Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

[Project Willow]

her facial expressions during the balloon drop at the convention, kid parts coming out, her extended coughing fits due to closed throat anti-interrogation conditioning.

The balloon drop incident actually is the most disturbing. It physically disturbs me. She looks ... Completely out of her mind, or like some kind of badly designed android, or some combination. Just inhuman.

I forgot the vid of her when she froze in response to some protesters who had a sign about killing animals. She went blank, and then her SS/handler guy had to tell her to keep talking. Then she said, "Okay, here we are. Okay, we'll keep talking."

[Grizzly]

"Trump and his kids have killed a lot of animals"?...lol Jesus Crisp...lol

Maybe she has anxiety disorder or something being under the microscope of the vast right wing...??

Also see, Tom Flocco*
https://twitter.com/tomflocco/status/764097419474640896


*I know this (His Name) but not sure from where, anyone else?

[seemslikeadream]

British tabloid the Daily Mail concurrently ran the photos in a piece titled "'I have no shame... I HUNT & EAT game':
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -hunt.html

Re: Animals before Humans
Unread postby Nordic » Wed Jun 01, 2016 11:51 am
Best thing I've read on this was posted by John Steppling (playwright) on FB:

"Prior to the 19th century, museums tended to be small and private, open only to the aristocracy of a given nation. During the 19th century, the modern museum as we know it began to take shape. With plunder streaming in from all corners of the British Empire, the modern museum was born.
The British Museum was created largely as a repository for artifacts looted from Africa between the 17th and 19th centuries. Such plunder includes many artifacts from Ancient Egypt which prove that the Ancient Egyptians, who established the first museum, were themselves dark-skinned Afroancestrals.

Across the world, one of the consequences of British colonialism was the violent appropriation of cultural artifacts, sacred and precious objects; and one of the legacies is their ongoing display in British museums. For centuries, the museums of Great Britain have served to bolster national white pride and glorify British imperial culture, by displaying a wide array of artifacts looted and plundered during European slavery and colonialism.

One example of the rather grim history of colonial racial terrorism is the long European history of human zoos, which featured Africans and conquered indigenous peoples, displayed in the same way as animals. Men, women and children would be kidnapped, locked up in cages and exhibited in front of European large audiences. Many people died after short stints in captivity and they lived in tortuous conditions. Visitors to the human zoos would often poke the African children with sticks, throw food at them and audiences were permitted to subject the captives to various degrading acts for a fee.

The primitive practice of putting indigenous people on display began during the modern period when explorers like Columbus and Vespucci lured natives back to Europe to be flaunted and paraded like trophies.

In the late 1800′s, Europe had been filled with human zoos in cities like Paris, Hamburg, Antwerp, Barcelona, Warsaw, Milan, and London. Thirty-four million people visited the 1931 World Fair for human zoos in Paris. New York was not morally exempt from such racist and degrading practices. New York City saw these popular exhibits continue into the twentieth century, even after the ends of both World Wars. Millions of Americans attended these spectacles.

Prior to the Second World War, human Zoos in America were at their height and the New York Timesreported at the time, “few expressed audible objection to the sight of a human being in a cage. The crowd loved it…It is absurd to make moan over the imagined humiliation and degradation that they suffer.” At a time when America and Britain accepted human zoos as perfectly normal, Adolf Hitler was the one to ban them.

By creating the first mass contact between Whites and Blacks, and by promoting the spectacularizationof “The Other”, human zoos were a key factor in the progressive shift in the West from scientific to popular racism." Garikai Chengu

=======
The Romans had zoos, or rather menageries. The word zoo was the term employed by post enlightenment europe to serve as *scientific* cover for the display of exotic animals taken from foreign soil. And of course, well into the 1950s, *exotic humans*. The aristocracy in England and France kept menageries...sometimes open to the public in limited ways.

"In 1907, six different villages were built in the Jardin d’Agronomie Tropicale, representing all the corners of the French colonial empire at the time– Madagascar, Indochine, Sudan, Congo, Tunisia and Morocco. The villages and their pavillions were built to recreate the life and culture as it was in their original habitats. This included mimicking the architecture, importing the agriculture and appallingly, inhabiting the replica houses with people, brought to Paris from the faraway territories."

From Human Resistance

So, the discussion of the gorilla needlessly shot in Cincinnati, seems to be missing the fact that firstly, all zoos should be shut down. Secondly, all zoos are ideologically colonial. All zoos are institutions of display -- the returning of stolen (usually) wildlife to the metropole.

When Cecil the Lion was shot by a trophy hunting dentist from the US, the layers of irony ran deep. Cecil was named after arch colonialist cecil rhodes (Rhodesia). But most trophy hunters are white (the Windsor boys, prince harry and william and don trump's idiot son are big hunters). It is white privilege that drives these modern day safaris. It is the reenactment of 18th and 19th century colonial plunder. To symbolically continue the destruction and domination and theft from Africa and the rest of the *periphery*. These ideas run deep. Even in popular entertainment, Game of Thrones, you see the savage and uncivilized peripheral kingdoms. The West is always the center. The tragic death of that gorilla makes him just another casualty in the endless violence of the West. The liberal outrage over the dead gorilla is itself, however, a sign of privilege. The outrage is not at the keeping of these endangered animals in cages, but in shooting one and depriving the audience of its viewing pleasure.

Zoos are racist by extension. Trophy hunting is, by extension, racist....as well as a number of other things. Just like climbing Everest is racist. Hire your Sherpa. Hire local guides. Domination. Domination by the privileged West. Disseminating violence. And keeping the privilege of comfortable viewing of the exotica intact.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39799&p=599048&hilit=trump+son+big+game#p599048

[mentalgongfu2]

Also see, Tom Flocco*
https://twitter.com/tomflocco/status/764097419474640896


*I know this (His Name) but not sure from where, anyone else?

He was responsible for many discredited articles on conspiracy subjects back in the early 2000s.

Here is a mention from our own Jeff Wells. I know, I know, the link is from a version posted at Red Ice but I don't want to go hunting for the original.


http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2005/10oct/headtop.html

Edit: Easier than I thought.

http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/10/top-of-my-head.html

What do we do about the poetics of mystery? Sometimes we construct our own. At least that's how I understand the self-discrediting work of Tom Flocco, Sherman Skolnick and others. Flocco's recent "exclusive" fantasies - Barbara Olson arrested! French intelligence kill Israeli terrorists in NYC subway! Bush orders Fitzgerald fired! - is "conspiracy theory" as poetry slam: associative narratives to compete with the official stories, all of them wholly unhinged from reality. Such writers are not disinfo agents so much as they are fabulists, and no matter how often they are proven wrong they will still find a readership, because they promise emotionally satisfying resolution. As in a fable, all loose ends are tied. And like a fable, it all happens without our intervention. All we need do is watch it unfold, though only in our minds.

[Nordic]

"Trump and his kids have killed a lot of animals"?...lol Jesus Crisp...lol

Maybe she has anxiety disorder or something being under the microscope of the vast right wing...??

Also see, Tom Flocco*
https://twitter.com/tomflocco/status/764097419474640896


*I know this (His Name) but not sure from where, anyone else?

So .... Do we know that this African dude is the same guy in the Doctor listing? Regardless of Flocco's past, if this is true it's a pretty Big Deal.

[Grizzly]

grants from the Facebook Drug Task Force will get ya...
http://www.snopes.com/clintons-secret-s ... zepam-pen/
I was a 'truth enthusiast', once...lol

googled, Oladotun Okunola and Clinton, found some interesting stuff... Who the fuck knows anymore what's truth or make believe ... thanks for the info on Tom Flocoo, guys.

Regardless of Flocco's past, if this is true it's a pretty Big Deal.

Agreed... nothing astounds me any-more.

[Nordic]

She's out of her freaking mind.



Yeah so some country ALLEGEDLY hacks us so we bomb the shot out of them.

While she lies about Russia hacking the DNC.

She's a fucking menace. How can ANYBODY VOTE FOR THIS MURDEROUS NUTJOB???

[backtoiam]

I'm thinking Hillary may be focused on the hacking and Trump harping on rigged elections so that between the two stories the gubmint can declare the electoral process critical infrastructure that will need to be taken over and protected. The electoral system is already rotten but if the government decides it has to be protected as critical infrastructure we can turn out the lights forever on any hope of regaining control over it. We are already there anyway but if they take it over it will give them more control because certain key positions involved in the process can be appointed and vetted and they won't have to be as sneaky about it. The gov is already floating the balloon on this.

[mentalgongfu2]

I'm thinking Hillary may be focused on the hacking and Trump harping on rigged elections so that between the two stories the gubmint can declare the electoral process critical infrastructure that will need to be taken over and protected.

Yeah I saw that story on zerohedge too.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-31/obama-planning-seize-control-state-election-infrastructure


The problem with ZH is a partisan agenda occluding factual analysis.

Red herring. The election infrastructure was commandeered with HAVA.
Admin. Rules limited equipment purchases to a handful of corrupted companies

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_America_Vote_Act

Criticisms of electronic voting machines
Critics of HAVA argue it imprudently attempts to solve one problem of punched-card voting machine errors seen in Florida in the 2000 election, by replacing them with electronic voting machines.[who?] Some believe that HAVA may represent an effort to help large electronic voting systems vendors such as Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold Election Systems), Election Systems & Software, and Sequoia Voting Systems make millions of dollars throughout the country in selling electronic voting devices

.

[backtoiam]

I saw that on zero too but I didn't get that idea from them. If you listen to Hillary carefully in the above video she is hinting at it, seemingly. I have been thinking it for quite some time now. I can also see the possibility of Hillary not being electable for health reasons and some sort of special electoral commission picking our next president. I have had a lot of wild ideas about this election because it is so bizarre.

[JackRiddler]

In small groups she's warm, personable, and caring!

The NYT, tonedeaf when it comes to the rich motherfuckers of New York, tries to spin this story into something good. At least they're covering it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/04/us/po ... ising.html

Where Has Hillary Clinton Been? Ask the Ultrarich
Amy Chozick and Jonathan Martin

Robby Mook, the Clinton campaign manager, said 2.3 million people had contributed to the campaign, which has significantly increased the number of donors who give online in small increments.

The public has gotten used to seeing Mrs. Clinton’s carefully choreographed appearances and her somewhat halting speeches and TV interviews over the course of the long — and sometimes seemingly joyless — campaign, but donors this summer have glimpsed an entirely different person.

It is clear from interviews with more than a dozen attendees of Mrs. Clinton’s finance events this summer and a handful of pictures and videos of her at the closed-press gatherings that Mrs. Clinton, often described as warm and personable in small settings, whoever the audience, can be especially relaxed, candid and even joyous in this company.

Look WHO DID come over for lunch... Wow. #ImWithHer pic.twitter.com/1pX4V4mUxq
— Justin Timberlake (@jtimberlake) Aug. 23, 2016

Mrs. Clinton’s aides have gone to great lengths to project an image of her as down-to-earth and attuned to the challenges of what she likes to call “the struggling and the striving.” She began her campaign last year riding in a van to Iowa from New York and spent much of last summer hosting round-table discussions with a handful of what her campaign called “everyday Americans” in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Yet some of the closest relationships Mrs. Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, have are with their longstanding contributors. If she feels most at ease around millionaires, within the gilded bubble, it is in part because they are some of her most intimate friends.

“It’s like going to a wedding or a bar mitzvah — you catch up,” explained Mitchell Berger, a Democratic donor in Florida, about the familial nature of the events. Mr. Berger would know: He has been raising money for the Clintons since he held a fund-raiser in his Fort Lauderdale office for Mr. Clinton the day after he announced his candidacy in 1991.

Mr. Berger, who joined Mrs. Clinton last month at a donor event in Miami Beach, said many of the individual conversations before and after she speaks at the gatherings are centered more on grandchildren than weighty policy matters.

But when she has had a give-and-take this summer about issues, Mrs. Clinton, who has promised to “reshuffle the deck” in favor of the middle class and portrayed Mr. Trump as an out-of-touch billionaire, has almost exclusively been fielding the concerns of the wealthiest Americans.

Mrs. Clinton with Jimmy Buffett, Jon Bon Jovi and Paul McCartney on Tuesday at a fund-raiser in the Hamptons.

To businessmen who complain to Mrs. Clinton that President Obama has been unfriendly to their interests, she says she would approach business leaders more like Mr. Clinton did during his administration.

When financiers complain about the regulations implemented by the Dodd-Frank financial overhaul, Mrs. Clinton reaffirms her support for strong Wall Street regulation, but adds that she is open to listening to anyone’s ideas and at times notes that she represented the banking industry as a senator.

The wealthy contributors who host Mrs. Clinton often complain about her opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership and express concerns that Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont pushed her to the left on trade and other issues. Mrs. Clinton reminds them she has both opposed and supported trade deals in the past.

And, as she noted at an event last month on Cape Cod in Massachusetts, Mrs. Clinton points out that she worked cooperatively with Republicans when she served in the Senate and would do so as president.

OPEN Graphic
Graphic: Donors for Bush, Kasich and Christie Are Turning to Clinton More Than to Trump

“I’d say the major themes are small business, regulation and getting people back to work,” said Alan Patricof, a financier and longtime donor to Mrs. Clinton.

The campaign’s finance team is led by Dennis Cheng, previously the chief fund-raiser for the Clinton Foundation, and it employs a couple dozen staff members. Mr. Cheng, who attends the events with Mrs. Clinton, offers donors a number of contribution options that provide them and their families varying levels of access to Mrs. Clinton. John Morgan, a Florida lawyer and donor, described Mr. Cheng as “the master concierge.”

For a donation of $2,700, the children (under 16) of donors at an event last month at the Sag Harbor, N.Y., estate of the hedge fund magnate Adam Sender could ask Mrs. Clinton a question. A family photo with Mrs. Clinton cost $10,000, according to attendees.

Another advantage to choosing private fund-raisers over town halls or other public events is that Mrs. Clinton can bask in an affectionate embrace as hosts try to limit confrontational engagements.

Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild, a backer of Democrats and a friend of the Clintons’, made sure attendees did not grill Mrs. Clinton at the $100,000-per-couple lamb dinner Mrs. Forester de Rothschild hosted under a tent on the lawn of her oceanfront Martha’s Vineyard mansion.

“I said, ‘Let’s make it a nice night for her and show her our love,’” Mrs. Forester de Rothschild said.

Cash-seeking candidates from both parties often rely on August to reach vacationing donors who open their wallets, and their palatial homes. In 2012, the Republican presidential nominee, Mitt Romney, brought in close to $4 million over a single weekend from events in the Hamptons. And Mr. Trump, while netting $64 million through online and direct-mail fund-raising in July, also made the trek this summer to the eastern end of Long Island to raise cash.

But Mr. and Mrs. Clinton have occupied a particular place in the social fabric of the enclave. Over the past several summers, they have spent the last two weeks of August in a rented 12,000-square-foot home with a heated pool in East Hampton and in a six-bedroom mansion with a private path to the beach in Sagaponack. This year, the former first couple stayed in the guesthouse of Steven Spielberg’s East Hampton compound built on nine acres overlooking Georgica and Lily Ponds.

Mr. Trump’s candidacy has allowed Mrs. Clinton to reach out to a new set of donors in the area who typically give to Republicans but dislike the current nominee. (Mr. Trump feels more at home at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla., than in the Hamptons, where the exclusive Maidstone Club once denied him a full-time membership, according to The New York Post.)

“The Hamptons is full of powerful, wealthy people who are bored and go to constant social events to see who else got invited and to show your status,” said Ken Sunshine, a veteran Democratic activist and public relations executive with a home in Remsenburg, N.Y.

“This year,” he added, “going to a Clinton event is at the very top of the list.”

[guruilla]

Leaked Clinton Emails Show Discussions About An Illuminati Owl God And Moloch

Get ready folks, cause we’re taking a trip down the rabbit hole.

In a leaked email chain to Hillary Clinton, Lynn Forester de Rothschild wrote rather innocuously, “You are the best, and we remain your biggest fans. Sweet dreams and Godspeed with everything you are doing.”

Hillary’s response was rather… odd.

Let me know what penance I owe you.

OK then. Whatever. This is probably just an odd turn of phrase. Just gonna keep on… wait, what the hell is this? In another email chain discussing a public statement on Libya, Hillary begins by writing:

Ok–and Minerva agrees.

Minerva is a Greek Goddess of Wisdom, but she is also the Bavarian Illuminati Owl God. For those who don’t know, there is an Owl Shrine at Bohemian Grove, a place where the world’s elites reportedly gather every year around mid-July and perform odd ceremonies. Here’s a description of the Owl statue and one of the ceremonies surrounding it:

The ceremony takes place in front of the Owl Shrine, a 30-foot (9 m) hollow owl statue made of concrete over steel supports. The moss- and lichen-covered statue simulates a natural rock formation, yet holds electrical and audio equipment within it. For many years, a recording of the voice of club member Walter Cronkite was used as the voice of The Owl during the ceremony. Music and pyrotechnics accompany the ritual for dramatic effect.

Anyway, Jacob Sullivan replies to Clinton’s email:

Do you think the last paragraph violates the owl/minerva rule?
They are fine with the last paragraph.

What does the last paragraph they are discussing say? It’s a public statement in reference to Libya. Specifically it says:

“When a leader’s only means of staying in power is to use mass violence against his own people, he has lost the legitimacy to rule.”

I guess that might be offensive to their owl god apparently. The context of what exactly is being said is a bit unclear. And who are “They?”

Another one from Sydney Blumenthal to Hillary notes that Colin Powel and Henry Kissenger were both at the 2009 Bohemian Grove event.

There’s more weird stuff within the leaked emails as well. An email string addressed to W. Lewis Amselem (a right wing leftover from the Bush administration) ends a rather dull email with this tid-bit:

With fingers crossed, the old rabbit’s foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch …

Moloch, a god whose followers perform child sacrifice.

All of these emails took place perhaps a week or two after the Bohemian Grove meeting in 2009 (it always takes place in mid-July).

I can hear CNN now: “Look, it’s just the Democrats talking about their weird cult shit. What’s the big deal?”

http://www.vulgartrader.com/post/149830 ... s-about-an

[Nordic]

"they are fine with the last paragraph" is the creepiest thing in that post. ^^^

Yes indeed, who are "they"?

[Burnt Hill]

The Vulgar Trader?
The article on the e-mail chain is not only out of context but out of order.
First Hillary says she owes Rothschild a "penance" for breaking the R's date with Blair.
Rothschild then responds that it doesn't amount to a hill of beans, and
then -“You are the best, and we remain your biggest fans. Sweet dreams and Godspeed with everything you are doing.” Pretty innocuous.
More yellow journalism unworthy of this forum.

[backtoiam]

I have seen these emails of varying subject matter in several places on the internet for a good while now. I don't know what the true origin of them is.