Lord Balto » Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:06 pm wrote:these are Moslem (sorry, no speaka duh Newspeak) Belgians who, presumably, are locked in a global war against American/British/French hegemony, and they are using English internet hacker slang?
Obviously. The funny thing is, you
think you've just argued for the opposite of what you've just argued.
Also, you may think this is one of those "intuitive" as opposed to "rigorous" calls, whereas intuition would say, of
course they might use the "4." Whom would they be trying to attract? Youth they want to turn away from Justin Bieber? Or 110-year-old men like us, capable -- in 2015 -- of describing "4" as "internet hacker slang"! (Did you really just write that?)
Is there a requirement that threads that might actually produce a "there" in terms of real reasons to doubt elements of an official story must maintain a minimum level of non-intuitive non-rigorous bullshit to drown out any possible real evidence? Let's insist on it!
Speaking of numbers, let's get back to that 13!
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.
To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.
TopSecret WallSt. Iraq &
more