Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

[MacCruiskeen]

But of course we can trust the FBI/CIA to tell us the whole truth and nothing but the truth about Orlando, San Bernardino, Boston, etc.

[NeonLX]

Did anyone really expect anything different?

Why hope for anything "good" to ever come from the monstrosity that goes by the title "US Government"?

I'm done with it. We can rant, rave, protest, sign petitions all we want and nothing will change.

I don't have the foggiest idea how to get a revolution going.

Fuck it.

[Project Willow]

"We do not see these things here."

so the CIA told the FBI ...you do not see things here

[Luther Blissett]

Any of us could have written that /pol/ fan fiction if we were anti-Semitic and racist.

[maco144]

Ken Starr made general public believe Bill had no skeletons in his closet as he looked into everything and couldnt find anything to impeach.
Comey validates that Hilary doesnt deserve prison, she is just reckless.

40+ dead people in their wake, billions of laundered money, treason, etc. "Nothing to see here" political play turning liability into strength.

[Nordic]

Mena means everything. That's where they got made.

[slimmouse]

Mena means everything. That's where they got made.

Thats certainly an angle Nordic.

Shameless liars. Committed globalists. Inveterate womanizers. Unrepentant drug runners. Unconvicted money launderers. Fake humanitarians. And two of the most popular politicians in America. Meet the Clintons.

https://www.corbettreport.com/meet-the-clintons-video/

[Wombaticus Rex]

Mena means everything. That's where they got made.

I am re-reading Terry Reed's classic Compromised -- not a well written book, but thorough and documented and very damn interesting.

I agree with your sentiment 100%. Mutual blackmail has always been the M.O. ... "hang together or hang separately"

"Turning liability into strength" is a good way to put it! Liabilities are assets in a career on that stage. It's proof you'll play ball.

[slimmouse]

Mena means everything. That's where they got made.

I am re-reading Terry Reed's classic Compromised -- not a well written book, but thorough and documented and very damn interesting.

I agree with your sentiment 100%. Mutual blackmail has always been the M.O. ... "hang together or hang separately"

"Turning liability into strength" is a good way to put it! Liabilities are assets in a career on that stage. It's proof you'll play ball.

Well sure, but Who are the coaches of the ball game ?

[JackRiddler]

Mena means everything. That's where they got made.

I agree. Which means the Clinton machine and the Bush mob (which may be dissolving through generational change) are, if no longer the same organization, then emerging from the same branch, and never had a reason to engage in anything hostile to each other except for non-fatal intramural territorial spats. All the big Clinton scandals since have not been entirely scripted, but safe maneuvers for the consumption of voting publics and for distraction from more difficult issues. Both the congressional Republicans and the Clintons/Democrats have found these beneficial. We will get more of the same under HRC, of course.

[seemslikeadream]

Glenn Greenwald on MSNBC criticizing Clinton for failing to protect classified information.

H. Clinton and Ed Snowden: Some Animals are more Equal than others
By Juan Cole | Jul. 6, 2016 |

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –
Hillary Clinton has repeatedly attacked Ed Snowden for being careless with government information. So it is ironic that she has been found guilty of being . . . careless with government information. She, of course, will suffer no consequences, since she is part of the ruling class.
Here’s an ironic juxtaposition:
FBI Director James B. Comey: “From the group of . . . e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time . . . Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”
Hillary Clinton on Edward Snowden: “He broke the laws of the United States . . . He stole very important information that has unfortunately fallen into a lot of the wrong hands. So I don’t think he should be brought home without facing the music.”
But anyway the real source of her annoyance with Snowden is that she believes in Big Government surveillance of the general population, no matter how unconstitutional it is. (So does Comey). Hillary Clinton voted for the USA Patriot Act, which gutted the fourth amendment right to protection from unreasonable, warrantless search and seizure of papers and personal effects. She also voted to renew it in 2005 and 2006. It was practices that the FBI and NSA alleged were authorized by these laws that Clinton helped pass that constituted the abuses on which Ed Snowden felt compelled to blow the whistle. She now talks in excruciatingly vague terms about striking a “balance” between security and democracy, but there is no evidence anywhere that she cares about the invasion of the privacy of millions of Americans online that she has assiduously enabled.
Clinton has also wrongly and irresponsibly said that Ed Snowden could have gone through internal channels to blow the whistle on NSA abuses, and would thereby have gained legal protections.
First of all, no such legal protections exist with regard to his particular circumstances. A whole string of other intelligence whistleblowers has gone to jail, which is what would have happened to Snowden. That is not to mention the evidence for dirty tricks played on whistleblowers by government agencies, including the destruction of exculpatory evidence.
Second of all, the NSA has now been forced to admit that Snowden did in fact repeatedly try official channels and was stonewalled.
Clinton should apologize for her earlier allegations about Snowden and acknowledge her mistake in suggesting that he could have blown the whistle through official channels and been legally protected. She could just ask Thomas Drake if any of that were true. While she has admitted that the USA Patriot Act vote was a mistake, she should have the decency to admit that she put persons of conscience like Snowden in a position where they had to risk their lives to let Americans know that the National Security State had repealed the Constitution.
At the very least, you would hope that, having almost fallen victim to its vague and unconstitutional provisions, Sec. Clinton would at least now commit to repealing the Espionage Act of 1919, passed at the height of an earlier Trump-style immigration hysteria. But guess what? Obama has loved this law to death and used it viciously against whistleblowers, and the likelihood that Clinton will seek to repeal or revise it is low.
The irony is that we may finally be getting ethnic and gender diversity at the top of our politics, but those considerations pall before the distinction between the governmental class and the hoi polloi.
Because on the animal farm, some animals are more equal than others.

[Project Willow]

ROTFLMAO at the above 4chan creepy-pasta role-playing session.

Please tell me nobody here takes this amateur hour shit seriously.

J

The troll has 4chan investigating in earnest now, and is training them on how to persuade people for Trump. I'd bet real money it's Roger Stone.

[Nordic]

[Grizzly]

Comey: FBI didn’t put Clinton under oath Hillary Clinton was not put under oath and there is no transcript of her interview with the FBI, Director James Comey told Congress on Thursday??
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/ ... nder-oath/

[Grizzly]

How serious the Hillary e-mail leak really is

Information so secret the DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELIGENCE gets jumpy talking about, and his aides cannot see without propper "edditing".

Also, what is "The agency"?

Reminds me of:

"Right now we have the executive branch making a claim that it has the right to kill anyone, anywhere on Earth, at any time, for secret reasons based on secret evidence, in a secret process undertaken by unidentified officials. That frightens me." This is how Rosa Brooks, a Georgetown professor and former Pentagon official under President Obama, explained the US policy on drone strikes during a congressional hearing last year.

viewtopic.php?p=552903#p552903