know how to turn in and get to it. It's nobody's fault but your own, and the problem is not a problem of fall and atonement and exile and coming out of exile. It's a psychological problem totally, and it can be solved.
While listening to this recently released speech in an exceptional ongoing series highlighting Campbell's work, I'm reading Amir D. Aczel's The Jesuit and the Skull, based on the French Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and his role in helping discover the Peking Man in 1929. Teilhard de Chardin had no trouble merging his Christian faith with science, becoming one of the world's most prominent anthropological figures for his work in China in the 1920s and '30s. Committed to discovering and translating hard facts regarding our planet, he was no less devoted to spiritual pursuits. He developed his theory of the noosphere, a realm above the biosphere that is a global domain of thoughts and ideas. The noosphere, he believed, grows in relation to the complexity and input of human thought, continuously collecting information as we move towards the Omega Point, the culmination of history under guidance of divinity.

Obviously the Jesuit order thought the man dangerous. As careful as Teilhard de Chardin was to state that evolution did not imply that men "came from" apes, and that there was plenty of room in this world for evolution and God, the higher-ups in Rome did everything in their power to silence him, from sending him to an obscure post in China -- ironically, the very assignment that would lead to his role in discovering Peking Man -- to denying him publication of his masterful book, Le Phénomène Humain, as well as forbidding him to lecture to scientific communities.

Eighty years later, we're stuck on the same issues: religious organizations attempting to discredit evolution with creation "science," egomaniacal arguments concerning the validity of this god over that one, the appropriation of certain aspects of one discipline -- Christian yoga, anyone? -- which denies the cultural foundation of the practice. Extracting fragments might work in marketing food and philosophies, but for those seeking actual knowledge and nourishment, it leaves you hungry.

Campbell continues:

In the East, the ultimate divine mystery is absolutely beyond personification, absolutely beyond naming, absolutely beyond categories. You cannot ask is God merciful, just, wrathful? Does he like these people and not those? This is anthropomorphic projection of human sentiments on an ultimate mystery. But that mystery that is absolutely transcendent is the mystery of your being as well. It is completely imminent within you.
A certain luxury of modern society is the right to choose. Many before us did not have that option. While too many Americans have had it drilled into their heads that their religion is the only one, we have grown too far intellectually and spiritually to stay constrained by the manic and attention-starved demands of others. Guidance, yes, and the knowledge of elders will certainly help us, but there is a huge difference between demands of submission and a helping hand lending itself in times of need.

Any organization that would so clearly deny the validity of honest research, which Teilhard de Chardin faced and which we continue to experience today, is blatant in its self-interest. Any person of faith content with his or her decision needs not the verification of the world. That is the mark of a company losing its grip on the public imagination. The ultimate mystery, if be there one, remains transcendent of the individual's "knowledge" of what God wants. Pinning down a divinity to push your agenda is like grasping the sun with tiny palms. You can try, but it'll slip through your fingers every time.

Or maybe the mystery is that we just haven't figured out to make room for everyone else yet. My religion takes place on the streets and in the people I encounter every day of my life, not in buying futures with expectations of great rewards. Every day I live for tomorrow, I miss what's right in front of me now.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby brekin » Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:10 pm

slad wrote:

why didn't his "friend" who knew him for a very long time and was a "friend" of his for a very long time.....confront him about his views before he died?....because he was a COWARD


Sure, he could be a coward...and Campbell could still have been an anti-semite. There not mutually exclusive. He may have even been afraid of retaliation by Campbell while living, or he could just have been snakey and wanted to damage his reputation. I don't really care about his intentions but the validity of what he is saying about Campbell's views.

Why did his wife stay with him for 40 years...until his death?


Love? Economic security? He was a great lay? Maybe she shared his views? Again that really doesn't matter, what does is Campbell's views.
If I knew all mysteries and all knowledge, and have not charity, I am nothing. St. Paul
I hang onto my prejudices, they are the testicles of my mind. Eric Hoffer
User avatar
brekin
 
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:14 pm

http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/suic/Referen ... 6aecc7586b
While the late mythologist's works and methodology have continued to be studied and debated, his supporters remain steadfast. Sir Lauren van der Post, writing in the London Times, cited Campbell for his efforts to "rediscover for a deprived world the fundamental mythological pattern of the human spirit. . . . He has done more than any scholar of our time to reconnect modern man to a reality which his mind and spirit were rejecting at great peril to his well-being and sanity." And Joseph Coates of theChicago Tribune called Campbell "that rare scholar with something really useful to say about how life should be lived."
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:36 pm

one old fucking coward of a "friend" and couple of fucking coward gossips compared to all these people...who didn't believe a word they said ......you're calling them all idiots for not seeing the dirt you are slinging


http://www.jcf.org/images/eNewsletter/C ... rogram.pdf

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:54 pm

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby justdrew » Wed Jun 26, 2013 5:13 pm

brekin » 26 Jun 2013 12:52 wrote:slad wrote:
^^^^ TWO YEARS AFTER HE DIED....NOT ONE WORD BEFORE CAMPBELL TOOK HIS LAST BREATH AND COULD NOT DEFEND HIMSELF....FUCKING GOSSIP THAT'S ALL IT IS FUCKING GOSSIP PLAIN AND SIMPLE


Because someone dies we can't examine alleged behavior from those that knew him? slad I get it - you like Campbell and his work. I did and continue to do in parts. But I'm also concerned he (and possibly his work) had a darker side that all the ra-ra around him is over shadowing. Why would colleagues and students write the new york times and go on record detailing such behavior? I can understand having a grudge, but surely they have more to lose by challenging the status of such a benign figure.

I myself like J.R.R. Tolkien and his work, but I wouldn't let that get in the way of discovering whether he had views that were disagreeable or not.

Unfortunately you have to pay to see this entire article:
Joseph Campbell on Jews and Judaism

Robert A Segal
Religious Studies Program, Louisiana State University,106 Coates Hall, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, U.S.A.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-721X(92)90056-A, How to Cite or Link Using DOI
Permissions & Reprints
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1 ... cs5ovKB7Mg

Abstract

[b]Joseph Campbell's private expressions of antisemitism have been documented by his acquaintances, his students, and even his friends. But Campbell's own writings attest to his prejudice. Nearly all of his references to Jews and Judaism are disdainful and hostile. Campbell's dislike of Judaism does stem in part from his dislike of Western religions generally and to that extent cannot be said to reflect antisemitism. But his dislike of Judaism is especially uncompromising and, more, appeals to common antisemitic stereotypes. At the same time Campbell applauds the mythology of Judaism, as he does every other mythology, and really seeks to substitute the mythology for the religion.[/b]


so objecting to aspects of 'the religion' make you an anti-semite now? Wrong.

consider what axe Robert A Segal is seeking to grind too.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby brekin » Wed Jun 26, 2013 5:30 pm

justdrew wrote:

so objecting to aspects of 'the religion' make you an anti-semite now? Wrong.
consider what axe Robert A Segal is seeking to grind too.


Maybe you should read his essay before you dismiss it from the abstract? (Perhaps we can go halfsy's to buy online access to it?)
And even if people were out to get Campbell out of professional jealousy or competing doctrine that doesn't mean what they are documenting isn't true.
Just as Campbell being a great teacher, friend, inspiration, theorist, etc doesn't preclude him from being anti-Semitic.

It is possible that Campbell did good while harboring some truly evil thoughts. I think someone familiar with his work would recognize that possibility.
That may be hard for those, though, who don't want to see him other than a modern saint. Ironic that someone who showed us the power of myth, now is becoming enveloped in a myth.

“The Garden is a metaphor for the following: our minds, and our thinking in terms of pairs of opposites--man and woman, good and evil--are as holy as that of a god.”
― Joseph Campbell, Thou Art That: Transforming Religious Metaphor

http://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/31 ... s-metaphor
If I knew all mysteries and all knowledge, and have not charity, I am nothing. St. Paul
I hang onto my prejudices, they are the testicles of my mind. Eric Hoffer
User avatar
brekin
 
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby justdrew » Wed Jun 26, 2013 5:37 pm

brekin I already pointed out that there just might be some parallels between Campbell and Evola, and that was completely ignored.

I haven't seen anything in this thread that sheds light on what those 'possible ramifications' ARE. Are you suggesting there's some secret mind-virus hidden in his work that turns people into crypto-antisemites?
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jun 26, 2013 5:58 pm

The posthumous battle that was engaged by Brendan Gill against his deceased Centurion friend and intellectual sparring partner, Joseph Campbell [NYR, September 28], is easy to account for. In the banter of the bar "in the art gallery off the landing of our grand marble stairway," perhaps Brendan Gill was the verbal match of Joseph Campbell. In death Joseph Campbell won, and it is easy to see why. It is the triumph of ideas and insight over style, of originality over reaction.

As one of the executive producers of the series "Joseph Campbell and the Power of Myth with Bill Moyers," and, incidentally, a new member of the Century Club, I'd like to join the give and take of what, unfortunately, Joe is no longer here to make into a vigorous discussion .

First, Mr. Gill advances an interpretation of one of Campbell's most frequently quoted phrases, "Follow your bliss," that I believe is hardly vigorous and, in fact, off base. He writes that the meaning of Joe's message is to do only that which makes one happy, and, as such, that is sanctions the selfishness that has become deplorably familiar to us in the Reagan years. With that interpretation, he likens Campbell's philosophy to that of Ayn Rand, one of the absolutists for the value system of materialism.

After years of working with this material, I would suggest that this interpretation is the opposite of what Campbell meant. Campbell says: "We are so busy doing things of outer value that we no longer know what we intend," and he says this in many different ways, What Joe meant - and continues to mean in this period of infant mortality that so irks Mr. Cill - is that the impositions of our culture, have caused us to lose touch with our inner selves and our own inner sensse of being that directs us toward things that are most meaningful in our lives.

Further, he said: Follow your bliss no matter what the cost, though society may revile you, though you may live as an outcast and in poverty. This is the philosophy he followed in his own life in pursuing his intellectual passion - mythology, It is the message he gave to his students, young and old, and it is the reason he drew their admiration and love.I have been asked many times by those who admired the series why I think it was so successful. My answer, uncertain though I am, is that in this society,, which is completive and materialistic, there is little outlet for our spiritual selves. We are so engaged in activities of outer value- the pursuit of financial security and social gain - and our sense of reality, our sense of ourselves, is dominated by a popular culture that admits only what is tangible, quantifiable, and measurable that we have little validation of our inner life, our souls, if you will. It used to be that there were institutions and other forums that were a home for the expression of what we call the soul- houses of religious worship, the corner bar, the community, the family, All of these have changed, and many have ceased to serve as sanctuaries for spiritual concerns. Most are operating at a deficit and have less time for the spirit than for their own survival.

Nevertheless, there is something inside - call it the soul - that needs expression, and what I think Campbell series did is to give it an outlet, to acknowledge and address it through an exploration of the literature of the spirit . The electronic hearth became for six hours a sacred place for the human tribe which throughout history, has asked the same questions: Who am I? Why am I here? What does my life mean? Why must we kill? How can I forgive and be forgiven? Is there a God? And more.

Ironically, the series is now called a "cash cow" by public television stations which originally questioned the whole production. Stations are using it, successfully for fund-raising and so our culture confirms the existence of the soul in its very own terms - in ratings that can be quantified and contributions that can be counted.

Some additional observations:

Yes, Joe said "Yes to life, the good and the evil, the paradox, the suffering. One person told me that she believed the series was successful because Joe expressed the difficulty of everyone's life so well and yet he was so affirming. "Is this a private fight," Joe would paraphrase an old Irish saying, or can anyone get in?" And: "It's a wonderful opera, only it hurts." That's an accurate reflection of the experience of being alive and accepting it as it is. It says we all share the suffering, and the sharing without pretense is comforting.

Yes Joe loved the German culture. And the Japanese culture, and the war years were painful and puzzling for him.

And yes, Joe viewed the Jewish God, Yahweh, and the Old Testament, as a mythology (like all religions) that was the expression of a war-like, punitive culture, as he sys in the series, and many would agree, None of that means that Joe was anti-Semitic, which, in fact, as an alumna of Sarah Lawrence and, possibly, because I am Jewish, I have been told many times, I will not dispute it. I can only say that none of it emerged during the twenty-four hours of interview.

I have heard other things about Joe Campbell, in particular, about his conservative politics, not only during the war years but throughout his life, not exactly a sin. And I have heard about his intolerance on several fronts. That he was opinionated I certainly came to see in daily drives to the location for taping. But that is just more of life's mysteries, how one so learned can be, in some ways, so limited; and one so seeing can be so blind. Those, too are questions that are hardly new, and the series was not intended to be a biography of Joe, nor an exploration of his character, nor was it intended to make him a hero. Joe Campbell was a teacher, passionate about his work and ideas, dedicated to the illumination of the spiritual traditions, a broker, an interpreter, and, to some, a sage.

Joe would be delighted at the final achievement of his life's ambition, which was to spark a wider interest in the riches of spiritual traditions, to release the enormous energy and power that they contain, and to direct attention to their insights and wisdom. He would be excited about the discussion and dialogue about his ideas. He would be amazed, and, I think, dismayed to find the dialogue deformed into a debate, for or against, the glorification of Joe. How has it is that Joe's posthumous acceptance by the public has caused a friend in life to turn against him in death.

Joan Kormer
Graduate School of Journalism
Columbia University
New York City
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:01 pm

justdrew » Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:37 pm wrote:brekin I already pointed out that there just might be some parallels between Campbell and Evola, and that was completely ignored.

I haven't seen anything in this thread that sheds light on what those 'possible ramifications' ARE. Are you suggesting there's some secret mind-virus hidden in his work that turns people into crypto-antisemites?



Are you suggesting there's some secret mind-virus hidden in his work that turns people into crypto-antisemites?

apparently there is :roll:

but no one can find them except brekin, AD, Mr. Gill and the two gossips :P
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby brekin » Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:08 pm

justdrew wrote:

brekin I already pointed out that there just might be some parallels between Campbell and Evola, and that was completely ignored.
I haven't seen anything in this thread that sheds light on what those 'possible ramifications' ARE. Are you suggesting there's some secret mind-virus hidden in his work that turns people into crypto-antisemites?


Unfortunately, as I said earlier, I don't think we can even explore the possible philosophical links between Campbell's elevation of myth and those who have similarly done so for fascist agendas because of the tenor of the thread right now. Even if there are many examples some will just see it as trying to smear or find evidence of Campbell's overt antisemitism. I'm not sure right now, but I have a hunch, that not literally some "secret mind-virus hidden in his work that turns people into crypto-antisemites" but that his focus on the hero's journey can be a form of the "strong man" narrative of history and that mythic thinking chunks ambiguity and diversity into a merely hero/villain dynamic which can be exploited to (or even unintentionally lead to) persecution of innocent groups. Campbell may have been completely unaware that his work could tip in this direction or for all we know he could have been so smitten with Nazi Germany's strong national myth-making he was covertly attempting to do the same. I recall in his series though he was clear that "we don't get to choose what story will become myth", I'm not so sure about that though because I think dictators have been quite clear that someone can. Much of Campell's work, (and its rose-colored glasses appeal I think) is because it is very apolitical and individualistic while he was a very smart man and had to know that his work had political ramifications. Of course, his work can be perverted or misinterpreted to fit other agendas (a la Nietzsche) that he wouldn't have agreed with (or not, who knows) but I think an exploration would be beneficial. Unfortunately I think the more literal of us would simply she it as slandering Campbell and not exploring his ideas.

(More in a minute)..
If I knew all mysteries and all knowledge, and have not charity, I am nothing. St. Paul
I hang onto my prejudices, they are the testicles of my mind. Eric Hoffer
User avatar
brekin
 
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:09 pm

you are saying that all those people who I have sited page after page after here are so dumb and you are soooooooo smart....you and Mr. Gill and those two gossips..I'll take the views of all the people I have posted over yours and your 2 pals, the gossips. You are the all knowing one and they all have been duped ...What a bunch of crap you are trying to sell.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby justdrew » Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:37 pm

well the simpler way to approach that would be to ignore the claims of anti-antisemitism, because even if such claims were proven, in and of itself, it wouldn't be very relevant. Clearly he was not OBVIOUSLY anti-Semitic, and we will never know what private personal views he held. No incident of clear bigotry, prejudice or unfair treatment has been found.

the 'great men' theory of history isn't joined at the hip with people's views about "jews"

What I would look for is:

has the archetypal "hero's journey" story structure become OVERREPRESENTED in the global or western cannon of story since ~1950? How common was it for EARLIER stories, say 1800-1949, to adhere to this structure?

Since publication of The Hero with a Thousand Faces, Campbell's theory has been consciously applied by a wide variety of modern writers and artists. The best known is perhaps George Lucas, who has acknowledged a debt to Campbell regarding the stories of the Star Wars films.


consciously applied. Did earlier authors unconsciously apply the archetype? Is there any notable difference?
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: IS JOSEPH CAMPBELL AN ANTI-SEMITE?

Postby American Dream » Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:46 pm

Was Campbell a founding member of Mankind Quarterly?

If so, he lacked judgement and discrimination, if not worse...



Foundation for Fascism: the New Eugenics Movement in the United States

Patterns of Prejudice, vol. 23, no. 4. 1989 by BARRY MEHLER

The Mankind Quarterly

The Mankind Quarterly, dedicated to 'race-science' and 'racial history', was established in 1960 by Professor R. Gayre of Edinburgh who believed that 'racial fundamentals' were 'all important' in human affairs. He maintained that scientific evidence proved blacks 'prefer their leisure to the dynamism which the white and yellow races show'.(25) Gayre's work owed a heavy debt to that of Hans F. K. Günther, a major Nazi race theorist. Indeed, Gayre's first important work, Teutotn and Slav, argued for improving the 'racial homogeneity' and 'Nordic' purity of the German nation.(26) Among the founders, early editors, advisory board members and contributors to the /20/ Mankind Quarterly one finds people who have supported apartheid and neo-Nazism, such as Donald Swan, Robert Kuttner [link: http://www.ferris.edu/isar/bibliography/kuttner.htm] and the South African, J. Hofmeyer.

In the late 1970s, control of the Mankind Quarterly - was transferred to Roger Pearson [link :http://www.ferris.edu/isar/bios/pearbib.htm] in Washington D.C. who came to the United States from Britain in the mid-1960s to work with Willis Carto, America's leading publisher of antisemitic literature. He became editor of Western Destiny, a neo-Nazi magazine, whose staff included Arthur Ehrhardt, former Waffen-SS officer and founder of the post-war Nation Europa; A. K. Chesterton, pre-war editor of Blackshirt (published by the British Union of Fascists); Fabrice Laroche, the pseudonym for Alain de Benoist, editor of Nouvelle Ecole; and Henry Garrett, Chairman of the Department of Psychology at Columbia University and champion of racial segregation in US schools [link: http://www.ferris.edu/isar/bios/cattell/garrett.htm]. Pearson himself founded the Northern League in 1958 which brought together Nazi and neo-Nazi intellectuals from Europe to further the cause of post-war fascism. He has argued for a eugenic use of modern biological technology to produce 'a new super-generation'. The first nation to adopt this 'would eventually dominate the rest of the world'.(27)

Richard Lynn, [link: http://www.ferris.edu/isar/bios/cattell/lynn.htm] Professor of Psychology at the University of Ulster and the leading proponent of the oriental superiority theory, has been associate editor of Mankind Quarterly for over fifteen years.(28) In 1987, he invited Rushton to contribute an article which elaborated on the political and social consequences of his biological determinism.(29) In that article, Rushton found the causes of 'ethnic conflict and rivalry' to be rooted in the genetic differences between groups, and warned that the white majority in the United States and the Soviet Union was 'unlikely to maintain their position' as the dominant group' given the differential birth rate' between the white and non-white populations.(30)

This raised a problem which Rushton recognized as a paradox in his own theory. If we are all out to advance our own genes, why have whites adopted ideologies which 'discourage nationalist and religious beliefs' reflecting their interest in outbreeding blacks and Hispanics? 'Why are European populations throughout the world currently experiencing negative growth while allowing extensive immigration from genetically less similar gene pools? Clearly ideologies can arise which have the paradoxical effect of dramatically decreasing fitness.(31) Rushton speculated that this is the key to why civilizations decay. The ruling group, either a class or race, fails to reproduce itself, How to solve the 'fertility paradox' will 'herald a quantum jump in understanding the nature of gene-culture coevolution.'(32)

The implications of this new biological determinism (spelt out in detail by Raymond B. Cattell) [link: http://www.ferris.edu/isar/bios/cattell/] are that nations should recognize themselves as biological entities.(33) Immigration should be discouraged and the genetically superior stocks should be encouraged to have large families."(34) People are poor largely because they are unintelligent, according to Cattell, and progressive taxation is thus unethical because it is dysgenic - i.e. it helps the poor to reproduce. This apocalyptic vision demands that society recognize /21/ that extinction of the unfit is the only path to progress, since ignoring the laws of nature will destroy civilization.

The Pioneer Fund

Behind this resurgent fascism stands the Pioneer Fund. Established in 1937 by textile machinery millionaire, Wickcliffe Draper, the Pioneer Fund has a long connection with Nazi and neo-Nazi race theories, and for many years has been funding a small, tightly knit group of people who cite each other's work, review each other's books and acknowledge each other in their books. When scandal emerges, these people invariably deny knowing anything of the Pioneer fund's nefarious history, even though many scandals have broken into national prominence and articles about the fund have appeared for over three decades.

The Pioneer Fund was incorporated in 1937 by two American scientists: Harry Laughlin, who received an honorary doctorate from Heidelberg University in 1936 in honor of his contribution to Nazi eugenics, and Frederick Osborn, who wrote in 1937 that the Nazi sterilization law was 'the most exciting experiment that had ever been tried'.(35)

The fund had two purposes. The first, modeled on the Nazi breeding program, was aimed at encouraging the propagation of those 'descended predominantly from white persons who settled in the original thirteen states prior to the adoption of the Constitution of the United States and/or from related stocks, or to classes of children, the majority of whom are deemed to be so descended'. Its second purpose was to support academic research and the 'dissemination of information, into the 'problem of heredity and eugenics' and 'the problems of race betterment'.(36)

Among the first projects discussed for 1937 was the distribution of two Nazi eugenic propaganda films to 'high schools, colleges, clubs [and] churches'." (37)

In the 1950s and 1960s, the Pioneer Fund aligned itself with the American right fighting Brown v. Board of Education.(38) Draper [link http://www.ferris.edu/isar/Institut/pioneer/silent.htm] also worked with the House Un-American Activities Committee to prove "that the Negro race is genetically inferior and that American Negroes ought to be 'repatriated' to Africa", and was regarded by several academics as 'a racist of the usual type'.(39)

Ralph Scott [link: http://www.ferris.edu/isar/archives/mehler/scott.htm] (alias Edward P. Langerton), Professor of Educational Psychology at the University of Northern Iowa,"' received over $40,000 from the Pioneer Fund in the mid-1970s. This included a $6,000 grant to test 'Anglo-Saxon' schoolchildren in a study directed by Donald Swan, Assistant Professor of Anthropology at the University of Hattiesburg, Mississippi. When Swan was arrested in 1966 for mail fraud, authorities found Nazi paraphernalia, swastika flags, weapons, pictures of Swan with members of George Lincoln Rockwell's American Nazi Party and hundreds of anti-semitic, anti-black and anti-Catholic pamphlets in his home."

Although Scott is not a geneticist, he also used Pioneer funds to study /22/ 'forced busing and its relationship to genetic aspects of educability',(42) and to organize anti-busing conferences, out of which grew the National Association for Neighbourhood Schools.(43) Scott defended his acceptance of Pioneer funds, even when the organization was exposed as racist.(44)

Eugenicists have successfully legitimated and integrated themselves with the Reagan right. In 1985 Scott was chosen as the chair of the Iowa Advisory Commission on Civil Rights by Clarence Pendelton, Reagan administration appointee to the US Civil Rights Commission.(45) The Pioneer Fund also is currently closely associated with Jesse Heim's [link: http://www.ferris.edu/isar/Institut/pioneer/helms.htm] multi-million dollar high-tech political machine. The fund's president, Harry F. Weyher, is lead counsel for Fairness in Media (FIM), the group that attempted to take over the CBS television network. Thomas F. Ellis, Helm's political strategist and FIM founder, served as a director of the Pioneer Fund.(46) Despite Roger Pearson's connections through the World Anti-Communist League with people such as Earl Thomas, former American Nazi Party storm trooper, and Giorgio Almirante, former leader of the Italian MSI, who served in Mussolini's government, he has also developed successful relationships with the conservative mainstream. In 1982, he distributed a letter from President Reagan praising Pearson's substantial contribution to 'promoting and upholding' those 'ideals and principles that we value at home and abroad'. In 1984 the Wall Street Journal [link: http://www.ferris.edu/isar/bios/wall.htm] embarrassed the White House into asking Pearson to stop sending the letter out but it refused to repudiate the letter.(47)

The current focus for many scientists is the IQ question. A recent survey of 661 scholars working on this issue showed that the campaign to legitimate the work of the racist scholars connected to the Pioneer Fund is having a profound effect. The survey revealed that the single most compelling reason convincing scholars of the genetic component to IQ was the recent 'barrage of studies on identical twins reared apart'.(48)

The source of this 'barrage' is Thomas Bouchard's Minnesota Twins Study Project. Although only a few articles on personality and character traits have been published in refereed journals, the Minnesota group has announced 'conclusions' and generated massive publicity about the heritable nature of personality traits. In order for the scientific community to have an opportunity to evaluate the twin study a book-length monograph is needed. Such a monograph was promised by 1987. The twin project is now entering its second decade and a full-length study has still not appeared.(49)

It is possible that Bouchard's survey is methodologically rigorous, but few bodies save the Pioneer Fund would back a study which has not been published in a reputable academic journal. Until such time, 'a decade of media coverage will have made its impression',(50) and ideas generated by right wing eugenicists heralding all end to white civilization might have become acceptable and commonplace.


http://www.ferris.edu/ISAR/archives2/me ... dation.htm
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 179 guests