The peoples voice.

[Wombaticus Rex]

AD, that was empty snark and utterly content-free.

[seemslikeadream]

but more importantly what do you think of Rush Limpballs.....Mr. Hofton?


I've checked myself twice and believe there was no hint of racism in my post

[American Dream]

AD, that was empty snark and utterly content-free.

I dunno- I think there was useful news in it:

David Icke during his fabulous turquoise period, revealed himself to be "a son of the Godhead" — believes Prince Philip to be a Satanist, shape-shifting, reptilian- the man who says Bob Hope was a "slave-handler". Lord Carrington, whom Mr Icke has exposed as an evil, drug-running, global manipulator - they’re using human feet, bellybuttons, tears and armpits to make cheese in America- that "humming in your head"? Yup, those manipulators are at it again, turning you into a zombie. ..

[Wombaticus Rex]

AD, I would be surprised if there was a single anti-Icke diatribe you've contributed to RI that did not mention the "delusions of divinity" period, and favorite colour, of Our Mutual Friend, Dave.

Both are integral to his caricature.

As for Carrington, do you really think Icke is that far off? I don't.

[American Dream]

As for Carrington, do you really think Icke is that far off? I don't.

Is Lord Carrington a powerful man who attained a high place in the power structure? Sure.

Is Lord Carrington a satanist, paedophile, mind-controlling, reptilian, shape-shifting, blood drinker from Draco? I'd have to see the evidence for any and all claims...

[slimmouse]

I think its pretty clear whats going on here with AD.

A while back now, I politely requiested that AD make his muddled bigoted and generally completely ignorant personal opinion of Icke the subject of a seperate thread ( as reflected in yet another of his collection of hit pieces, from people who are equally as ignorant and bigoted.). What will now follow is doubtless a cocophany of redundant noise, meaning that the content of the show will be undermined ( one really cant help but wonder sometimes if this is not the intention)

AD, If you have any comment on the clips from the show I posted, then feel free.

But otherwise, might I politely request that you post your stuff about Icke as a seperate topic,

[slimmouse]

Heres Dr Robert Verkerk ( Second half of the show), along with Lynn Mctaggert, talking about what doctors dont tell you ,( largely out of institutionally directed deceit and ignorance)

[American Dream]

I Don’t Licke Icke (all that much anymore)
by DANIEL on JUNE 7, 2004

http://crookedtimber.org/2004/06/07/i-d ... h-anymore/

David Icke has always had a fond place in the hearts of lovers of kitsch conspiracy theories ever since the famous “Wogan” interview[2]. However, after scaling (pun intended for the cognoscenti) the heights of inspired lunacy in his second book, “The Biggest Secret”, his works have become less and less entertaining even as the “J” section of the index has grown and grown. “Alice in Wonderland and the WTC Disaster” was just about bearable as a compendium of every 9/11 conspiracy theory ever published on the Web, but “Tales from the Time Loop” is a desperate rehash; as well as having surprisingly little genuinely new material, for me it marks the point at which Icke takes the leap from mere dabbling with codewords into full-blown anti-Semitism.

Dealing with this issue first, Icke has always had a thing or two about “international bankers” as a group and the Rothschild family in particular, but has usually in the past been scrupulous and thorough enough in his disavowals of anti-Semitism to get the benefit of the doubt from me (if not from the ADL). However, the new material in TFTTL is just disgusting. Icke has got hold of a copy of Norman Finkelstein’s excellent “The Holocast Industry”, filtered it through his own wonky prism and come up with a view of history in which the Jewish people do not exist as a race, but only as a conspiracy to hoodwink Gentiles out of their cash. Of course, Icke is at pains to insist that “ordinary” Jews don’t incur his hatred; they apparently are as much victims as the rest of us of the “leaders” of the international Jewish conspiracy. This is boilerplate sub-Protocols rubbish circa 1902, and chucking a few lizards into the mix doesn’t improve it very much.

For the rest of the book, seasoned Icke fans will recognise almost everything here, not least because Icke doesn’t regard the acquisition of a new global conspiracy theory as a reason to dump any old ones, even if they’re laughably inconsistent. (Why is “…And The Truth Will Set You Free” still on sale, btw? It predates Icke’s discovery of the Annunaki Lizard conspiracy and thus should presumably be regarded by anyone who’s up to speed on the lizards as dangerously misleading.) We have more or less the Greatest Hits of Icke; the Bush/Rameses bloodline, Dick Cheney as a rampaging child murderer in Bohemian Grove, the pyramid diagram of the Illuminati power structure and here there and everywhere a lizard (the White Martians, interestingly, don’t get much of a look-in this time round, while Credo Mutwa has been downplayed as Icke takes on a new, South American shaman in the role of provider of vague confirmatory myths and psychedelic herbal teas).

[Searcher08]

AD, please can we keep to the original topic of The Peoples Voice?

[seemslikeadream]

AD are you Catholic ...were you raised Catholic?

or at least do you have high regard for the Catholic religion?

[slimmouse]

Id already written what follows below before the latest requests for keeping this thread about the Peoples voice,, so for clarity Im addressing our resident troll, AD.

Im wondering exactly what the views of a show consisting of highly qualifed scientific academics, talking about what doctors dont tell you, has to do with your latest reply?

Maybe, you believe that its all David Ickes fault this information is being beamed live on the internet 24/7?

Still cant figure out whats wrong with that personally, but its your parade Bro.

[American Dream]

Talking about "The People's Voice" without mentioning David Icke would be like talking about hamburgers without mentioning cows.

Surely all institutions do some bad and some good but I think it's always a public service to mention the turd in the punchbowl...

[slimmouse]

Talking about "The People's Voice" without mentioning David Icke would be like talking about hamburgers without mentioning cows.

Surely all institutions do some bad and some good but I think it's always a public service to mention the turd in the punchbowl...

So when a highly trusted and qualified scientific academic ( Dr Robert Verkerk) warns people of the many, largely unknown dangers of modern medicine, did you put Icke up there as a show of disaproval?

I doubt it, cos your prolly aint seen it. But dont let that put you off, will you ?

Ignoramus.

[American Dream]

Talking about "The People's Voice" without mentioning David Icke would be like talking about hamburgers without mentioning cows.

Surely all institutions do some bad and some good but I think it's always a public service to mention the turd in the punchbowl...

So when a highly trusted and qualified scientific academic ( Dr Robert Verkerk) warns people of the many, largely unknown dangers of modern medicine, did you put Icke up there as a show of disaproval?

I doubt it, cos your prolly aint seen it. But dont let that put you off, will you ?

Ignoramus.

Is pointing out the turd in the punchbowl a statement against all sweetened beverages?

[Searcher08]

Talking about "The People's Voice" without mentioning David Icke would be like talking about hamburgers without mentioning cows.

Certainly one can talk about hamburgers without *having to* mention cows. I can talk about buns, fillings, relishes.
Feeling that when hamburgers are mentioned, that you HAVE to talk about cows is something that only the most strident PETA advocates do.

So, your statement that it is not possible to talk about TPV without mentioning **** is a statement that YOU cannot talk about TPV without mentioning ****.
It is verging on HMW turning every media thread into a KWH issue.

Surely all institutions do some bad and some good but I think it's always a public service to mention the turd in the punchbowl...

The purpose of an institution is WHAT IT DOES.
Saying an institution does some good or some bad is a moral judgement.
Who determines what is good or what is bad?
How do they determine it?
Does this not depend on the frame of the viewer?

Also, putting the power on the institution is an abdication of the personal responsibility of the people involved - for example the Eichmann defense.