Where is UFOlogy at in 2015?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2014?

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:29 am

Dying Scientist Reveals Details on UFOs, Area 51 and Aliens

9 Comments October 29, 2014 Paul Seaburn

He was primarily known as a respected scientist who worked for a number of top military contractors and as one of the inventors of the Stinger missile … until he recorded a video on his deathbed. With its release on YouTube, Boyd Bushman is now famous for revealing details about his personal experiences at Area 51 with aliens and UFOs.

Boyd Bushman passed away on August 7, 2014, at the age of 78 after a long career with Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, Texas Instruments and Hughes Aircraft. In the video, Bushman gives amazing information from his time at Area 51, especially about the aliens there. He says it took only 45 years for these 230-year-old, 5-foot-and-under beings with long fingers and webbed feet to travel to Earth from a planet called Quintumnia.
There are two groups of aliens. They divide them into two groups. It’s like a cattle ranch. One group are wranglers, and the others are rustlers – the stealers of cattle. ‘The ones that are wranglers are much more friendly, and have a better relationship with us.
By “us” he’s referring to to the workers at Area 51.
With respect to the alien craft, we have American citizens who are working on UFOs 24 hours a day. We are trying to learn what to do.
Diagram of an alien spacecraft from Boyd Bshman's notes
Image
The UFOs were Boyd’s area of expertise at Lockheed Martin, where he claims to have reverse-engineered an alien spacecraft that is 38 feet in diameter. Even more interesting, he said he told the visitors to take pictures of various planets as they traveled from Quintumnia and he had possession of the photos.
If you work for a defense contractor in the U.S., take a good look at the photo Bushman is holding because he claimed that 18 of the aliens are your fellow employees.
Interesting stuff, but it’s a deathbed video so Bushman’s not around for some follow-up questions. If he were available, what would you ask him?
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2014?

Postby elfismiles » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:12 am

Are UFOs an Intelligence Psyop? - James Corbett's reddit AMA
corbettreport


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkBcnD8V6c4

Published on Nov 3, 2014

James answers the question:

"Do you think that some of the more outlandish conspiracy theories you see online (this subreddit included) about ancient cults, UFOs, the occult, and secret advanced technology actually do more to help the international banking cartel continue to perpetuate their financial schemes by deterring otherwise serious researchers from studying what is really hidden at the top of the financial "pyramid"? Do you think that elements of the intelligence apparatus owned by this global banking monopoly are partially behind these outlandish theories? In the same way that the US gov't encourages people to believe there are UFOs at Area 51 to hide the real aircraft research that happens there, do secret online CIA trolls tell stories about the Illuminati and Zionists to hide more mundane crimes of greed and psychopathy? As the international banking system is slowly being publicly revealed as the pyramid scheme that it is, how do you suggest people involved/employed within the establishment media (like myself) approach these subjects, while avoiding the psychological traps set in the minds of others by these ideas?"

Follow the AMA thread here:
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comm ... _here_ama/
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2014?

Postby Pele'sDaughter » Wed Nov 05, 2014 10:15 am

http://www.examiner.com/article/ufo-pho ... feed-video

UFO photobombs the ISS, NASA cuts live feed




An incredible UFO video, uploaded to YouTube on Nov. 3, shows a massive, unidentified flying object approaching unusually close to the International Space Station (ISS) as the live NASA camera feed rolls. After a moment, the UFO, which appears to go dark, fades from view just before the camera feed is cut off. It doesn't seem this floating object was known to be near the space station, otherwise the ISS would have been steered away from such a dangerous hazard. So, if NASA was unaware of such an anomaly, what is it?

The amazing video is split into two segments. The first shows the UFO stealthily approaching the ISS, growing in brightness all the while. That's not unusual, as the space station itself is brilliantly lit by the Sun. But, as the object draws closer (and suddenly stops its forward motion completely) it begins to darken and fade, as though switching off exterior lights. As it goes completely dark, the live camera feed catching the action is cut, with just a video slate showing and asking viewers to stand by until the live feed can be re-established.

The second part of the video isolates and magnifies the UFO, showing its oblong, non-aerodynamic shape and its strange configuration of illumination, which eventually goes completely dark, despite being brightly bathed by sunlight. The magnification doesn't help to identify the object, except to confirm it's not similar to any known aircraft or spaceship yet witnessed by anyone outside of the government's super-secret classified programs. In other words, if it's a stealth spaceship, the secret is out.

Which raises the question of why NASA would allow such a sight to be witnessed by anyone with an Internet connection and monitoring the High Definition Earth Viewing (HDEV) experimental website, which the space agency maintains and provides to the public. Is it possible that NASA itself was unaware the object was stealthily approaching the ISS? Could the UFO be a spacecraft built by a nation with intentions of showing off its sophisticated, and potentially deadly, orbiting capabilities?

As it turns out, NASA is in the middle of a PR blitz, showing the down-to-Earth side of space travel and exploration. David Bowie has once again allowed a cover of his signature hit song, "2001: A Space Oddity" to be published by Chris Hadfield, an ISS astronaut who sang and played the tune on guitar while on an earlier mission. But, it seems, there's much more to the story.

What do you think? Have a look at the video above and please leave a comment below. Are secret government agencies keeping each other in the dark? Is this an alien spacecraft stalking the International Space Station? Was NASA photobombed by a UFO?
Don't believe anything they say.
And at the same time,
Don't believe that they say anything without a reason.
---Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Pele'sDaughter
 
Posts: 1917
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Texas
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2014?

Postby elfismiles » Sun Nov 16, 2014 9:04 am

Emma Woods, Creepy Professors and My Little Wooden Box
http://logdriver.tumblr.com/post/102673 ... wooden-box
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2014?

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Nov 17, 2014 10:17 am

Triangle UFO on Michigan video might be stealth aircraft

Image
Posted by: Roger Marsh November 6, 2014 2 Comments 7,424 Views

A Michigan witness near Auburn Hills and Rochester reported capturing “an inbound triangle” UFO that he feels might be a stealth aircraft, according to testimony in Case 61223 from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database.
The “CE-5 outing” with a group of people was in place when the video was shot at 8 p.m. on November 2, 2014.
“The group met at the organizer’s house in Auburn Hills,” the witness stated. “When we were heading out to the cars to make half-mile journey to our selected field, we noticed the skies were perfectly clear – an excellent night to be star gazing. It was fairly bright as the moon was overhead and about 70 percent full.”
The group then drove to the site about a half-mile away.
About 30 minutes into the session the witness saw and videotaped a triangle craft appearing from the north on a southerly trajectory. Pictured: Auburn Hills, MI. (Credit: Google)

“We again looked skyward and this time commented on three chemtrails being visible. We grabbed our chairs and walked a couple hundred feet to the middle of the field and set up our chairs and blankets. That process couldn’t have taken more than 15 minutes.”
According to the chemtrail conspiracy theory, long-lasting trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft are chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed for sinister purposes undisclosed to the general public. Believers in the theory argue that normal contrails dissipate relatively quickly, and contrails that do not dissipate must contain additional substances. (Wikipedia)
But then they noticed more “chemtrails” in the sky.
“But now there were 15 chemtrails blanketing the sky. The entire sky was nearly completely obscured.”
The witness began shooting video with night vision recording equipment.

“Somewhere about 30 minutes into the session I saw a triangle craft appear from the north on a southerly trajectory. It was emitting light from each of its three corners (as you’ll see in the attached video ‘auburn hills’). Its altitude seemed to be at least several thousand feet. I called out that I saw an inbound triangle and the guy next to me tried frantically to see what I was talking about. He didn’t have any light enhancing devices and never ended up seeing the craft.”
The group remained in the field until 9:15 p.m. when the cold sent them home.
“The next day, Monday, November 3, 2014, I went through the recordings to show the craft to the others who didn’t see it.”
But once the entire video was reviewed, more objects were seen.
“I hadn’t reviewed more than five minutes of video when I saw what looked like a huge craft moving behind the clouds. I then created a program to step through the frames one at a time so I could see what was going on. It ended up being that what looked like a huge stealth craft with two more fast moving lights. They came in on parallel trajectories from the top of the video and split off towards the center as you should be able to see in the attached video ‘hidden UFOs.’ Since I didn’t notice the crafts during recording, I panned away earlier than I would have liked had I known they were there. If you step through the frames, you can see the lower craft initiating a hard bank to its left when I’m starting to turn away.”

The witness is speculating on what was seen.
“When there are three craft in two separate encounters within 30 minutes of each other – this is beyond coincidence. Now considering the clouds that were specifically created (being chemtrails) and only over a relatively localized area, and there was a flurry of advanced technology overhead, it is undeniable that the chemtrails were anything but specifically placed there to shield us from seeing what was going on overhead.”
The witness believes the objects may be part of a man-made project.
“Since these didn’t exhibit out of this world maneuvering capabilities, I am hesitant to say they were of alien manufacture. Their speed and triangle shape indicates advanced technologies which are within reach of our black projects, so all of this seems likely to be a military cover-up of alien technology.”
Auburn Hills is a city in Oakland County, MI, population 21,412. Michigan MUFON is investigating.
Michigan has a current UFO Alert Rating of 5 with a low number of recent reports nationally. Michigan had 16 UFO reports that occurred during October 2014 – calculated at 1.62 sightings per million population.
The UFO Alert Rating System is based on five levels – 1 through 5 – where states with 4.01 or higher reports per million residents are rated an Alert 1; 3.01 – 4.0 reports are an Alert 2; 2.51 – 3.0 are an Alert 3; 2.01 – 2.5 are an Alert 4; and those states with 2.0 or lower are rated an Alert 5.
Please remember that most UFO sighting can be explained as something natural or man-made. The above quotes were edited for clarity. Please report UFO activity to MUFON.com.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2014?

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Dec 01, 2014 5:04 pm

A Nineteenth Century Japanese Folk Tale Still Inspires UFO-Believers

A Nineteenth Century Japanese Folk Tale Still Inspires UFO-Believers
Image
In the early 1800s, two folk tales circulated around Japan. Both involved a very strange woman emerging from a very strange ship. Her dress and appearance seemed out of this world. What happened?

There are two versions of this story. One was written in 1825 and one in 1844. In both versions, some Japanese sailors happened to notice, floating in the ocean, a very strange vessel. It was circular, which was not so unusual. What caught there attention was that it seemed to have a lid that covered the top of the ship, and glass windows. When they got it to shore, out came a very beautiful woman holding a very mysterious box. She wouldn't let anyone touch it. They couldn't ask her about it, because she didn't speak their language. All the materials making her ship, her clothes, and her box, were completely unknown to them. Eventually, the woman went back to her boat, and drifted out to sea again.

A Nineteenth Century Japanese Folk Tale Still Inspires UFO-Believers
Image
Well, that's the boring 1844 version. The 1825 version plays out more like an old BBC murder mystery. You can tell, because the woman is more of a vamp. She has bright red hair and eyebrows, and red hair with white extensions. Plus, the box was bigger. The size of the box provided a crafty local with an important clue, and, after consideration, he announced his conclusions. The woman was a foreign princess who had had an illicit love affair. The lover had been beheaded, and the princess was put to sea in a craft, with his head in a box. The villagers, aghast at the hussy in their midst, pushed her and her vessel into the sea again.

As short as it is, the myth about the strange-looking vessel made with foreign materials has become an enduring favorite of ufologists. They believe that, possibly, a flying saucer crashed in the sea, and washed up on land. Possibly aliens were trying to blend in by matching our technology, sending flying saucers when we could fly and sailing saucers when all we could do was sail. When people argue, the ufo believes point to the unnatural substances of the woman's clothes and ship. They argue that, although people weren't as savvy in those days as we are today, they people in the legend were hardly yokels. They would have recognized most kinds of materials and most kinds of vessels. This utterly foreign being might have been crash-landed, or might have been on a scouting ship.

What do you think?
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2014?

Postby semper occultus » Sun Dec 14, 2014 5:48 pm

Image


By Keith Basterfield
ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
11-30-14

http://www.theufochronicles.com/2014/11/dr-bruce-maccabee-and-cia.html

Introduction:

I have read numerous conspiracy based websites about the depth of the involvement of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), in UAP. Few people, however, have had the opportunity to interact with CIA personnel with an interest, in this area. So, it was with great delight that I read Maccabee's book titled "The FBI CIA UFO Connection." Published by Richard Dolan Press. Rochester, NY. ISBN 978-150 231 7216 (2014).

"First contact" 1979:

Maccabee relates that following his investigation of the 1978 New Zealand, visual, radar and photographic case, he was referred to a Dr Gordon MacDonald of the MITRE Corporation, who referred him to a contact in the CIA known to MacDonald.

"About the middle of March...I got a call from a man who said he worked at the CIA and offered me the opportunity to get some technical help if I would present my work to the CIA." (p.259.)

Maccabee then presented his NZ case work to seven CIA employees, one of whom was a Christopher 'Kit' Green. Green invited Maccabee to return at a later date "...for a more general discussion of the UFO subject." (p.296.) Maccabee subsequently met with Green and two other CIA employees. "Kit portrayed his interest in the subject , and that of the others, as more of a personal than an agency interest." (p.297.) A week later, Maccabee returned to talk to a radar expert at the CIA about the New Zealand case.

1984:

Maccabee was at this stage working at the Naval Surface Weapons Center in Maryland, in the field of Laser Generated Underwater Sound (LGUS.) In August 1984, he received a call from a Dr Ronald Pandolfi. Pandolfi was"...a scientist and intelligence analyst in the Scientific Intelligence branch of the CIA." (p.299.) Pandolfi questioned Maccabee about LGUS. Pandolfi knew of Maccabee's UAP interests, and earlier visits to the CIA, via Kit Green. "Thus began a more than fifteen year association with Ron based on the original CIA interest in LGUS and an unofficial interest of Ron and other agency employees on the subject of UFOs and the status of UFO research." (p.301.)

1986:

Pandolfi resurfaced at the time of the 17 November 1986, JAL1628 aircraft encounter over Alaska. Maccabee learned of the case via Pandolfi on 30 December 1986 and "I told Ron about my concern and boldly asserted that I could do a better investigation than the FAA." (p.313.) Pandolfi contacted the FAA and arranged a meeting with John Callahan, Division Chief of the Accidents and Investigations Branch of the FAA. Pandolfi, Maccabee and another CIA employee met on 5 February 1987 with Callahan and others. "Then, as we left, Ron surprised me with a gift: a box containing radar printouts, transcripts of interviews, a copy of the AARTCC voice tape and numerous other valuable documents." (p.316.)

"At the time of the investigation I wondered whether or not Ron would get into trouble for supplying me with the information I needed to analyse the sighting. After all, UFO investigation was not supposed to be a task of the CIA...Many years later (2008) he told me that there was an official concern but it was not that the UFOs may have been ET craft. Rather it was that they might have been Soviet jets trying to use a large commercial jet aircraft, as a sort of cover for clandestine flights over Alaska. (p.319.)

1987:

Pandolfi invited Maccabee "...to speak about the UFO subject at CIA headquarters." (p.322.) He did so on 7 July 1987 to about two dozen people. One effect was "...my lecture had created a lot of "spies" within the agency, that is, employees who were using their top secret clearance level to nose around and try to find top secret UFO related information and projects. Whether anyone found such projects, I do not know." (p.322.)

Pandolfi later told Maccabee that "...a CIA archivist had spent some amount of time searching but had not found MJ-12 in the CIA files. " (p.324.)

Gulf Breeze:

Maccabee then became involved with investigations into the numerous visual sightings, and photographs associated with Gulf Breeze.

During meetings about the LGUS Maccabee appraised Pandolfi of his investigations "...there apparently was a considerable level of interest on the part of CIA employees. About the middle of September, I showed some of Ed's pictures to several employees and was invited to discuss this and other UFO subjects with a branch chief." (p.332.) Maccabee then lectured at the CIA about his Gulf Breeze research.

1989:

A wave of sightings came out of the Soviet Union. Maccabee writes "In August 1989, I pointed out to Ron that we could not keep up with the Russian flap because of the language problem, so he arranged to have newspaper articles translated for agency use and for me to receive copies of FBIS translations." (p.339.)

"About two months later, in June, Ron told me that the fact that Maltsev had made a series of official reports about the March 21 sighting caused quite a stir at upper CIA levels." (p.340.) Maltsev was Air Defence General Igor Maltsev.

1993:

In 1993, the Director of the CIA Robert James Woolsey asked National Reconnaissance Office historian Gerald K Haines "...to review all the records on the subject and write what would be the official history of the CIA involvement with the subject of UFOs." (p.341.) Maccabee received a copy in 1996, "I thought I might learn something about saucers/UFOs that I didn't know. No such luck." (p.344.)

"The subject of my last lecture at the CIA was a UFO that had a "magnetic personality.""(p.348.) This was the 11 September 1992 Gulf Breeze case when an investigator used a flux gradient magnetometer to determine the presence of a magnetic field, where the sighting had occurred. Maccabee writes "The CIA employees were as puzzled as I by the "magnetic sighting." (p.356.)

Summary:

Maccabee summarises his efforts by saying "From the time I first visited the CIA, I wanted the answers to two main questions...I wanted to know (a) if they had top secret information about UFOs and (b) if they were in control of the assumed cover up." (p.357.)

In response to these two questions, Maccabee says "Kit seemed to treat the subject as something of medium importance, not very important but not something to laugh at...Ron on the other hand, seemed to treat it as a joke or an amusement." (p.358.)

"...but there didn't seem to be an official reason for the CIA to pay any attention to UFO research. Then, in 1990, Ron told me the official reason: the possibility of espionage. He said that in the 1970's, the CIA had obtained "firm evidence" that the KGB had devised a plan to use US citizens, including UFOlogists, to penetrate the US defense program." (p.354.)

Maccabee answers part two of hit two part question, was there a hidden CIA control group, by saying Pandolfi, in March 1994 told him "The Director of Central Intelligence and the Deputy Director come to me when they want to know what is going on in UFOs. He admitted there might be a liaison person, a sort of "mole" in the CIA, working with a UFO group in another agency, but he was "not aware of any group in the CIA.""(p.361.)

Maccabee mentions in other places in his book, that he felt he knew more about the UFO topic than any CIA employee he came across.

"Kit, during a conversation in 2008, provided a potential answer to this question. He told me that he had questioned 18 top level CIA officers to cabinet ministers and high level military and even a president. Most didn't know anything about the subject but some did. This led him to conclude that there was something going on, but not in the government." (.361.)

Having said all the above, Maccabee notes, that in 2012 "...another CIA employee, Chase Brandon told interviewers that he had seen, some years before, a "Roswell box" inside a Top Secret vault that contained part of the Historical Intelligence Collection of the CIA." (p.362.)

My comments:

Overall, a very interesting insight by Maccabee into the role of the CIA in UAP. One wonders which of their employees now, if any, undertakes the role previously taken by Christopher Green and Ronald Pandolfi?



CIA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90

A Die-Hard Issue
Gerald K. Haines

https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/97unclass/ufo.html

An extraordinary 95 percent of all Americans have at least heard or read something about Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), and 57 percent believe they are real. (1) Former US Presidents Carter and Reagan claim to have seen a UFO. UFOlogists--a neologism for UFO buffs--and private UFO organizations are found throughout the United States. Many are convinced that the US Government, and particularly CIA, are engaged in a massive conspiracy and coverup of the issue. The idea that CIA has secretly concealed its research into UFOs has been a major theme of UFO buffs since the modern UFO phenomena emerged in the late 1940s.
User avatar
semper occultus
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Project Core

Postby elfismiles » Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:01 pm

User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2014?

Postby justdrew » Fri Dec 26, 2014 1:31 am

Where is it? Increasingly, in China.

There seems to be growth in the cottage industry in China, picking up steam lately.

Will the Chinese government try to shut down the subject? I'm guessing no.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2015?

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Jan 19, 2015 3:43 pm

Air Force UFO files hit the web
By Stephen Losey, Staff Writer 10:20 a.m. EST January 17, 2015

The truth is out there — and it's now on the web.

The fabled Project Blue Book, the Air Force's files on UFO sightings and investigations, have tantalized and frustrated extraterrestrial enthusiasts for decades. But this week, nearly 130,000 pages of declassified UFO records — a trove that would make Agent Fox Mulder's mouth water — hit the web.

UFO enthusiast John Greenewald has spent nearly two decades filing Freedom of Information Act requests for the government's files on UFOs and other phenomena. On Jan. 12, Greenewald posted the Blue Book files — as well as files on Blue Book's 1940s-era predecessors, Project Sign and Project Grudge — on his online database, The Black Vault.

Project Blue Book was based at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio. Between 1947 and 1969, the Air Force recorded 12,618 sightings of strange phenomena -- 701 of which remain "unidentified."

According to a 1985 fact sheet from Wright-Patterson, posted online by the National Archives, the Air Force decided to discontinue UFO investigations after concluding that "no UFO reported, investigated and evaluated by the Air Force has ever given any indication of threat to our national security [and] there has been no evidence indicating that sightings categorized as 'unidentified' are extraterrestrial vehicles." Wright-Patterson also said the Air Force has not seen any evidence suggesting the sightings "represent technological developments or principles beyond the range of present-day scientific knowledge."

Skeptics smelled a whitewash. The private and now-defunct National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena, for example, charged throughout the 1960s that the federal government was covering up what it knew about UFOs and pushed for congressional hearings.

The National Archives has made these files available to public on microfilm in its Washington headquarters. Parts of the Project Blue Book files have previously been posted online in various locations, Greenewald said. But his webpage is the first time the complete files have been posted in PDF form in a searchable database, he said.

The more than 10,000 cases include a 1950 incident at Holloman Air Force Base in Alamogordo, New Mexico, where an Air Force Office of Special Investigations agent reported a star-like craft that shifted from a bright white color to red and green as it moved erratically in several directions.

And in 1965, Air Force Maj. Jack Bond, the deputy for reconnaissance at the Directorate of Advanced Recon Planning, reported seeing an unidentified object moving in a sine wave pattern while on a flight out of Wright-Patterson. Bond said the object strongly reflected the sunlight as it rose and appeared gray as it descended. It rose and fell three times at varying speeds, before leveling off and accelerating away at more than 600 knots.

The investigator dismissed Bond's observation as a mirage caused by the sun, due to the motion of Bond's plane and the hazy atmospheric conditions.

One thing you won't find online are records related to the alleged 1947 Roswell, New Mexico, incident, where conspiracy theorists maintain the military recovered a crashed alien spacecraft and its occupants.

But Roswell does pop up several times in the files. There are several blurry photographs of lights in the sky taken at Roswell in 1949, for example. And in 1950, airmen there spotted a circular object 10 feet in diameter with a bluish-white color going fast at 8,000 feet and taking a sharp turn to the right.

The National Archives maintains it "has been unable to locate any documentation among the Project BLUE BOOK records which discuss the 1947 incident in Roswell, New Mexico."

But that is just what they would say, wouldn't they?
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2014?

Postby Nordic » Mon Jan 19, 2015 4:15 pm

Pele'sDaughter » Wed Nov 05, 2014 9:15 am wrote:http://www.examiner.com/article/ufo-photobombs-the-iss-nasa-cuts-live-feed-video

UFO photobombs the ISS, NASA cuts live feed




An incredible UFO video, uploaded to YouTube on Nov. 3, shows a massive, unidentified flying object approaching unusually close to the International Space Station (ISS) as the live NASA camera feed rolls. After a moment, the UFO, which appears to go dark, fades from view just before the camera feed is cut off. It doesn't seem this floating object was known to be near the space station, otherwise the ISS would have been steered away from such a dangerous hazard. So, if NASA was unaware of such an anomaly, what is it?

The amazing video is split into two segments. The first shows the UFO stealthily approaching the ISS, growing in brightness all the while. That's not unusual, as the space station itself is brilliantly lit by the Sun. But, as the object draws closer (and suddenly stops its forward motion completely) it begins to darken and fade, as though switching off exterior lights. As it goes completely dark, the live camera feed catching the action is cut, with just a video slate showing and asking viewers to stand by until the live feed can be re-established.

The second part of the video isolates and magnifies the UFO, showing its oblong, non-aerodynamic shape and its strange configuration of illumination, which eventually goes completely dark, despite being brightly bathed by sunlight. The magnification doesn't help to identify the object, except to confirm it's not similar to any known aircraft or spaceship yet witnessed by anyone outside of the government's super-secret classified programs. In other words, if it's a stealth spaceship, the secret is out.

Which raises the question of why NASA would allow such a sight to be witnessed by anyone with an Internet connection and monitoring the High Definition Earth Viewing (HDEV) experimental website, which the space agency maintains and provides to the public. Is it possible that NASA itself was unaware the object was stealthily approaching the ISS? Could the UFO be a spacecraft built by a nation with intentions of showing off its sophisticated, and potentially deadly, orbiting capabilities?

As it turns out, NASA is in the middle of a PR blitz, showing the down-to-Earth side of space travel and exploration. David Bowie has once again allowed a cover of his signature hit song, "2001: A Space Oddity" to be published by Chris Hadfield, an ISS astronaut who sang and played the tune on guitar while on an earlier mission. But, it seems, there's much more to the story.

What do you think? Have a look at the video above and please leave a comment below. Are secret government agencies keeping each other in the dark? Is this an alien spacecraft stalking the International Space Station? Was NASA photobombed by a UFO?



Well this is certainly interesting. Would love to hear more about this one.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2014?

Postby Pele'sDaughter » Mon Jan 19, 2015 5:43 pm

Nordic » Mon Jan 19, 2015 3:15 pm wrote:
Pele'sDaughter » Wed Nov 05, 2014 9:15 am wrote:http://www.examiner.com/article/ufo-photobombs-the-iss-nasa-cuts-live-feed-video

UFO photobombs the ISS, NASA cuts live feed




An incredible UFO video, uploaded to YouTube on Nov. 3, shows a massive, unidentified flying object approaching unusually close to the International Space Station (ISS) as the live NASA camera feed rolls. After a moment, the UFO, which appears to go dark, fades from view just before the camera feed is cut off. It doesn't seem this floating object was known to be near the space station, otherwise the ISS would have been steered away from such a dangerous hazard. So, if NASA was unaware of such an anomaly, what is it?

The amazing video is split into two segments. The first shows the UFO stealthily approaching the ISS, growing in brightness all the while. That's not unusual, as the space station itself is brilliantly lit by the Sun. But, as the object draws closer (and suddenly stops its forward motion completely) it begins to darken and fade, as though switching off exterior lights. As it goes completely dark, the live camera feed catching the action is cut, with just a video slate showing and asking viewers to stand by until the live feed can be re-established.

The second part of the video isolates and magnifies the UFO, showing its oblong, non-aerodynamic shape and its strange configuration of illumination, which eventually goes completely dark, despite being brightly bathed by sunlight. The magnification doesn't help to identify the object, except to confirm it's not similar to any known aircraft or spaceship yet witnessed by anyone outside of the government's super-secret classified programs. In other words, if it's a stealth spaceship, the secret is out.

Which raises the question of why NASA would allow such a sight to be witnessed by anyone with an Internet connection and monitoring the High Definition Earth Viewing (HDEV) experimental website, which the space agency maintains and provides to the public. Is it possible that NASA itself was unaware the object was stealthily approaching the ISS? Could the UFO be a spacecraft built by a nation with intentions of showing off its sophisticated, and potentially deadly, orbiting capabilities?

As it turns out, NASA is in the middle of a PR blitz, showing the down-to-Earth side of space travel and exploration. David Bowie has once again allowed a cover of his signature hit song, "2001: A Space Oddity" to be published by Chris Hadfield, an ISS astronaut who sang and played the tune on guitar while on an earlier mission. But, it seems, there's much more to the story.

What do you think? Have a look at the video above and please leave a comment below. Are secret government agencies keeping each other in the dark? Is this an alien spacecraft stalking the International Space Station? Was NASA photobombed by a UFO?



Well this is certainly interesting. Would love to hear more about this one.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... xpert.html

During a spacewalk on 7 October a ‘UFO’ was spotted hovering near the International Space Station (ISS), leading some to suggest Nasa had inadvertently revealed an alien spaceship in orbit.

Sadly the answer is much more straightforward, with the smudge being either an speck of dust or a lens flare from the sun.

That hasn’t stopped some conspiracy theories arising though, with ufologists somewhat speculatively claiming it was proof that we are not alone in the universe.
Image
The not-so-alien object was spotted when Flight Engineers Reid Wiseman of Nasa and Alexander Gerst of Esa conducted a spacewalk outside the ISS to fix an electrical problem.

In video shot by Nasa and uploaded to YouTube last week, the UFO can be seen hovering just for a few seconds behind the astronauts, before the camera cuts to another angle.

Nasa was yet to comment on the event when contacted by MailOnline.

In images just before a point in the live feed the smudge is not visible, but then in the next moment it suddenly appears.

Some observers were quick to label the object a ‘mysterious craft’ or some other sort of UFO.

‘The video showed astronauts spacewalking as they were working on a mission,’ says UFO Blogger.

‘Suddenly almost after 1:50 minutes, a mysterious craft appeared flying near the astronauts for a few seconds.

‘The shape and size of the UFO could not be defined clearly as the telecast was not much clear.’

But others were less than convinced.

Professor Andrew Balogh from the Imperial College London Department of Physics tells MailOnline: 'Generally speaking UFO sightings are either explained by some artefact effect - even some space junk - or left unexplained as there is not enough evidence.

‘It's difficult to judge from the video in this instance, because of its poor quality.

'If Nasa has access to high quality images, they may investigate further.

‘It's difficult correctly to interpret the size of an object on a 2D projection.

‘However, while the "object" was visible, the ISS must have moved a considerable distance [but] there appears to be no change in the size.

‘So if it was indeed an object, it was travelling with the ISS.

‘My guess is that it's an artefact of some sort, not space debris, unless something suddenly detached from the ISS.’

But he adds it’s ‘unlikely to be an "object" - this sighting isn't enough to convince the sceptics.’

Space science writer Amy Teitel adds: 'I’d say it looks like a reflection inside the camera, a trick of light.

'It’s not moving at all so it’s unlikely to be floating hardware, but it looks like it could be the reflection of some hardware hitting the lens the right way to show up on the image and look like a UFO when really, it’s not physically there.'

Meanwhile Nigel Watson, author of the UFO Investigations Manual, says: 'In these latest images a faint elongated object appears and brightens.

'It is visible for a few seconds and it is not reportedly seen by the two astronauts carrying out repairs to the ISS.

'To sceptics it is caused by lens flare or light reflecting off a piece of debris; to ufologists this is convincing evidence that UFOs are taking a regular and active interest in the ISS.

'If it was a UFO it would have been nice if its alien occupants had stepped out and helped with the repairs.'

Some have incorrectly speculated that it could be one of two spacecraft docked to the ISS - SpaceX’s Dragon or the Soyuz TMA-14M - but as both were docked at the time this isn’t possible.

The fact that the ISS is quite clearly bathed in sunlight at the time - as the whole shot is in light -heavily suggests it is a bit of lens flare from the sun on the camera lens.

The Examiner was slightly more speculative in its analysis of the incident though: ‘The October 7 incident cannot be video of either the Dragon X or Soyuz spacecraft which are docked. Nor does it appear to be caused by a lensflare/camera reflection.

'The elliptical shape of the object is consistent with earlier incidents at the ISS involving UFOs close by or even docking with the ISS.

'Is it possible that once again, a spacecraft of unknown origin has been captured on video visiting the ISS, this time monitoring a spacewalk by two astronauts?’

Some might be disappointed that the real explanation, though, is slightly more mundane - if the event in which live footage is broadcast from a football pitch-sized space station hurtling around Earth at 17,150mph (27,600 km/h) can be considered mundane.

Astronauts Wiseman and Gerst were working to relocate a failed cooling pump the size of a fridge and install a power cable device to provide backup electrical capability to the station.

It was the station’s 182nd spacewalk in support of station assembly and maintenance, and the first for both Wiseman and Gerst.



WHAT WAS THE MYSTERY OBJECT?

Outlandish theories suggested it might be an alien spaceship joining the ISS in orbit.

Of course these theories are very wide of the mark, clearly evidenced by the fact the object doesn't appear in other images - aside from more obvious reasons.

Another theory suggested it might be a Dragon or Soyuz spacecraft, but as both of these were docked at the station at the time of the spacewalk this was not possible.

As the object is not moving in the image another suggestion was that it was a piece of debris that fell off the ISS. But, again, as the object does not appear in other images this also seems unlikely.

This leaves just one option, namely that it is an artefact in the lens of the camera taking the shot, likely just a bit of glare from the sun as the ISS continued its orbit around Earth.
Don't believe anything they say.
And at the same time,
Don't believe that they say anything without a reason.
---Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Pele'sDaughter
 
Posts: 1917
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Texas
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2015?

Postby BrandonD » Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:34 am



Interesting video, if you disregard the annoyingly repetitive person in the background

(edit: it is looking like this particular video is likely a CGI hoax)
Last edited by BrandonD on Tue Jan 20, 2015 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"One measures a circle, beginning anywhere." -Charles Fort
User avatar
BrandonD
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2015?

Postby elfismiles » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:02 am

Just wanted to quickly note that all the recent MSM articles about this are loaded with misinfo in classic msm style.

These docs have been available for a long time but were made more accessible (though not as well as others would like) recently by a handful of folks who've largely gone unacknowledged by these news stories. There is background history to this that isn't being talked about because the people who did the real research don't want to pipe up and make a seen.

Just FYI. MSM: same as it ever was...

seemslikeadream » 19 Jan 2015 19:43 wrote:
Air Force UFO files hit the web
By Stephen Losey, Staff Writer 10:20 a.m. EST January 17, 2015

The truth is out there — and it's now on the web.
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Where is UFOlogy at in 2015?

Postby Luther Blissett » Wed Jan 21, 2015 4:23 pm

The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 158 guests