Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby zangtang » Thu Jun 30, 2016 10:35 am

Nordic! - have saved that, called it 'Hilary selfie'.........

just going to email my t-shirt guy....
zangtang
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:13 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby American Dream » Thu Jun 30, 2016 10:42 am

Luther Blissett » Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:21 am wrote:
Philly has a law on the books prohibiting infiltration by local law enforcement and it seems like they stick to it. During the run-up to the RNC in 2000, Pennsylvania state troopers were attending lefty meetings, which is how warehouses began to be raided on the suspicion of finding bombs and bomb-making materials. I'm sure you've all heard the stories, but all they found was puppets and posters. I haven't seen any pigs at any planning meetings thus far, but it seems as though there's a good amount of security culture going on in ours - everyone is already affiliated with one community org or another (Greens, Black Lives Matter, Solidarity feminists, all sorts of Socialist groups, etc). The person who probably looks the most like a pig is me.


There's always the shell game of using multiple government agencies to muddy the waters, e.g. this state entity is prohibited, let's not talk about that other agency which is not. That said, whatever the excesses of the previous cop regime, it may well be that they want to try to avoid more bad PR and intend to use other strategies: overwhelming numbers of cops, tightly targeted detentions etc., not to mention their choice of a terrain where resistance will be managed through crowd control techniques that the squads will drill heavily on. Add to the mix emerging tracking and surveillance technologies (stingrays, fusion centers, drones, social media technologies) and the capacity of the organized and/or controlled left to cooperate and they may well have the situation in Philly to a manageable point, where ugly headlines will not be such a problem.

Cleveland however, is potentially much more explosive, due in large part to the Trump factor...
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Luther Blissett » Thu Jun 30, 2016 10:53 am

American Dream » Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:42 am wrote:
Luther Blissett » Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:21 am wrote:
Philly has a law on the books prohibiting infiltration by local law enforcement and it seems like they stick to it. During the run-up to the RNC in 2000, Pennsylvania state troopers were attending lefty meetings, which is how warehouses began to be raided on the suspicion of finding bombs and bomb-making materials. I'm sure you've all heard the stories, but all they found was puppets and posters. I haven't seen any pigs at any planning meetings thus far, but it seems as though there's a good amount of security culture going on in ours - everyone is already affiliated with one community org or another (Greens, Black Lives Matter, Solidarity feminists, all sorts of Socialist groups, etc). The person who probably looks the most like a pig is me.


There's always the shell game of multiple agencies to muddy the waters, e.g. this state entity is prohibited, let's not talk about that other agency which is not. That said, whatever the excesses of the previous cop regime, it may well be that they want to try to avoid more bad PR and intend to use other strategies: overwhelming numbers of cops, tightly targeted detentions etc., not to mention their choice of a terrain where resistance will be managed through crowd control techniques that the squads will drill heavily on. Add to the mix emerging tracking and surveillance technologies (stingrays, fusion centers, drones, social media technologies) and the capacity of the organized and/or controlled left to cooperate and they may well have the situation in Philly to a manageable point, where ugly headlines will not be such a problem.

Cleveland however, is potentially much more explosive, due in large part to the Trump factor...


All good points, I don't trust any of these authoritative figures as far as I can throw them and find all statements of calm from the Kenney administration almost insulting to a degree. I'm definitely imagining ugly headlines though!
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby American Dream » Thu Jun 30, 2016 10:59 am

From what I understand, the preferred model will be using their overall hegemony (control of the permitting process, etc.) to manage the protests. This means that the more "reasonable" and cooperative liberal/left formations get privileged and that there are thus easy ways to split the resistance into "good" and "bad" formations, in order to blame the victims of police violence for their own fate. But yeah, some level of ugly headlines is pretty much unavoidable.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby American Dream » Thu Jun 30, 2016 11:10 am

Also, if the requisite alphabet soup agencies are doing their jobs, they should be developing their list of psychologically vulnerable protestors with a predilection towards "violence", be it against property or people. Those folks- most especially angry young men from out of town- should therefore be steered towards "friends" who are not friends, places to stay that are in the web of control, etc.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby maco144 » Sun Jul 03, 2016 8:48 am

Fan fiction?
Image
maco144
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2015 11:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Freitag » Mon Jul 04, 2016 1:37 am

Whoah.
User avatar
Freitag
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Jerky » Mon Jul 04, 2016 2:08 am

ROTFLMAO at the above 4chan creepy-pasta role-playing session.

Please tell me nobody here takes this amateur hour shit seriously.

J
User avatar
Jerky
 
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:28 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby coffin_dodger » Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:07 am

Jerky wrote:Please tell me nobody here takes this amateur hour shit seriously.
J


What are you going to do if they do? Call them 'stupid', and claim they are too far intellectually beneath you to bother further?

Could you possibly paste up a facsimilie of the document (that you clearly must have in your possession), that proves you know everything about this subject and that everyone else must obey your thinking regarding it, or else be cast as idiots and unworthy by society at large, especially so here at RI. I need proof that are not just another automaton, regurgitating the party line of a system that is falling apart as we speak. Thank you
:thumbsup
User avatar
coffin_dodger
 
Posts: 2216
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:05 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (14)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jul 05, 2016 10:15 am

FBI Director James Comey news conference coming up in 45 minutes...maybe he's going to indict bush/cheney for war crimes :P
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:16 am

Hillary was extremely careless in handling of classified material

no evidence

no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges

not recommending charges against Clinton

we can't find evidence

Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Nordic » Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:36 am

Did anyone really expect anything different?
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby norton ash » Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:51 am

Wet squib. Totally predictable.
Zen horse
User avatar
norton ash
 
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Canada
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby RocketMan » Tue Jul 05, 2016 12:53 pm

"We do not see these things here."

:shrug: :cofee: :ohno:
-I don't like hoodlums.
-That's just a word, Marlowe. We have that kind of world. Two wars gave it to us and we are going to keep it.
User avatar
RocketMan
 
Posts: 2813
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:02 am
Location: By the rivers dark
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Jul 05, 2016 1:05 pm

RocketMan » Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:53 am wrote:"We do not see these things here."

:shrug: :cofee: :ohno:



so the CIA told the FBI ...you do not see things here
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests