DrEvil » Sun Aug 07, 2016 10:53 am wrote:Much as I hate to say it, Hillary would be preferable to Trump. At least with her we know what we get.
I agree with you on the second part, but not the first. Neoconservative policy has pushed the West right up against the world's largest nuclear power on multiple fronts, and it's going to be crunch time within the next four years if that course doesn't radically change. Clinton would not only not change it, but is determined to extend it.
Trump could do anything, including change it. Several of his statements imply a desire to do that, while others do not; as I said, he is both unpredictable and dangerous.
But Clinton is more dangerous simply because she is predictable. She will do the Clinton thing, the regime change thing, the neocon thing, and the world simply can't take anymore of that. It's right against the wall at this point.