slimmouse » Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:23 pm wrote:Mason I Bilderberg » 02 Jul 2013 17:08 wrote:In the video, between the times 6:55 - 7:55, Icke tells a story about a CIA guy who has to wear a sachet filled with a golden liquid. His body had been manipulated to require this drug to survive. If the patch (sachet) and the liquid are not replaced every 72 hours, this CIA agent begins to die.
Do you believe this story?
MIB
I think the politest way to put it , is that I was never once quite as convinced of the story related by the source as David Icke was. But of course I wasnt there listening to it.
I would say that that was not only polite, but also gracious and even generous. Although I myself don't believe that story and have very serious concerns about what I see as the potential for abuse and exploitation that's attached to it.
Good for you, slim.
(COMPLETELY CONCEDING SLAD'S POINT, WHICH IS COMPLETELY SOUND IN PRINCIPLE:
That's: "I have very serious concerns about those things just as I do about all faith-based hierarchical systems that operate primarily on a just-trust-me-I'm-an-enlightened-leader basis," btw.
So as far as the question raised
here (about why some stuff (such as Catholicism) is not considered bizarre while other loosely equivalent stuff is) goes, the simple answer is:
It's culturally determined. And I don't think any sensible person disputes that.
There are more complex answers, too, but since real circumstances do count when it comes to evaluating such things, it's kind of a case-by-case thing.
_______________
ON EDIT: Breaking into two posts, for length and ease.