maco144 » Tue Sep 06, 2016 8:37 pm wrote:Yeah a lot of attacks against me by people sitting on the sidelines not even choosing to participate intelligently. It's exactly what I expected when I made my original comment about the old guard not having any rigorous integrity when it comes to this issue.
You're complaining about attacks and then you label all your opponents as having no rigorous integrity on the issue, and at the same time you dismiss things that don't fit your theory as a hoax (Antarctic midnight sun)?
The reason you're being attacked is that the idea of a flat Earth is ridiculous and people are baffled that anyone can actually take it seriously, and your arguments aren't helping.
And you still haven't explained why we fall down (see my previous post). Preferably in your own words (or text, at least) and not another time-wasting Youtube video. Reading is so much faster, and I won't have to listen to that annoying git in the videos.Edit: You replied while I was typing:
Density fully explains your conundrum, it's up to you to try and learn to understand it.
No, it really doesn't. Density only says something about how densely packed matter is, it says nothing about how that matter falls down to Earth. Density is a
property, not a force. You might as well say that length makes things fall down. An incredibly dense object (like a black hole for instance) still weighs nothing (not really, but close enough for this argument) when it's floating around space. According to you it should be falling down towards something simply for being dense.
What I want to know is: What is the force that makes dense objects fall down (and why isn't the Sun falling down), as opposed to up or sideways? Something must be acting on that density to make it fall down, right (and again - weight and density are not the same thing)?
Extraedit: typo
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave