Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Joe Hillshoist » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:11 pm wrote:
Just out of interest what are people sposed to think when you put this string of words together?They really contained the seeds of their own destruction, and thank God they went. Their style was a gift to their opposition.
jakell » Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:40 am wrote:Joe Hillshoist » Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:09 am wrote:
...You say your whole thing is "WNs think this:..." (which we already knew,) and "...its just one view."
Why is it the only view you put forward?
You've spent countless words trying to keep the focus of the discussion on WN tropes to the exclusion of all others. You give them no platform.
Actually, I've spent very few words on it, the rest have been to point back to those in the face of people trying to (inadvertently) complicate issues. There is an alternative WN trope that I have so far failed to mention.
82_28 » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:31 pm wrote:jakell » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:16 pm wrote:I reckon 82_28, like me, you are a great believer in peer-moderation. (been watching you).
The trick is to avoid going from this to this.
You won't get the second guy with me. I've become very practiced at staying cool
Great. Now I'm being watched. Oh well. But if you say who you say from where you are from I at least have a 12 hour head start.
jakell » 05 Mar 2016 22:23 wrote:Joe Hillshoist » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:11 pm wrote:
Just out of interest what are people sposed to think when you put this string of words together?They really contained the seeds of their own destruction, and thank God they went. Their style was a gift to their opposition.
Seems a fairly vanilla phrase to me, even when context has been stripped out
82_28 » Sat Mar 05, 2016 1:07 pm wrote:I just do my part to keep things civil because I motherfucking remember the fucking old ass fucking days.
Joe Hillshoist » Sat Mar 05, 2016 1:17 pm wrote:
You talked about modern attempts to mainstream WN/BN, bemoaned the leaders around before those attempts,said you were glad they went, then you pointed out that what they were doing benefitted people who don't like racist violence or white, british nationalism. If you're gonna link those thinks in a paragraph instead of keeping them as separate ideas then don't get all defensive when people take you at your words.
Sounder » Sat Mar 05, 2016 2:22 pm wrote:Not a given?
The points that Joe is making sure don't seem to be a stretch though.
82_28 » Sat Mar 05, 2016 5:07 am wrote:I just do my part to keep things civil because I motherfucking remember the fucking old ass fucking days.
82_28 » Sat Mar 05, 2016 4:31 pm wrote:82_28 » Sat Mar 05, 2016 5:07 am wrote:I just do my part to keep things civil because I motherfucking remember the fucking old ass fucking days.
I should have put that in green. I was just going back to myself swearing all the time. I thought some would get it. But it was meant as sarcasm.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests