David Icke: Methods Of A Madman

[seemslikeadream]

posted 8 fuckin' times in this thread...this is getting really old...but hey we can get this thread up to a hundred if you keep trying

again let's all repost our posts over and over cause we're all so very stupid we did see it the first 7 times

[American Dream]

posted 8 fuckin' times in this thread...this is getting really old...but hey we can get this thread up to a hundred if you keep trying

What are you talking about?

I think you're wrong.

[seemslikeadream]

same rehash over and over and over

http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/search.php?keywords=Will+Offley&fid%5B0%5D=8

[American Dream]

posted 8 fuckin' times in this thread...this is getting really old...but hey we can get this thread up to a hundred if you keep trying

again let's all repost our posts over and over cause we're all so very stupid we did see it the first 7 times

same rehash over and over and over

http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/search.php?keywords=Will+Offley&fid%5B0%5D=8

Bullshit.

[seemslikeadream]

mixing up the words and spitting them out again...same ol same ol....but keep going you'll hit a hundred real soon with any luck and your thread will look so very important

[Canadian_watcher]

he sounds so reasonable, thoughtful and community minded here. Not calling for any sort of violence, and not even advertising his stuff.
I like the message.
I support all of what he says even if I might choose to say some things differently.

I like the guy. These are interesting and inspiring videos. And recent, too.
First hand. No reading in to the take of someone else - pure Icke.

decide for yourself.

[Canadian_watcher]

Here's some more straight up logic .. no woo woo whatsoever and once again, right from the horse's mouth.

[seemslikeadream]

I think I'll post this one of mine again....

[American Dream]

mixing up the words and spitting them out again...same ol same ol....but keep going you'll hit a hundred real soon with any luck and your thread will look so very important

Translation: "We should all just ignore the disturbing, creepy facts regarding Icke- I don't care and never will."

[compared2what?]

She seems to me like an ardent defender of Icke- I've never noticed her to disagree with him about anything at all. But what I hear her saying directly with her words is something quite different. So, rather than misinterpret what seem to be discrepancies, I'd much rather have her represent her own opinions- directly, in her own words.

She's been very clear in consistently saying that she's not interested in doing that and doesn't intend to, though.

And since her opinion of what Icke says and does doesn't actually change it or prevent anyone else from commenting on it, that's not an enormous impediment to the discussion of anything except SLAD's opinion, which is her business to share or not.

So it's all good.

[seemslikeadream]

I really liked this one also

[conniption]

brainpickings

How Inviting the Unknown Helps Us Know Life More Richly
By: Maria Popova
18 JUNE, 2013

“The unknown was my encyclopedia. The unnamed was my science and progress.”

“Have patience with everything unresolved in your heart and try to love the questions themselves,” Rilke famously urged. “It is possible to live and NOT know,” Richard Feynman dissented in his memorable meditation on the responsibility of scientists. John Keats called for “negative capability” — that peculiar art of remaining in doubt “without any irritable reaching after fact & reason.” Debbie Millman advised to look both ways when lingering at the intersection of the known and the unknown. And yet we continue to grasp for the security of our comfort zones, the affirmation of our areas of expertise, the assurance of our familiar patterns — however badly they may need rewiring.

continued

[seemslikeadream]

I've changed my mind actually I believe this was one of my best and should be repeated

so maybe hope for the reptiles?

A chimp-pig hybrid origin for humans?

Comparison of human and chimp chromosomes. Credit: science.kqed.org/quest/2008/05/12/chromosome-fusion-chance-or-design/
(Phys.org) —These days, getting a Ph.D. is probably the last thing you want to do if you are out to revolutionize the world. If, however, what you propose is an idea, rather than a technology, it can still be a valuable asset to have. Dr. Eugene McCarthy is a Ph.D. geneticist who has made a career out of studying hybridization in animals. He now curates a biological information website called Macroevolution.net where he has amassed an impressive body of evidence suggesting that human origins can be best explained by hybridization between pigs and chimpanzees. Extraordinary theories require extraordinary evidence and McCarthy does not disappoint. Rather than relying on genetic sequence comparisons, he instead offers extensive anatomical comparisons, each of which may be individually assailable, but startling when taken together. Why weren't these conclusions arrived at much sooner? McCarthy suggests it is because of an over-dependence on genetic data among biologists. He argues that humans are probably the result of multiple generations of backcrossing to chimpanzees, which in nucleotide sequence data comparisons would effectively mask any contribution from pig.

Generally speaking, interspecies hybrids—like mules, ligers (lion-tiger hybrids), or zedonks (zebra-donkey hybrids)—are less fertile than the parents that produced them. However, as McCarthy has documented in his years of research into hybrids, many crosses produce hybrids that can produce offspring themselves. The mule, he notes, is an exceptionally sterile hybrid and not representative of hybrids as a whole. When it comes time to play the old nuclear musical chairs and produce gametes, some types of hybrids do a much better job. Liger females, for example, can produce offspring in backcrosses with both lions and tigers. McCarthy also points out that fertility can be increased through successive backcrossing with one of the parents, a common technique used by breeders. In the case of chimp - pig hybridization, the "direction of the cross" would likely have been a male boar or pig (Sus scrofa) with a female chimp (Pan troglodytes), and the offspring would have been nurtured by a chimp mother among chimpanzees (shades of Tarzan!). The physical evidence for this is convincing, as you can discover for yourself with a trip over to macroevolution.net.

When I asked McCarthy if he could give a date estimate for the hybridization event, he said that there are a couple broad possibilities: (1) It might be that hybridization between pigs and apes produced the earliest hominids millions of years ago and that subsequent mating within this hybrid swarm eventually led to the various hominid types and to modern humans; (2) separate crosses between pigs and apes could have produced separate hominids (and there's even a creepy possibility that hybridization might even still be occurring in regions where Sus and Pan still seem to come into contact, like Southern Sudan).
This latter possibility may not sound so far-fetched after you read the riveting details suggesting that the origin of the gorilla may be best explained by hybridization with the equally massive forest hog. This hog is found within the same habitat as the gorilla, and shares many uncommon physical features and habits. Furthermore, well-known hybridization effects can explain many of the fertility issues and other peculiarities of gorilla physiology.

[American Dream]

She seems to me like an ardent defender of Icke- I've never noticed her to disagree with him about anything at all. But what I hear her saying directly with her words is something quite different. So, rather than misinterpret what seem to be discrepancies, I'd much rather have her represent her own opinions- directly, in her own words.

She's been very clear in consistently saying that she's not interested in doing that and doesn't intend to, though.

And since her opinion of what Icke says and does doesn't actually change it or prevent anyone else from commenting on it, that's not an enormous impediment to the discussion of anything except SLAD's opinion, which is her business to share or not.

So it's all good.

Strikes a chord for me- going into my control settings and putting a second person on "ignore".

It's for the best, I'm sure.

[Searcher08]

Here's some more straight up logic .. no woo woo whatsoever and once again, right from the horse's mouth.

And some kids are getting as mad as hell and NOT taking it any more