It is the film that The Magus should have been.
All the trailers give too much away.

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
brekin » Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:41 pm wrote:It is the film that The Magus should have been.
Cordelia » Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:00 pm wrote:brekin » Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:41 pm wrote:It is the film that The Magus should have been.
Interesting observation. I found 'Best Offer' to be a lush, beautiful film, and thought Geoffrey Rush gave a brave performance--if my memory is correct, he was in every scene. Thanks for the reminder (to buy it used on Amazon).
stefano » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:17 pm wrote:Cordelia » Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:00 pm wrote:brekin » Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:41 pm wrote:It is the film that The Magus should have been.
Interesting observation. I found 'Best Offer' to be a lush, beautiful film, and thought Geoffrey Rush gave a brave performance--if my memory is correct, he was in every scene. Thanks for the reminder (to buy it used on Amazon).
Thanks for this, brekin, I watched it last week. Really beautiful bit of magical fiction - very The Magus, as you said. I never knew The Magus had been made into a movie but from the reviews I've read it doesn't sound all that good.
Cordelia » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:11 pm wrote:stefano » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:17 pm wrote:Cordelia » Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:00 pm wrote:brekin » Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:41 pm wrote:It is the film that The Magus should have been.
Interesting observation. I found 'Best Offer' to be a lush, beautiful film, and thought Geoffrey Rush gave a brave performance--if my memory is correct, he was in every scene. Thanks for the reminder (to buy it used on Amazon).
Thanks for this, brekin, I watched it last week. Really beautiful bit of magical fiction - very The Magus, as you said. I never knew The Magus had been made into a movie but from the reviews I've read it doesn't sound all that good.
Last year a friend bought 'The Magus' dvd at Wal-Mart for $5; we got through about 20 minutes. It was an unwatchable parody of the book, which was too bad, because Anthony Quinn & Michael Caine played the leads. It should be on the list of worst films adapted from great novels (surprisingly Fowles himself wrote the screenplay).
A mid 1960's film adaptation of Fowles' psychological/thriller novel 'The Collector' is worth seeing imo. It's a chilling but restrained (by today's standards) story of obsession, stalking, kidnapping, etc., by a mentally unbalanced person, made before the theme became popular Hollywood fare. Great performance by underrated Terence Stamp.
brekin » 29 Jan 2016 17:41 wrote:I recommend this, but can't talk about it...too painful.
It is the film that The Magus should have been.
All the trailers give too much away.
Jerky wrote:Whoa! Hold on now! The film that The Magus should have been? How do you mean? Do you mean that it reflects the spirit of the Fowles novel better than the (execrable) film version put out in the 1970s could ever hope to? I'm definitely intrigued! Also by you saying that it's too painful to discuss. On what level? Unless even talking ABOUT TALKING ABOUT it is too painful!
yer old pal Jerkybrekin » 29 Jan 2016 17:41 wrote:I recommend this, but can't talk about it...too painful.
It is the film that The Magus should have been.
All the trailers give too much away.
KUAN wrote:.
I've not seen the movie but the rewritten ending of the revised version of the novel was a great disappointment to me
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests