Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby General Patton » Sat Oct 31, 2015 12:15 pm

SonicG » Sat Oct 31, 2015 3:07 am wrote:
Hmmm but there are certainly more independent voices without such juicy links to actual power...Anyhow, I see what the arguments here boil down to so I'll just let it go...


I posted it because it provides links to said rapes and harassment by migrants (many of whom are not even Syrian). It's not being enthusiastically covered by mainstream European media. I could also direct link such stories like this:

http://www.epochtimes.de/politik/europa ... 80197.html

:thumbsup

And more to the point, if women are being raped and attacked, and the media is going out of it's way to ignore it, does that make it a feminist issue?
штрафбат вперед
User avatar
General Patton
 
Posts: 959
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby backtoiam » Sat Oct 31, 2015 1:05 pm

And more to the point, if women are being raped and attacked, and the media is going out of it's way to ignore it, does that make it a feminist issue?


no. it is a human issue. is there a point about this that i am missing?
"A mind stretched by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions." Oliver Wendell Holmes
backtoiam
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:22 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby General Patton » Sat Oct 31, 2015 3:01 pm

backtoiam » Sat Oct 31, 2015 12:05 pm wrote:
And more to the point, if women are being raped and attacked, and the media is going out of it's way to ignore it, does that make it a feminist issue?


no. it is a human issue. is there a point about this that i am missing?


When people are pressuring rape victims to be quiet about their experiences, when authorities are telling women to dress very modestly to avoid inciting male lust, these are normally issues that feminists react with horror too.

Things have been quiet thus far, particularly among types which might be called "allies" (as cheap as that term is) to feminists.

My larger interest is if feminism will become explicitly right wing in Europe in response to the left-wing being very, very quiet about muslim rapes and attacks.
штрафбат вперед
User avatar
General Patton
 
Posts: 959
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby American Dream » Sat Oct 31, 2015 3:41 pm

The horrors of Lesbos: on the front-lines of Fortress Europe

By Harriet Paintin On October 31, 2015

Image


Far from providing safe refuge to those who survive the crossing, Europe is subjecting refugees to dehumanizing, degrading and life threatening conditions.


By Harriet Paintin and Hannah Kirmes-Daly.

Nothing could have prepared us for the night when approximately 300 people were shipwrecked off the coast of Lesbos.

Boatloads of people were brought in by the coastguard. Everyone was drenched to the bone, hypothermic, screaming the names of family members who had perished. Medics and volunteers desperately attempted to revive the unconscious.

One moment I was consoling a young man, shuddering and shaking in my arms, as he cried out, “my brother, my brother, I have lost my brother, our boat was broken, two hours at sea,” the next I was wrapping my arms around a woman screaming and banging her head against the wall, her eyes wide in shock, desperation and grief.

Another woman slipped in and out of consciousness, coughing up salty sea water, her lips blue, shaking under the pile of blankets on top of her. Another refused to let us change her out of her soaking wet clothes, refused water, food and warm tea, until she found her two-month-old baby. Nearly everybody that night lost a family member to the sea.


Continues at: http://roarmag.org/2015/10/lesbos-drown ... gee-camps/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby tapitsbo » Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:48 pm

General Patton » Sat Oct 31, 2015 3:01 pm wrote:
backtoiam » Sat Oct 31, 2015 12:05 pm wrote:
And more to the point, if women are being raped and attacked, and the media is going out of it's way to ignore it, does that make it a feminist issue?


no. it is a human issue. is there a point about this that i am missing?


When people are pressuring rape victims to be quiet about their experiences, when authorities are telling women to dress very modestly to avoid inciting male lust, these are normally issues that feminists react with horror too.

Things have been quiet thus far, particularly among types which might be called "allies" (as cheap as that term is) to feminists.

My larger interest is if feminism will become explicitly right wing in Europe in response to the left-wing being very, very quiet about muslim rapes and attacks.


I've always been baffled by the silence of mainstream feminism with regards to elite pedophilia (except in cases like Cosby, Ghomeshi, or Catholic priests where the perpetrators have been identifiably ostracized before shaming commences)

Maybe the purpose of what mainstream feminism has become is not to protect the average woman from attacks, in the first place.
tapitsbo
 
Posts: 1824
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby zangtang » Sat Oct 31, 2015 11:59 pm

feel free to assume that I have zero compassion...............
What do you,...personally, think an invasion would look like~?
zangtang
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:13 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby American Dream » Sun Nov 01, 2015 1:03 pm

https://clandestinenglish.wordpress.com ... ros-fence/

New from the protest against Evros fence

Posted by clandestina on 1 November 2015

Around 500 people, from various towns, participated in today’s protest against Evros fence.

At a blockade close to the border, police announced that the demonstrators could not reach the fence because it is in a militarized area. After this, the demonstrators clashed with the police in the village of Kastanies, just some hundred meters away from the fence. The police used lots of tear gas, but the demonstrators managed to stand firm.

Some hours earlier, in the morning, in Thessaloniki, members of the ruling SYRIZA party tried to infiltrate (sic!) the protest (the Youth of SYRIZA and the “department for civil rights” of the ruling party, just half a day before the protest, publicized an announcement stating that they support the protest!). Anarchist groups didn’t allow SYRIZA members to participate in the protest.



Image
"If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything."
-Malcolm X
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby tapitsbo » Sun Nov 01, 2015 1:52 pm

Genuine question: where do Greek anarchists get their food from? I had thought the social welfare programs there have collapsed. Yes I am being lazy not looking this up myself but I'm sure somebody more knowledgeable like JackRiddler or American Dream can enlighten me.
tapitsbo
 
Posts: 1824
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby American Dream » Sun Nov 01, 2015 8:17 pm

http://idavox.com/index.php/2015/10/25/ ... es-2-dead/

Racial Attack on Swedish School Leaves 2 Dead

Once again, anti-immigration activity sheds blood - and the WPs couldn't be happier.

Posted on October 25, 2015

Image

When the news first came out that there was a violent and deadly attack on a school in Trollhattan, Sweden Thursday, the neo-Nazi website Stormfront immediately began to suggest that since there were no pictures of the victims or suspect at the time, the attacker was more than likely Muslim, poster “SouthernCornbread” noting that “It sounds like something you hear about in the Middle East of Pakistan. Oh that’s right. Sweden has a lot of crap like that on its shoes.”

When it finally came out however that the attacker was a 21-year-old White Swede that targeted persons of color in particular, poster “laidbackguy71”, who initially posted that his first guess was that a Muslim, was the assailant. “I heard the ones he attacked were all non whites,” he wrote. “So it seems he was defending Sweden and gave his life up for the cause.”

Indeed, police are investigating the attack where Anton Lundin-Pettersson stabbed and killed two and injuring two others before being shot and killed by police as a hate crime, noting how he selected his victims based on race and items police found in his apartment. Media reports that looked at his social network accounts noted that he “liked” pages on Facebook related to Adolf Hitler and supported a call to stop immigration to Sweden. “We are convinced that the culprit was driven by racist motives,” officer Niklas Hallgren said on Swedish Radio.

Image
Anton Lundin-Pettersson, Rot in Hell!

Racial tensions had already been rising in this industrial town reportedly known for its right-wing extremists when local resident Lundin-Pettersson walked into the Kronan School and attacked students and teachers with a sword while wearing a Darth Vader mask. There was so much confusion during the attack, some students thought he was someone putting on a prank and he even stopped to pose for a picture with some of them, holding the sword he had just used to kill one of their teachers, Lavin Eskandar. The 20-year-old is being remembered as a hero for trying to protect students at the school during the attack before being killed while trying to overpower Lundin-Pettersson. Also killed was Ahmed Hassan, 15, who was born in Somalia and moved to Sweden three years ago with his family. A 41-year-old teacher and a 15-year-old boy are in serious but stable condition.

The attack comes after Sweden announced that they would be working to accommodate as many as 190,000 refugees this year, many of whom are fleeing war-torn countries like Syria. Over the past seven months there has been a number of arson attacks on asylum centers in Sweden in response to the asylum-seekers. The attack on the Kronan School, the students ranging in age from to 6 to 15 and foreign-born, punctuated even further how hatemongers in the country have attempted to intensify racial discontent, and the Stormfront page is not the only place online they will find support. Prior to the news of the attack, visitors to the White supremacist website American Renaissance could hardly contain their glee over the possibility of violent reaction to immigrants in Sweden. Some of the comments to a story posted Friday about the refugee estimates there ironically said it would be the newly-arrived who would initiate a criminal act of violence that would spark a civil war, one poster saying, “Blood in the street is better than the country submitting to dhimmitude without a fight.”

But the response to the school attack suggests that there will be pushback to such attempts. Before a candlelight vigil to remember the victims, a few hundred participated in an anti-racist protest held at the school, some attendees carrying banners with the words “No to racism, no to hatred” and “Why?” Sabri Al Harbiti, chairman of the Muslim Organization of Trollhattan, condemned the recent fires, calling them attempted murder. “People that act like this are not just racists, they are criminals, and they need to be brought to justice,” he said.

Sweden’s Prime Minister Prime Minister Stefan Lofven visited the school to express the nation’s grief over the attack and spoke to reporters there. “This is a black day for Sweden,” he said. “It is a tragedy that hits the entire country.”
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sun Nov 01, 2015 8:40 pm

This could just as well go in AD's thread, A New Europe: Anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, Nation-State, but I chose instead to place it here.

German Village of 102 Braces for 750 Asylum Seekers

By ANDREW HIGGINS OCT. 31, 2015

Image
Christian Fabel, the mayor of Sumte, Germany, stands in front of a facility to house asylum seekers from Africa and the Middle East. Credit Gordon Welters for The New York Times

SUMTE, Germany — This bucolic, one-street settlement of handsome redbrick farmhouses may for the moment have many more cows than people, but next week it will become one of the fastest growing places in Europe. Not that anyone in Sumte is very excited about it.

In early October, the district government informed Sumte’s mayor, Christian Fabel, by email that his village of 102 people just over the border in what was once Communist East Germany would take in 1,000 asylum seekers.

His wife, the mayor said, assured him it must be a hoax. “It certainly can’t be true” that such a small, isolated place would be asked to accommodate nearly 10 times as many migrants as it had residents, she told him. “She thought it was a joke,” he said.

But it was not. Sumte has become a showcase of the extreme pressures bearing down on Germany as it scrambles to find shelter for what, by the end of the year, could be well over a million people seeking refuge from poverty or wars in Africa, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

In a small concession to the villagers, Alexander Götz, a regional official from Lower Saxony, told them this week that the initial number of refugees, who start arriving on Monday and will be housed in empty office buildings, would be kept to 500, and limited to 750 in all.

Nevertheless, the influx is testing the limits of tolerance and hospitality in Sumte, and across Germany. It is also straining German politics broadly, creating deep divisions in the conservative camp of Chancellor Angela Merkel and energizing a constellation of extremist groups that feel their time has come.

One of the few people, in fact, who seem enthusiastic about the plan for Sumte is Holger Niemann, 32, an admirer of Hitler and the lone neo-Nazi on the elected district council. He rejoices at the opportunities the migrant crisis has offered.

“It is bad for the people, but politically it is good for me,” Mr. Niemann said of the plan, which would leave the German villagers outnumbered by migrants by more than seven to one.

Germans face “the destruction of our genetic heritage” and risk becoming “a gray mishmash,” Mr. Niemann added, predicting that public anxiety over Ms. Merkel’s open-armed welcome to refugees would help demolish a postwar political consensus in Germany built on moderation and compromise.

Unlike those in other European countries, far-right parties in Germany have had little success in national elections, and remain firmly rejected by the overwhelming majority of Germans.

Reinhold Schlemmer, a former Communist who served as the mayor here before and immediately after the collapse of East Germany, said people like Mr. Niemann would “have been put in prison right away” during the Communist era.

“Now they can stand up and preach,” he said. “People say this is democracy, but I don’t think it is democracy to let Nazis say what they want.”

Image
Dirk Hammer of Sumte at a public meeting on refugees. Credit Gordon Welters for The New York Times

Mr. Schlemmer is among those concerned that extremists are exploiting widespread concerns, even in the political mainstream, over absorbing vast numbers of refugees, as the influx tests Germany’s capacity to cope.

Sumte has no shops, no police station, no school. The initial number of arrivals was, in fact, reduced to avoid straining the local sewage system and give time for new pumps to be installed.

“We have zero infrastructure here for so many people,” Mr. Fabel, the mayor, said.

As the federal government desperately scrambles to find shelter for the refugees before winter sets in, it is assigning quotas to each of Germany’s 16 Länder, or states, based on factors like economic strength and population.

Initially, the migrants were housed in renovated homes, then in gymnasiums, military bases and old schools, but as obvious shelters run out, the authorities are hunting for any free space they can find, like the 23 empty office buildings in Sumte.

Dirk Hammer, a Sumte resident, said that he felt sympathy for the refugees, but that he feared the sheer number of people dumped with little warning in places like this could offer “an ideal platform for the far right.”

“I get stomachaches from fear of what is going to happen — not just here but in the whole of Germany,” he said.

At least for the moment, the tolerant values of people like Mr. Hammer have proved resilient, even as Mr. Niemann and like-minded neo-Nazis deride such views as alien imports imposed by the United States and other World War II victors.

Graphic
Seeking a Fair Distribution of Migrants in Europe

German and European Union leaders have called for European countries to share the burden of absorbing the hundreds of thousands of migrants who have poured into the continent this summer.

Image

When Mr. Niemann took the floor at a meeting in October between villagers and regional officials responsible for migrants, Mr. Hammer snatched away the microphone.

“We have to take a clear stand against these people,” Mr. Hammer said later, noting that his family had lived in Sumte for 400 years. He dismissed Mr. Niemann, who lives in a village a couple of miles down the road, as a disruptive outsider.

Mr. Hammer himself initially reacted with horror when he heard of plans to move refugees into the empty office complex, built by a now-defunct debt collection company. He wrote an angry open letter on Facebook expressing his fury as a longtime supporter of Ms. Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union party who felt betrayed.

“If we are being used as a dumping ground, this shows the situation is out of hand,” Mr. Hammer said in an interview at his family’s home, a modernized farmhouse.

But he has curbed his anger and rallied to efforts by the mayor, Mr. Fabel, to make sure that extremists do not capitalize on the widespread unease among residents. He said he knew people who “are not far right, but who are afraid and their fear is being exploited.”

Unable to speak at the village meeting last month, Mr. Niemann and a handful of followers heckled speakers who voiced sympathy for refugees, and waved banners demanding an end to “asylum terror.”

At a follow-up meeting between officials and villagers on Wednesday, Mr. Niemann stayed silent, taking notes.

An assertion by a senior regional police official that Sumte did not need a permanent police presence prompted one villager to jump to his feet and shout, “Of course we need protection.” But the discussion was civil and devoid of inflammatory outbursts.

European Refugee and Migrant Crisis

“People are just tired and think that so long as we have enough food in the fridge we are all fine,” Mr. Niemann said in an interview, frustrated that his efforts to stir resistance to the refugee relocation had gained little traction in Sumte.

Other extremists in the area have resorted to blunter methods to get their message across. Shortly after the news first broke of the plans to move 1,000 refugees to Sumte, unidentified arsonists attacked a smaller refugee center in the nearby town of Boizenburg, setting fires and smashing windows.

Mr. Niemann said he rejected violence, but a far-right coalition he represents on the district council includes two of Germany’s most belligerent groups, the National Democratic Party, better known by its German acronym N.P.D., and Die Rechte, which was last week linked by authorities in Bavaria to a cache of weapons assembled in an alleged plot to attack refugees.

“There are individuals who cannot be controlled at all times,” said Mr. Niemann, a car washer.

Asked whether he considered himself a neo-Nazi, he said, “No, I am National Socialist” — in other words, a real Nazi. “We are not extremists, but people have become so soft that we seem extreme,” he added.

Mr. Fabel, the mayor, insisted that Sumte, despite its unease, was open-minded and hospitable, and was now focused on making the refugee holding camp work.

“Many families here suffered during the war, so they will think twice about joining extremists,” he said.

He said he realized that there was no point in trying to block the plan when, at the initial meeting, he asked Mr. Götz, the regional official in charge of finding places for migrants, whether Sumte had any choice. “You have two options,” he said he was told. “Yes, or yes.” Mr. Götz declined to be interviewed.

The asylum seekers will stay in Sumte only as long as it takes to process their applications for refugee status. But those who move on will eventually be replaced by new arrivals, as the vast stream of refugees and migrants shows no signs of slowing.

“Life here is going to change,” the mayor said.

Katarina Johannsen contributed reporting.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/01/world/europe/german-village-of-102-braces-for-750-asylum-seekers.html?ref=world

I swear I saw a photo of Holger Niemann accompanying the article when I read it yesterday, but now it's gone and the byline doesn't indicate the article had been updated.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby General Patton » Sun Nov 01, 2015 9:48 pm

I thought the tally of arsons in Sweden was closer to 15, but Fox News cites at over 20. Some of them get spotted and put out before they do much damage.

Shotgun sales are up in Austria:
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/10/28 ... ee-crisis/
According to the broadcaster OE24, approximately 70,000 more firearms have been sold in Austria so far this year compared to the same period last year. The report says that an estimated 900,000 firearms are in Austrian homes.

With a population of 8.5 million people, Austria is one of the most heavily armed countries in Europe.

"Nearly all shotguns are sold out because you don't need to have a firearms permit to buy them," Thomas Ortner, spokesman for gun retailers in the state of Upper Austria, told the paper. "Registration courses for pistols are usually held only every five weeks but are now held weekly."
...
The report also noted that many of the new gun buyers are women. The report stated that the most common reasons given for buying a gun were fear of refugees and fear of burglars.
...
In Sweden, the country’s immigration agency said it will discontinue publicizing the location of refugee housing facilities after more than 20 fires, many considered arsons.




I'm very interested to see if there will be serious pushback from European labor in the long run from this. It would be curious for other facets of the left like labor to become explicitly right wing as well.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/ ... 2G20151027
Image

Migrants walk near tents in the 'New Jungle' make-shift camp as unseasonably cool temperatures arrive in Calais, northern France, in this October

"We use (canister) gas to heat the tent and everybody wants to come inside. The baby is always kept under blankets and a sleeping bag," he says.

Kazhen, 27, who fled from Kirkuk in Iraq in September, is blind, and moves around with the help of his friends.

"So many people are catching a cold. We wear a lot of clothing," he says.

"We have a fire place. We burn wood, plastic also... but it’s not good for health you know?"
штрафбат вперед
User avatar
General Patton
 
Posts: 959
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby American Dream » Mon Nov 02, 2015 11:10 pm

http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/psychic-refuge/

Psychic Refuge

By SOPHIE HOYLE

Image

Western psychiatry pathologizes and depoliticizes the trauma experienced by refugees

Contemporary psychiatric care and infrastructure in the Middle East is inadequate to the occurrence of psychiatric conditions resulting from armed conflict, military occupation, persecution and displacement. Western countries make nominal efforts towards closing this gap, exporting psychiatric treatment and medication globally—including to the Middle East, where it is often used in the aftermath of conflict—but this is structurally undermined by continuing Western military intervention and arms trade in the region as a contributory cause of these psychiatric conditions.

Though there have historically been flows of migrants and refugees from places of conflict in the Middle East to Europe, these issues in psychiatry are increasingly pertinent with the scale and speed of the recent influx of refugees in the so-called “European migrant crisis.” The already limited infrastructures for Transcultural Psychiatry in the west — an approach that foregrounds how differences in sociocultural norms are implicit in criteria for psychiatric diagnoses, and how these norms marginalize cultural and ethnic minorities —may be equally unable to cater to the specific needs of increasing refugee populations, both in terms of psychiatric help and the linguistic and cultural support in administering it. Nevertheless, refugees arrive, and the majority need some form of psychiatric care in the short or long-term.

PTSD is a particularly common condition for refugees. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder occurs when exposure to a traumatic event has continued effects even after the initial threat has subsided, with symptoms including hypervigilance and flashbacks; it alters biological reactions to stimuli, perceiving everyday audio-visual phenomena as a “threat.” Many symptoms overlap between psychiatric conditions, and refugees can have multiple conditions (e.g: PTSD, anxiety, depression). Though these conditions are not necessarily permanent, as seen by a growing body of research into “neuroplasticity” and brain flexibility, they can still have lasting or permanent effects on peoples’ lives.

In order to “diagnose” psychiatric conditions, a person’s experiences and biomedical information must be quantified and abstracted, their body medicalized and objectified. Many critics of Psychiatry have argued for a shift from the biomedical, individual and familial models of mental health to looking at a wider socio-political context; from a reformist idea of adaptation (e.g: that we should be more “aware” of mental illness,) to looking at its potential structural causes.

However, the process of diagnosis is required for the individual to be able to access psychiatric services; for example, in the UK, general practitioners, (GPs), are the gate-keepers to more specialized psychiatric care. GPs often provide self-report questionnaires for anxiety and depression, which depend on the patient being able to identify and articulate their emotional experiences, and whether these are translatable into diagnostic criteria. These results effect benefits and employment, as the state measures, tests and attempts to control their “fitness for work” and “productivity”; mental illness becomes a venue for biopolitical control of the individual. Increasingly, however, because of austerity policies, it has become the responsibility of individuals to practice their own self-regulation.

As a user of psychiatric services in London, I saw a great inequality in services and resources between the different boroughs of the city, and within this further differentiation of approaches and diagnoses with each doctor. Access to psychiatric health-care exists in a double bind: if one has a debilitating illness (that prevents them from leaving the house such as social anxiety, dgoraphobia, catatonic depression) then they will be unlikely to attend appointments with a GP or psychiatrist to get medication and treatment, or access other state services they are entitled to such as disability benefits. In 2010, the Conservative government implemented policies to reduce low-income and disability benefits, where an estimated sixty people died directly related to benefits withdrawal between February 2012 and the 21st of October 2014; based on information provided by disability rights group Black Triangle, a third of these people had pre-existing mental health conditions and two-thirds were driven to suicide. The Black Triangle’s “UK Welfare Reform Deaths” campaign, which coincided with Department of Work and Pensions internal investigations, led to a UN investigationinto the UK’s failure to meet its disability rights obligations.

In mainstream British media, psychiatric conditions are often considered an “invisible illness,” at least when the person is not having an acute episode of psychosis, mania, or other recognized forms of “abnormal” behavior. This could be seen as a comparative privilege (in terms of passing as privilege), as individuals may have relative choice whether to out themselves in various contexts; though people with psychiatric conditions are often marginalized, their experiences of prejudice and inequality may be decentered and delegitimized by their ability to “pass.” There continues to be polarity in healthcare available by income and workplace discrimination. And when it comes to minority populations and refugees, these problems of varied treatment and gatekeeping become deepened by cultural difference, language barriers, and racism.

There are disproportionately high rates of psychosis and schizophrenia in Black minorities in London, where a disproportionately high percentage also live in poverty. Despite this, there is comparatively little psychiatric research into minority communities, and where it exists there is little translation of this into longer-term government policy; specialist psychiatric care for ethnic minorities is often provided through short to medium-term funded research projects and charities, but often only where there is a population threshold in the borough. There is a tendency to misdiagnose signs of distress as psychosis or schizophrenia where it may be a proportionate response to life circumstances such as poverty and racism, particularly with cultural differences in how this distress is expressed. Psychiatric research, as part of wider scientific research, assumes there are universal scientific laws, and that such research is a common language that is cross-cultural. Whilst linguistic translators are provided for psychiatric research on minority groups, this does not necessarily “translate” cultural difference; for example, in some cultures people may not identify individualized emotions but identify them as part of collective, family or social feelings, which are not compatible with psychiatric diagnoses.

While working as a psychiatrist in French-colonized Algeria, Frantz Fanon in 1961 explored how the internalization of a colonized subjecthood by the population had dehumanizing effects that impacted their mental health. Roland Littlewood noted the incidence of marginalized groups that have high rates of schizophrenia, which tends to occur globally in circumstances of colonization; many minority groups in the UK formed after the British colonization of their home countries, and subsequent flows of migrants and refugees have continued since then. Littlewood suggests that a specific neuropsychological relationship exists in the use of dominant colonial language “in which you yourself are objectified” and “alienated by your very process of thought,” that can lead to behaviors and expressions that may be perceived as psychopathologies. Fanon was writing about psychiatry within a modern nation-state and at the beginnings of post-colonial ideology; this has since developed since into a globalized, marketized psychiatric care system.

If research into psychiatric conditions of non-white minorities within Western nations is poor, there is perhaps an even greater lack of Psychiatric research into trauma and PTSD in Arab populations residing in the Middle East, especially considering the rate of recent and continuing conflict in certain parts of the region. The study of PTSD in psychiatry usually depends on state and private funding for research, and so has tended to focus on drone pilots and Western and Israeli military. As modes of funding for research, policy and care are still state-based, in the Middle East, where many borders are re-drawn and contested and populations migrate with conflict, it can be even harder to administer services for these populations. During conflict, health care and psychiatry are considered global humanitarian issues by the United Nations, rather than issues of the individual states; however, this often results in a series of temporary responses rather than longer-term systematic ones. There are many complexities in treating PTSD that are not accounted for in the short-termism of healthcare provision and public policy; for example there are delays between the onset of disorders and onset of treatment, and cases of indirect as well as direct trauma, such as children seeing events on television or hearing of killings through adults. The effects of trauma can be lifelong, as well as intergenerational, where longer-term research and healthcare planning is needed to address these issues.

However, in the context of military conflict, could we see trauma not as a disorder or individual pathology, but a wholly proportionate reaction to the socio-political context?

• • •

According to the UNCHR (UN Refugee Council) 2015 has seen a 20-year high in the global total of refugee applications. Figures from the UNHCR in 2014 show that Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan have the highest percentages of applications for asylum in industrialized countries; this article will be focused on Syrian refugees. It’s important to note that, while news of this refugee crisis focuses on those headed to Europe, whenever there is a conflict in the Middle East most refugees stay in the region. In August 2015, the UNHCR made an estimate based on data from 2014 that there were 119,891 applications from people from Syria applying for asylum in EU states (28 countries), and 146,373 applications to wider Europe (38 countries).By comparison, there are 4 million registered Syrian refugees in neighboring countries, including 1.94 million in Turkey, 1.1 million in Lebanon, (despite the country not being party to the 1951 Refugee Convention,) 629,266 in Jordan and 249,463 in Iraq; all of these countries have lower GDPs than Western Europe. This puts the apparent “crisis” of Europe’s infrastructural capacity in stark relief.

The overall number of refugees seeking asylum in industrialized countries has increased, but government responses to this increase have depended on how it has been framed in national political discourse. Since the 1990s, and more so since 9/11, there has been an increasing language and proliferation of government and NGO organizations based around security; this is also seen in attitudes towards asylum and migration. Migration has increasingly been seen as a process that needs to be controlled, with political parties mobilizing a politics of fear, positioning migrants and refugees as an existential threat to the nation-state, despite the acceleration and deepening of transnational ties via globalization. This is exacerbated by political parties diverting anxiety about such issues of globalized capital towards migrants groups instead.

The problematization of movements of people in terms of legitimacy and crisis is formed by popular opinion and news media – which both respond to and inform political rhetoric. It is this construction of illegitimacy that perpetuates the idea of crisis, even when there is no such thing as an illegitimate refugee or asylum seeker, as they are protected by international law.

Even with this rhetoric of crisis and urgency, the UK government’s response to the situation has been relatively small, given that the military conflict in Syria has been on-going since 2011 and Britain has supported direct military intervention. In the apparent generosity of the UK recently deciding to take in Syrian refugees — which they are legally obliged to do, as they co-wrote and signed the 1951 UN Convention — there has been a collective forgetting of previous flows of migrants, like those from the Balkans in the early 1990s, and of the selective generosity in accepting refugee populations after the Second World War in 1945. Even when refugees do receive asylum, it is limited; for example, the UK accepts refugee children, but they then have to leave when they are 18, or have to prove to the Home Office in court that they have substantial ties to the UK. Though the UK government has just announced an official policy to invest in rehousing Syrian refugees, general austerity measures have reduced the capacity of informal, civil-society organizations that historically provided services to asylum-seekers and refugees. For example, in London the Refugee Council of Lambeth and Southwark that helped those seeking asylum closed on 1st April 2014 as the Home Office transferred services to the larger charity Migrant Help.

The UK government claims it does not have the resources to handle this influx of refugees, yet by comparison to how much was spent by the UK government in military intervention in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, they could easily afford to. It was estimated that between 2003-2009 the UK spent £8.4 billion on the Iraq war, and at least £37 billion in Afghanistan between 2001-2013. The UK Ministry of Defense gives a lower estimate of £25 billion, but this does not account for the total costs of the war including long-term care for returning soldiers with physical injuries and PTSD. The UK spent approximately £79 million on military intervention in the Syrian civil war so far, and it is now clear that the 2003 invasion of Iraq contributed to the formation of ISIS, which is provoking the movement of refugees in the first place.

Since 2012, the UK has allocated £1 billion to partner organizations including UN agencies, NGOs and the Red Cross, as well as donating to refugee camps in the Middle East and will spend £1 billion on housing and living costs of refugees entering the UK, but for only up to one year of their stay. In comparison to ongoing total military spending in the region and intended UK military intervention, these efforts are minimal. When it comes to access to natural resources and geopolitical power, there is a great deal of investment and diplomacy, but the human fallout from military intervention is given much lower priority.

• • •

Of the refugees fleeing conflict, it is likely a large number have psychiatric conditions from their experiences of conflict or of seeing people die in the process of traveling to Europe. As there is uncertainty of the refugees’ end destination, many governments cannot plan in the medium to long term for psychiatric healthcare for these groups, and governments do not want to make substantial investments into services within refugee camps that they prefer to see as temporary, and where the staff are on short-term staff contracts. There is little transitional or sustainable healthcare as refugees move between camps to their destination country. There are also psychological impacts of living in refugee camps themselves, in their isolation, and infrequent or lack of interaction with the outside world and their former support networks; bureaucratic processes of applying for asylum can take months, with no certainty, which can further lead to a sense of apathy and clinical Depression.

In Lebanon, in the refugee camps for Palestinian refugees it is estimated that a high proportion of those living in the camps suffer from psychiatric conditions, and the numbers have increased massively with the influx of Syrian refugees, the majority of whom are young and likely to suffer from PTSD. Only 12 percent of Syrian refugees across the region live in formal refugee camps, and can thus access formal psychiatric services. In refugee camps in Iraq, doctors are seeing not only an increase in the rate of psychiatric conditions but also more complex reactions and symptoms, and increased rates of extreme conditions such as schizophrenia. Increasingly, Palestinian refugees within Syria are internally displaced or stranded, as Jordan closed its borders to Palestinian refugees early in the conflict in 2011, and Lebanon closed its borders in May 2014.

The problems of psychiatric treatment within refugee camps reflect the wider problems of lack of resources in refugee camps generally. According to Charles Watters, the term “PTSD” is often used to flatten different kinds of reactions to trauma into one overarching category. Still, the use of the term is effective as a means to get funding, and so rates of PTSD in refugee camp populations are often overestimated for pragmatic reasons. The social construction of refugees and asylums seekers in this psychiatric context as “pathological” individuals can impact their self-perception; they are often treated as passive victims rather than being allowed agency to assert their own interpretations of their needs and choices for treatment.

Psychiatric care is only beneficial if included as part of wider holistic care in refugee camps, and few camps include bottom-up approaches of asking refugees what would help them; when refugees are asked and answer, they more often point to socioeconomic factors than a need for psychotherapy, though these are interconnected. The mental health of refugees is seen to be better where they are allowed to retain their own cultural identity and support networks, building their resilience and ability to adapt to new circumstances; having current or former-refugees help providing services themselves is also beneficial for a sense of self-help and community support. Where formal psychiatric care may not be available, other grassroots alternatives may form with facilitation by charities and NGOs, forming a sense of self-empowerment and agency. Though scarce food supplies in refugee camps lead to physical and mental exhaustion, where a sustainable support network may not be able to grow, and with the uncertainty of being moved at any time people may not be willing to make such an investment to root themselves in the camps.

The current refugee “crisis” is symptomatic of wider longer-term structural problems in the Middle East, in which Western intervention continues to play a large part. Though it would be reductive and over-deterministic to reduce current events in the Middle East to the history of Western intervention alone, the legacies of military intervention, redrawing borders, and supporting regimes that fulfill short-term goals of Western governments instead of those that would be beneficial in the long-term for the region has contributed to continued instability. The idea of Western-exported psychiatry as a cure to mental health “problems” in a large part both caused (in terms of military intervention) and ideologically constructed (in terms of individual pathology) by the West itself is fundamentally contradictory. Ongoing military intervention reduces the infrastructural capacity for indigenous forms of mental health care to grow and develop, and there are ethical questions surrounding the export of Western-modelled psychiatric care as one facet of a continuing neo-colonial project.

There remains a great lack of self-reflexivity in and by the West as to the impacts of its (neo)colonial violence, in terms of its responsibilities in contributing to the current refugee “crisis” and falling short of providing a proportionate amount of aid in response. This is part of a wider lack of acknowledgement of sociopolitical inequalities and psychological damage of colonial violence, both in ethnic minority communities within the UK and on a global scale in former colonized countries. Partial, Western-centered psychiatric care for individuals’ symptoms both obscure and reproduce wider structural problems.

However, in the face of this, alliances can be formed where these different kinds of inequality and marginalization intersect, such as the self-organized refugee movement Refugee Struggle for Freedom that fights for rights and representation, and organizes hunger strikes and protest marches. There have been a number of protests in solidarity with refugee struggles in the UK, and a proliferation of grassroots activist efforts including transporting supplies from the UK to refugee camps in Calais such as Bikes without Borders. Experiences of mental illness do not have to be individualized or depoliticized, with organizations such as the Mental Health Resistance Network looking at wider political context of psychiatric care, and grassroots organizations forming to fill the gap left by government cuts to refugee mental health care.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby semper occultus » Tue Nov 03, 2015 5:47 am

My larger interest is if feminism will become explicitly right wing in Europe in response to the left-wing being very, very quiet about muslim rapes and attacks.


...I don't know about left:right - that is far too clear cut a distinction to deal with & disentangle the gordian strands of intersectionalism and the internecine schismatic behaviour-patterns so characteristic of its denizens.....but this is clearly something of an ideological San Andreas fault in the landscape..

.....the recent case of Lisa McKenzie is quite indicative of the phenomenon in practice though - she is a sociologist at the LSE, author of the book Getting By : Estates, Class and Culture in Austerity Britain aswell as an activist with noisy anarchist street organisation Class War

.....she published the following article in the Guardian....

The refugee crisis will hit the UK’s working class areas hardest

...this is where she got into trouble....

But they told me that they were most unhappy and frightened that every day, as they walked through the precinct, a group of men they referred to as “Iraqis” were constantly asking them for “business”, meaning sex. It happened to me on several occasions. The women felt angry and disrespected at these incidents.

One woman told me that she and a group of women had “battered” (physically attacked) “one of the Iraqi asylum seekers” for asking to buy sex from one of the women’s 15-year-old daughter. When I spoke to this woman about it, she said: “Why should we be the only ones having to put up with this?”

The women I was working with in Nottingham were aware of how accusations of white working-class racism are played with by politicians, the media and the do-gooders, as they called teachers and social workers – the people who, they knew, never had to put up with this. They were careful about what they said, and who they complained to, about those they called the Iraqis.


...trouble in the form of.

www.facebook.com

We were somewhat surprised when the Guardian published an article written by Lisa McKenzie (see previous post) which approached the refugee crisis from the perspective of working class communities affected by the issue. We were less surprised however at the reception the article received from ‘left wing’ academics and ‘liberal’ Guardian readers.
Sadly, such was the level of abuse that Lisa received from this quarter that she felt compelled to post the following on her Facebook page:

‘I’m off Facebook and Twitter for a while, the abuse I have had over the Guardian article I wrote has been too much for me. I have been attacked by the right wing for years for being a lefty and having a mixed race son, I have been called every nasty racist name under the sun because of my son but I can honestly say this has been much worse particularly from academics. At least the BNP only wanted to beat me up and take photos, the people attacking me about, this mainly educated middle class people, are trying get me out of my job and destroy me. I feel I am unable to defend myself against this.'

Lisa reports that one of these charming characters told her that: “my son should have been taken into care because I'm not fit to raise 'a child of colour''.

Such is the conservative left’s detachment from the working class that when concerns are raised from our communities over any issue (and especially that of race and immigration) they react with confused apoplexy. What’s more, rather than engage with the communities to offer practical support or proffer a sensible and equitable way forward they choose to vilify activists and the communities they seek to represent as ‘ignorant’ and ‘racist’.

They do this because any authentic working class voice is seen as a potential threat to their self-appointed position as the ‘natural leadership’ of our class. So the reaction to Lisa McKenzie’s article is a validation of the writer and should be seen and celebrated as such.
So chin up Lisa, keep up the good work and don’t let the bastards grind you down!
User avatar
semper occultus
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby Sounder » Tue Nov 03, 2015 6:05 am

Why should anyone pay attention to the crocodile tears of internationalists? The same people that advocate for the dissolution of nation states, while effectively achieving their goals displacing and causing untold amounts of suffering in the Middle East, are now calling for Europeans to ‘humanely’ accept the refugees into their countries?

The people calling for the dissolution of nation states are the ones with no compassion, and they are not going to turn that around on me if I can help it.

Here is George to lay it out for you, speaking in reference to Mr. Orban.
“His plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees as an obstacle,” Mr Soros added. “Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.”


The following is a fair picture of George’s ‘humanitarian’ methods.

http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/10/28/p ... cutioners/

Yeah boy, George is such a fine exemplar of love and caring.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Europe's Refugee Influx Crisis

Postby tapitsbo » Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:01 pm

It is interesting that Orban went to Oxford with a grant from Soros... Controlled opposition, anyone?
tapitsbo
 
Posts: 1824
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 174 guests