Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Tyler Rabbit » Sat Sep 06, 2014 6:56 am wrote: Personally I believe there are people out there who are very willing to commit atrocities for various political and religious reasons. Am guessing we can all agree on that. I think it comes down to who is committing the atrocity in question and if it falls under the category of violence or deception (or both).
If I play out various scenarios (ie the journalists are still alive), the problem with many of them is that they conclude with ISIS being fully owned and operated by various US agencies, and this requires too many leaps of faith and perhaps an over-estimation of US power/importance in the region. So I'm left with the belief that ISIS is likely an actual organization comprised of people who are violent and don't care for western ideology. (Difficult to imagine them all being actors or US special ops in disguise.)
Tyler Rabbit » Sat Sep 06, 2014 12:56 pm wrote:Hunter » Sat Sep 06, 2014 10:17 am wrote:Notice in the video how Sotloff just kicks his legs and feet out making it easy for the "executioner" to lay him down, and no blood at all when that happens so it wasnt like he was dead. I cannot imagine not kicking and screaming at the point when the knife is put to the neck, it just doesnt jive with the reality of how any person would react to that situation.
Guess I'd say if it were fake, and designed to fool millions of people, you'd think they would have directed the dude to do a better acting job...
You can't fool all the people all of the time
But if you fool the right ones, then the rest will fall behind
"Part of this job is also the theater of it," Obama said
Hunter » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:38 pm wrote:Danish Muslim poses with severed heads on fence posts, what do you think, are these heads real? This is making the rounds at reddit.
WARNING GRAPHIC
http://tundratabloids.com/2014/07/dutch ... -post.html
He apparently posted a bunch of these on his FB today.
8bitagent » 09 Sep 2014 09:46 wrote:To use a word PKD came up with, "Operation Mindfuck". And I believe the mindfuckery has barely begun.
Torture Apologist Marc Thiessen: Bush Was "Right" About Something He Was Totally Wrong About
No, no, no, no, no, and fuck no, Marc Thiessen, torture advocate and Washington Post columnist. You don't get to fucking write something fucking titled, "George W. Bush was right about Iraq pullout." You don't get to fucking say that fucking George fucking Bush can say, "I told you so" about anything having to do with Iraq. Just because every night you sit with a cocked pistol in your mouth, trying to think of reasons not to pull the trigger, it does not give you the fucking right to fucking rewrite history, you simpering, shit-sucking, soulless son of a bitch, and by "bitch," the Rude Pundit means your fucking mother.
Thiessen smugly thinks that Bush gets to be smug because in a July 12, 2007 news conference, Bush warned about all kinds of terrible shit that would happen if the United States withdrew troops from Iraq. "It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to al-Qaeda. It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale. It would mean we’d allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan," Bush said. So Thiessen then gleefully lists the ways that Iraq has turned into a hellhole compared to the paradise of figs and pussy it would have been had the United States not withdrawn.
If Bush had quit right then and there, if he had finished that press conference and said, "Fuck ya'll, I'm done," well, motherfuck, Thiessen might have a point.
But our national anal rape by George W. Bush still had another year-and-a-half to go, and, goddamn, if things didn't change in late 2008. That was when, in November, Iraq's parliament passed a Status of Forces Agreement that said that American troops had to get the fuck out by the end of 2011. But don't take the Rude Pundit's word for it. Here's what the actual agreement said: "All the United States Forces shall withdraw from all Iraqi territory no later than December 31, 2011." Oh, and "The United States recognizes the sovereign right of the Government of Iraq to request the departure of the United States Forces from Iraq at any time."
You know who praised the vote? George motherfuckin' Bush, who said, "Today’s vote affirms the growth of Iraq’s democracy and increasing ability to secure itself. Two years ago this day seemed unlikely — but the success of the surge and the courage of the Iraqi people set the conditions for these two agreements to be negotiated and approved by the Iraqi Parliament."
You know who signed the agreement? George motherfuckin' Bush. In a joint appearance in Baghdad with then-President Nouri al-Maliki in December 2008, Bush said, "We're also signing a Security Agreement, sometimes called a Status of Forces Agreement. The agreement provides American troops and Defense Department officials with authorizations and protections to continue supporting Iraq's democracy once the U.N. mandate expires at the end of this year. This agreement respects the sovereignty and the authority of Iraq's democracy. The agreement lays out a framework for the withdrawal of American forces in Iraq -- a withdrawal that is possible because of the success of the surge."
Yeah, Bush was acting like this was the last great thing he would do before leaving for his painting career, like a Hitler in reverse. He continued, "With these agreements, Mr. Prime Minister, we're honoring the sacrifices that I just described in the best possible way -- by building a freer, safer, and more hopeful world. By signing these agreements we're showing the people of Iraq the United States of America keeps its word. And we are showing the people of the Middle East that America stands firmly for liberty and justice and peace."
Finally, yes, oh, goddamn, Bush said something that was completely and utterly the opposite of that 2007 quote that Thiessen parades around with like a toddler boy with hard-on: "And we are leaving the next President with a stable foundation for the future, and an approach that can enjoy broad bipartisan support at home." You got that? No horror, no terrorist safe havens. Stability. Bush signed the agreement that withdrew the troops, and he said everything was on the road to cool now.
It doesn't get any fucking clearer than that. The troops came home because Bush signed off on it. President Obama would have violated a signed agreement and the word of the United States if he hadn't withdrawn all troops (even if he tried to negotiate a force to remain behind). If there is chaos in Iraq now, it's because of Bush.
By the way, the point of this is not that the troops should have stayed in Iraq. The point is that we shouldn't have been there in the first place. That's what Bush and Thiessen are totally, utterly, unforgivably wrong about
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 169 guests