Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Karmamatterz » Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:16 pm

Image

Apologies if this was already posted, just stumbled onto it.
User avatar
Karmamatterz
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Nordic » Thu Aug 04, 2016 5:12 pm

Wait what?

https://digitalempire.wordpress.com/201 ... case-dead/

Talk about killing the messenger.

The body count is rising. Shaun Lucas found dead. The latest update on this is that he died in his sleep. Refer to the tweets above.

According to a Reddit thread, Shaun Lucas was an activist who served the DNC with an election fraud lawsuit.

"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Aug 04, 2016 5:25 pm

pretty soon the Clintons will have killed us all off...I truly believe they killed Santa...cause I haven't gotten a Christmas present since 2000
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby PufPuf93 » Thu Aug 04, 2016 5:32 pm

seemslikeadream » Thu Aug 04, 2016 2:25 pm wrote:pretty soon the Clintons will have killed us all off...I truly believe they killed Santa...cause I haven't gotten a Christmas present since 2000

I don't now and never have taken the Clinton body count seriously.

I do take the CIA / Bush / JFK body count seriously.

I just (re)watched An American Affair based upon Mary Pinchot Meyers yesterday.

Boardwalk Empire reminded me how much I like the actress Gretchen Mol.

Lots of CIA and JFK and murder.

But no to Clinton body count.
User avatar
PufPuf93
 
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:29 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Nordic » Thu Aug 04, 2016 5:38 pm

PufPuf93 » Thu Aug 04, 2016 4:32 pm wrote:
seemslikeadream » Thu Aug 04, 2016 2:25 pm wrote:pretty soon the Clintons will have killed us all off...I truly believe they killed Santa...cause I haven't gotten a Christmas present since 2000

I don't now and never have taken the Clinton body count seriously.

I do take the CIA / Bush / JFK body count seriously.

I just (re)watched An American Affair based upon Mary Pinchot Meyers yesterday.

Boardwalk Empire reminded me how much I like the actress Gretchen Mol.

Lots of CIA and JFK and murder.

But no to Clinton body count.


Im open minded about the Clinton body count. Surely a great many of them represent right-wing paranoia. But the more I learn about the Clintons the more I realize there is very likely a body count. Not necessarily the one the RW has presented. But there certainly is one. They both have demonstrated a complete willingness to slaughter on behalf of their own power.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Thu Aug 04, 2016 5:39 pm

PufPuf93 » Thu Aug 04, 2016 4:32 pm wrote:
But no to Clinton body count.


There's no "Clinton body count" independent of the CIA, but that doesn't mean it's not real.

Where do you stand on Don Henry & Kevin Ives?
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby PufPuf93 » Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:16 pm

Wombaticus Rex » Thu Aug 04, 2016 2:39 pm wrote:
PufPuf93 » Thu Aug 04, 2016 4:32 pm wrote:
But no to Clinton body count.


There's no "Clinton body count" independent of the CIA, but that doesn't mean it's not real.

Where do you stand on Don Henry & Kevin Ives?


When I think of "Clinton Body Count", my mind goes immediately to Vince Foster.

Never heard of Don Henry and Kevin Ives until just now. So off to search.
User avatar
PufPuf93
 
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:29 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby PufPuf93 » Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:58 pm

Do I have the narrative correct?

Don Henry & Kevin Ives were young boys ran over by a train near the Mena drug operations.

The deaths were first attributed to acute marijuana intoxication and them falling asleep on the tracks.

Some including parents thought the boys were murdered. The general impression was that law enforcement and other officials had been influenced.

The bodies were re-autopsied and they were found to have been murdered and placed on the tracks.

Bill Clinton impeded further investigation as this all happened when Clinton was Governor of Arkansas.

There were several later deaths of others related to the investigation and cover-up including some with known connections to the drug trafficking.

Perhaps the boys stumbled on Mena-related drug activity and were killed.

Here are links to two versions of Clinton Body Count:

http://www.akdart.com/body-c.html

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCH ... BODIES.php

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have considered Barry Seal and Gary Webb likely CIA murders.

Also Michael Hasting looked like a CIA murder.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I gave Bill and Hillary Clinton passes on Vince Foster, Michael Brown, anything related to Whitewater, and anything related to Bill Clinton's bimbo eruptions (at least regarding associated murders).

My opinion of the Clinton's changed after Hillary Clinton New York Senator, Hillary Clinton candidate 2008, Hillary Clinton SoS, Clinton paid private speeches, The Clinton Foundation, and Hillary Clinton candidate for POTUS 2016.

I think Hillary Clinton extremely likely to be the next POTUS and her ascendancy was determined long prior to the primaries.
User avatar
PufPuf93
 
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:29 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Thu Aug 04, 2016 7:07 pm

Exactly - the Roger Stone / Richard Viguerie version has the Clintons as some autonomous Gambino family.

There's no Clinton Hit Squads.

There are CIA hit squads, though, and they protect operations and assets. At various phases of their careers, the Clintons have been one or both.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Grizzly » Thu Aug 04, 2016 8:29 pm

“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4923
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Aug 04, 2016 8:39 pm

Wombaticus Rex » Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:07 pm wrote:Exactly - the Roger Stone / Richard Viguerie version has the Clintons as some autonomous Gambino family.

There's no Clinton Hit Squads.

There are CIA hit squads, though, and they protect operations and assets. At various phases of their careers, the Clintons have been one or both.


Basically, yes. It's one of those right-wing tropes that magically transforms things that are CIA-America-SOP into weird personal tyrannies (or Gambino family action, as you put it) of some Democrat leader they hate for being communist. I will never understand this mentality and its blindspots. Any time I look at the Foster thing seriously (and I have not in years) it looks totally like a message to the Clintons, not a hit ordered by them. It's why "Whitewater" was a "scandal" and Mena was not. I don't know why the idea that they've been part of a kabuki with other spook factions is considered even more "conspiratorial" than the idea that they are a magical crime family whose purge would restore a purified "America," but there it is. It's why I must be crazy to think after 30 years of this shit that the Epstein angle or some other Trump-Clinton combo scandal could still turn into the one that finally reveals that the "Clinton crime family" has been part of the "Bush crime family" all along. No chance. Sounds impenetrable to the average person. Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby divideandconquer » Thu Aug 04, 2016 8:58 pm

Here’s Why Hillary Won’t Allow Her Corporate Speeches to be Published

It was red meat for the biotech base. Hillary Rodham Clinton, in a 65-minute appearance at the BIO International Convention on Wednesday, voiced support for genetically modified organisms and possible federal subsidies. …

“Maybe there’s a way of getting a representative group of actors at the table” to discuss how the federal government could help biotechs with “insurance against risk,” she said.

Without such subsidies, she said, “this is going to be an increasing challenge.” …

She said the debate about GMOs might be turned toward the biotech side if the benefits were better explained, noting that the “Frankensteinish” depictions could be fought with more positive spin.

“I stand in favor of using seeds and products that have a proven track record,” she said [at 29:00 in the video next posted here], citing drought-resistant seeds she backed as secretary of state. “There’s a big gap between the facts and what the perceptions are.” [that too at 29:00] …

Minutes earlier, Gov. Jerry Brown made a rousing 3-minute pitch for companies to see California as biotech-friendly.

“You’ve come to the right place.” …

Brown had some competition for biotech boosterism in the form of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, the longtime Clinton ally who pitched his own state as best for biotech. …

[Clinton was] Given a standing ovation at the start and end of her appearance.

[...]
In other words: the reason why Hillary Clinton won’t allow her 91 corporate speeches, for which she was paid $21,667,000. , to be published, is the lying political cravenness of her pandering to those corporations there. Each group of lobbyists is happy to applaud her lying, regardless of whether her lies include insults against another group of lobbyists, to whom she might be delivering similar lies to butter them up at a different annual convention or etc.

In other words: she’s telling all of them collectively: You’re my type of people, and the public who despise you are merely misguided, but as President I’ll set them straight and they’ll even end up paying part of the bill to be ‘educated’ about these matters, by my Administration, and even part of the bill to pay corporations’ product-liability suits.

The reason why Clinton doesn’t want those speeches to be made public is that she doesn’t want the voters to know that she intends to use their money to propagandize to them for the benefit of those corporations, and also to protect those corporations from liability for harms their products cause the public.


March 19, 2015 American Camping Association Atlantic City, NJ $260,000.00

March 11, 2015 eBay Inc. San Jose, CA $315,000.00

February 24, 2015 Watermark Silicon Valley Conference for Women Santa Clara, CA $225,500.00

January 22, 2015 Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Whistler, Canada $150,000.00

January 21, 2015 tinePublic Inc. Winnipeg, Canada $262,000.00

January 21, 2015 tinePublic Inc. Saskatoon, Canada $262,500.00

December 4, 2014 Massachusetts Conference for Women Boston, MA $205,500.00

October 14, 2014 Salesforce.com San Francisco, CA $225,500.00

October 14, 2014 Qualcomm Incorporated San Diego, CA $335,000.00

October 13, 2014 Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers Colorado Springs, CO $225,500.00

October 8, 2014 Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed) Chicago, IL $265,000.00

October 7, 2014 Deutsche Bank AG New York, NY $280,000.00

October 6, 2014 Canada 2020 Ottawa, Canada $215,500.00

October 2, 2014 Commercial Real Estate Women Network Miami Beach, FL $225,500.00

September 15, 2014 Cardiovascular Research Foundation Washington, DC $275,000.00

September 4, 2014 Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLP San Diego, CA $225,500.00

August 28, 2014 Nexenta System, Inc. San Francisco, CA $300,000.00

August 28, 2014 Cisco Las Vegas, NV $325,000.00

July 29, 2014 Corning, Inc. Corning, NY $225,500.00

July 26, 2014 Ameriprise Boston, MA $225,500.00

July 22, 2014 Knewton, Inc. San Francisco, CA $225,500.00

June 26, 2014 GTCR Chicago, IL $280,000.00

June 25, 2014 Biotechnology Industry Organization San Diego, CA $335,000.00

June 25, 2014 Innovation Arts and Entertainment San Francisco, CA $150,000.00

June 20, 2014 Innovation Arts and Entertainment Austin, TX $150,000.00

June 18, 2014 tinePublic Inc. Toronto, Canada $150,000.00

June 18, 2014 tinePublic Inc. Edmonton, Canada $100,000.00

June 10, 2014 United Fresh Produce Association Chicago, IL $225,000.00

June 2, 2014 International Deli-Dairy-Bakery Association Denver, CO $225,500.00

June 2, 2014 Let’s Talk Entertainment Denver, CO $265,000.00

May 6, 2014 National Council for Behavorial Healthcare Washington, DC $225,500.00

April 11, 2014 California Medical Association (via Satellite) San Diego, CA $100,000.00

April 10, 2014 Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. Las Vegas, NV $225,500.00

April 10, 2014 Let’s Talk Entertainment San Jose, CA $265,000.00

April 8, 2014 Marketo, Inc. San Francisco, CA $225,500.00

April 8, 2014 World Affairs Council Portland, OR $250,500.00

March 24, 2014 Academic Partnerships Dallas, TX $225,500.00

March 18, 2014 Xerox Corporation New York, NY $225,000.00

March 18, 2014 Board of Trade of Metropolitan Montreal Montreal, Canada $275,000.00

March 13, 2014 Pharmaceutical Care Management Association Orlando, FL $225,500.00

March 13, 2014 Drug Chemical and Associated Technologies New York, NY $250,000.00

March 6, 2014 tinePublic Inc. Calgary, Canada $225,500.00

March 5, 2014 The Vancouver Board of Trade Vancouver, Canada $275,500.00

March 4, 2014 Association of Corporate Counsel – Southern California Los Angeles, CA $225,500.00

February 27, 2014 A&E Television Networks New York, NY $280,000.00

February 26, 2014 Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Orlando, FL $225,500.00

February 17, 2014 Novo Nordisk A/S Mexico City, Mexico $125,000.00

February 6, 2014 Salesforce.com Las Vegas, NV $225,500.00

January 27, 2014 National Automobile Dealers Association New Orleans, LA $325,500.00

January 27, 2014 Premier Health Alliance Miami, FL $225,500.00

January 6, 2014 GE Boca Raton, FL $225,500.00

November 21, 2013 U.S. Green Building Council Philadelphia, PA $225,000.00

November 18, 2013 CME Group Naples, FL $225,000.00

November 18, 2013 Press Ganey Orlando, FL $225,000.00

November 14, 2013 CB Richard Ellis, Inc. New York, NY $250,000.00

November 13, 2013 Mediacorp Canada, Inc. Toronto, Canada $225,000.00

November 9, 2013 National Association of Realtors San Francisco, CA $225,000.00

November 7, 2013 Golden Tree Asset Management New York, NY $275,000.00

November 6, 2013 Beaumont Health System Troy, MI $305,000.00

November 4, 2013 Mase Productions, Inc. Orlando, FL $225,000.00

November 4, 2013 London Drugs, Ltd. Mississauga, ON $225,000.00

October 29, 2013 The Goldman Sachs Group Tuscon, AZ $225,000.00

October 28, 2013 Jewish United Fund/Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago $400,000.00

October 27, 2013 Beth El Synagogue Minneapolis, MN $225,000.00

October 24, 2013 Accenture New York, NY $225,000.00

October 24, 2013 The Goldman Sachs Group New York, NY $225,000.00

October 23, 2013 SAP Global Marketing, Inc. New York, NY $225,000.00

October 15, 2013 National Association of Convenience Stores Atlanta, GA $265,000.00

October 4, 2013 Long Island Association Long Island, NY $225,000.00

September 19, 2013 American Society of Travel Agents, Inc. Miami, FL $225,000.00

September 18, 2013 American Society for Clinical Pathology Chicago, IL $225,000.00

August 12, 2013 National Association of Chain Drug Stores Las Vegas, NV $225,000.00

August 7, 2013 Global Business Travel Association San Diego, CA $225,000.00

July 11, 2013 UBS Wealth Management New York, NY $225,000.00

June 24, 2013 American Jewish University University City, CA $225,000.00

June 24, 2013 Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Company, LP Palos Verdes, CA $225,000.00

June 20, 2013 Boston Consulting Group, Inc. Boston, MA $225,000.00

June 20, 2013 Let’s Talk Entertainment, Inc. Toronto, Canada $250,000.00

June 17, 2013 Economic Club of Grand Rapids Grand Rapids, MI $225,000.00

June 16, 2013 Society for Human Resource Management Chicago, IL $285,000.00

June 6, 2013 Spencer Stuart New York, NY $225,000.00

June 4, 2013 The Goldman Sachs Group Palmetto Bluffs, SC $225,000.00

May 29, 2013 Sanford C. Bernstein and Co., LLC New York, NY $225,000.00

May 21, 2013 Verizon Communications, Inc. Washington, DC $225,000.00

May 16, 2013 Itau BBA USA Securities New York, NY $225,000.00

May 14, 2013 Apollo Management Holdings, LP New York, NY $225,000.00

May 8, 2013 Gap, Inc. San Francisco, CA $225,000.00

April 30, 2013 Fidelity Investments Naples, FL $225,000.00

April 24, 2013 Deutsche Bank Washington, DC $225,000.00

April 24, 2013 National Multi Housing Council Dallas, TX $225,000.00

April 18, 2013 Morgan Stanley Washington, DC $225,000.00


Follow the 'dark money': America's oligarchs support Clinton almost unanimously

There is, amongst them, a near-100% unity around one nominee, as there has never been before in American history, at least going back to 1896, and perhaps to the founding of the republic. (Furthermore, back near the founding, there was no oligarchy; the nation started out as being, to a large extent, a democratic republic. It no longer is that.)


'I see clearly that man in this world deceives himself by admiring and esteeming things which are not, and neither sees nor esteems the things which are.' — St. Catherine of Genoa
User avatar
divideandconquer
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Nordic » Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:15 pm




Wow. By the end of this I was laughing my ass off. God bless the USA. Great comedy for the whole world.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby divideandconquer » Fri Aug 05, 2016 9:06 am

Yesterday, I tuned back into the mainstream media, listened to NPR, watched ABC, etc. to see what's being said, and I'm convinced Hilary will win. In those few minutes, it was reported that Trump, while In PA, kicked a crying baby out, trashed veteran families, trashed the town he was speaking in, all the while promising he would support veterans. He's such a bumbling bully that he can't be for real. I'm back to thinking he's working to ensure Hillary's victory because no one can be that stupid.

Then, while listening to NPR, I heard an interview with GOP strategist Matt Mackowiak about why he thinks Trump should bow out, and how that would even be possible. He practically admitted that Hillary would be preferable to Trump. The Republicans know Hillary is as GOP as you can get, or better yet, will protect their cult of wealth and power.

Very interesting interview below. He doesn't say Hillary is behind Vince Foster's death, but puts forth lots of evidence that suggests he was murdered. Possibly--the author speculates-- for something he was about to expose concerning children. Vince Foster was no boy scout. His hands were as dirty as the rest involved in Iran Contra but supposedly he was not happy about something he discovered that disgusted him. Possibly about to blow the whistle? . Anyway, the following was found in the the national archives regarding Vince Foster. It was the cover of a report: "Child Abduction and Serial Killer Unit: Questions for a suicide expert: Vincent Foster death Investigation." along with a 30 page memo from Miguel Rodriguez, the lead investigator for the Office of Independent Counsel who was forced to resign because he was really investigating the case ...

And Ken Starr, who at one time represented Epstein, the one scandal that involves both the Clintons and Trump, did everything he could to cover up the evidence and facts of the Foster case. The cult of wealth and power doesn't care about the divisions we take so seriously. They're all in it together, playing their roles.

'I see clearly that man in this world deceives himself by admiring and esteeming things which are not, and neither sees nor esteems the things which are.' — St. Catherine of Genoa
User avatar
divideandconquer
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby PufPuf93 » Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:15 am

Wombaticus Rex » Thu Aug 04, 2016 4:07 pm wrote:Exactly - the Roger Stone / Richard Viguerie version has the Clintons as some autonomous Gambino family.

There's no Clinton Hit Squads.

There are CIA hit squads, though, and they protect operations and assets. At various phases of their careers, the Clintons have been one or both.


BTW Wombat R

I 100% agree with your take that there are CIA hit squads but no Clinton hit squads and no Clinton Crime family.

I can see Bill Clinton as a CIA asset from Rhodes Scholar on.

Off topic but I see the rise of Barack Obama as multiple-generation CIA backed.
User avatar
PufPuf93
 
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:29 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 155 guests