Sounder » Mon Apr 04, 2016 10:02 am wrote:Yes, for now tightly held, hey maybe some super hacker can re-hack the documents and we could get a clue.
Although I'll concede that was funny.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Sounder » Mon Apr 04, 2016 10:02 am wrote:Yes, for now tightly held, hey maybe some super hacker can re-hack the documents and we could get a clue.
lucky » Mon Apr 04, 2016 5:34 am wrote:Over 2 terabytes of info - its all over the UK press today, could get very sticky for some people and a great spectator sport for the rest of us. But what is the subtext to it all we are sensible enough to know that nothing gets leaked and released unless TPTB want it to..imo anyway.. Interesting that one name that is being spoken about out of a handful is Putin while others are referred to as 'business men, politcos etc.
It would be my special pleasure to kick you off this site, if I could. A little bit petty, no? But justified.
We can always rely on your ignorance.
So far, there's solid info in there about money laundering by Cameron's family. So the Guardian reliably tries to spin it through vague allegations as if it's about all about Putin - exposing themselves more than anything else. And you're lapping it right up. Who's your latest imagined Soros-Jew "organisation," by the way - Sueddeutsche Zeitung?! And I love "Conspirascope" as perfectly blind projection on your part. How did I not have you on ignore yet for a better reading experience?
THE PANAMA RACKET IN ONE SENTENCE
No need to write a 5,000-word piece anymore (even though maybe I'll go for 800). My reader Jueri nails it in one sentence:
"The Panama Papers are the exact kind of weaponized psyops posing as an 'activist leak' I wanted to see from hybrid warfare."
THE ULTIMATE LIMITED HANGOUT LEAK
Put on your Panama hat and dance the leak.
And if you believe in the integrity of the "International Consortium of Investigative Journalists" (ICIJ), I got a made in Shenzhen Panama hat to sell ya.
I never was, and never will be, a member of this racket; well, people asked me, and I'm answering.
The ICIJ gets its cash and its "organizational procedure" via the Exceptionalistan-based Center for Public Integrity. The money comes from: Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, Rockefeller Faimly Fund, Kellogg Foundation and the Soros racket.
This alleged most massive leak ever was obtained by - what else - US intel.
But the REAL leak will never be known. Even the uber-pathetic Grauniad admitted, on the record, that "much of the leaked material will remain private".
Why? Because it DIRECTLY implicates a gaggle of Western 0.00000000001% multibillionaires and corporations. All of them play the offshore casino game.
So what next? Messi in jail?
Interviewer: Do you still run stories past GCHQ...have you ever done that?
Rusbridger: Yeah, well, we've had... I mean... I think... I don't have a problem with that and I don't think Glen Greenwald has, erm...so, since early June we have multiply, erm... talked to the...GCHQ...sometimes they say...we, you know, begin by saying we would rather you didn't publish this, but if you are going to publish it can you look out for X, Y, Z....
JackRiddler » Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:25 pm wrote:It would be my special pleasure to kick you off this site, if I could. A little bit petty, no? But justified.
Thanks for spewing your arrogance and hatred through the site like you used to. Constantly. And here I was starting to think maybe you'd changed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests