DrEvil » Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:47 am wrote:All social constructs that unify groups of people are being ripped to shreds in a very intentional and methodical way. Total control is the goal.
I think you're wrong about this one. Some of the old social constructs are losing traction, but new ones are popping up in their place. Societies and cultures change over time and the old guard are often uncomfortable with that. I'm in my late thirties and twenty-somethings are in some aspects completely alien to me. Things change.
"New ones" that, to paraphrase Orwell, in a time of universal confusion, makes stating the obvious not only a revolutionary act, but makes you at best, politically incorrect, at worst, jobless, in extreme cases, maybe even life-less.
There is no doubt that the family is an enemy to the agenda of the global elites, the owners, who at the very top, are such a small group of people that they fit into a 747, and who, unlike us, are united. Remember, there is no such thing as a shared interest when one owns and the other labors...they are always working against us, despite their never-ending propaganda.
By asserting a bunch of convoluted notions, creating false dichotomies, and destroying/tearing down not only social constructs but essential truths, they seek to replace what they've destroyed with either nothing and/or "solutions" that are only beneficial to them. Read
Bella Dodd's testimony to the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee in 1952. So there is always a hidden agenda, always under the guise of human/civil rights, that powerfully influences left wing ideology, as well as right-wing ideology, however, right-wing ideology--anything that supports war, corporations, wealth-- is more transparent for the most part.
For instance, take the feminism movement, largely confined to white, middle and upper-middle class women. While this movement struggles to maintain workplace equality and eliminate gender discrimination--a very good thing--believe it or not, there was/is more nefarious reasons behind this movement: to fragment families, splinter classes; to increase the number of hard-pressed taxpayers; to create another division: men and women, etc..
Today, the US has the highest family fragmentation rates in the industrial world, not because women are gaining equality to men, but because those at the top made sure to sabotage the economic infrastructure, to sabotage morality at the same time they were promoting their version of "feminism". They created a very unfriendly family/economic, morally relative environment where the choice to be a full-time mother was eliminated for most women, and where that choice, if taken, is disparaged and ridiculed. 40-50 years ago, it was possible to raise large families--sometimes over ten kids-- with one parent working in a middle class job--teacher, cop, etc. Today it's almost impossible to raise even a small family without both parents working full-time jobs and still struggle to pay the bills.
Once again, under the guise of civil rights, now it's the LGBT community that's being used to forward their plan. Yes, just like
some women benefited from the women's movement, members of the LGBT community will benefit by gaining acceptance, maybe acquire civil rights, all a very good thing, but it's important to understand how they're also being used to forward a completely different kind of harmful reality that only benefits the oligarchy.
As Thomas Pynchon said, “If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about the answers,” and most people are asking the wrong questions.
