Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

[Agent Orange Cooper]

http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendel ... de818a5b80

Cruise's Mena movie retitled American Made and delayed - again. Now it won't be out for more than a year ostensibly to compete in next year's awards cycle. Or to get it as far away from the election as possible, either way...

[brekin]

Too much supposing. Either Rich was the source or he was not. Either Assange knows that definitely, because he or Wikileaks were in contact with Rich, or he does not. The guy's dead. Assange should clarify or he will be accused of just playing for whatever hurts Clinton.

Yes. Why does Wikileaks get to keep secrets? Irony. They've actually blundered and released informant information with the Guardian before. But as Rich is dead, saying he was informant wouldn't put him in danger, and would do much to help his murder investigation if he was. Alluding to him as a source just seems sordid and opportunistic. WikiSneaks.

[seemslikeadream]

they sure weren't thinking of his family

[Nordic]

Too much supposing. Either Rich was the source or he was not. Either Assange knows that definitely, because he or Wikileaks were in contact with Rich, or he does not. The guy's dead. Assange should clarify or he will be accused of just playing for whatever hurts Clinton.

"Too much supposing"? You can't be serious. He makes it as clear as can be, along with that $ 20,000 reward he's offering for info on who murderd Rich. You really expect Assange to come out and state it in so many words? It's against his policy, number one, and 2 would start a sensationalist blowup of people screaming for proof and the entire media/government complex hysterically accusing him of being insane.

He put out the reward and he has clearly stated he is all about building his case.

Btw when I posted that I was at work and actually didn't have the time to find the link for the video and post it into the RI site using my cell phone. I was on location, at night, in East LA, on a street.

Thank you, JR, for taking the time to post the actual video. I figured somebody would.

[seemslikeadream]

‘It’s crazy out here,’ resident says of violence in one D.C. area

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/pu ... story.html


47 killed in DC to date



I'm sure Hillary killed them all with her bare hands

[brekin]

Let's run this one through our noggins again.

1. Assange has his own show on Russia Today.
2. He is a paid mouth piece for the Russian government/mafia.
3. He is planning an October Surprise for the Clinton campaign and is cahooty with Trump advisers.
http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2016/ ... s-assange/
4. The Russians have been alleged to be the perps in the DNC hack.
5. But wait, Assange, is going to conveniently interject that a murdered DNC employee was the source for the hack, kinda, maybe, maybe not, thereby taking heat off the Russians.

I'm all for transparency, and lord knows, the Clintons could always use more.
But Assange is a paid shill for his Russian paymasters/protectors.

[seemslikeadream]

how long has he been at the Embassy?

[The Consul]

Just out of curiosity, since Assange has been in stir in the embassy for like ever, where does he get $20,000 to offer as bounty? He must be driving the other Wiki folks nuts. Seems to me that he crossed the line a long time ago from finding the story to becoming the story. A brilliant mind in a trap maybe making the only play he has left, hoping what the hell, a Trump state department might let him walk out into London. I never saw Wikileaks potential as a player in electoral political campaigns.

[Nordic]

Let's run this one through our noggins again.

1. Assange has his own show on Russia Today.
2. He is a paid mouth piece for the Russian government/mafia.
3. He is planning an October Surprise for the Clinton campaign and is cahooty with Trump advisers.
http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2016/ ... s-assange/
4. The Russians have been alleged to be the perps in the DNC hack.
5. But wait, Assange, is going to conveniently interject that a murdered DNC employee was the source for the hack, kinda, maybe, maybe not, thereby taking heat off the Russians.

I'm all for transparency, and lord knows, the Clintons could always use more.
But Assange is a paid shill for his Russian paymasters/protectors.

Brekin I usually like you're writing even when I disagree with you but this is just silly DNC propaganda you're spouting. Stop it. It's embarrassing especially to you.

[seemslikeadream]

hey I went with you on Greenwald

[Nordic]

Just out of curiosity, since Assange has been in stir in the embassy for like ever, where does he get $20,000 to offer as bounty? He must be driving the other Wiki folks nuts. Seems to me that he crossed the line a long time ago from finding the story to becoming the story. A brilliant mind in a trap maybe making the only play he has left, hoping what the hell, a Trump state department might let him walk out into London. I never saw Wikileaks potential as a player in electoral political campaigns.

From what I've heard about Assange, from a person who has dealt directly with him, is that he's a difficult but brilliant person. I don't think any of us can actually get into his head and ascertain his motives. But why would anyone criticize someone whose total goal in life is to reveal truth? Do we have that many Hillary supporters here? It's weird.

The whole "Russia as bad guy" trope is so fucking stupid. Has anyone s really looked into Russia Today even? It was crowd funded. It's called "Russia" today. Even with any flaws it might have it is 1000% better than ANY of the corporate/government "news" outfits in the US. Hell, Pepe Escobar writes for them. Are you gonna call Pepe Escobar a "Russian Stooge?" That's just pure fucking idiocy worthy of Wolf Blitzer.

And if Putin can prevent WW3 by helping keep Hillary out of the White House, he's a fucking hero.

[seemslikeadream]

AD had me married off to Putin....he thought I loved him so much by what I posted.....now I am considered a Russia hater....

I guess I am justa bi-polar bear

[brekin]

Let's run this one through our noggins again.

1. Assange has his own show on Russia Today.
2. He is a paid mouth piece for the Russian government/mafia.
3. He is planning an October Surprise for the Clinton campaign and is cahooty with Trump advisers.
http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2016/ ... s-assange/
4. The Russians have been alleged to be the perps in the DNC hack.
5. But wait, Assange, is going to conveniently interject that a murdered DNC employee was the source for the hack, kinda, maybe, maybe not, thereby taking heat off the Russians.

I'm all for transparency, and lord knows, the Clintons could always use more.
But Assange is a paid shill for his Russian paymasters/protectors.

Brekin I usually like you're writing even when I disagree with you but this is just silly DNC propaganda you're spouting. Stop it. It's embarrassing especially to you.

This is funny, only on RI would I be accused of being a DNC propagandist.

Nordic, I'm keeping open the possibility of Rich's murder being an actual DNC retaliatory wack, but think it extremely unlikely. More likely, wouldn't "they" have sought to destroy him in other ways? Or even take him out in a less crude way? Seems shoddy and counter productive. What message was he suppose to be? And to who? Fellow DNC staffers? The American public? During an election year?

Also, everything I've written about Assange above is true. He is literally paid by the Kremlin to promote anti-Western propaganda. This is not a secret. Wiki Assange or visit his shows website: http://assange.rt.com/

And as Putin favors Trump,

Vladimir Putin Just Made A MASSIVE Donald Trump Announcement!
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/vlad ... ouncement/

“[Donald Trump is] a really brilliant and talented person, without any doubt,” [Vladimir] Putin told reporters, according to a translation by Interfax. “It’s not our job to judge his qualities, that’s a job for American voters, but he’s the absolute leader in the presidential race.”

So Assange is anti-Clinton. He has been pursuing Clinton via Wikileaks, but not Trump (backing away from exposing his tax returns) because that is what his bosses want. Also, how can Assange not know who the source of the hack was? As Editor in Chief of WikiLeaks how could he not know? And why wouldn't he want to know when he is already in such legal problems? He literally has nothing to lose! But he will say he can't confirm a murdered dead man was the source, because? And especially when many believe he was murdered because he was the source?

Because more likely he knows it was the Russians, his bosses, who probably just handed him the info on a usb at their weekly RT briefing. He probably didn't even want to be the one to make that allusion in person, but when the your Russian Godfather wants a favor, what can you do?

Julian Assange and Donald Trump on Same Team?
http://www.americanlibertyreport.com/ar ... same-team/

[Agent Orange Cooper]

Dastardly!

[seemslikeadream]

brekin » Wed Aug 10, 2016 4:59 pm

This is funny, only on RI would I be accused of being a DNC propagandist.

yea and I am a neo con...makes me nostalgic for solace