Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
MacCruiskeen » Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:38 am wrote:What is the point of all those cameras if they are practically never used to find actual criminals?
BART police investigating the weekend killing of a passenger on a train in Oakland have no onboard video of the crime, even though the transit agency had what appear to be surveillance cameras just feet from where the suspect shot the victim at close range, The Chronicle has learned.
Although all BART cars have what look like cameras mounted to their ceilings, the vast majority of the devices are decoys incapable of capturing footage, BART officials conceded Wednesday. And some of the actual cameras are broken, two police sources said.
BART police said Wednesday that the suspect in the still-unsolved slaying was recorded before entering the train and after fleeing from it at the West Oakland station Saturday evening. They released clear photos taken by station cameras of a slim, tall man in a green jacket.
However, they released no images from inside the train. BART officials would not say why, but the two police sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, said no such footage exists — possibly because the cameras on the train were decoys.
The use of such dummy cameras is not common knowledge. Even one member of BART’s Board of Directors said he was unaware of the decoys, and conceded that they amounted to a security gap in the Bay Area’s backbone train system. A spokeswoman for the agency said working cameras will be on every car in BART’s new fleet, the bulk of which will arrive between 2017 and 2021.
At present, what appear to many riders to be sets of four cameras on the ceilings of each BART car are primarily fakes, an effort by agency officials to deter criminals — particularly vandals — without spending money on a more extensive surveillance system for soon-to-be junked cars.
Although BART has many working cameras on platforms and in station lobbies, the fact that cameras inside trains are decoys comes with a cost, as some crimes and key incidents aren’t preserved on film.
backtoiam » Sat Jan 16, 2016 2:38 pm wrote:This is an extremely weird 14 minutes of video. I don't know whether to believe it or not. If this is a real scenario our world is going to get really weird.
jakell » Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:35 am wrote:Didn't hear anything approaching unrelenting spittle frothing hatred, in fact I heard a fair amount of fairly balanced dark humour which seemed a healthy response to the rather scary situation he was in.
As an exercise in perspective it may be useful to imagine the lengths he could have gone to, and any possible outcomes.
Swedish police will no longer be able to give descriptions of alleged criminals for fear of being seen as racist.
According to an internal letter, police in capital city Stockholm are instructed to refrain from describing suspects' race and nationality, according to news website Speisa.
Local newspaper Svenska Dagbadet reported it had seen the letter, which it said outlined how officers should now notify the public of crimes.
The crimes “involve everything from lighter traffic accidents to serious crimes like muggings, beatings and murder,” the paper reported.
The letter specifies that, for everyday crimes such as burglary, basic information such as ethnicity, nationality, skin colour and height should not be given.
It was written by Stockholm police press officers Wolf Gyllander and Carina Skagerlind, and said crimes should be reported externally via the police website, without descriptions.
“We want to avoid pointing out ethnic groups as criminal,” said Mr Gyllander.
Sepesia reported the letter read: “Criticism is sometimes made against police regarding information about people’s skin colour. It is perceived as racist.
“As police are not racist, nor shall be constructed as so, this directive now applied.”
The letter, dated September 15, 2015 was written just a few weeks after a youth festival in central Stockholm at which there were a number of alleged sex attacks.
Elvis » Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:31 pm wrote:jakell » Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:35 am wrote:Didn't hear anything approaching unrelenting spittle frothing hatred, in fact I heard a fair amount of fairly balanced dark humour which seemed a healthy response to the rather scary situation he was in.
As an exercise in perspective it may be useful to imagine the lengths he could have gone to, and any possible outcomes.
Absolutely. He could have said, "Hey brother, can I give you a lift?"
jakell » Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:35 am wrote:Didn't hear anything approaching unrelenting spittle frothing hatred, in fact I heard a fair amount of fairly balanced dark humour which seemed a healthy response to the rather scary situation he was in.
As an exercise in perspective it may be useful to imagine the lengths he could have gone to, and any possible outcomes.
Elvis » Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:31 pm wrote:jakell » Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:35 am wrote:Didn't hear anything approaching unrelenting spittle frothing hatred, in fact I heard a fair amount of fairly balanced dark humour which seemed a healthy response to the rather scary situation he was in.
As an exercise in perspective it may be useful to imagine the lengths he could have gone to, and any possible outcomes.
Absolutely. He could have said, "Hey brother, can I give you a lift?"
Nordic wrote:jakell » Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:35 am wrote:Didn't hear anything approaching unrelenting spittle frothing hatred, in fact I heard a fair amount of fairly balanced dark humour which seemed a healthy response to the rather scary situation he was in.
As an exercise in perspective it may be useful to imagine the lengths he could have gone to, and any possible outcomes.
Rather scary situation? How was it scary?
What's so scary about a bunch of bored and curious refugees trying to get away from their camp and Che k out the surrounding countryside?
Obviously he was terrified but it seemed in the same way a heavy viewer and worshippers of Fox Noise might be finding himself with a flat tire in the streets of Compton. He's clearly a racist fuck.
But seriously what was scary about that situation?
Fixx » Mon Jan 18, 2016 9:28 am wrote:
They are not out trying to "check out the local countryside", they are trying to stow away on vehicles. One of my cousins is a lorry driver, he does the route to Europe quite a lot, on several occasions he has had to await police back up after he was threatened with knives, iron bars and the like for trying to remove people from the back of his wagon (for both safety reasons and the fact he does not want to face the potentially massive fines if he was caught with migrants in the back of his truck.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 154 guests