Trayvon Martin

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby American Dream » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:35 pm

Instead of saying “I am Trayvon Martin" it would do more good for white people [and non-Black people] in solidarity with the Trayvon Martin case to recognize all the ways they are Zimmerman.

As in, if you live in a “safe" suburban or gated community that is mostly white and that is considered a “good" neighborhood because it excludes people of colour [especially excluding Black people] then you benefit from the same conditions that created Zimmerman.

If you benefit from “police protection" to your property that depends on racial profiling of people of colour [especially Black people] and brutality towards them then you take part in the same systems that create Zimmerman.

If you have the racial privilege to work, move, live in mostly white spaces and have limited contact with… [Black people], particularly “low income" …[Black people], then you live with the same social and economic policies of casual segregation that create Zimmerman.

It’s good that people recognize the injustice of Trayvon Martin’s death, but if that recognition is not accompanied by the work to recognize and undo the systematic economic, social, educational and employment policies that create neighborhoods where Black people are seen as threatening trespassers - and how people benefit from this racial privilege - then no true anti-racist work can occur.

Nobody wants to say “I am Zimmerman" but until we recognize how Zimmerman reflects institutionalized racism there will continue to be more Trayvons.


— El Jones


http://sazkc.tumblr.com/post/5547305622 ... n-it-would
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby compared2what? » Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:16 pm

Searcher08 » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:42 am wrote:
I dont know sweet FA about the details of this case; from the saturated air-siren media coverage, this had psyop all over it.


What is being saturated in the MSM and why?


Are you saying that the whole thing was a psyop, shooting and all? Or just that saturation media coverage is psyop-y?
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby Searcher08 » Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:57 pm

compared2what? » Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:16 pm wrote:
Searcher08 » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:42 am wrote:
I dont know sweet FA about the details of this case; from the saturated air-siren media coverage, this had psyop all over it.


What is being saturated in the MSM and why?


Are you saying that the whole thing was a psyop, shooting and all? Or just that saturation media coverage is psyop-y?



ONLY the saturation media coverage and then more in terms of what seems like masses of multi-directional 'echo-chamber' messages. Comparing this with the Florida woman who was given 20 years for firing warning shots against an abusive husband - that story seemed to be extinguished like it was in an "anechoic-chamber".
My take away is that the degree of racism in the US needs a fucking dial that goes to 11 because 10 / 10 just isnt enough.
Behind the whole media circus, it seems to me there is a deeply cold hearted 'directed division' split races apart, put blacks and whites and hispanics against each other.
Yeck.
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby parel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:17 pm

Rolling Stone runs with it.

Singer won't play where 'Stand Your Ground' law is in effect

Image

By Erin Coulehan
July 16, 2013 8:25 AM ET
Following the acquittal last weekend of George Zimmerman in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, Stevie Wonder says he won't perform in Florida or anywhere else that recognizes the "Stand Your Ground" law, according to The Hollywood Reporter. The law permits the use of force for self-defense without an obligation to retreat first.

Photos: New Yorkers March for Trayvon Martin.

"I decided today that until the Stand Your Ground law is abolished in Florida, I will never perform there again," Wonder on Sunday during a concert in Quebec City. "As a matter of fact, wherever I find that law exists, I will not perform in that state or in that part of the world."

The singer has also asked that his fans participate in the boycott.

"The truth is that – for those of you who've lost in the battle for justice, wherever that fits in any part of the world – we can't bring them back," Wonder said. "What we can do is we can let our voices be heard. And we can vote in our various countries throughout the world for change and equality for everybody. That's what I know we can do."

Musicians including Nicki Minaj, Mandy Moore and Flo Ridawent online to express their disapproval of the verdict, while protests against the verdict have broken out in many U.S. cities.
By Erin Coulehan
July 16, 2013 8:25 AM ET
Following the acquittal last weekend of George Zimmerman in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, Stevie Wonder says he won't perform in Florida or anywhere else that recognizes the "Stand Your Ground" law, according to The Hollywood Reporter. The law permits the use of force for self-defense without an obligation to retreat first.

Photos: New Yorkers March for Trayvon Martin.

"I decided today that until the Stand Your Ground law is abolished in Florida, I will never perform there again," Wonder on Sunday during a concert in Quebec City. "As a matter of fact, wherever I find that law exists, I will not perform in that state or in that part of the world."

The singer has also asked that his fans participate in the boycott.

"The truth is that – for those of you who've lost in the battle for justice, wherever that fits in any part of the world – we can't bring them back," Wonder said. "What we can do is we can let our voices be heard. And we can vote in our various countries throughout the world for change and equality for everybody. That's what I know we can do."

Musicians including Nicki Minaj, Mandy Moore and Flo Ridawent online to express their disapproval of the verdict, while protests against the verdict have broken out in many U.S. cities.



Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... z2ZFyhzoJm




about the psyoppyness of the saturation coverage.

Why is There So Much Hype About Riots After this George Zimmerman Verdict?
by Davey D.

With respect to this threat of riots/civil unrest, let’s unpack that for a minute. My experience over the years of covering uprisings during the Oscar Grant Movement, the Occupy Movement, various the DNC and RNC Conventions from 2000 on up, to several G20 and G8 summits has led me to the conclusion that we should always be asking the following questions; 1-Who is pushing the assertions that riots are imminent and how are they pushing it? 2-Who stands to benefit the most from the threat of unrest? (key word ‘threat’) 3-What’s the political, economic and social agenda if any, attached these threats?

click
parel
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:22 pm
Location: New Zealand
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby 8bitagent » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:39 pm

If Al Sharpton and these other gatekeepers put all that energy into mobilizing black communities to have mass protests against black on black killings(ie: the majority of violent deaths in major cities)
as well as the root socio-economic causes and ways to stem the cyclical hopelessness THEN good would come. I've NO doubt it is in the powers that be's top interest to keep young black men feeling hopeless,
incarcerated, killing eachother, etc. I mean they introduced crack into inner cities, which was akin to AIDS in the gay community as far as lingering devestation.

People need to see this documentary, the Interrupters:
Last edited by 8bitagent on Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby 8bitagent » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:41 pm

American Dream » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:35 pm wrote:
Instead of saying “I am Trayvon Martin" it would do more good for white people [and non-Black people] in solidarity with the Trayvon Martin case to recognize all the ways they are Zimmerman.

As in, if you live in a “safe" suburban or gated community that is mostly white and that is considered a “good" neighborhood because it excludes people of colour [especially excluding Black people] then you benefit from the same conditions that created Zimmerman.

If you benefit from “police protection" to your property that depends on racial profiling of people of colour [especially Black people] and brutality towards them then you take part in the same systems that create Zimmerman.

If you have the racial privilege to work, move, live in mostly white spaces and have limited contact with… [Black people], particularly “low income" …[Black people], then you live with the same social and economic policies of casual segregation that create Zimmerman.

It’s good that people recognize the injustice of Trayvon Martin’s death, but if that recognition is not accompanied by the work to recognize and undo the systematic economic, social, educational and employment policies that create neighborhoods where Black people are seen as threatening trespassers - and how people benefit from this racial privilege - then no true anti-racist work can occur.

Nobody wants to say “I am Zimmerman" but until we recognize how Zimmerman reflects institutionalized racism there will continue to be more Trayvons.


— El Jones


http://sazkc.tumblr.com/post/5547305622 ... n-it-would



I would say it's also a class issue. I'm fortunate enough to live in a crime free posh area that's also extremely diverse. Heck all around in my condos I see so many Hispanic, Arab, Indian, Russian, Black, Asian, etc families. And everyone gets along. But it has to do with the perception of class more than race, in this case.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby American Dream » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:12 pm

There Is No Justice For Trayvon Martin Under This System

Image

George Zimmerman, the stalker with a loaded gun, killed Trayvon Martin, a 17 year old African-American youth who was unarmed and minding his own business. Trayvon Martin is in his grave; Zimmerman is on trial for the murder. There will be no justice for Trayvon Martin.

The capitalist media and the attorneys seem to be saying that the only issue at trial is who was screaming for help and if George Zimmerman felt he was facing bodily harm. The media and the attorneys say that if Zimmerman was crying for help and if Trayvon Martin was hitting him, if Trayvon was on top, then Zimmerman had the right to kill Trayvon Martin because it was self-defense or because Zimmerman was “standing his ground.” This is total bullshit.

Zimmerman was the stalker, the bully, the attacker, the racial profiler. Zimmerman in his SUV with his loaded gun and his delusions of being cop in training saw a young African-American man wearing a hoodie and walking through the neighborhood. Zimmerman in his SUV followed Trayvon Martin and called the police on Trayvon Martin. The police told Zimmerman to stop following the young man. Zimmerman ignored this, got out of his SUV with his loaded gun and went after Trayvon Martin, shot him and killed him. Trayvon Martin had been to the corner store and was walking back to the house where he and his father were staying – the home of his father’s fiancé. He was doing nothing wrong and like any of us, had every right to walk through the neighborhood.

Zimmerman stalked, harassed and came after Trayvon Martin for one reason: because Trayvon Martin was a young African-American man. Zimmerman had no right to self-defense or to “stand his ground” because Zimmerman was the stalker coming after Trayvon Martin. Trayvon Martin was the only person who had the right to self-defense or to “stand his ground".

If you are sitting in your house watching TV and you see a stranger sizing up your house and then coming into your house, then you have every right to defend yourself against the intruder. If you hit the intruder in the nose when he’s coming through your door or already in your house, then you have every right. And, after you pop the intruder in the nose, if the intruder gets up, pulls a gun and shoots and kills you, then it’s murder. The intruder has no right to self-defense, no right to “stand his ground.” It’s ridiculous to even consider that the intruder could claim self-defense and get away with murder.

But that’s what happened to Trayvon Martin who was minding his business while walking through the neighborhood. Zimmerman was the intruder, the stalker, the attacker.

Trayvon Martin called his friend to say some strange white guy was following him, stalking him in his SUV. It was Zimmerman who escalated. He got out of his van with his loaded gun and went after Trayvon Martin. If Trayvon Martin defended himself against this attacker, then Trayvon Martin had every right to defend himself. Trayvon Martin was doing nothing wrong. When Zimmerman, the stalker and attacker, pulled his loaded gun and shot and killed Trayvon Martin it was murder, clear and simple.

But the media and the attorneys and the courts want you to think this is some difficult problem; they attempt to sow confusion. They claim that if Trayvon Martin hit Zimmerman, then Zimmerman had every right to shoot and kill Trayvon Martin in self-defense. Or Trayvon Martin was on top so Zimmerman had every right to pull out his gun and kill him. Don’t believe a word of it. Trayvon Martin had every right to defend himself against the attacker, George Zimmerman. Zimmerman was a bully who stalked and killed Trayvon Martin. Watch how this all gets turned around so that Zimmerman is the victim and Trayvon Martin the attacker. A total lie, but “justice” under this system is a total lie. Trayvon Martin is dead; he did nothing wrong; and he will not receive justice. Justice under this system is reserved for the stalkers and the racial profilers. It is not for African-American youth who are the victims of stalking and racial profiling.

Now the defense attorneys and the media, again, are trying to focus on whether Trayvon Martin might have smoked weed. This is has nothing to do with the case. Whether or not it happened, so what? It had nothing to do with Zimmerman’s decision to stalk, attack and murder Trayvon Martin. Make no mistake, even if the jury finds Zimmerman guilty of something, he will go to jail for a while and Trayvon Martin will still be gone. The racists and the profilers will continue to argue that Zimmerman was right and Trayvon Martin caused his own death. Trayvon Martin will still be dead.

There is only one way to achieve any justice for Trayvon Martin and the thousands of other young, African-American men and women who have been profiled, attacked or killed because they were walking or driving while Black, and that is to resist, to rise up, and to rebel.

If we want justice for Trayvon Martin and if we want to confront racism, racial profiling and the wholesale attacks on young African-Americans and people of color, then we must bring it. There is no justice for Trayvon Martin under this system. Be prepared. What we have to say, all of us is: Justice is coming and we are all bringing it.

That’s the only way there will be any justice for Trayvon Martin and for our brothers and sisters, friends, children and neighbors! We must organize and enforce it. We must bring the justice ourselves, in the streets and across this country.

http://m1aa.org/?p=696
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:16 pm

Juror B37 - Travyon 'played a huge role' in own death

Juror B37 - "George got in a little too deep, but Trayvon got mad and attacked him."


Image
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/1 ... r=Religion




Trayvon Protesters Flood Florida Capitol For #TakeoverTuesday


Justice For Trayvon Protestor Compares America To Occupied Palastine

Dream Defenders Spokeswoman Denies Crump Connection, Says She Works For ACLU

Justice 4 Trayvon Protestor Sit In Preparation For Sit-In

Kevin Smith Part 4: The Dark Side Of The Internet

Dream Defenders Sit-In At Florida Capitol : We Are Not Leaving

The Dream Defenders have flooded Florida’s capitol, “occupying” the building in a protest of the Trayvon Martin case’s outcome, and the acquittal of George Zimmerman.

The event, hashtagged #TakeoverTuesday, involves the student group known as Dream Defenders, and they have released a statement calling on Florida Gov. Rick Scott to review Stand Your Ground laws in response to Zimmerman’s controversial acquittal.


The statement begins:

We are here to honor the memory of Trayvon Martin and pay respects to his family. This tragedy serves as a vivid reminder of the pain felt by our communities, in which we are profiled, criminalized and targeted. Unless we take action nothing will change. Saturday’s verdict showed the world that Florida has no value for the life of it’s children. This is an opportunity for Governor Rick Scott and the Florida legislature to prove their commitment to the next generation of Floridians.

The #TakeoverTuesday statement continues:

“Dream Defenders demand that Governor Rick Scott call a special session of the Florida legislature to address the issues at the center of the Trayvon Martin tragedy: stand your ground vigilantism, racial profiling and a war on youth that paints us as criminals and funnels us out of schools and into jails.”

The group adds:

We are here because Trayvon can’t be… We are here because our lives and our dreams remain at risk every day that the Governor and Legislature refuse to act… We are proof of an organized youth resistance, in solidarity with youth movements across this country… We will stay here as long as WE see fit, in defense of our rights as citizens, voters, and human beings.

It concludes, requesting legislation named for Trayvon Martin in the wake of the verdict:

“We demand the Governor call a special session of the legislature to create a New Trayvon Martin Civil Rights Act for our state… We will remain here, standing OUR ground, for Trayvon, for justice, until our demands are met.”

On Twitter, the group is using #TakeoverTuesday and #JusticeForTrayvon as organizing hashtags for the Trayvon protest.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:31 pm

Image
ImageImage

Image

THE DREAM DEFENDERS HAVE CONVERGED ON THE CAPITOL OF FLORIDA TO DEMAND #JUSTICEFORTRAYVON.

We have released the following statement:

We are here to honor the memory of Trayvon Martin and pay respects to his family. This tragedy serves as a vivid reminder of the pain felt by our communities, in which we are profiled, criminalized and targeted. Unless we take action nothing will change. Saturday’s verdict showed the world that Florida has no value for the life of it’s children. This is an opportunity for Governor Rick Scott and the Florida legislature to prove their commitment to the next generation of Floridians.



Dream Defenders demand that Governor Rick Scott call a special session of the Florida legislature to address the issues at the center of the Trayvon Martin tragedy: stand your ground vigilantism, racial profiling and a war on youth that paints us as criminals and funnels us out of schools and into jails.



Together we are united in ensuring Trayvon’s unjust death was not for nothing. Our anger in the face of gross injustice has led us to take action but it is the love of our people and our community that pushes us forward.



We are here because Trayvon can’t be.

We are here because our lives and our dreams remain at risk every day that the Governor and Legislature refuse to act.

We are proof of an organized youth resistance, in solidarity with youth movements across this country.

We will stay here as long as WE see fit, in defense of our rights as citizens, voters, and human beings.



We demand the Governor call a special session of the legislature to create a New Trayvon Martin Civil Rights Act for our state.



We will remain here, standing OUR ground, for Trayvon, for justice, until our demands are met
.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby 8bitagent » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:42 pm

Proof America is ass backwards in a lot of ways:

This silly fun commercial featuring a mixed raced family has generated an insane amount of racist hate, mostly from whites but also some blacks.



To this damn day you're not really allowed to show a black man and white woman being lovey dovey, kissy kissy or sexual on tv or in the movies. In some ways it seems like gay rights has propelled a little further recently(thankfully) than this mentality. Wasnt Desi kissing Lucile Ball 60 damn years ago on tv? These idiots always talk about "the nuclear family! the nuclear family!" and here is a loving traditional family shown on a commercial and all these chuckleheads have nothing but hate. All those people should just off themselves now.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby Nordic » Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:17 am




I fucking love this. It says it all.

If this were the case, Zimmerman would be on death row, no other option.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby justdrew » Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:17 am

This puts things into crystal clear view...

There Needs To Be A Third Choice Besides Death Or Arbitrary Restraint By A Madman
By Amanda Marcotte | Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:37 EDT

This Tumblr that went up recently called We Are Not Trayvon Martin is an interesting experiment, a way to talk about the role of race and privilege in this case, and how some of us have the privilege—which should be a right!—of being at least safe from would-be vigilantes deciding to murder us for crimes we’re committing only in their heads. A lot of us out here are angry and upset about George Zimmerman being able to chase down and murder an unarmed young man, and get away with it because he was able to convince a jury that the young man—gasp!—had the temerity to fight back. Anti-racists, I think, have long understood that the cops are a real threat to young black men who can be randomly treated like criminals on the thinnest of excuses, but the possibility that any random white (or white-appearing, anyway) person can, if you’re black, just chase you down and detain you arbitrarily or they now have the legal right to take your life? That’s a cold bath of WTF. This tweet captures exactly what is bothering me so much:

Image

I’ve been thinking about it a lot, because as a woman, being followed by creepy dudes who clearly have bad intentions in their cars while I’m out walking and minding my own business is something I’ve experienced probably a dozen times in my life. Unsurprisingly, Rachel Jeantel—who was on the phone with Martin when Zimmerman began to follow him—had the threat of rape pop into her head and made a crack about it to Martin before telling him to run. A lot of scary things go through your head when this happens to you: You worry that if he catches up to you, he’ll overpower you. You worry that you won’t be able to fight him off. You worry about how violent he intends to get with you.

But you know what I never worried about? That if I defended myself, he would have an excuse to shoot me dead and that cops would shrug it off and not bother to contact my family.

I never worried that if he caught up with me, any hitting or kicking to get away would be used as evidence that he was in his rights to murder me.

That’s because I’m a white woman, and if a man chased me down and shot me dead, a few scratches on his face would probably be seen as evidence that he was really determined to hurt or kill me, not that he was acting in “self-defense”. I have the privilege of people using their basic common sense when it comes to what’s going on when creepy guys start following me. Even sexists have to admit that creepy guys stalking women are up to no good. With that in mind, if anyone ever started to chase me with the intention to restrain me against my will (which is, uh, kidnapping) or do bodily harm to me, I can give into the instinct to protect myself by fighting back without worrying that he now has the “right” to kill me.

I’ve seen a lot of conservatives arguing that Martin should have just surrendered if he didn’t want to die. Surrendered, i.e. allowed someone to arbitrarily just hold him there under threat of violence if he tries to leave (which, again, is kidnapping) because, well, he wanted to. That any random white or white-appearing dude has the apparent right to just randomly tell a young black man that he is no longer allowed to move freely, on pain of death. This is bananas. They wouldn’t say that for a white woman, and they sure as hell wouldn’t say that for a white guy.

I don’t know what else to say about this. I just wish that more people could perform the basic act of putting themselves in Trayvon’s shoes and realizing that Zimmerman just got away with, functionally, offering him the choice between surrender to a crazy man with unclear but definitely dark intentions or death. In the year 2013, in America. And somehow we’ve decided that’s legal.


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/07/15/another-trial-involving-a-florida-man-who-fatally-shot-an-unarmed-black-teen/
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby Searcher08 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:05 am

Seconded.

Wannabee 'pre-crime' civilian cops in the era of cop and mercenary militarisation and cradle to prison economic models... sounds perfectly sensible

justdrew » Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:17 am wrote:This puts things into crystal clear view...

There Needs To Be A Third Choice Besides Death Or Arbitrary Restraint By A Madman
By Amanda Marcotte | Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:37 EDT

This Tumblr that went up recently called We Are Not Trayvon Martin is an interesting experiment, a way to talk about the role of race and privilege in this case, and how some of us have the privilege—which should be a right!—of being at least safe from would-be vigilantes deciding to murder us for crimes we’re committing only in their heads. A lot of us out here are angry and upset about George Zimmerman being able to chase down and murder an unarmed young man, and get away with it because he was able to convince a jury that the young man—gasp!—had the temerity to fight back. Anti-racists, I think, have long understood that the cops are a real threat to young black men who can be randomly treated like criminals on the thinnest of excuses, but the possibility that any random white (or white-appearing, anyway) person can, if you’re black, just chase you down and detain you arbitrarily or they now have the legal right to take your life? That’s a cold bath of WTF. This tweet captures exactly what is bothering me so much:

Image

I’ve been thinking about it a lot, because as a woman, being followed by creepy dudes who clearly have bad intentions in their cars while I’m out walking and minding my own business is something I’ve experienced probably a dozen times in my life. Unsurprisingly, Rachel Jeantel—who was on the phone with Martin when Zimmerman began to follow him—had the threat of rape pop into her head and made a crack about it to Martin before telling him to run. A lot of scary things go through your head when this happens to you: You worry that if he catches up to you, he’ll overpower you. You worry that you won’t be able to fight him off. You worry about how violent he intends to get with you.

But you know what I never worried about? That if I defended myself, he would have an excuse to shoot me dead and that cops would shrug it off and not bother to contact my family.

I never worried that if he caught up with me, any hitting or kicking to get away would be used as evidence that he was in his rights to murder me.

That’s because I’m a white woman, and if a man chased me down and shot me dead, a few scratches on his face would probably be seen as evidence that he was really determined to hurt or kill me, not that he was acting in “self-defense”. I have the privilege of people using their basic common sense when it comes to what’s going on when creepy guys start following me. Even sexists have to admit that creepy guys stalking women are up to no good. With that in mind, if anyone ever started to chase me with the intention to restrain me against my will (which is, uh, kidnapping) or do bodily harm to me, I can give into the instinct to protect myself by fighting back without worrying that he now has the “right” to kill me.

I’ve seen a lot of conservatives arguing that Martin should have just surrendered if he didn’t want to die. Surrendered, i.e. allowed someone to arbitrarily just hold him there under threat of violence if he tries to leave (which, again, is kidnapping) because, well, he wanted to. That any random white or white-appearing dude has the apparent right to just randomly tell a young black man that he is no longer allowed to move freely, on pain of death. This is bananas. They wouldn’t say that for a white woman, and they sure as hell wouldn’t say that for a white guy.

I don’t know what else to say about this. I just wish that more people could perform the basic act of putting themselves in Trayvon’s shoes and realizing that Zimmerman just got away with, functionally, offering him the choice between surrender to a crazy man with unclear but definitely dark intentions or death. In the year 2013, in America. And somehow we’ve decided that’s legal.


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/07/15/another-trial-involving-a-florida-man-who-fatally-shot-an-unarmed-black-teen/
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:00 am

A Rough Guide to Life in the United States of Zimmermanm, the US of Z
In the US of Z the law allows people to hunt each other, and feel no remorse for killing someone.
July 16, 2013 |

The most important thing about the Zimmerman verdict is that it's a clear demonstration of how the American legal system is only about law. It is not about justice. It is not even about the consequences of killing another person.

The verdict demonstrates that, despite the protestations of the law that it is about justice, that's only a pretense to cover the reality: that when the law produces justice, it's a fluke, an accident, a surprise. The law is only about the law.

And it's no wonder, when you stop to think about who makes laws and why. Justice is one of the last things on the legislative mind, if it ever gets there at all.

And so the Zimmerman verdict can be seen as a metaphor for the American way of life and death these days, a psychic rorschach blot of our culture, a measure of the zeitgeist in the United States of Zimmerman, the US of Z.

In the distorting mirror of the Zimmerman verdict we glimpse all too much of who we are today as a nation - not what each of us is, nor what all of us are, but an inescapable collage of how exceptional we are in so many ways of which we should be ashamed. Here's a sampling of those reflections.

A Rough Guide to Life in the United States of Zimmerman, the US of Z

In the US of Z the law allows people to hunt each other.

In the US of Z you can be a self-appointed volunteer vigilante, and you have permission to decide a person is up to no good based solely on the color of his skin, and maybe the time of day and your own bigotry.

In the US of Z you may racial profile to your heart's content and the judge won't let it be used against you in court.

In the US of Z, you don't have to feel remorse if you kill someone, even if that person did nothing wrong, even if you went out of your way to get to kill him. You can just believe it was God's plan.

In the US of Z, there is confusion about whether Trayvon Martin is another Medgar Evers or Emmett Till. He might have grown up to be a Medgar Evers. He died an Emmett Till.

In the US of Z, the acquittal of someone who stalked and killed a young black man comes as no surprise. But it's still surprising that Zimmerman's defense attorney asserted, in all apparent seriousness, that in the same circumstances, Zimmerman would not even have been charged if he was black.

In the US of Z, it is no surprise for a black man to go uncharged when he does not survive his arrest. That's not what the defense attorney meant, because in the US of Z, it's the killer Zimmerman who is somehow the victim.

In this US of Z, there are white people who believe that black people don't care about dead black boys except when whites kill them.

Is It Ever Fair to Arrest a Judge's Son?

In this US of Z, people still think it's unfair that Zimmerman was even arrested 44 days after the killing. They don't believe that George Zimmerman's father, Robert Zimmerman, a retired Virginia Supreme Court magistrate, reportedly talked the police out of arresting George the night he killed Trayvon.

In the US of Z, the Zimmerman verdict no doubt gives some hope to Michael David Dunn, 45, a Florida white man who killed an unarmed black teenager in the back seat of a car for having the music too loud, shooting him at least eight times. Dunn has pleaded not guilty, saying he felt threatened and acted in self defense, and besides the law gives him the right to stand his ground.

In the US of Z, having rap music too loud for the guy who drives up beside you in the parking lot is an even worse offense than walking home in the rain with Skittles and iced tea while black.

In the US of Z, WWB - Walking While Black - is risky behavior that sensible people avoid. So is SITBSWB - Sitting in the Back Seat While Black.

"Healing Dialogue" for the Zimmermans Starts with "Blacks Are Bad"

In the US of Z, your older brother can go on TV (CNN) and trash talk your victim and pretend he's starting a healing dialogue and the news people will just nod.

In the US of Z your brother's behavior doesn't seem so odd because your father, the retired Virginia magistrate decided to publish an e-book right before your trial started, with the title: "Florida v. Zimmerman - Uncovering the Malicious Prosecution of My Son George."

In the US of Z, Judge Zimmerman makes clear, among other things, that in his view the "True Racists" in the US of Z are all African-American. And the judge names names, including: the Congressional Black Caucus, the NAACP, the Black Chamber of Commerce, the United Negro College Fund, and Trayvon Martin's undertaker.

In the US of Z, someone puts up a "Kill Zimmerman" page on Facebook that gets more than 7,000 "likes" in just a few hours, gets reported by an unknown number of people, and doesn't get taken down right away.

In the US of Z, perhaps counterintuitively till you think about it, the Zimmerman verdict, like the O.J. verdict, went to the money side.

In the US of Z there is little appreciation of the dark irony that the Zimmerman verdict was delivered in Seminole County.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trayvon Martin

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:50 am

JULY 17, 2013

"No Rights That Any White Man is Bound to Respect”
What It Feels Like to be Black in America
by KEVIN ALEXANDER GRAY
Seminole County, Florida ~ named for the Seminole people who once lived throughout the area. The term Seminole comes from the Creek word ‘semino le’, which means ‘runaway’ and the Spanish word cimarrón which means “runaway slave.” While the logo of the Florida State University Seminoles is that of a white man, Thomas Wright a longtime music professor at the school with a free lifetime pass to all athletic events, Seminole is the collective name given to the amalgamation/intermixing of various groups of native Americans and runaway- ex-enslaved Africans who settled in Florida in the early 18th century and fought three wars against the United States. The 1st Seminole War was from 1814 to 1819, the 2nd from 1835 to 1842, and the 3rd from 1855 to 1858. In 1817, future U.S. President Andrew Jackson, called the “Extermination President” for his savagery in profiling and annihilating the Native population, invaded then-Spanish Florida and defeated the Seminoles in the 1st war. And after defeating U.S. forces in early battles of the 2nd War, Seminole leader Chief Osceola was tricked, then captured on Oct. 20, 1837, when U.S. troops said they wanted a truce to talk peace. In 1946, Jackie Robinson, in Sanford at a Brooklyn Dodgers’ baseball training camp, couldn’t stay in a white-owned hotel with teammates and was forced to flee the town in the middle of the night to avoid being lynched by local whites opposed to desegregation of the team. Fast forward to Christmas 1952, in an atmosphere of race terror and state indifference, NAACP leader Harry T. Moore and his wife Harriette were killed when the Ku Klux Klan blew up their’ home on Christmas night. The closest hospital was 35 miles away in Sanford. There was a delay in getting the couple to the hospital and getting a black doctor to attend to them. They both died in Sanford. No one spent a day in jail for his or her murders. Today the racial makeup of the county is 82.41% White, 9.52% Black, 11.15% Hispanic, or Latino, 0.30% Native American 2.50% Asian, 0.04% Pacific Islander, 3.06% from other races, and 2.18% from two or more races. Out of a population of 54,000, about 57 percent of Sanford City residents are white and 31 percent are black.

A friend asked me if I’d been keeping up with the George Zimmerman trial. My immediate answer was, “Not really. Watching it was really angering me.” But then I admitted I was lying. I had hedged to temper my anger. I also didn’t want to try to explain to the white person on the other end of the phone how it feels being black in the USA these days.

Like many others, I believe that Zimmerman is a liar, a racist and a murderer (with the understanding that ‘murder’ is a legal term).

I believe that Zimmerman profiled Martin.

And I believe that Martin had every right, even a greater right, to fight for his life with all the strength he could muster. He lost the fight for his life because his killer had a gun, and Martin had only a can of Arizona iced tea and a bag of Skittles.

Yet if you didn’t know any better you’d think Trayvon Benjamin Martin was on trial, and George Zimmerman the victim.

After the five white, one Latina all female jury found Zimmerman not guilty it occurred to me that Martin has been subjected to worse treatment over the airwaves than Adam Lanza, the perpetrator of the Newtown killings.

I was disappointed with the verdict. I think my disappointment is related to the reason why blacks are so overwhelmingly in support of Barack Obama. Because, with all the unfairness that comes with living in an environment with pervasive racism and white skin entitlement, blacks still consciously and subconsciously desire white acceptance. To many blacks Obama represents that acceptance. So, though my experience told me it was a done deal from the very start of the trial, I had hoped that a white judge, white prosecutors and for the most, a white jury would be just.

I make no apology for my bias against racist and racism. Oftentimes when I’m speaking to a crowd I’ll introduce myself as a father and a grandfather followed by “they can take your car, house, job, a spouse can kick you to the curb, but being a parent and grandparent is something they can’t take from you.” I was a young black boy at one time and I’ve raised black boys. I know what they face. I know that white supremacy does take us out at will.

When I was coming up, I would hear a young white man proclaim that “he’s free, white and 21,” and that meant the world was his. For black males the benchmark age is “35 and still alive.”

So in all honesty, I despise Zimmerman and every racist thing he and his supporters stand for. That’s the feeling I get by just seeing his image online or in the courtroom or even hearing his voice. I’ve seen too many victims of raw, racist power wielded by fools. No court proceeding or verdict is going to change that feeling in me or that reality for black males.

My friend, knowing me as well as she does, never took my “not really” seriously and pressed on until I told her that I had watched most of prosecution’s case, including Don West and Mark O’Mara’s cross-examination of prosecution witnesses. I watched most if not all of Martin’s mother and father, Sabrina Fulton and Tracy Martin, and his brother Jahvaris Fulton’s testimonies. I saw a good deal of the medical examiner, Dr. Shiping Bao, who conducted Martin’s autopsy. I watched Alexis Carter, the instructor who taught Zimmerman’s criminal litigation class and instructed him on Florida’s self-defense laws. And I watched prosecutors Richard Mantei, Bernie de la Rionda and John Guy. I saw very little of the defense’s case other than a couple of minutes of Zimmerman’s mother Gladys’s testimony and O’Mara’s closing. I didn’t waste time or emotional capital watching much of the defense. I saw some. But basically, I saw what I expected to see in their cross-examinations. To me, any witness they put up only served to bolster Zimmerman’s lies.

Even so, I went on to tell my friend how excruciating it was to hear the defense argue that Zimmerman, against the instructions of the police, initiated a pursuit of a stranger who was not committing a crime, and that Zimmerman had a greater right of self-defense than his victim.

That Martin’s fists and the concrete sidewalk were his “deadly weapons.”

That Martin was basically a “homicidal maniac.”

But for all Trayvon Martin knew Zimmerman could have been a Jeffrey Dahmer-type.

Yet many Zimmerman supporters will only ever see black boys and men as “dope smoking,” “gang-banging” “thugs” and “low-lifes” with no right to exist.

That’s what Zimmerman’s father, brother and backers were saying before the start of the trial. They hired attorneys to advance their racism and assert their demand for white privilege. They even found Chana Lloyd, a young, black, attractive female third-year law student to sit behind them in court. Lloyd claimed in an interview that she asked O’Mara, “Is George a racist?” to which he responded, “I wouldn’t work for him if he was.” I won’t be surprised to see Lloyd land a spot on Fox News, where Zimmerman has said he also hopes to be.

Obviously, knowing history is not a requirement for a law degree. If it were Lloyd would have had to recognize O’Mara’s Klan defense strategy. That Zimmerman was protecting white womanhood. That’s why in his closing argument he showed the jury of six women, five of whom were white, a picture of Zimmerman’s white woman neighbor, defense witness Olivia Bertalan. The defense invoked the same justification for the killing of Martin that the Ku Klux Klan used to lynch black men in the past.

O’Mara held up a picture of a “thugged-out version” of Martin, shirtless and wearing his gold “gangsta grill” in his teeth. The implicit message: “George Zimmerman was protecting, not just himself, but white womanhood from this vicious, black thug.” When he held up a big chunk of concrete all I could think about was the old racist joke where the white sheriff and his deputies pull the body of a black man killed by the Klan out of the lake wrapped in chains and his response is: “See boys! Just like a nigger. Stole more chains than he could carry.”

In the months leading up to the trial, Robert Zimmerman Sr., the father of the accused, said, “Racism is flourishing at the insistence of some in the African-American community.” He called the Congressional Black Caucus “a pathetic, self-serving group of racists… advancing their purely racist agenda.” And that “all members of Congress should be ashamed of the Congressional Black Caucus, as should be their constituents,” adding, “They are truly a disgrace to all Americans.” He called NAACP President Benjamin Jealous “a racist” and said his organization “simply promotes racism and hatred for their own, primarily financial, interests” and “without prejudice and racial divide, the NAACP would simply cease to exist.”

Like father, like son, Robert Zimmerman Jr., the defendant’s brother, sent out a series of racist Tweets and photos before the trial. He compared Trayvon Martin with De’Marquise Elkins, a 17-year-old detained in the murder of a Georgia infant. Both pictures feature the young men “flipping the bird” at the camera, with the caption: “A picture speaks a thousand words…Any questions?” He also posted several Tweets saying that “blacks” are worthy of others’ fear, including: “Lib media shld ask if what these2 black teens did 2 a woman&baby is the reason ppl think blacks mightB risky.”

Frank Taaffe, outspoken defender of Zimmerman, has been all over the media spewing just about any racist thing he wants to spew. Such as: “The stage was already set. It was a perfect storm.” In one CNN interview he let loose, “Neighbor-hood (emphasizing ‘hood’), that’s a great word. “We had eight burglaries in our neighborhood, all perpetrated by young black males in the 15 months prior to Trayvon being shot…You know, there’s an old saying that if you plant corn, you get corn.” So in Taaffe’s white supremacist world black people should expect to take a bullet for another black person’s actions even if there’s no connection between them.

Then there’s Fox News where it seems that the only thing blacks can do to make them happy (unless you’re against Obama, a hawk, fundamentalist Christian xenophobe, Republican, quasi-libertarian or into self-hate for the money) is to somehow move to another planet or solar system. One of their news hosts, Gregg Jarrett, suggested on air that Zimmerman might have been justified in killing Martin because the teen “may have been violent” from smoking marijuana. I thought, the 18 states and the District of Columbia where medical marijuana is legal must not have gotten the memo. Ironically, for the most, it’s whites leading marijuana legalization efforts and smoking more pot than blacks. Yet whites, and white youth in particular, are not criminalized like blacks kids in the ongoing war on drugs.

When Judge Debra Nelson allowed Martin’s drug test in was a “tell” on the way the trial was going to unfold. How could the prosecutors wholeheartedly argue against the ridiculous claim that pot makes a person violent when the majority of the people that they prosecute and imprison are for marijuana possession charges? Pot arrests and adjudications are the feeding trough of the criminal justice system. It’s the essence of what Michelle Alexander and others call “the new Jim Crow.”

The police, prosecutors, judges and defense lawyers are all complicit in a system that regularly jails young black drug offenders, the majority of which are non-violent offenses. They are not going to contradict one another.

Early on in the trial, before Nelson allowed Martin’s drug test results into evidence, my wife, who works at one of the big department stores, was in the break room on her job. The news played in the background on the television set as she chitchatted with about 5 co-workers, all black of various ages,
most either mothers or grandmothers. Into the room comes a middle-aged, 50-ish white female employee who just starts up talking about the trial. There was no invitation for her to strike up a conversation, nor care or awareness as to whom she was talking to. Just her arrogant, know-it-all, intrusive whiteness sucking the air out the room. Or as my wife put it, “She was talkin’ at us.”

From the beginning, the white woman goes in on Martin saying, “Well you know he smoked that marijuana!” At that point, so I’m told, nobody responded to her. The black women all got up and left the room. And as they got out of the cussing-the-woman-out range, the conversation went:

“White people think they can say and do anything.”

“He (Zimmerman) had no business following that boy.”

“What’s smoking pot got to do with anything?”

“He had no right to shoot that boy.”

“I was about to lose my job.”

“Me too!”

“Me too!”

“Me too!”

As I told that story to my friend she became quiet. I joked; didn’t that white woman know she was talking to a group of black mothers? Then I mentioned Trayvon’s mother, Sabrina. I went on to say how many blacks are extremely proud of the way she and her ex-husband, Tracy Martin, have taken the high road throughout this ordeal. “Dignified” is the word most often used, although I see it as one of those words that mean they didn’t cuss white folks out. For the most, the parents have let attorney Crump do the attacking. Crump has repeatedly expressed what most blacks feel, “If Zimmerman had been killed, Trayvon Martin would have been drug-tested, immediately jailed without bond and put on trial for 1st degree murder facing the death penalty.” Tracy Martin may have let down his guard once in the courthouse if one believes Zimmerman’s crew. On the first day of the trial, Zimmerman supporter Tim Tuchalski claimed Martin called him a “motherfucker.” If it happened, he lucky that’s all he was called.

Even so, I went on to say to my friend that Sabrina Martin was becoming somewhat of an icon to many black people, much like what happened with Mamie Till, the mother of Emmett Till, who died at the hands of racists. I told her that for many blacks, Sabrina represents how they view black mothers and wives. And I said that many black women view themselves going through hell or high water for their kids, as she has don. That her strong bearing, dark-skin, motherly but attractive and sensual look, was the kind of woman that most southern black men married. That women like her had our kids and raise our families. For those who would denigrate dark-skinned women the response has long been “the blacker the berry the sweeter the juice.”

In addition, Tracy Martin, though divorced, maintained a close relationship with his son and a respectful relationship with his ex-lover, ex-wife and mother of his child. He wasn’t an absentee father. He seemed to be a good parent. But you just knew that a white man was going to play the irresponsible black parent game. Kind of like Obama does from time to time even though a Boston College study done a couple of years back revealed – surprisingly to some – that black fathers not living in the same domicile as their children are more likely to have a relationship with their kids than white fathers in similar circumstances.

I found myself posting photos of the parents and their sons on social media throughout the trial. Many others did as well. I did it because I wanted to remind myself and others what the trial was really about. And instead of getting angry at the mere sight of Zimmerman, I wanted to focus instead on the strength of Trayvon Martin’s parents. I used words like “respect” and “strength” as captions to cut through efforts to dehumanize and denigrate the family and their slain son.

Zimmerman’s defense team wanted words like “gang,” “gang-related,” “gun” or “drug-related” added to the story because they know that most of the time it strips “the accused” (who are usually black) of their human rights and humanity. They know that if some black kid’s face on the news and the word gun or drug is mentioned, even blacks, unless they’re family members, most often don’t really care what happens to them. The defense’s goal was to flip the script and make Martin the accused.

And the defense couldn’t put the gun in Martin’s hands so they did the next best thing – they tried to bring drugs into the game by advancing the old “Reefer Madness” myth arguing that “marijuana makes one violent.” Back in the 80s and 90s, usually after a cop shot someone, they’d say the shooting victim was on PCP (angel dust) or crack and that the drug gave them super-human strength. I’ve haven’t seen many super-strong crack heads in my lifetime but I’ve seen a lot of them wasting away to little or nothing. I’ve haven’t seen all that many super-strong potheads either.

Painful as it was at times, I watched defense attorney West attempt to tar prosecution witness, 19-year-old Rachel Jeantel, as a stupid liar. Jeantel was on the phone with Martin the night Zimmerman killed him. She was the last person Trayvon spoke to. He told Jeantel he was being followed by a “creepy-ass cracker.” Her testimony sparked a courtroom, online and television argument and a trumped-up controversy with the premise that Martin calling Zimmerman a “cracker” made Trayvon the racist.

Then Jeantel came under attack from the ‘”Precious”-ghetto-big-black (dark-skinned) girl-“mammy”-bashing crowd … both black and white.

On the side of white privilege against Jeantel was Don West’s daughter Molly, who posted an Instagram photo showing the family enjoying ice cream after West’s contentious and contemptuous cross-examination of Jeantel. Molly West’s picture is accompanied with the description, “We beat stupidity celebration cones … #dadkilledit.” Kind of reminds me of a lynching afterparty.

In response to the smearing of Jeantel, someone posted online a quote by James Baldwin that read: “It is not the black child’s language that is in question; it is not their language that is despised: It is their experience.”

On the black side of the attack – perhaps unknowingly injecting “light-skin” “high-yella” privilege” into the mix–was Olympian Lolo Jones, who’s had past public problems with “dark-skinned” black women who are more talented runners but ignored by media for reason of their complexion. Jones compared Jeantel to Tyler Perry’s character “Madea,” tweeting: “Rachel Jeantel looked so irritated during the cross-examination that I burned it on DVD and I’m going to sell it as Madea goes to court.” Like many others I went to her website, Twitter and Facebook pages to post – Shame!

Coming on the heels of the Paula Deen “n-word” blow-up, CNN devoted airtime to debate “Does cracker = nigger?”

I laughed sardonically as I told my friend, “A cracker cracks the whip that some poor nigger is at the business end of.”

I posted the Last Poet’s “Niggers are Scared of Revolution” to CNN’s Don Lemon’s Facebook page as an example of one “appropriate” use of the word. I added: Why should blacks (or whites or any other racial or ethnic group for that matter) buy into the idea that there’s a word that has so much “power” that when said by ‘anyone’ of another racial-ethnic group it causes one to take leave of their senses or become out of control? Why should a word be a prelude to fight? Have the power to make people act against their interest? Provoke a response that empowers the stereotype “These people are guided by emotion versus reason”? How can a word be an excuse to forgive violence? It can and does signal bigotry and if the bigot is one’s employer, it can signal and unveil discriminatory employment practices. For the racist, that word is tantamount to “sub-human” or “having no rights anyone is bound to respect.” You wanna talk about power? That word has power. Banning it just gives it more power. I think it’s better to teach, “Sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me.” That’s what I’ve told my kids through the years.

There are some who disagreed with me. One person suggested to me that there are such things as “fighting words” that ought to be banned or prohibited or a hate speech code of conduct. On Lemon’s show Columbia University professor Marc Lamont Hill said it is perfectly fine for black people to use the word but not whites. He said, “You just have to accept that there are some things in the world, just, at least one thing, that you can’t do that black people can! That just might be okay.”

I was listening to my young neighbor’s (twenty-something) music the other night: the song “My Nigga” by YG, Young Jeezy & Rich Homie Quan (three southern rappers out of Atlanta). To me, the use of the term “my nigger” among black people can mean: “I love (or regard) you even though others think you’re nothing.” It’s solidarity between “the damned & despised.” Obviously, for whites, it’s hard to be in “the damned & despised” group when you’re doing all the damning & despising, thus whites using the word has been culturally verboten. Still, there are plenty of whites, often in the same socio-economic class, who grew up around blacks in an intimate way, who faced similar experiences as their black neighbors and are called ‘nigger’ (to their faces) by blacks. They take the moniker as a badge of acceptance, though they rarely reciprocate. It was even that way when I was growing up. That said, “My nigger” can also have a slavery connotation, as in “My boy.”

Late in the evening on the 4th of July I went outside to sit on the front porch. I was drinking a little rum, puffing on a birthday joint, just thinking about things. Things like the trial, “creepy-ass cracker(s),” the n-word, the announced death of the Voting Rights Act, the split decision on affirmative action, Paula Deen, politicians talking about building a higher, longer wall on the border with Mexico and sending a “surge” of 20 or 30 thousand additional troops to guard it– no talk about a northern surge–the black unemployment rate continuing to rise and what it was doing to those around me. Just a host of things. It all seemed bad. Just a ton of bullshit, poison and ill will, all aimed at black people and people of color in the “colorblind,” post-racial” “new normal.” It had rained on and off most of the day but it cleared up around 9ish. Fireworks and gunshots rang out continuously for more than an hour or so. I took it all in from my perch in the middle of a very black southern neighborhood. I could hear a helicopter in the distance. Folks were back on the grills they had abandoned earlier due to the rain. Across the railroad tracks from me (maybe 200 yards thru the woods and what’s left of an old cemetery where blacks committed to the state mental asylum were buried) someone had their music turned up really, really loud. Cutting thru the smoke, dampness and fog of the night was “My Nigga.” I’m sitting and laughing out loud thinking the “sweet smelling” black folks and white people would love this scene. BBQ and marijuana smells mixed together, gunshots, helicopter, black neighborhood, music. I’m also thinking that CNN and Don Lemon need to come talk to the folk back in the cut. And then some older person must have taken over the DJ duties. Frankie Beverly and Maze singing “Happy Feelings’ took over the air and played for long while.

I go back in the house, jump online to see what’s in my news feed and I saw a New York Times headline on the trial, “Race is an undertone of trial…” “Undertone!” Wow. How about “White supremacy and race privilege is everything America is?”

People, such as that headline writer, substituting the word “race” for “racism” to soften its true meaning and meanness always gets to me.

Drug testing Martin after the killing and not testing Zimmerman is just one of many privileges of racism and white supremacy granted to Zimmerman before a single charge was filed against him. I watched trial video of Zimmerman riding in a cop car after the killing and taking the detective on a tour of the crime scene while crafting his lies. No handcuffs. Front seat. I’m thinking, “Wow, they’d never let a black person to do such a thing.”

I believe the Zimmerman trial is of greater racial and civil significance for blacks than the O.J. Simpson trial.

First of all, there’s no epidemic of aging black ex-football player movie stars (allegedly) killing their young white wives and their boyfriends.

But there has been a dramatic increase in the number of black males killed by whites under “stand your ground” laws. White defendants who assert “stand your ground” as a justification for their acts of violence are more likely to prevail if the victim is black. Seventy-three percent of those who killed a black person faced no penalty compared to 59 percent of those who killed a white.

Yet in all likelihood, when a black person in Florida claims ‘stand your ground’ as a defense there’s a good chance that that police, prosecutors and jury don’t buy it. Not only did it not apply to Trayvon Martin, if you buy the jury’s verdict, there’s the story of Marissa Alexander, the 31-year-old Florida woman, charged and tried by State Attorney Angela Corey, the very same prosecutor who had jurisdiction over the Martin case. Alexander is serving a 20-year sentence following her conviction on three counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon for firing a single shot into a wall near her abusive ex-husband and his two young children at their Jacksonville home in 2010. Alexander says she wasn’t trying to hurt anyone and that she was standing her ground against a man who had beat her on several different occasions. She said that she believed she was protected that day under the state’s Stand Your Ground Law. Corey offered a plea bargain that would have sent her to prison for three years, but she rejected it, hoping to convince a jury that she simply had been defending herself. It took a jury 12 minutes to find her guilty. If Alexander’s future appeals are unsuccessful, and she serves her full 20-year term in prison, her twins will be 31-years-old when she is released. Her youngest will be 22.

Years ago someone said to me: “White folk believe that most blacks are criminals even if they’ve haven’t ever been charged with a crime or haven’t done time in jail.” As my lawyer friend Efia Nwangaza put it: “To a racist, the average cop, and even the courts, most blacks are either busted or bustable. They just haven’t been caught.” In a nutshell, racial profiling takes away the “benefit of a doubt.”

It’s not so hard to imagine that Zimmerman’s not guilty verdict might just give any white stranger the ammunition (pun intended), or gumption to approach any stranger black man on the street and ask them anything they want. Blacks now face a civilian version of the NYPD’s dreaded “stop and frisk” in states with “Stand Your Ground” laws. it’s tantamount to deputizing the six million conceal carry permit holders.

It doesn’t take much to imagine questions like: “What are you doing? Where are you going? Why are you here? Let’s see some id?” And what if the stranger black man tells his stranger white inquisitor to “back off” — with or without vulgarities, and the white man he doesn’t know responds in a menacing way or tries to detain him or attempts to lay hands on him, and the black fellow fights for his life or something other than surrender himself to the stranger, how is it that he becomes the criminal and the stranger white man has the right to take his life?

It’s nullification of the social contract – “you go your way, I’ll go my way” between blacks and whites, especially men—that was established after Jim Crow.

It’s also really not so far-fetched that this nation is publicly ruminating that there are some people within its borders, that can do nothing more than completely surrender themselves to an entitled stranger or the stranger becomes “the victim” and has the right to take their lives.

Sounds a lot like how the United States has treated the Iraqis and those it has labeled “terrorists.” But then again, as someone said to me as we talked about the war on people of color, here and abroad, “To call a nigger a terrorist is redundant.”

It’s reminiscent of slavery and Jim Crow days whereby if a white man was walking on a sidewalk and a black person was walking towards him on the same sidewalk, the black person had to step into the ditch or road and give the white man the whole sidewalk to pass. It was a time when “blacks had no rights that any white man was bound to respect.” But as Vernon Johns, the preacher who preceded Martin Luther King at Dexter Avenue Church in Montgomery, once said, “You have to have a license to hunt rabbits in the state of Alabama, but niggers are always in season.”

I’ve also spoken with some black folks at various points during this tragedy who are quite open about protecting their children, homes and themselves. They say, “We got guns, too.” They aren’t gangbangers. Most are working-class, homeowners, prior military, rural, many sort of in the vein of Robert Williams, Jr., former president of the North Carolina NAACP, who wrote a book called Negroes With Guns about the right of self-defense for black families in the south.

One young family man, who is not suppose to have a gun or be around one either because he happens to have a couple of drug felonies on his record, told me something often said by 2nd Amendment supporters: “Look, if it’s about protecting myself or my family and I need or have to use a gun I’d rather be judged by 12 of my peers than carried by six.”

One other thing that makes the Zimmerman case far more significant than Simpson’s is that what Zimmerman is accused of, and the police are often guilty of, is denying people of color due process and equal treatment with their disparate use of official violence. And they’re often willing to use deadly force even when their lives are not in danger and their victims are unarmed. According to the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement, a black man, woman, or child died at the trigger of law enforcement or “the color of law” every 28 hours in 2012. And in most cases, had the alleged perpetrator been adjudicated and found guilty of a crime the sentence wouldn’t have been the death penalty.

That’s not to ignore the fact that black people kill other black people. According to the Justice Department, 93 percent of black victims were killed by other black people, and about 85 percent of white victims were slain by other white people. A majority — 51 percent — of the black murder victims are young — between 17 and 29. Comparatively, just over a third — 37 percent — of white people murdered are between the ages of 17 and 29. That tells us a couple of things. First, blacks don’t kill whites and vice-versa, but laws like “stand your ground” might change that. And second, we need to deal with the issues that create the conditions for societal violence. Approximately 46 murders are committed each day in the U.S. and 27 of those will be killed by a gun. That’s a total of about 16,700 each year. What we don’t need are laws like “Stand Your Ground” that will only increase that number.

As I was talking to some young brothers the other night, they joked that “If Zimmerman had killed a white man, they’d drop the ‘white’ from the ‘white Hispanic’ description of him and he’d be just another mistreated ‘Hispanic’ instead of being able to pimp off playing white.”

If Martin been a female teen of the same age that laid dead in the grass (the race of the victim would have also played a part), Zimmerman would have been charged with a crime on the spot.

Despite my contempt for Zimmerman – I still supported the idea that he was ‘innocent until proven guilty’ or as the jury decided ‘not guilty.’ Especially in the face of a criminal justice process that is routinely and institutionally unfair to people of color.

Protecting the theory is a good thing. From a progressive framework, the system should protect the rights of the accused whether we like the defendant or not. And it shouldn’t be a system of revenge.

Revenge is the final, worrisome reaction to this trial. All one has to do is check out the comments in almost any article about Zimmerman posted on black-oriented media outlets and it’s clear that a lot of people wish him dead and many have stupidly and publicly offered to kill him. Back in the period between the shooting and arrest, former heavy weight boxing champ Mike Tyson (who in 1992, was convicted of raping Desiree Washington, a beauty pageant contestant, and served 3 years in an Indiana prison) offered a death wish for Zimmerman: “…It’s a disgrace that man hasn’t been dragged out of his house and tied to a car and taken away. That’s the only kind of retribution that people like that understand. It’s a disgrace that man hasn’t been shot yet. Forget about him being arrested–the fact that he hasn’t been shot yet is a disgrace. That’s how I feel personally about it.”

Most of the death threats are probably not serious but a few very well might be.

A young brother was trying to convince me that had it been his child murdered, he’d would have gone up in the courtroom after Zimmerman. I told him he was talking nonsense and asked was he willing to harm or kill people that did him no harm just to get Zimmerman? I suggested that it would make him as bad or worse than Zimmerman. Someone else asked about the New Black Panthers. I said: “What they gonna do? Provocative pictures with members wearing bulletproof vest standing face-to-face with police? What can they do beyond pose?”

One Zimmerman hater wrote: “He (Zimmerman) has proven that he fears blacks and will kill them because of that fear. He’s a danger to black people and blacks would be within their right to shoot him in self-defense.”

After the verdict Atlanta Falcons wide receiver Roddy White Tweeted the jurors should “kill themselves.” Doubtless he backtracked the next day, as did many other players who in anger expressed violent sentiments. Which is pretty much what one would expect from employees in the “soft-core” (as compared to war or policing) violence industry.

I think Zimmerman should be in jail. Though that would be a very dangerous place for him. Still, I do have the compassion to fear for his life. I don’t support the death penalty by the government or by revenge seekers. To me, that’s one of the things that being ‘civilized’ is all about.

It’s very easy to kill a person. As Michael Corleone said to Tom Hagen in the movie “Godfather II:” “…If anything in this life is certain – if history has taught us anything – it’s that you can kill anybody.”

Worldwide an estimated 520,000 people are murdered each year. That’s an average of 1,477 per day per day. Two-fifths of them are young people between the ages of 10 and 29, killed by other young people. That doesn’t even include those killed in war. Like those murdered by U.S. soldiers in Iraq. And the deaths of those like 16-year-old Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, the son of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American al Qaeda propagandist killed by an Obama ordered drone in 2011 isn’t recorded as a murder. Not so ironically Robert Gibbs, former White House press secretary, sounded a lot like the Zimmerman defense attorney’s attack on Tracy Martin in a failed attempt to paint al-Awlaki as another “irresponsible black father.” Gibbs said the Colorado-born teen should have had a “more responsible father.” Some might think I’m off topic here, but to me, but I mentioned Abdulrahman al-Awlaki only to remind people that Obama did the same thing to him as Zimmerman did to Trayvon Martin. For me, he lacks the moral credibility to condemn Zimmerman and the outcome of the trial because he condemns strangers to death every Tuesday.

It’s easy to kill, but to be civilized is to help people live and to seek ways to end animosity and needless killing. And it’s a parent and adult’s duty to help young people get through the dangerous and stupid periods of their lives, where little things can become life altering or ending events. One can’t fall into the trap of criminalizing youth or youthful behaviors and fads. Or using blanket stereotypes. Or fearing and wanting to kill someone because they don’t look like you.

On the night prior to the verdict my friend Tony dropped by and the television was on with the trial coverage playing in the background. Tony, who manages a gospel radio network here in South Carolina, has twin 13-year-old sons. He relays to me that his sons have kind of followed the trial as kids tend to do. I mean, they’re not glued to the tube but they’re watching the process. So Tony says, “Andrew asked me ‘Dad, what’s happening with Zimmerman?’ And I say it’s with the jury. He responds, ‘We gotta wait?’” Tony continued, “It was then I realized that this was shaping their (his sons) reality. They have white friends that they hang out with and now all this goes into their mix.”

A number of people have called or emailed or stopped by or asked me to stop by to help them sort out what they feel. Black kids have had their world shaken up by this verdict. They understand it wasn’t just a court case but a referendum on their value as human beings, and they lost.

I was talking to my son as his neighbor was walking up the street with his daughter. They heard our conversation on the decision and stopped. He said he had to talk to his daughter, who couldn’t have been more than 10 or 11. She was visibly sad. Yet it was beautiful to see a young father walking with his young daughter talking about something important albeit tragic. And their stopping to share their experience with my son and me was cool as well. That’s been the positive thing coming out of this tragedy. People are talking to one another in a different way. Children facing the prospect of early mortality. Parents responding in lots of ways, but having to respond. And this doesn’t just apply to blacks. Yet for the most, blacks are unified on the wrongness of it all. It’s white people who are divided.

As I struggled to finish this record of observations, a young father stopped by my house late in the evening. His 14-year-old son in response to the verdict said, “Daddy that’s messed up. What we gonna do?” The young father said he was trying to figure out a way to make his boy feel more secure and able to take care of himself. He says he is putting his son in a self-defense class and enrolling him in a gun training and safety class.

As I said from the start, I have a rock hard bias against Zimmerman. But my anger isn’t just about him. It’s about the repulsive and dangerous swirl of racism that is in the air right now in America. It’s shaping future generations in a very bad way.

Fulton and Martin plan to file a wrongful death civil case. I did a radio show with their attorney Benjamin Crump after the verdict in which he reminded listeners that the case would be heard in Seminole County, in the very same courthouse. In the meantime, as Zimmerman supporters scream about double jeopardy, the NAACP and others are pressing the Department of Justice to bring a federal civil rights case against the freed killer. Al Sharpton is trying to corral the rage over the verdict in support of the 50th Anniversary March on Washington in late August. I hope this isn’t more of ‘the best way to control the opposition is to lead it…” The last Trayvon Martin rally I attended in Columbia was organized by black Tea Partiers and the main speakers were a black democratic representative who supported stand your ground and a young wannabe politician who at the time was running for office and using Martin’s death as a platform for his own aims.

Stevie Wonder has said he’ll no longer play states with stand your ground laws but that will mean he’ll be mostly playing in Europe . At least thirty-three other states in addition to Florida (and counting) now have the same law (also called ‘Line In The Sand,’ ‘Make My Day,’ ‘Kill at Will’ or ‘No Duty To Retreat’) language and all. Those other states are – Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin. So instead of not going to the states, he ought to come in and help mobilize against the law – not as an entertainer but as a citizen.

Doubtless, racism is a hard nut to crack. Yet at the very least, maybe the groundswell of public pressure in support of Trayvon’s parents Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin that forced Zimmerman’s indictment will spread beyond his trial into a grassroots state-by-state movement to repeal “Stand Your Ground” laws. And as people organize against stand your ground, maybe they’ll stay organized to take on what happening with voting rights, Medicaid funding, aid to the poor and a host of issues that we should have been fighting off or fighting for.

One can hope.

And right on cue. The day after the verdict, hundreds of miles away from Florida at Benny’s Burritos on Greenwich Avenue and 12th in New York City. It was reported that a drunken, white, Goldman Sachs employee, “angry at both his job and his dissolving marriage” was passing a black couple eating at a burrito shop when he stumbled into their table. Douglas Reddish, 25, tried to help the man regain his balance, when the drunken man lashed out at him. “This nigger wants to fight me!” And, “You niggers are why I lost my job.” Shortly after that, Reddish punched the white guy in the face, knocked him out cold. The man hit his head on the curb. Paramedics arrived and rushed the man to Beth Israel Medical Center with brain trauma. Reddish took off after the assault, but was later arrested. He was arraigned in Manhattan Criminal Court for misdemeanor assault. He was released on his own recognizance. The man remains in critical condition–as does America.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 168 guests