NASA Satellite stops on a dime!? WTF!!!

[DrEvil]

I bet that's what happened to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. They strayed too close to the edge and was shot down by the PTB.

[MacCruiskeen]

*sigh* You're so gullible, you think airplanes exist? You swallow anything the PTB tell you?

When you get on a "plane", they just project films of the "sky" on the windows so you think you're "flying". Then when you get to "New York", it's just a giant film set they have built to fool you.

[82_28]

i no areplains r ther their is a prujeture down hte street form me that maks them apear in the skye

[DrEvil]

Goddammit! How could I have been such a fool! It's all so obvious now.
Well played PTB, well played.

[maco144]

I dont expect any of you to be able to recognize CGI passed as real. The ISS doesn't exist and is a hoax to perpetrate the globe. There are plenty of videos with the space actors caught in front of green screens and video artifacts that clearly show layering.

[82_28]

I don't see a green screen. The ISS exists and I have seen it many times. Thine own eyes.

[Luther Blissett]

*sigh* You're so gullible, you think airplanes exist? You swallow anything the PTB tell you?

When you get on a "plane", they just project films of the "sky" on the windows so you think you're "flying". Then when you get to "New York", it's just a giant film set they have built to fool you.

As always, you are right.

Does anyone else care to explain why this matters at all anyway?

http://www.newyorker.com/books/joshua-r ... simulation

Does it matter that we might be living in a simulation? How should we feel about that prospect? Artists and thinkers have come to various conclusions. The idea of living as a “copy” in a simulated world was explored, for example, in “Permutation City,” a 1994 novel by the science-fiction writer Greg Egan, which imagines life in the early days of simulation-creation. The protagonist, a computer scientist named Paul Durham, becomes his own guinea pig, scanning his brain into a computer to create two Pauls; while the original Paul remains in the real world, the digital Paul lives in a simulated one, which is a little like a modern video game. Standing in his simulated apartment and looking at a painting—Bosch’s “The Garden of Earthly Delights”—Paul can’t quite forget that, when he turns around, the simulation will stop rendering it, reducing it to “a single gray rectangle” in an effort to save processing cycles. If we live in a simulated world, then the same thing could be happening to us: Why should a computer simulate every atom in the universe when it knows where our eyes aren’t looking? Simulated people have reasons to be paranoid.

[tazmic]

My favourite video is of the Apollo crew when they remove a circular cut-out from their window. Previously the cut-out served to make the earth look much farther away, but now I realize it also made it look like a globe!

Wish I could find it....
​

[Belligerent Savant]

.

ISS via a (ground-based) 10" (25.4cm) Newtonian telescope -- no sign of image manipulation, but I'm a mere layman:







View from ISS (reportedly):

[DrEvil]

I dont expect any of you to be able to recognize CGI passed as real. The ISS doesn't exist and is a hoax to perpetrate the globe. There are plenty of videos with the space actors caught in front of green screens and video artifacts that clearly show layering.

You still haven't explained why. Why are they fooling us into thinking we live on a sphere. What's in it for them, and who are they? What's the point?

[Luther Blissett]

To keep people from the knowledge that the entire universe is a simulation.

[MacCruiskeen]

You still haven't explained why. Why are they fooling us into thinking we live on a sphere. What's in it for them, and who are they? What's the point?

^^Quite.

And you haven't answered these questions either, maco:

Flat earth clearly implies geocentric universe therefor Earth is different than what's in the heavens.

Right, thanks. The fog is clearing. So, in your cosmological model, the earth is a Unique Giant Quiche surrounded by lots of little spinning gobstoppers (NB: not other quiches).

[...]

So, next questions:

1. What happens when an airplane attempts to fly over the edge of the quiche?

2. What's to stop the pilot taking photos of the underside?

[82_28]

Here's another aspect to the ISS. Why is it always going west to east and not the other way around? "Turning on a dime" as this thread started out as. Why?

Momentum as it falls around the Earth with just enough velocity to keep it in orbit. Even though this is rocket science, as they say, this is so elementary.

I would freak out if I saw the ISS going the other direction. I will give you that.

Why do they launch spacecraft as close to the equator they can get? Momentum from being closer to it. The craft use the gravity of a spinning globe to get a boost to achieve orbit.

[NeonLX]

OK. So I launch in a supersonic plane headed due east on the equator. I decide to set my cruising speed at 1000 MPH, which is ~the same speed as the globe is spinning westward (24,000 mile circumference and an entire rotation is one day, or 24 hours. 24,000 miles/24 hours = 1000 MPH). When I touch the start button, I'm moving 1000 MPH westward along with the rest of the globe at my latitude. But once I'm aloft, plowing through the atmosphere at 1000 MPH, I'll eventually speed up to the point where I'm counteracting the spin below me, correct? In other words, I'd be "stationary" from the standpoint of an observer directly below me--right?

[vanlose kid]

Published on Sep 1, 2016

Very Compelling Proof of the Flat Earth

A note on comments: I have ZERO tolerance for drama, insults, manipulation, passive aggressive attacks, lying or deception in any form. Comments possessing any of these attributes will be deleted. And as this is my video I am the arbiter of which comments qualify for deletion. Present precise and relevant evidence if you want to challenge anything I have presented.

I will also delete all comments that attempt to draw me into any debates or arguments about other "flat earth" related topics that are not DIRECTLY covered in my video. I am focused on one thing and one thing only and that is to either validate or invalidate the evidence I have collected and presented.

If you want to argue with someone about the ISS, the southern cross, or any other "flat earth" topics please take it somewhere else. I am not interested AT ALL. I will delete challenge comments that are not directly challenging my data with countervailing data. And again as this is my video I am the arbiter of whether or not you are presenting a legitimate challenge.

Don't get me wrong. I want to be challenged. In fact I am actively looking for some piece of data that will debunk my observation. I want to see it. I want to be challenged with relevant data but I will not argue or be drawn into petty drama like I see ALL OVER flat earth video comments. I am and always have been incapable of functioning at the level arguing and drama. It's not going to happen so don't even bother trying.


And now... about me and the process of making this video and my related thoughts about it.


My love of truth and love of the pursuit of truth compelled me to conduct this experiment and produce this video.

I find the evidence I collected to be very convincing. In fact I find no way to interpret this data other than to say that it clearly supports the conclusion that the earth is flat. Yet if you were to ask me if I believe the earth is flat my answer would be “I don't know" because at this point I truly do not know what I believe. I am fully aware of what this evidence is pointing to and yet my mind seems unable to firmly settle on the belief that the earth is flat. Maybe this is due to a lifetime of being told that I live on a globe flying through space.

As of now, the day I will upload this video, I am in still in a state of suspense not knowing what to believe. I do trust my own eyes and the evidence I collected but I want more. If I had one wish relating to flat earth it would be that fifty replications of this test be carried out by fifty different individuals or groups of people around the world and that the corresponding fifty videos be produced and uploaded onto Youtube presenting the evidence collected.

And I wouldn’t stop there. I’d wish for new tests to be developed that were easy to understand, concise, and conclusive methods of measuring the shape of the surface of the earth. These new tests would also be carried out by individuals or groups of people around the world and the corresponding videos would also be produced and uploaded onto Youtube presenting the evidence collected.

If I could see many repeats of the test I conducted as well as the presentations of many other tests and all of them clearly pointed to the exact same conclusion that my test points to then maybe my mind would feel comfortable enough to settle on the belief that the earth is flat.

I think what I’m trying to say is I’m not really interested in a belief system. I’m not interested in proof that takes me ninety nine percent of the way there and then it’s up to me to make that last one percent leap of faith or belief. I want one hundred percent irrefutable proof so I do not have to adopt a new belief system. I want to know. Maybe that’s not possible. Maybe the evidence I collected and presented in this video is enough proof. I’m not sure. As of now I really don’t know what to believe.

But I do know that this evidence very clearly and without hesitation points to the conclusion that the earth is flat.

Is it?

Could this actually be true?

One thing I do feel confident of is that the earth is indeed the shape that it is right now at this very moment. And to the best of our knowledge it will be this same shape tomorrow and even a hundred years from now. As this is the case it can be measured and human beings can prove conclusively the shape of the earth. We have the tools of measurement and the tools to record and present our findings. The shape of the earth can be proven conclusively and shared in an easy to understand and intuitive way that most every person can grasp. I have absolutely no doubt about this. And this can be done by ordinary people. We don’t need a government to do this for us. The technology that is available to each and every one of us today makes this entirely possible. All that is required is the will to do so.

Do we have the will to do this?

Do we really want to know?

I think I do.

[Jon McIntyre]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPDtMQqlprk&t=0s


*