Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby BrandonD » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:16 am

I listened to a speech of his recently, and I thought it was great.

I didn't get an impression that he is racist, but perhaps he is. If so, then in that sense he is in the wrong.

Nevertheless, in other areas he is dead-on correct.

People can be correct on one subject and incorrect on another. It happens fairly often. Which is one reason why wise people acquire information about anything important from multiple sources.

It is a common tactic for the establishment, and people supporting the positions of the establishment, to use a person's flaw in one area to discount their very valid criticism in another area.

As John Stewart once said, "We have to be right ALL THE TIME." - I don't see this statement as referring to liberals per se but to all those who oppose the establishment, which always occupies the high ground and will exploit this fact in every way.
"One measures a circle, beginning anywhere." -Charles Fort
User avatar
BrandonD
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby solace » Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:29 am

BrandonD » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:16 am wrote:I listened to a speech of his recently, and I thought it was great.

I didn't get an impression that he is racist, but perhaps he is. If so, then in that sense he is in the wrong.

Nevertheless, in other areas he is dead-on correct.

People can be correct on one subject and incorrect on another. It happens fairly often. Which is one reason why wise people acquire information about anything important from multiple sources.

It is a common tactic for the establishment, and people supporting the positions of the establishment, to use a person's flaw in one area to discount their very valid criticism in another area.

As John Stewart once said, "We have to be right ALL THE TIME." - I don't see this statement as referring to liberals per se but to all those who oppose the establishment, which always occupies the high ground and will exploit this fact in every way.



Guy's a scumbag antisemitic racist with a teardrop tatoo at the side of his eye which is what you get in prison to brag that you KILLED somebody . That's more than a fucking flaw on both accounts. You and others sticking up for him because you like his ideological and conspiratorial "message," is sick sick sick and immoral. Course that's par for the course around here (eg Icke, Shamir, Atzmon and any number of proven associates of Holocaust deniers and antisemites and White Supremacists used as sources willy nilly to support some point and then defended when exposed.)

It's a common tactic among moral people not to like assholes like this Jew hating racist shit head.
solace
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 11:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby backtoiam » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:14 am

Solace what if he didn't like cats, and you were a cat lover? Would that make him wrong too?
"A mind stretched by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions." Oliver Wendell Holmes
backtoiam
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:22 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:17 am

CounterPunch
Dissent Voice
Zero Hedge
The Guardian
What Really Happened
My dear old good internet friend Alstair at Scoop did a story on him.... Scoop was also recognised in the Qantas Media Awards as a finalist for "Best News Site" in 2007
all publish O'Keefe

Haaretz did an article on him.... :shrug:

Kenneth O’Keefe on BBC’s Hardtalk :shrug:



"Psychopaths Are Running The World" Former US Marine Blows Whistle On Syrian False Flag, Exposes Real Agenda
Tyler Durden's pictureSubmitted by Tyler Durden on 09/13/2015 12:45 -0400

Submitted by Sophie McAdam via TrueActivist.com,

"All of these players, these politicians are nothing more than puppets, they don't serve the people there is no real democracy, they serve the rich and powerful who run the world and that would be the bankers who control the money supply. The bankers make huge amounts of money....wars are great for them and ultimately they control the politicians.

Psychopaths are running the world."
Ken O’ Keefe is a former US Marine turned anti-war campaigner who appeared on a Press TV debate called Syria: War of Deception, and absolutely owned his opponent in such an awesome way that you’ll be cheering at his every comment.





Recorded in August 2013, this interview is now two years old, but in light of the current European refugee crisis it’s more relevant today than ever before. Passionate, articulate and knowledgeable about the subject matter, O’Keefe is the perfect guy to step up and tell these home truths- and boy, does he do a good job.

This guy nails so many crucial points about the Syria situation in one interview, he’ll have you jumping around and punching the ceiling.

“We have tortured and killed and maimed and raped around this planet; who in their right mind would consider the United States or the West in general to be in any position to punish anybody?” the veteran begins angrily, going on to outline the evidence for Syria being a false flag attack (Note: leaked emails showing how Assad was framed by the USA are detailed in this cached Daily Mail report from January 2013, which was published online briefly before being removed).

He rightly points out that the USA dropped more bombs in Vietnam than during the whole of WW2 combined, that it regularly arms terrorists (but the mainstream press refer to them as ‘freedom fighters’ when it suits them) and the former marine also points out how the so-called ‘War on Terror’ is nothing more than a well-planned strategy to be in a “perpetual state of war to destabilize the region for the Greater Israel plan.”

“We don’t operate under international law; we have the law of the jungle in which the rich and powerful basically determine what goes and what doesn’t go.” O’Keefe shouts. He correctly points out that Bush and Blair would be “rotting in prison cells” if the law were administered equally to all, or even “executed if their own rules were applied to their own crimes“. He also acknowledges that these men are nothing more than puppets who “serve rich and powerful bankers who control the money supply.”

O’Keefe rants about the hypocrisy of the West, who are arming terrorist organizations in the name of ‘freedom’ for civilians in geo-politically strategic countries while turning a blind eye to vile human rights abuses in countries like Saudi Arabia. The only people who still fall for all this crap, O’Keefe passionately points out, are “bought-off prostitutes [our politicians] or the dumbest of the dumb.”

In short, this is a video you should consider sharing with anyone you know who is still under the illusion that the USA and Britain are doing good in the world, anyone who doesn’t believe the ‘conspiracy theory’ that 9/11 (or Syria, or Libya, or Afghanistan or Iraq) were not orchestrated attacks to further a sinister long-term goal of controlling the Middle East, and anyone who believes that the desperate refugees fleeing these countries we have systematically destroyed have no right to seek help from their oppressors in Europe and North America- after all, without Western imperialism, we wouldn’t have any refugees in the first place (more on that here).

Ken O’Keefe renounced US citizenship in 2001 and now holds Irish, Hawaiian & Palestinian citizenship. He says on his blog: “My ultimate allegiance is to my entire human family and to planet Earth.”

Well said.


Rough Passage
On May 31, former U.S. Marine Kenneth O'Keefe was aboard the Mavi Marmara in the Free Gaza flotilla. He witnessed the passengers' preparations for a clash and the confused takeover by Israel troops that resulted in nine dead.

Noam Sheizaf Sep 24, 2010 12:02 PM

The IDF is silent
'Is that the behavior of a terrorist?'
 
BELFAST - "I don't remember exactly how long we were at sea. Maybe three-four days. There were all kinds of delays, but the atmosphere was good and our spirits were high. I was certain we would succeed in entering Gaza. I brought my expensive possessions - a computer, cameras. People came to me two-three hours before [the takeover of the ship] and told me, 'There will be an attack.' I replied, 'No, that can't be.' I really didn't believe it. In the 2008 flotilla I was the captain of one of the ships and there, too, Israel said they would stop us by force, but in the end let us through. I was convinced that it would be the same this time."

Kenneth O'Keefe. "I knew that if the Israelis boarded the ship, it would be a disaster."Facundo Arrizabalaga
Belfast, Northern Ireland. Kenneth O'Keefe is sitting at the bar of the Europa Hotel in the center of town. Guests are seating themselves all around on comfortable couches for afternoon tea. Nina Simone and Louis Armstrong play softly in the background while O'Keefe describes his one-on-one combat with an Israeli commando unit.
Kenneth O'Keefe has no hesitations about saying that he failed completely to foresee the Israeli naval operation against the Gaza flotilla, even though he had a convenient observation point aboard the Mavi Marmara.
On the night of May 31, the former U.S. marine who became a devoted activist for Gaza found himself at the center of one of the major fiascos of the Israel Defense Forces in recent years. The confused takeover by naval commandos of the flagship in the flotilla that aimed to breach the blockade of the Gaza Strip ended in a pitched battle, the killing of nine of the passengers, the temporary capture of three soldiers, 10 soldiers and dozens of passengers wounded, a revision of Israel's blockade policy and a rash of investigative commissions, Israeli and international alike.
O'Keefe, who lives in Ireland with his wife and son, devotes most of his time to Aloha Palestine CIC, created to promote trade with Gaza. According to him, he boarded the Turkish ship in order to reach Gaza and advance his organization's goals. After seizing the ship, the IDF claimed that O'Keefe wanted to get to the Gaza Strip in order to set up and train a Hamas commando unit, a charge O'Keefe denies vehemently (see box). O'Keefe maintains his political activity is out in the open and he offered to be interrogated while in Israel. Our conversation is his first meeting with an Israeli journalist.
"We knew there was at least a theoretical possibility that the Israelis would try to stop us, and Fehmi Bulent, the president of IHH [the Turkish NGO that organized the flotilla], told us from the outset that this time we were not simply going to sit and wait for the soldiers," O'Keefe continues. "He said this publicly even before the flotilla set out. When we were at sea, the IHH asked some of us, the passengers, if we would agree to take part in the defense. I was asked whether I wanted to film or help out. Team leaders were assigned to every area of the ship. Our area was the stern. I was one of a group of six and there was a Turk who was in charge of us. Because of my background and military experience, I was appointed his deputy.
"On the night before the attack, a meeting was held of all those who had volunteered to take part in the ship's defense. We were told that our goal was to prevent the soldiers from boarding the vessel, and that if they did board, maybe to try to disarm them. We were told explicitly not to use knives; even before we set sail we were told not to bring knives. I had a small knife that I used to peel fruits, but when I heard that no knives would be allowed on board I left the knife in Antalya.
"We were told in the briefing, 'If they throw a rope with a hook onto the deck, throw it back.' Things like that. They said explicitly not to kill. I don't remember anything being said about the possibility that we would seize a few of the soldiers.
"That night we were told to rest now, because the closer we would get to Gaza, the more likely it was that something would come up. We were surprised to be attacked in international waters. We weren't afraid. It was only just before the assault, when we saw the ships, the helicopters and the drones, that people really began to be afraid.
"We were resting in the sector that had been assigned to us when the boats carrying the commandos arrived. There must have been 10 or 12 boats behind the Mavi Marmara. We could see them getting closer, and when they drew close they threw stun, gas and smoke grenades at the ship. Most people don't know the difference between a stun grenade and a real grenade. It was about 4 A.M. It didn't feel like an innocent boarding of the ship, it felt like an assault.
"After they threw the stun grenades and approached the ship, people threw chairs at them and whatever came to hand. I tried to tell one of the Turks not to throw anything - I must still have been under the notion that they wouldn't try to board - but within a few minutes I already saw the first dead body. It was the Turkish photographer. He was killed even before the first soldier landed on the deck. That man was not even on the upper deck. He was not in any contact with the soldiers. He took a bullet in the forehead and then he was carried to the stern, where I was. When I saw him he was already dead." (For the IDF response, see box.)
"Less than five minutes after the [soldiers in] the boats failed to board the ship, the helicopters appeared. Now there was no longer any doubt about what was happening, but people around me were still in shock, not believing that it was really happening. Now there was also fear. I have been in difficult and dangerous situations in my life and I learned that at moments of tension the way to overcome fear is to control your breathing and focus on the things that have to be done.
"I went from the stern to the middle deck, below the upper deck, on which the soldiers landed. Just as I got there, one of the commandos fell from the upper deck, just a meter and a half from me, in front of my eyes. I think it was the soldier whose photograph was later published looking straight into the camera. The first thing I saw was the 9 mm pistol he was carrying, and I immediately tried to take it. The soldier was conscious but pretty much in shock, and it was easy to deal with him. I took his firearm but didn't know what to do with it. The whole time I heard shots from the upper deck, both the sound of paintball guns and firearms, simultaneously. It wasn't automatic fire, but there were a lot of single shots. There were many shouts all around.
"In the meantime, more people arrived and took the soldier inside. I went on from there to the middle deck holding the pistol in my hand, close to my chest and pointed upward. People passed me saying, 'They are killing people, they are using live ammunition.' I saw more wounded being rushed inside, and another body.
"One of the Turks asked me what I was doing with the pistol and I told him I didn't know. I tried to find one of the IHH leaders to ask him what I should do with the pistol. I didn't find the person who was in charge of our sector in the stern, so I went to the other side of the ship and then went back again, but none of the leaders was [sic] there. I went up to the command bridge and asked the captain if he could take the pistol from me. He said, 'No, I don't want firearms here.' In the end I decided to separate the weapon from the bullets. I gave the bullets to someone and hid the pistol. The logic was that if I succeeded in getting out of there the pistol would serve as evidence of the attack on the ship. I thought the pistol was evidence, so it shouldn't be thrown into the sea.
"After hiding the weapon I went back to the middle deck from the other side, when another commando was thrown down. This soldier had an assault rifle and was fully conscious. It was a lot harder to cope with him than with the first soldier. I and another Turk tried to take his firearm, but the strap was tied behind his back and he lay on his back and fought us. I saw that he was trying to reach the trigger, so we both made sure not to be opposite the barrel. He held the weapon so tightly that I had to pry his fingers loose from it. In the end we managed to get the rifle away from him and the Turk who was with me took it. Another two people arrived from midship and took this soldier inside, too.
"After a few minutes I went into the room where our wounded were. The three soldiers were there, too. They were without their masks, helmets and communications equipment and they were frightened. Very frightened. That was clear. They didn't speak. They looked like scared kids whose dad is about to beat them. I think they thought that we would do to them what they had done to us. They thought they were going to die, or at least they feared for their lives, you could see that on them.
"On this deck there were people who had lost their dear ones at the hands of the Israeli army and there were people who had lost their friends just now, in front of their eyes. By this stage I had already seen two bodies and a few more wounded. In these circumstances, there is no doubt that there were very angry people who wanted revenge of some sort, but they were an absolute minority. We all felt anger, but from the point of view of the absolute majority and from the point of view of the leaders there was no question of revenge, or even anything like it. The moment the soldiers were below they received medical treatment and no one hurt them anymore. Before they were taken there they took a few blows, there is no doubt of that. I think most of the blows were quite superficial, even though some of them may have been more than just blows. As far as I know, no soldier absorbed an injury he will not recover from or that will remain with him all his life, and the moment they got below they were given medical care.
"After about 15 minutes the order came to release the soldiers. I don't remember if it came over the speaker system or was given orally, but an order like that came through and six or seven of our people took the three soldiers and went out with them toward the bow of the ship. One of the soldiers was in worse condition than the two others. He had taken more blows and was in shock. The two who were in better shape jumped into the water and the third remained at the bow, from where the other soldiers rescued him.
"The IDF account according to which the soldiers escaped under cover of the melee and the shooting is simply untrue. I was inside the ship with the soldiers. There were at least a hundred people around the soldiers when the order came to release them. There was a small group of people, six or seven, who took the three soldiers from the room to the bow. There were shots or stun grenades there, and because they were about to be released anyway, our people just turned around and went back inside. Otherwise, from their point of view, what was the point of taking the soldiers outside? After all, there were helicopters and snipers there. If we had wanted to hold on to them, the right thing would have been to leave them inside.
"After the soldiers were released I saw another two-three bodies and I heard more explosions and shots, but less consecutively. A little more time passed and then the ship's captain announced over the speaker system, 'They have taken control of the command bridge, stop resisting.' And that was the end."
No invitation to tea
O'Keefe's body is covered with political tattoos such as "Citizen of the world" and "Truth, justice, peace." He is against all forms of nationalism ("It's ironic that because of opposition to the occupation I find myself supporting a Palestinian national struggle. I long for the day where all people see each other part of one human family, regardless of lines drawn on a map." ). He believes that the United States government was involved in the 9/11 attacks and views Zionism as an offshoot of Western imperialism. Personally, he does not call for an armed struggle and thinks that "the most powerful weapon the Palestinians have is the truth; violent resistance is nothing in comparison."
In a BBC interview he referred to some of Hamas' actions as "violation of human rights" but in the conversations with me he was adamant not to condemn Hamas: "I am against such attacks in the same measure that I am against state terror. Hamas has not perpetrated suicide attacks for years now, and when they won the 2006 elections everyone who prevented them from taking part in the political process is as much to blame as they are for the violence that followed. You hate them because they are violent, but what do you do when they take part in the elections? You kick them out and push them into a corner."
O'Keefe has devoted himself to the Palestinian cause since 2004. He has visited Israel and the West Bank twice. The first time he was caught by the IDF trying to enter the Gaza Strip without a permit, was incarcerated for 20 days and then deported. In the flotilla of 2008, he was the captain of one of the two ships that eventually reached Gaza. He spent a few weeks in Gaza before managing to leave via the Rafah crossing. The suffering of the population in Gaza, he says, which he witnessed firsthand, together with the sense of honor and pride that the Gazans showed, reinforced his determination to continue the struggle for Gaza.
Were you present when Bulent said the flotilla participants would struggle to defend the ship?
"I knew before we set out that the Turks are not like the other Westerners, that there would be no passive resistance in this case. The Turks are a tough people. They are people you don't mess with too much. In the United States or Britain people are asleep, there is no danger of rebellion. The Turks are different. I knew that if the Israelis boarded that ship, it would be a disaster. Not only from the aspect of the people who would be killed, but that it would also be a disaster for the Israelis."
Did you see them sawing the beams in preparation for the attack?
"I knew we would defend the ship. That was stated publicly a great many times. You have to be an idiot to board that ship and think it will be a ship of passive resistance."
So the same things would have happened even if the confrontation had taken place in the territorial waters of Gaza?
"That is my feeling, yes. Even though the fact that it was done in international waters - every Israeli will agree that that was a terrible mistake. If you attack, do it in the region of dispute. Apparently the army wanted to do it at night, because a trained force equipped with night-vision instruments possesses a tremendous tactical advantage. You know, the Israelis didn't send police or riot units to handle the demonstrations. They sent commando troops who are trained to kill. Ehud Barak said he would stop the flotilla at any price - and that is what they set out to do.
"If they thought we were a group of passive peace activists and that there would be no resistance to boarding the ship, what was the logic in coming in the middle of the night and using grenades? It's an insult to the intelligence to say that. Is Israeli intelligence so useless that they didn't even bother watching international newscasts, in which the leader of IHH said explicitly that we would defend the ships bodily? Did they know so little about the mood on the Turkish street that they thought boarding the ships would be an invitation to tea? Or did they know all that and because of it came at night, with stun, gas and smoke grenades and sought to gain a tactical advantage, in the clear knowledge that there would be a confrontation?
"There were helicopters there with snipers. The first to be killed was the photographer. That's the proof of the way the army behaved there, that and the 250 bullet holes in the ship itself, including places where there was no fighting."
Israel claims there was a planned ambush for the soldiers by a few dozen passengers.
"How exactly did they plan to attack? That's bullshit. When someone comes aboard with a rifle and shoots you, you don't start to think, 'Is it moral to raise an iron bar and protect myself?' You do what you have to do. The theory about 40 or 80 extremists is simply nonsense. Where is the proof? Israel says the passengers shot at the soldiers. Where are the gunshot wounds? Where are the weapons, the shells?"
Didn't the resistance to the soldiers make their reaction legitimate?
"I am not even going to pretend to persuade the Israeli public to adopt my point of view. It's clear that the Israelis believe that the army had every right to board the ship, international waters or not. It's clear that they believe we were terrorists or connected to terror. It's clear that the Israelis believe that we had no right to resist, because you are right and we are wrong and that's that.
"But if you look at it from a different perspective, there are a million and a half people in Gaza of whom the overwhelming majority are not Hamas, there are 800,000 children who are suffering from trauma and diseases. We wanted to help them. And in my opinion, that is also an Israeli interest, because the present approach to the Palestinians will not bring you security. We defended not only ourselves but also the mission, to aid innocent people. How is it possible to believe that it's justified to punish 800,000 children? If you see things like I do and like the people aboard the ship, it's as though they are your children. What would you do to save your child?"
But how could Israel be sure there were no weapons on the ship?
"Do you think there was any chance that the Turks would have transported weapons on their ship to Gaza? Israel could easily have approached the Turkish authorities and received guarantees that there would be no weapons and no terrorists on the ships. All that could have been done through diplomatic channels, if they were really interested in doing it.
"Personally, I have no desire or interest to bring weapons into Gaza, and I don't think anyone else wanted that. It's beyond stupidity. And what exactly could you bring that would be able to cope with the IDF? I don't believe armed resistance against Israel is anything but a losing battle. One flotilla is better than 10,000 rockets."
Fault line
The second time I was to meet O'Keefe, the road adjacent to the center of Belfast was blocked by the police because of a suspicious object. The convoy of armored vehicles and vans of the security forces illustrates the fragility of the Good Friday Agreement that ended what everyone had claimed was an intractable conflict. In addition, one could not avoid seeing the support of the Catholic community for the Palestinian cause. Not far from Sinn Fein headquarters, two Britons were collecting donations for a new convoy to Gaza. It is those civil society activists who were shocked by operation Cast Lead in ways Israelis don't always appreciate. During our interview, O'Keefe asked me at least twice whether I thought that the estimate that 80 to 90 percent of the Israeli public supported Cast Lead was realistic. "It's very hard to accept that," he says. "In the eyes of the world, support on that scale for bombing civilians with phosphorus is gross."
Nothing in O'Keefe's past indicated the course he would follow as an adult. He is from an affluent family and grew up in the suburbs of San Diego. He liked soccer and football, but gave them both up in favor of surfing. Politically, he leaned toward the Republicans and admired President Reagan.
He enlisted in the Marine Corps at the age of 19. He was, he says, a good soldier, popular with his buddies, until during a six-month mission aboard a ship in the Mediterranean he complained about unbecoming behavior on the part of a veteran sergeant. His life then became hell; he still becomes overwrought when he tells the story. In the First Gulf War, in 1991, he took part in the ground invasion of Iraq. There was "no serious resistance," he says. He paid no particular attention to the residents of the country he invaded.
"I was like all Americans, spoon-fed what I needed to know. I was so dumb that I didn't grasp that Saddam Hussein had been our boy for years, because he had fought against Iran; that he received weapons from us with which he killed Kurds; and that suddenly he had become a new Hitler who had invaded a defenseless sovereign country. At the time I was also an avowed supporter of Israel. I would have told you then that the Palestinians are a gang of terrorists who want to throw the Jews into the sea.
"That's why I don't hate the Israelis: I see myself in them. I also bought into that stuff. I would be happy to meet with the Israeli commandos who boarded the ship. I would like to sit down with them and talk to them respectfully. I would tell them, 'Considering the circumstances and what you were told, you are doing what you think is right. And you are fighters - I respect that. But I'm sorry, if you move away from the conditioning and the propaganda, if you are honest and fair and know history, you understand what these people are resisting.' Ehud Barak said himself that if he were a Palestinian, he would join the resistance."
After his discharge, O'Keefe entered college and underwent a conceptual revolution. He went to Hawaii and became a diving instructor, took part in activity to preserve marine life and started to take an interest in the indigenous population and in the "dispossession and land theft" that they were subjected to, as he puts it. In 2001 he renounced his American citizenship. Two months after the September 11, 2001 attacks he left the United States and requested political asylum in Holland.
On the eve of the invasion of Iraq in 2003, O'Keefe initiated Operation Human Shields in which hundreds of citizens of Western countries took part, in an effort to protect the Iraqi people bodily against the American bombs. "It was an extraordinarily powerful idea that simply took off, because people understood that the invasion was a disaster and was based on lies," he recalls. "Before going there I gave media interviews and made it clear that I did not support Saddam Hussein, who was a tyrant, a murderer and a dictator. That's why I wasn't invited to Saddam's palaces, as others were, but that didn't bother me.
"In the end," he continues, "the mission failed. People told the media stupid things that made it look as though we were working for Saddam Hussein. Saddam prevented us from visiting hospitals and from deploying where we wanted to. Ten days before the invasion I was deported from Iraq."
Do you understand that in the eyes of most people, if you go to Baghdad you are Saddam's ally and that if you go to Gaza you are the ally of Hamas? How could it be otherwise?
"Easily. At least hundreds of thousands of people died because of the invasion of Iraq. They could have been alive today. They are the proof that I went for the right reasons. How could I try to help those people without being accused of supporting Saddam? I guess there is no way. It's the same with Gaza. Probably the most beautiful moment of my life took place on August 23, 2008, when we arrived in Gaza with the first flotilla. There was a special atmosphere in the port. There was excitement like we had just won the World Cup. Tens of thousands of people were there. No one believed we would get through, but we did. We knew it wouldn't break the blockade, but it showed that it was possible to reach Gaza via the sea. For one day there was total euphoria. They looked at us like we were heroes, when actually we respected them more for what they had gone through. At that moment there was no other place in the world that I wanted to be."
After his return from Gaza, O'Keefe founded Aloha Palestine together with Lauren Booth, the half-sister of Cherie Blair, Tony Blair's wife. The organization's goal is to maintain civil trade with the Gaza Strip. Among those who have endorsed the organization are Noam Chomsky and the Dalai Lama.
"In Gaza I understood that people cannot live only from aid. They have to be capable of buying food themselves, of working. I called the initiative Aloha Palestine because the Palestinians very much reminded me of the people of Hawaii: despite everything, they have remained courteous and welcoming. Aloha is actually a way of life. The Palestinians may not have much, but what they have they will share with you. As an American, you can't go to Baghdad, but you can walk around without any problem in Gaza or the West Bank. People will look after you."
In the sun without water
O'Keefe did not make it back to the Gaza Strip. The battle for the Marmara ended around 5 A.M. and the ship made for the port of Ashdod. "It took another two hours before it was decided that we would go one by one to the stern with our hands raised," O'Keefe says. "A few dozen soldiers were waiting for us, tied our hands and searched us. I was kicked a few times, but it was very superficial, nothing serious. More attention was paid to people with a distinctly Muslim appearance. From there we were taken to a few points on the upper deck and told to kneel and wait.
"We were kept in that position until the Marmara reached Ashdod, at about 7 P.M. There was no shade on the deck and we had no food or water. An elderly man urinated on himself after all his requests to be taken to the toilet were ignored. At one point I tried to raise myself to stretch my muscles and a soldier shouted at me to sit down. When I refused he kicked me. A few others were also roughed up. It was unnecessary and unprofessional, but in comparison to the big picture it wasn't serious.
"From Ashdod we were taken to a facility in the Negev [Ela jail in the Be'er Sheva prison], where we stayed two days. The treatment we received also changed radically. True, we were not allowed to contact anyone and had no access to a lawyer, but we had food and water and were allowed to smoke.
"Gradually the number of people in the jail decreased until only 50 of us were left, and in the end we too were taken to be deported. We arrived at the airport and there was someone in charge wearing civilian clothes. Under his command were policemen in special uniforms, black or very dark blue. [There were policemen, Border Police and members of the police special patrol unit at the airport.] It was obvious that they despised us. We sat in the airport and a few meters in front of me was an American named Paul Larudee. Paul had a black eye and deep contusions on his right arm and he was in handcuffs. Apparently he had been told that he had to go somewhere and he would not do it and lay down on the floor. He was picked up by the hand and started to scream with the pain of his injuries. We all got up and started to shout at them to let him go. The police came over and shouted at us and hit us. One policeman hit me on the head with a truncheon and blood started to run down my face. I did not resist but told them everything I thought, that they were shits and cowards, so one of them started to choke me and the others kicked me in the ribs.
"There were four or five of them on me. I couldn't breathe. Just as I started to black out, they got off. That was the only moment I thought I might not survive this story. Others were also beaten in the airport and one of the Turks had his arm broken.
"I was on the floor. They handcuffed me and started to drag me. At that point I started to resist, because I didn't understand where they were taking me, so they threw me on the floor again and one of them kicked me in the head while I was lying on the floor and my head was bleeding.
"When the guy in charge brought the policemen under control again I no longer wanted anything from them. Someone wanted to wipe the blood off my face and I told him to back off. Probably they didn't want me to fly with fresh wounds and all the blood on me, so they took me to some detention facility in the airport, where I ended up staying two more days while the others had already flown back.
"I was held in a cell alone in the airport. I was not allowed to see a lawyer or to call anyone. The Irish consul general came to see me and begged me to agree to leave. I told him I wanted to see a judge. On the day before I left someone came in and said, 'A judge will see you now.' I entered a room and there was a judge there and he asked me questions and I answered him. Half an hour later he called me in and said, 'You are being deported from Israel.'
"The night before I left I was attacked in my cell by two guards or policemen. I don't know who they were. I was sleeping, they came in, beat me and left. So I had blood on my face when I was released. I would not agree to wash my face, even though the Irish consul general asked me to. I told him, 'This is the way I was treated and I will keep the blood on my face. That's how I will stay, or that's how I will leave.'"



]Open Mind Conference
http://www.openmindconference.com/speak ... /124-ken-o’keefe-us
Ken Okeefe"My voyage from US marine Gulf War veteran to human rights activist" Ken O’Keefe’s original marine conservation work has been somewhat overshadowed by his non-violent, but fully confrontational work for human rights. He is an ex-US marine and Gulf War Veteran, who formally renounced his US citizenship in 2001.
O’ Keefe’s activities to date include founding Human Shield Action to Iraq (2003), serving as a captain on the first Free Gaza Mission (2008), surviving an Israeli attack on the ship Mavi Marmara (2010) and becoming Social Enterprise Managing Director of Aloha Palestine CIC and the Samouni Project.

O’ Keefe is a published author and lecturer who now holds Irish, Hawaiian and Palestinian citizenship, but his ultimate allegiance is to his ‘entire human family’ and ‘Planet Earth’. His style of activism is characterised by his involvement in disarming two Israeli commandos as nine of his fellow Mavi Marmara passengers were executed.

The Israeli military later claimed O’Keefe was a "terrorist operative of Hamas". O’Keefe has repeatedly stated that Israeli Mossad and its assets, along with traitorous elements within the US, are directly responsible for the ‘false flag’ 9/11 attacks. http://www.worldcitizen.uk.net/


Ken O'Keefe a Political Prisoner in Israeli Jail

Monday, 28 June 2004, 12:44 am
Press Release: P10K

Ken O'Keefe a Political Prisoner in Israeli Jail

Irish-American political activist Ken O'Keefe remains in an Israeli jail after interference in his court hearing by Israeli security services. The judge cleared the courtroom for fifteen minutes to hear the arguments from three agents 'in camera,' before declaring that O'Keefe would have to remain in jail until another court hearing on Sunday.

The hearing opened with statements from O'Keefe's lawyer Yael Berda, who argued that O'Keefe was only a threat to undermining Israeli propaganda, but that the state was using arguments of 'security' to suppress his right to free speech and to criticize Israeli policies.

O'Keefe later described these policies as 'genocidal' in a statement to the court, and also defended his position of making comparisons between George W Bush and Hitler. He said, "Both Bush and Hitler suppressed civil rights in their own countries, built up huge war capabilities, and then unleashed their war machines by illegally invading defenseless states. If more people had stood up to Hitler as I and many others are standing up to Bush, many people, particularly many Jewish people would not have perished needlessly."

Contact: Ken O'Keefe in jail: 972 (0)555 13990

ian (@) P10K.net

Ken O'Keefe Statement Wednesday 23rd June

Before I state my "defence", I feel compelled once again to express my infinite love for Mother Earth and my entire human family. If it were not for this love, I simply would not be before this court today.

For the record, my purpose in Israel and Palestine was, and shall remain even after my departure, to further the P10K Mission of truth, Justice and ultimately Peace. Among the primary objectives of this mission was to secure a P10K ceasefire "Agreement in Principle". I submit this agreement to the court as proof of my intentions. Had I been successful in securing this agreement the inevitable result would be a cessation of offensive operations in Israel by Islamic Jihad and Hamas; in other words Israel would be more secure, and Israeli life would be spared. In addition, Palestine would be more secure, and Palestinian life would also be spared.

It is worth noting that critical individuals within Al-Aqsa Martyr's Brigades had agreed to the conditions of this ceasefire and my journey to Gaza was intended to personally push for Hamas and Islamic Jihad to agree as well. That is why I went to Gaza.

With regard to law; contrary to the conclusions of those wishing to deport me, I have great respect for law, especially human rights law and international law. But with Mohandas K Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr and Nelson Mandela as examples, I do not respect laws that do grave injury to inherent human rights and a nation's right to self-determination. And just as Gandhi, King, Mandela and many more have proven, all such laws that violate humanity are laws that must be resisted and challenged.

When I came to Palestine I came at the invitation of Palestinians and their leaders. I came as their guest, and I traveled to Gaza as their guest as well. But because Gaza is effectively a prison with Israeli policy and control preventing peaceful travel to and from, I was compelled to violate Israeli law, endanger my own life, in order to further a plan intending to save greater life. I shall in no way apologize for this; quite the contrary. I shall wear like a badge of honour my time in Israeli jail as proof that the Israeli government is for now the greatest threat to the security of the Israeli people.

In order to justify my incarceration and pending deportation, the Israeli government has made four key conclusions about me: 1 – That I claim Israel uses "terrorist tactics" 2 – That I "have sympathy for the Palestinian resistance" 3 – That I "express solidarity with the armed struggle" 4 – That I am ultimately a threat to Israeli security

With regard to the first conclusion, not only do I claim that Israel employs terrorist tactics, but I expose it as a verifiable fact. By the firing on civilian targets such as apartment blocks, extra-judicial killings, Sabra, Shatila and Jenin and more all qualify as terrorist acts resulting in the predictable deaths of innocent civilians.

As a critical thinking person, a moral being, I make no physical distinction between individual, group or state terrorism. All are repugnant in my mind, but since the latter in the examples I cite is representative of the state of Israel, a so called "democracy" no less, I must admit that I find it the most offensive of the three. And it is just such state terrorism from my birth nation of the Untied States that was most responsible for me legally renouncing my US citizenship on March 1st, 2001.

The truth is the word "terrorism" is the most abused word of our times. Israel and the United States are the primary abusers of this word terrorism, and these nations make themselves the biggest of hypocrites in their use of this word.

And the hypocrisy is not lost on our Palestinian and Iraqi victims, nor is it lost on those of us who see the crimes of our nations for what they are. There is such thing as "collateral damage" or "precision strikes"; there is only a blood stained legacy masquerading as "security".

With regard to the second conclusion, that I have sympathy for the Palestinian resistance, yes I do. As I do for the targets for Palestinian resistance. I do not, contrary to the designs of well oiled corporate propaganda machines and political puppets who incessantly chant about the need to fight "terror", ignore the primary root cause of individual and group terrorism. I acknowledge that the primary root cause of individual and group terrorism is state terrorism. I acknowledge that yesteryears "terrorist" often becomes today's hero, and I cite Nelson Mandela and the "founding Fathers" of America as but two examples. In both cases great individuals defied tyrannical powers endorsed violent resistance as a legitimate tactic to affect justice. I will say however that I find the deliberate targeting of civilians to be tragic and unjustifiable. If I am successful with the P10K Mission, all such terrorism will cease in Israel and Palestine. And I must clarify, just because Israel says it "regrets civilian loss of life" when it firs rockets into apartment complexes or bullets into stone throwing crowds, I am not impressed. When Israeli officials make these ludicrous statements they paint themselves as dishonest terrorists and nothing more.

The third conclusion; "I express solidarity with the armed struggle." In the face of a brutal and illegal occupation, in accordance with a United Nations Mandate justifying armed resistance, yes I do express solidarity. In fact, I have no doubt that if I were Palestinian today, South African during Apartheid, or American under British Colonial rule, I too would not only support but join the armed resistance. If I were Iraqi today I would participate in armed resistance. But I am not Palestinian or Iraqi; I am a human being who sees greater power in non-violence and I am committed to this form of struggle above all else.

Yet I do not turn my back on my brothers and sisters who do not enjoy the luxuries I do as a western citizen, who can return to a comparatively safe life in Europe. Instead I will work incessantly to get my western brothers and sisters to see our collective power to expose the Israeli crime of occupation in order to end the occupation and eliminate the need for armed resistance. Once again, I make no apologies whatsoever for this position.

The fourth conclusion; "I am a threat to Israeli security". The truth in this matter is that the Israeli government itself is the greatest threat to Israeli "security". This government is serving the interests of extremist Jewish Zionism by its continued expansion of Jewish settlements and unlawful land grabs by the construction of the obscenity known as the "security barrier". This transparently Jewish Zionist agenda, backed by Christian Zionists in America, explains the horrendous policies that result. These policies provoke individual and group acts of terrorism in which Israeli and Palestinian civilians become the victims. This feeds the Zionist agenda, leading to the inevitable result; effective genocide of the Palestinian people and nation, and further land and settlement expansion, furthering the Zionist dream of "Greater Israel".

All of this insanity is made not just a Palestinian and Israeli problem, but a global problem. By virtue of the Israelis known stockpile of illegal nuclear weapons, citizens of the world not only have the right but the obligation to participate in resolving this conflict.

Indeed, the fate of our entire planet, our very survival is at stake. The world must not be held to ransom by any rogue state, especially states that not only have weapons of mass destruction, but have publicly stated their willingness to use them.

Israeli and American "security" has come to mean increasing global insecurity. And this by any standard is unacceptable. I for one refuse and reject in total Israel and America's farcical claims of seeking security and for now I will focus my energy on ending the primary cause of Israeli insecurity; the occupation of the Palestinian territories. My deportation will only strengthen me in this endeavour.

Truth Justice Peace

Ken O'Keefe
Last edited by seemslikeadream on Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby Searcher08 » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:37 am

solace » Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:29 am wrote:
BrandonD » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:16 am wrote:I listened to a speech of his recently, and I thought it was great.

I didn't get an impression that he is racist, but perhaps he is. If so, then in that sense he is in the wrong.

Nevertheless, in other areas he is dead-on correct.

People can be correct on one subject and incorrect on another. It happens fairly often. Which is one reason why wise people acquire information about anything important from multiple sources.

It is a common tactic for the establishment, and people supporting the positions of the establishment, to use a person's flaw in one area to discount their very valid criticism in another area.

As John Stewart once said, "We have to be right ALL THE TIME." - I don't see this statement as referring to liberals per se but to all those who oppose the establishment, which always occupies the high ground and will exploit this fact in every way.



Guy's a scumbag antisemitic racist with a teardrop tatoo at the side of his eye which is what you get in prison to brag that you KILLED somebody . That's more than a fucking flaw on both accounts. You and others sticking up for him because you like his ideological and conspiratorial "message," is sick sick sick and immoral. Course that's par for the course around here (eg Icke, Shamir, Atzmon and any number of proven associates of Holocaust deniers and antisemites and White Supremacists used as sources willy nilly to support some point and then defended when exposed.)

It's a common tactic among moral people not to like assholes like this Jew hating racist shit head.


I think it is a common tactic among those as dumb as a sack of asshats, to fling lots of insults together, pretend it is an argument and announce that they occupy the moral high ground because, well, they say so.

The contrast between Brandon's post and your is striking. For me, his is reflective, considered and raises an important issue. Yours is a disconnected, patronising, logic-free, sub-4Chan rant.

Brandon D's point that the tactic of denying discussion about a subject in area A by a person, because of what was once said in area B is still unaddressed.... - solace did demonstrate this tactic by throwing in David Icke into her feverishly churning maelstrom of "anti-semitic racist scumbags". Poor thing, they dont really do the KKK on the Isle of Wight.

PS Lose one point for forgetting to use the word 'virulent'. :thumbsup
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby backtoiam » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:38 am

Solace answer my question. If you were a cat lover, and he hated cats, would that make everything the man said wrong? I don't want to strain my medulla on this but...hey elvis
"A mind stretched by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions." Oliver Wendell Holmes
backtoiam
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:22 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby slimmouse » Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:12 pm

I wasnt sure where to post this, but I think this is probably the most relevant place ( feel free to crosspost wherever)

Whilst most of the west were observing Camerons liefest in Parliament, the Russians were showing the how where and when of ISIS and its activiities

/

It should be fascinating to observe how the duplicitous faesces that currently run this planet on behalf of the West, Obama, Cameron, Erdogan, Netynyahu and the rest of these psycopaths attempt to explain this. If they truly think they are running things, then theyre even more stupid than I give them credit for.

Nonetheless, Fuck them all by all means neccesary is how I feel just now.

slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:25 pm

Searcher08 » Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:37 am wrote:I think it is a common tactic among those as dumb as a sack of asshats, to fling lots of insults together, pretend it is an argument and announce that they occupy the moral high ground because, well, they say so.

The contrast between Brandon's post and your is striking. For me, his is reflective, considered and raises an important issue. Yours is a disconnected, patronising, logic-free, sub-4Chan rant.


Unsure whether Nietzsche on fighting monsters or Matthew 7:3 is the better quote for this observation.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby Searcher08 » Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:51 pm

Wombaticus Rex » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:25 pm wrote:
Searcher08 » Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:37 am wrote:I think it is a common tactic among those as dumb as a sack of asshats, to fling lots of insults together, pretend it is an argument and announce that they occupy the moral high ground because, well, they say so.

The contrast between Brandon's post and your is striking. For me, his is reflective, considered and raises an important issue. Yours is a disconnected, patronising, logic-free, sub-4Chan rant.


Unsure whether Nietzsche on fighting monsters or Matthew 7:3 is the better quote for this observation.


Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.

Friedrich Nietzsche


I'm taking from this that you think/feel/observe that i have become a monster?

or...

"For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you. 3"Why do you look at the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? 4"Or how can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' and behold, the log is in your own eye?…


You see a log in my eye, that I am blind to...

or...

You were being ironic and applying those to solace's post, not mine -

or... something else??
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:59 pm

I was suggesting that you could dial down your own rhetoric in order to facilitate conversation, yes.

I apologize for the inherent unfairness of treating you as responsible for the turning the other cheek, but you are.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby slimmouse » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:22 pm

I would also like to send a big heads up to all those genuine journalists in Turkey, who are being arrested for telling it as it is.
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby solace » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:11 pm

backtoiam » Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:14 am wrote:Solace what if he didn't like cats, and you were a cat lover? Would that make him wrong too?


Strawman. Look. The guy is an apologist for David Duke and other Holocaust revisionists. Hangs with known antisemites and Jew haters and thinks there must be a kernal of truth in age old "fucking Jew," hate. If that doesn't make him despicable to decent people I don't what will. When Greta Berlin and many Palestinian activists are backing away from the guy like 90, you gotta wonder why others wanna support him. The obvious answer is ideology. "He says stuff I like. He says stuff I say and think. He must be ok because if he isn't then I.m a monster too."
solace
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 11:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:14 pm

CounterPunch
Dissent Voice
Zero Hedge
The Guardian
What Really Happened
My dear old good internet friend Alstair at Scoop did a story on him.... Scoop was also recognised in the Qantas Media Awards as a finalist for "Best News Site" in 2007
all publish O'Keefe

Haaretz did an article on him.... :shrug:

Kenneth O’Keefe on BBC’s Hardtalk :shrug:
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby backtoiam » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:02 pm

solace wrote:
The obvious answer is ideology.


The obvious answer is not ideology because ideology is as fluid as a river. The obvious answer is factual details that can be observed in real time on the ground.
"A mind stretched by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions." Oliver Wendell Holmes
backtoiam
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:22 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Who is Ken O'Keefe?

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:04 pm

Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests