Freitag » Wed Mar 25, 2015 9:50 am wrote:I've read the first two Paulides books. The information is good, but the writing style annoyed me a bit. He refuses to draw any conclusions from the data. He just gives you the facts of each case. There's not a lot of meta-narrative.
It sure is a hell of a mystery though. It reminds me of fairy tales. If you wear bright colors in the woods, the big bad wolf's gonna get you. Little Red Riding Hood. The victims' bones are mostly gone, with only a few small bones left over, like they've been eaten.Fee-fi-fo-fum,
I smell the blood of an Englishman,
Be he live, or be he dead
I'll grind his bones to make my bread
It's like something is watching people in the woods, snatching them, and either eating them or throwing them off of mountains.
I'll probably buy the other two books at some point. Since reading the first two books, I've worked myself into a paranoid state more than once when alone near the woods.
(Oh - and Paulides speculated in one of his previous interviews that the removal of the shoes was so the victims are less likely to escape, or could not get far if they tried (the terrain being snow and/or forest floor).)
I agree with the criticism of writing style, although I guess he is into documentation and letting others go out on the speculative branches. He does tease a bit though, like holding back some of the speculations of the rangers and others that he interviews. I wish those were more complete.
I borrowed the series from the local library via interlibrary loan. I thought the books actually improved as they went along. He started adding a few interesting sidelines and info.