jakell » Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:21 am wrote:American Dream » Sun Feb 21, 2016 4:41 am wrote:Anti-fascistNews.net recently published an article about web magazine Heathen Harvest. Sadly, it rings true:
In almost every interview on the site they will begin referencing racial and neo-fascist themes. Often times questions reference the perennial traditionalism of [openly fascist political philosopher] Julius Evola , books like Oswald Spengler’s The Decline of the West, or racial paganism....
Their podcast, The Forest Passage, drops much of the pretense and takes us directly back to the racism of the Alt Right. In Podcast #12, they open with jokes like calling our current period the “current year,” a joke from the rabidly racist and anti-Semitic podcast The Daily Shoah. They go on to deride “liberals” for their universalizing morality, they admire nationalism instead of “globalism,” and certainly side with the idea that elites should be running society…. In this episode one of the hosts discusses Germany’s choice to let in Syrian refugees, which they say is “destroying” Europe. They present contemporary politics as “Nationalism vs. Globalism,” presenting the common straw-man argument from fascists that to be against nationalism is to be in favor of global corporate capitalism.
http://antifascistnews.net/2016/02/13/n ... -entryism/
Had to check the link to see what sort of site 'Heathen Harvest' is. As it's a music site it seems to belong more on your 'lines' thread'.
If antifascistnews are referencing an overwhelming and sudden change in their orientation, then we are looking at something similar to RedIceRadio which I think deserved more discussion. Gradual change (in whatever direction) is to be expected, but sudden change sort of points to external forces, or at least tends to stand out.
I'm not that convinced about there being a big problem with the themes they discuss in their podcast**, some of those described here seem to overlap with current general themes anyway. I was amused by them referencing Spengler's 'Decline of the West' as belonging among fascist material, a rather glaring error that suggest that the whoever wrote this piece is not that knoweldgeable.
**I might have a listen to it now, just to see.
Thought I'd bring this to this thread as it fits in with the recent music focus.
After listening to the
podcast, I discovered that antifascistnews' description of it is incredibly way off.
It's pretty loose and seems mainly two guys, one North American and one who sounds Scandinavian shooting the shit, it's so loose I didn't even catch their names and no introductions were made (the latter guy's name sounds amusingly like 'Yessir'). Anyway, I tried to find some intersections with the above description and the
only real 'hits' were
23:30 Some musings about how some 'fanzines' are developing more of an ideological backbone (I may talk on a different thread about my experiences in the fanzine/music scene)
24:20 How this 'ideological backbone' seems to revolve around ideas of globalism vs national identity.
note, this interview doesn't actually discuss or promote these ideologies, just mentions them, contrary to what antifascistnews suggests29:30 How a lot of the criticisms of the ideology expressed in Black metal music appears to be virtue signalling (who knows? this is an opinion about an opinion about an opinion)
46:00 A discussion about antifa (this guy seem so removed from that particular clusterfuck that he calls them 'anteefa'), and how their attitude to their events seems distorted. He particularly references a 'Death in June' one.
52:30 Remarks that the fussing about black metal ideology in the fanzine sphere seems to be more of an American that European phenomenenon. (links to the above snippet in some ways)
That some of the off-colour remarks are backlash against virtue signalling (like a lot of black/death metal was a backlash against Christian values/morality).
Questions that the Black metal scene is homogenous enough for antifa's (et al) broad criticisms to be valid.
These are about the only relevant points I could pull out of the hour and a half podcast. The vast majority seems to suggest that they don't give a fig about the antifa stuff and the ideological tussles
" Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism"