Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby Nordic » Wed May 18, 2016 3:44 pm

Interesting story from this D candidate as to how the D party blocked him every step of the way:

https://www.prlog.org/12539046-roque-ro ... orate.html

Obviously, I don’t fit the Democratic mold for this election cycle: I’m a socially liberal, fiscally responsible minority candidate without 30-plus years of relatively limited political effectiveness. So what has the party done?

It has refused my requests to be included in the polls that determine who qualifies for the national debates. Thus, I had no chance of being invited to the debates that are critical to building a national reputation and fundraising base.

Until California’s Secretary of State placed me on that state’s primary ballot, no other Secretary of State or State Party had granted me ballot access. In the few cases where a reason was offered, it ironically was because I had not participated in a national debate and therefore lacked name recognition.

In states like Florida, Georgia and South Carolina, there is no recourse. I was denied ballot access and the citizens of those states were denied a choice.

Some states provide an alternate path to ballot access. However, to retain control, many State Parties establish complex rules and signature requirements so high that no one in history had achieved them… until I did.

By late December, I passed Martin O’Malley in terms of the number of states in which I was qualified. I also qualified in the critical swing state of Ohio, while O’Malley did not. Yet he continued to be featured in the massive advertising that the DNC does online and through traditional media. The same is true of state websites, which showcased his likeness while refusing to include mine.

Once it became clear that I had a viable path toward the nomination in terms of the number of states and territories in which I qualified (40 so far), new barriers were erected.

Iowa, and every caucus since has refused to list my name on their sign-in sheets even though I qualified. Instead, I have been listed as “Other.” In addition, no places were provided to form my preference groups, we were denied signage while other candidates’ signage was permitted. The State Parties refused to provide us with a list of where their caucuses were to be held while such lists were provided to the “major” candidates.

Then, we moved on to the nation’s first primary in New Hampshire. At one point, I was listed in third place with 851 votes. Twenty-six minutes later, my tally was 54 votes; a loss of 797 votes. Perhaps I should take pride in being the first candidate in history to lose 94% of his votes during the actual course of the count.

I could dismiss this as human error had it not happened again on Super Tuesday. While watching Texas results, we were delighted to have 8,080 votes in Travis County. About twenty minutes later, we had only 108 votes; a 99% decline and, interestingly enough, a loss of 7972 votes. Apparently, someone likes the numbers 7, 9 and 7 (in that sequence).

We have lost votes and petitions at an alarming rate. Two boxes of signature petitions “disappeared” in Virginia, which left us short of the filing requirement. Wisconsin also denied us ballot access after it inexplicably lost 145 of the petitions.

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz offered the best explanation. CNN’s Jake Tapper recently asked her if the system was rigged (while discussing Superdelegates). Without hesitation, she said, “Unpledged delegates exist really to make sure that party leaders and elected officials don’t have to be in a position where they are running against grassroots activists.” I am a grassroots activist.

If it sounds like I’m disappointed and frustrated, it’s because I am.

If it sounds like I’m complaining, I’m not.

I just thought you should know what’s going on behind the scenes so you can do something about it in the upcoming primaries and caucuses. Please consider casting a vote for me. I may not win, but you’ll be sending a strong message to a party that needs to hear it.

Contact
Kitty Kurth
***@rocky2016.com
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby Project Willow » Wed May 18, 2016 3:47 pm

The video Nordic posted reflects what happened in Pike county when one of their machines was zeroed out. When the numbers were reposted Clinton was ahead. This comes from only one source, and not the best certainly, but that's what Ive been able to find so far. http://www.inquisitr.com/3107235/card-reader-issues-in-kentucky-push-hillary-clinton-ahead-of-bernie-sanders-pike-county-votes-erased/
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4798
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby Project Willow » Thu May 19, 2016 2:41 am

No exit polls will be conducted during the rest of the primary. I think the hammer is going to come down hard on Bernie.
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4798
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby Nordic » Thu May 19, 2016 2:47 am

We really need the UN, or somebody, to monitor and even run our elections. This is so third-world it's a joke.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby Nordic » Thu May 19, 2016 2:54 am

Ok for those who aren't on FB, our leader in absentia, one Mr Jeff Wells, posted the following today:

I hope he doesn't mind me sharing it.

American media, a thought experiment:

Madam Putin is running for President of Russia. She declares her husband - constitutionally prohibited from serving another term - will be in charge of the economy.

Her opponent, a reformer, packs stadiums and overflow stadiums with enthusiastic supporters, while she can't fill a high school gym.

Through her family's slush fund valued at hundreds of millions of dollars, she secures the loyalty of party apparatchiks.

Exit polls become inaccurate. Hundreds of thousands of voters are purged. Delegates are deregistered without explanation. Rules change on the fly. Protests are called unacceptable.

How would you report it?
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby overcoming hope » Mon May 23, 2016 1:47 pm

Clinton voter fraud in Polk County, Iowa Caucus

Caucus chair and Clinton precinct captain do not conduct actual count of Clinton supporters and deliberately mislead caucus

http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4578575/c ... owa-caucus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNz-dtnQ1Ys
overcoming hope
 
Posts: 489
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby overcoming hope » Mon May 23, 2016 1:51 pm

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tim-robbi ... 47102.html

We Need to Fix Our Broken Election System
Tim Robbins

Going into Tuesday’s Democratic primary in Indiana, polls showed Bernie Sanders trailing Hillary Clinton by around 7 percent. The final tally had Sanders up by 6 percent, a 13 point difference that seems to follow a pattern of polling discrepancies in this primary process that are quite troubling. A couple of weeks ago I shared a post containing statistics compiled from CNN and the New York Times figures comparing Democratic Party primary exit polls and final election results. The numbers show a significant discrepancy between the two, favoring Hillary Clinton in all but one of the primaries by an average of 9.02 percent and in the New York primary by 16 percent. The post carried an incendiary headline, suggesting election fraud, which caused quite a ruckus. I’m glad it did. We need to have this discussion.
overcoming hope
 
Posts: 489
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby Project Willow » Tue Jun 07, 2016 1:12 am

Watch this video. Yes, it's long. Yes, the folks are not telegenic and they're somewhat naive at times, but this is important. If you can't watch the whole thing, put on the last 5 minutes.

User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4798
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby conniption » Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:17 am

counterpunch

June 9, 2016
Where are the Missing California Primary Votes?


by Rick Sterling

Richmond California is a refinery town in the San Francisco Bay Area. It is also where there is a diverse working class community with a strong Richmond Progressive Alliance which previously elected a Green Party Mayor. Bernie Sanders visited the city and actively supported the populist movement in February 2014 making it likely that Bernie Sanders would receive strong support in Richmond.

My daughter is a school psychologist in Richmond’s local school system. Here is her experience yesterday in the California Primary Election:

“Never have I felt so much that my vote doesn’t count!

My Richmond, CA polling place at 1340 Marina Way South was an absolute mess.

1.The location was different from every other time I’ve voted out here and Google initially mapped me to an abandoned patch of dirt next to a park.

2. After I eventually figured out how to get there, myself and few other people waited in the wrong line for about 10-15 minutes, because the signs weren’t appropriately marked.

3. Finally I get to the table with ballots and I’m told they ran out of Democratic ballots.

4. NONE of the people working there with the exception of 1 woman, that I don’t think even worked there (!) could explain to me how the stupid NXD ballot process works and even then I was still confused.

5. I had to ASK for the other ballot with the prop measures and senate vote because the guy forgot to give it to me!

6. After I finished filling out my ballots, a woman takes my ballot with the prop measures and slides it in the machine, then LOOKS at my presidential ballot vote and stuffs it in a box that is filled to the brim with other provisional ballots. I asked her when it would be counted and she said in a few weeks.

7. Before I even get home the opposing candidate has been proclaimed winner.

I already reported all this BS to Bernie’s voter complaint hotline, but I’m ready for a revolution y’all.”


That experience was shared by many others in California. This LA Times story is headlined: “It was just chaos: Broken machines, incomplete voter rolls leave some wondering whether their ballots will count”. The report documents in writing and video the experience of numerous people with the observation that “experts said the culprit for Tuesday’s voting problems seems to be a confluence of factors — old voting machines, a competitive election that has drawn new voters, plus complex state voting laws that can be hard for poll volunteers and voters to follow.”

Huffington Post reported “LA Primary Mired in Voting Problems.” Across the city many people were forced to vote “provisionally” due to machine breakdowns and other problems.

Prior to the election there were reports of poll workers being misinformed in official training sessions.

As of noon the day after the election, the total count is shown to be 1.94M for Hillary and 1.50M for Bernie for total vote count of 3.44Million votes. This contrasts with a total vote count of over 5 Million in the 2008 California primary election. Where are all the missing votes? How many provisional votes have not yet been counted?

One might argue that the 2008 California was held on “Super Tuesday” in February and that generated more participation. However given the huge excitement over the Sanders campaign and high interest in the election race, it’s hard to explain such a large decline when the population has increased. One might argue that news reports that Hillary Clinton had already won the race, broadcast on the eve of the election, reduced participation. This is evidence of media bias and spin but it’s hard to see it suppressing the participation of Sanders supporters who came out in tens of thousands day after day in cities throughout the state. Huge crowds of Sanders supporters waited for hours to participate enthusiastically in Stockton, Vallejo, Sacramento, Oakland, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Santa Monica, Los Angeles, San Diego and beyond. It’s hard to see them being fooled or dissuaded from voting by a dubious AP story possibly promoted by the Clinton campaign.

Sixteen years ago, with Al Gore having little contest to be the Democratic nominee, 3.2M voters participated in the California Primary race. At that time relatively few progressives or independents were participating in the Democratic Primary race.

In short, it does not seem credible that there are 30% fewer votes, over 1.5 million, this year compared with 8 years ago. How many provisional ballots remain uncounted? Going back to my daughter’s experience in Richmond, how many boxes filled to the brim with provisional ballots are there throughout the state? Where are the missing ballots?
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby 82_28 » Thu Jun 09, 2016 10:01 am

I don't quite know how polls work other than that they exist and are given a certain weight to shit. Sanders however was polling within 1 point of Clinton and to lose like this seems fucking impossible. Obviously it reminds us of watching the returns in 2000 and Gore being declared the winner and then whoops, we got a change here folks! George W Bush is now being named the winner. Then fast forward 1 day and all the "liberal" sites blamed it on Nader voters. I was like WTF, don't you see the crime going on here?

Water under the bridge.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby Rory » Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:12 am

tmp_32223-IMG_20160609_07473994643306.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Rory
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby Luther Blissett » Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:52 am

Also via Jeff:

Image

http://thebernreport.com/have-we-witnes ... ialnetwork

…Together with Axel Geijsel, from Tilburg University (The Netherlands), we reasoned that, if anyone were to have ‘rigged’ the elections, it would be most evident by comparing the outcomes of states wherein it is possible to check the legitimacy of the placed votes to the states that cannot provide this evidence. For example, California offers a small ‘receipt’ that is torn off from the voting ballot, while certain other states do not.

What we found is that, on average, states that do not have paper trails were won by Secretary Clinton at a rate of about 65%. In contrast, in the states that do have a paper trail, the Secretary won at a rate of about 49%. These differences were statistically significant.…
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:37 pm

I mailed in my vote for Bernie. Looks like it may not have been counted.

HEY CALIFORNIA, YOUR ELECTION WAS RIGGED
Posted on June 9, 2016 by Daniel Hopsicker

Hey California. Here’s an URGENT SIGALERT: There’s a snake hidden in your midst, coiled inside your election machinery. Exercise extreme caution. Be on the lookout for a late-model black SUV with illegally-tinted windows… and a million votes tied up in the trunk.

Executives (and owners) of the election company that counted approximately 40 per cent of California’s vote have been convicted of bribing and suborning public officials. They’ve been busted for rigging elections—a couple times per decade—for the past 40 years. Top executives have gone to jail. Still, they soldier on, tabulating and counting the vote, as if nothing had happened. And we let them.

Two days before the California primary, I wrote, “If the 2016 Democratic primary in California is rigged, it’s ‘‘the boys’ from one company—Sequoia Pacific nee Dominion Voting Systems, working out of San Leandro, and Oakland, and tiny Exeter in the San Joaquin Valley—who’ll likely be charged with making it happen.”

I’m not gifted psychically. But making that call was easy. Why? Because these are the go-to guys for this sort of thing. Also, several years ago California’s then-Secretary of State left to go to work for the company, after steering them a good chunk of the state’s business.

So, there’s that.

khA felony conviction may prevent you from voting in states like Florida, but having a arm-long rap sheet doesn’t disqualify you from counting millions of other people’s votes. Just ask Katherine Harris.

They say a picture’s worth a thousand words, so I’m also publishing a video showing Sequoia/Dominion being caught in the act of rigging an election. But first, a brief criminal history of the company that rigged the 2016 Democratic Presidential primary election in California.


Getting mugged on Memory Lane

Just before the 2000 election, in the state capitol of Baton Rouge, Louisiana Commissioner for Elections Jerry Fowler was convicted of taking real money—maybe ten million dollars—for a period of a decade.

vlcsnap2016-06-09-03h12m40s008Fowler, a large slow-moving beefy man, had somehow parleyed playing in exactly four football games in 1964 as a lineman for the Houston Oilers into a lifelong career in Louisiana politics.

The name of the bag man passing all that cash to Fowler was Pasquale “Rocco” Ricci, of Marlton, New Jersey. Having a name right out of The Soprano’s doesn’t make you a wise guy. But what Rocco did is the very definition of organized crime.

After being convicted of bribing the Election Commissioner in the State of Louisiana for more than a decade, Rocco Ricci was sentenced to a year.

A year of home detention.


“Phil Foster, Please Leave Our Elections Alone”

vlcsnap2016-06-09-03h12m19s048What that means in real terms: If there were five statewide elections in Louisiana during this decade, one every two years, Rocco Ricci went to the Big House for about 70 days for each statewide election he fixed.

Only in his case the Big House meant his mansion in Marlton, New Jersey, instead of Jimmy Swaggart’s old mansion, which was his residence in Louisiana.

During the scandal, New Orleans newspapers asked, “What was Sequoia’s salesman Phil Foster doing when he delivered cash-filled envelopes on five occasions to businessman Pasquale Ricci, who passed them, in turn, to Louisiana election commissioner Jerry Fowler?”

Good question. Foster never answered, or publicly explained why he was never called to account for his role in the scheme that put his buddy Jerry Fowler in prison.

fosterBut hey…today’s a new day, and here he is again, the ultimate bad penny, working for the same company. Back in the game!

That’s him, second from left, in a recent photo whose caption reads: “Secretary Schedler, Phil Foster, Customer Relations with Dominion Voting Systems, WVLA reporter and Commissioner of Elections Angie Rogers.”


At the same time, in another part of the forest

FireShot Screen Capture #1426 - 'Sequoia Voting Systems Responsible for 2000 Presidential Debacle_ I WIRED' - www_wired_com_2007_08_sequoia-votinRemember hanging chad? These are those guys. That same year, 2000—a banner year for the company—Sequoia Pacific was responsible, according to a later Dan Rather-led investigation, of causing what became known as the Florida Vote Snafu. There were even suggestions it might have been deliberate.

At the time the company was known as Sequoia Pacific. Then—even though key personnel remained the same—they changed their name. Not just once. Twice. First to Sequoia Voting Systems. Then, after a move to Canada, where the glare of public scrutiny is slightly less white-hot, to Dominion Voting Systems.

autoWhen Sequoia Pacific began its modern life in the 1960s it was known as Automatic Voting Machine, a subsidiary of Defense contractor Rockwell International, which spun it off to a Rockwell executive named Lloyd A. Dixon Jr.

Incidentally, the defense industry motif recurs in other election companies, like the industry’s largest, E S &S, which was Dixon’s main competitor. Its President was Ransom Shoup, who also went to the Big House, in 1979. His company went on to become the industry’s largest, but apparently escaped a Justice Dept. investigation only after a change in Administrations in Washington.

“We had to get Ronald Reagan elected President to get this thing (the investigation) killed,” quipped E S & S’s President at the time.


“Tacho’s got a question for you”

In a Nov 29, 1985 Chicago Tribune report headlined “VOTE MACHINES CAN BE A DIFFICULT SELL” E S &S marketing director Ron Lawyer told the paper, “Whether working in the United States, Europe, Asia, Africa or Latin America, the first disquieting question of potential customers is always the same: ‘Can these things be rigged?’”

Lawyer spoke of a meeting he and Ransom Shoup took in the palace of Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza. in Managua, Nicaragua. Shoup was trying to sell Somoza some voting machines. “Tacho (Somoza) had only one question,” Lawyer told the Tribune. “Can I be guaranteed the election?”‘

13051536_10154139973257433_6978371511547785490_n-1Back at what would one day be Sequoia Pacific and then Dominion Voting Systems, Lloyd Dixon Jr. lasted as president and CEO until January of 1973, when he went to prison. Dixon got caught bribing election officials in Buffalo, and went to federal prison. At the same time, the company was also fined for bribing Texas and Arkansas election officials.

It was not a particularly auspicious beginning. Founder Lloyd Dixon Jr.’s sordid history got the company off on the wrong foot. But America is a country filled with entrepreneurial zeal, as well as a forgiving nation, and its hard to keep a company with a good get-rich quick proposition down.


Mugged on Memory Lane II

Sequoia/Dominion’s next owner was an infamous financier and corporate raider credited with creating the leveraged buyout, and leading the way for the Wall Street flim-flam men, like Michael Milken, who followed.

wolfsonLouis Wolfson’s eternal claim to fame, however, was that he bribed a sitting Justice of the Supreme Court on the United States of America, “Dishonest Abe” Fortas, the only Justice ever forced to resign in disgrace. Fortas got caught palming a lifetime yearly “retainer” from Wolfson’s family foundation.

Fortas cut himself a deal, and at the FBI’s behest taped phone calls with Wolfson, where the desperate financier pleaded with Fortas to for Christ’s sake dummy up.

fortas140It is in the transcripts of these phone calls that the word “cover-up” first enters the American lexicon, according to NY Times-man and wordsmith William Safire, a Nixon speechwriter when the sordid chapter played out.

Speaking loudly so the tape recorder would clearly pick up his words, Fortas said “No I can’t do that! That would be a cover-up!”

The Modern Age had begun.
Caught in the Act

susanAs a politician, Susan Bernecker was unremarkable, running—and losing—in a ho-hum race for the New Orleans City Council in the mid-90’s. However she distinguished herself in a much more important way, documenting how the second largest election company in America—Sequoia Pacific, both then and now—rigged an election.

It turns out to be frightfully easy.

Susan was surprised when she lost, she told me, and felt a twinge of suspicion that things might not be kosher. For one thing, she said, there were way more “Bernecker for City Council” signs festooning the lawns in her district, pretty much the gold standard for predicting local races where polling is prohibitively expensive.

So, what happened?

“In Louisiana,” she explained, more than five years later, “every candidate that runs for office is allowed, by law—three days after the election—to go and check the voting machines. The candidates themselves can inspect the machines. But very few ever do.”

vlcsnap2016-06-09-03h56m53s482

So, having nothing to lose, or so she thought, spunky Susan Bernecker showed up at the warehouse at the appointed time to check the machine, and brought a cameraman in tow. Inside she encountered a startled election technician.

“The election techs thought all they had to do was check in the rear of the machine, where when you push a button you get the numbers. So that’s what he did. He gave me a long ticker tape and said, ‘here are your results.’”


Rage Against the (Election) Machine

vlcsnap2016-06-09-03h57m15s624

“And I said, ‘Well, that’s nice, but I’d like to see how you arrived at this number.’”

“And he said, ‘Well, this is all you have.’ So I said, ‘Show me how the machine works.’”

“So he proceeded to open the machine and show me, okay, you push this number and if the machine’s in a certain mode it will give you your tally in a liquid crystal display. When you press your selection, its supposed to show up in the liquid crystal display.”

“So I pressed a few of them, and noticed when you pressed my name—voted for me—my name did not show up in the liquid crystal display. My opponent’s name showed up.”

On the video, we watch as she hunches over the machine, and narrates for the cameraman. “Pressing Bernecker… Got Giambelluca. Again… I’m pressing Bernecker, I got Giambelluca.”

vlcsnap2016-06-09-03h57m46s608

“And I was like, oh my god! And my name didn’t show up again, and I did it again, and again, and my name showed up about every three to fourth time. So I asked my cameraman to turn on the camera. What am I doing with a cameraman? I’m not a reporter, and I had a gut feeling that I might need some kind of proof of… something.”

“So I went to the next machine, and the next machine, and the next machine. And the same thing occurred all down the row.”

“So what we did is set up a press conference a few days later, because I felt—for my own safety—that I had to get this out on the news.”


Alice goes down the well-known rabbit hole

Evenvlcsnap2016-06-09-03h53m58s277 to run against her opponent in New Orleans, with its pervasive mob influence, had taken a big supply of moxie. Brave is one thing. This, however, was worse. Was she frightened?

“Actually I was scared to death,” she replied evenly. “Because if—if this was vote fraud, if this was manipulation of the voting machines—they knew that I knew… But nobody else knew!”

Bernecker matter-of-factly described what happened next. “My life was threatened continuously,” she said. “On practically a daily basis.”

With little warning, Susan Bernecker fell down a deep dark rabbit hole. For her, nothing has been quite the same since.



The connection between corruption in Susan Bernecker’s long-forgotten local race in New Orleans and the the “Florida Vote Snafu” after the 2000 Presidential Election is systemic corruption at Sequoia Pacific, or Dominion (or whatever it calls itself these days).

Why is this important now? Because the company’s fingerprints are all over the 2016 Democratic primary in California.

vlcsnap2016-06-09-03h58m35s970

Susan Bernecker had an interesting take on why she happened to have been singled out to lose. “I have my own theory. On the ballot at the same time was a big gambling initiative, on whether or not to allow gambling in Louisiana, which had already lost several times.”

“If there was scamming or fraud going on in that election, it was a consequence of all the gambling money involved. Everybody knows about gambling. Where gambling is, there’s always corruption.”

Which makes sense. And where there’s a buck to be made peddling goods and services to the government of the United States of America, the easiest and safest way to do it is through massive and virtually untraceable election fraud using electronic voting machines.

So far, pretty much, no one’s the wiser.
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: Gone baby gone
Blog: View Blog (37)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:37 pm



The only answers you'll ever get to this are a) "it's possible as a statistical variation" (which of course it is, any improbable event can happen, so what? because fraud isn't?) and b) CONSPIRACY THEORY!!! RRRRRRRRRLIBERALRAGERRRRRRR.

The answer you'll never hear is, well let's not make competing speculations but investigate empirically, audit and recount this shit in a transparent fashion to find out.

The only small chance of breaking it is inside whistleblowers who don't get instantly Connelled.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Election Fraud & Voter Suppression 2016

Postby Project Willow » Thu Jun 09, 2016 5:28 pm

User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4798
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 160 guests