I have noticed a big influx of posts recently at RI with a very focused theme, which is the propagation of the work of Anton Shekhovtsov and the focus of this has been to focus and call into question Global Research and focus on a theme of issues with Putin.
Now the fact that Globalresearch.ca is the web home of Peter Dale Scott
http://www.globalresearch.ca/author/peter-dale-scott
immediately makes me very careful about the provenance of criticism. Not just WHAT is said, but WHO says it and their background. I raised these issues several times and they were either left unanswered or were summarily dismissed (without dealing with the facts raised).
My purpose in starting this new thread is to shine a light on some of the people in what I have found is a professional anti-fascist ecosystem, involving university departments, Institutes, academic journals, conferences, grants, funding sources, intelligence connections, Israeli connections and many links to the Open Society Foundations.
My concern is not that I am *against* academic anti-fascism, rather that it in some ways is being co-opted / used to forward the globalist agenda of Soros and the Open Society Foundations and that that is being done here at R.I. whether innocently or... (<--see how manipulative three dots can be?)
Why is it important to be critical and very careful of Soros / Open Society?
Here is a quote from Wiki
Criticism
Left-wing critics of Soros and the Open Society Foundations argue that these institutions serve primarily to reinforce the existing social order. Nicolas Guilhot, writing in Critical Sociology, connects the Soros charities to the history of capitalist philanthropy maintained by the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, among others. Guilhot argues that control over the social sciences by monied interests has depoliticized this field and reinforced a capitalist view of modernization. He argues that despite critiques of malfunctioning free markets, Soros is actually a neoliberal who believes that competitive markets are the best way to organize society.[13] According to this view, the apparent radicalism of Soros' "open society" serves as cover for the capitalist order, the basic rules of which are never actually questioned or "opened".[2]
So starting with Anton, from his website:
Anton Shekhovtsov is PhD student at the UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (UK) and Visiting Research Fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences (Austria). He is also editor of the 'Explorations of the Far Right' book series at ibidem-Verlag.
Institute for Human Sciences
Board of Patrons / Kuratorium
Giuliano Amato
Professor em. of Law, Sapienza University of Rome and European University Institute, Florence; former Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior of Italy
Kurt Biedenkopf
Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Hertie Global School of Governance, Berlin; former Prime Minister of Saxony (Germany)
Erhard Busek
Chairman, Institute for the Danube Region and Central Europe, Vienna; former Deputy Chancellor of Austria
Joschka Fischer
Senior Strategic Counsel, Albright Stonebridge Group; former Deputy Chancellor and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Germany
Peter Mitterbauer
Chairman of the Management Board, Miba AG, Laakirchen; Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Austrian Industry-Holding Stock Corporation (ÖIAG)
Christopher Schönberger
Partner of Peters, Schönberger & Partner GmbH, Munich
Karel Schwarzenberg, Chair
First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic, Prague/Vienna
George Soros
Founder and Chairman of the Open Society Foundations, New York/Budapest
Lord Weidenfeld
Chairman of Weidenfeld & Nicolson Publishers, London; President of the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, London
Here is a video of Soros at the Institute:
Much more to follow.