Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Rory » Fri Oct 28, 2016 7:35 pm

http://washingtonbabylon.com/what-the-f ... -a-theory/

OK, so James Comey has announced that the FBI will reopen the investigation related to Hillary Clinton. This has something to do with Anthony Weiner — the disgraced former congressman and sexual predator who we wrote about here, first revealing that he continued to sext women.

Hillary’s army of apologists say there’s nothing there, it’s a minor matter and will be explained away shortly. Of course, Hillary’s apologists always say there’s nothing there. Hillary could carve out a baby’s heart on CNN and they would blame Donald Trump and Fox News.

But think about it: Would the FBI director make this announcement, less than two weeks from the date of the election, if he didn’t have something earth-shattering? I doubt it, especially as back in July Comey announced, in what was obviously a political decision, that he would not indict Hillary. So why bring this up now — with Hillary on the verge of winning the presidency — unless he effectively has no choice?

Furthermore, Comey would have been set for life if Hillary was elected. Now he’s infuriated her and her supporters. Why would he do that if he thought she was going to be valuable to him down the road? Principles? Uh huh. It’s more likely he doesn’t think Hillary is going to be so valuable.

OK, now remember that the FBI and the New York Police Department have opened preliminary investigations into charges that Weiner send disgusting explicit text messages to an underage girl. And I can say for sure that there was more than one girl and Weiner’s cell phone contains evidence about other actions he took with minors that could result in criminal charges.

What this means is that Anthony Weiner is going to prison — unless he cuts a deal. What I suspect is that Weiner is cooperating with investigators and — being a worm and a rat — is desperate to trade information that will save him from serving time. Recall that he and his soon-to-be former wife, Huma Abedin, are Clinton cronies from way back, so he would have information very damaging to Hillary Clinton.

Meanwhile, the feds have seized Huma Abedin’s computer as part of the Weiner investigation. Huma is 100 percent loyal to Hillary and would never sell her out but the FBI got her computer as part of the Weiner investigation and she had made a rookie mistake: she didn’t delete her emails. So that’s another source of highly damaging information to Hillary.

So we’ll see. Maybe the Clintonistas are right and there’s nothing significant here. If so, James Comey just made an utterly bizarre decision to seriously influence the 2016 election in Donald Trump’s favor. And that would really be insane.
Rory
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Agent Orange Cooper » Fri Oct 28, 2016 7:56 pm

82_28 » Fri Oct 28, 2016 10:59 am wrote:SLAD peaced if you didn't know. She told me over PM. I begged her to stay and so did NeonLX. But I think she might be gone for good.


she???
User avatar
Agent Orange Cooper
 
Posts: 616
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:44 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Fri Oct 28, 2016 8:11 pm

Rory » Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:35 pm wrote:Furthermore, Comey would have been set for life if Hillary was elected.


Where is he getting this from? I don't recall Clinton publicly promising to re-hire this Republican who donated to McCain in 2008 and Romney in 2012.

Rory » Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:35 pm wrote:Maybe the Clintonistas are right and there’s nothing significant here. If so, James Comey just made an utterly bizarre decision to seriously influence the 2016 election in Donald Trump’s favor. And that would really be insane.


Not too bizarre. Comey has a history of going after the Clintons. He was deputy special counsel in the Senate Whitewater Committee.

I wish I had a beer to go with all this popcorn! :wink:
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: Gone baby gone
Blog: View Blog (37)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby coffin_dodger » Fri Oct 28, 2016 8:12 pm

It looks like the winner may be the candidate that can release the greatest volume of the most ghastly, incriminating secrets of the other candidate. BEST ELECTION EVER.
Maybe we get to witness the self-implosion of another superpower. That probably sounds an unpleasant scenario, but just think - were that to happen - no more white privilege! :yay
User avatar
coffin_dodger
 
Posts: 2216
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:05 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (14)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Freitag » Fri Oct 28, 2016 8:48 pm

Does Kim Dotcom have the 33k emails? Did he give them to the FBI?

Image

More tweets here: http://imgur.com/a/zv174

One Redditor's take on it:

Image
User avatar
Freitag
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Novem5er » Fri Oct 28, 2016 8:59 pm

Comey explained that he sent the letter to Congress now, so that he can't be accused later of holding back an investigation until after the election was over. I think he's expecting a Hillary victory and doesn't want the Republican congress pissed at him that he might have been holding back information. Also, by throwing Trump a bone (and an edge) it might gain some favor from those same Republicans.

Here is Pete Williams on MSNBC explaining what he's learned. Basically, they were looking on Weiner's laptop and found that Huma had used it also to communicate with Hillary. So they now have 1,000s of Huma/Hillary emails to look through, looking for classified information. Pete Williams says the feds will need to get a court order to look at the email (easily done) and that it will take time to understand their contents and to NOT expect any conclusions until after the election.

https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/792112714457972736

(on edit) Hey, that's interesting about Kim Dotcom. I hadn't heard that the actual Clinton Foundation was hacked.
User avatar
Novem5er
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:55 pm

Ok so 10 days away from the big ol (s)Election, the score stands at:

A woman who lead the destruction of Libya, married to a sexual predator, whose real love is with her right hand woman Huma Abedin married to a pedo pervert...investigated by
the FBI recently for luring a 15 year old for sex, and in the course of said investigation the FBI possibly uncovered enough evidence to reopen a Clinton criminal investigation...
with another (at least journalistic) investigation showing the Clintons used their "charity" to procure quite a lot of money for themselves(including from countries that are
dictatorships and known state sponsors of terrorism)

versus

A man who brags about sexual assault, has numerous abuse accusers, used racism to wiggle out of the media spotlight on his fraud pyramid scheme University trial,
openly courts unstable far right nutjobs, and is telling his supporters to take matters into their own hands (possibly with violence) if his opponent wins. And of whom,
the US government is accusing of being a secret agent of Russia.

No wonder Trump and Slick Willy have been long time friends and talking on the phone as recent as last spring.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Sat Oct 29, 2016 12:53 am

That moment when you're Clinton's closest friend and right hand woman, and your pedo perv husband may be costing
Madam Secretary the glory of the last quarter with FBI investigations

Image
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Nordic » Sat Oct 29, 2016 12:56 am

Hillary rode to power on a weiner and she may be taken down by a Weiner.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Freitag » Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:16 am

The Kim Dotcom Theory

October 28, 2016

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: This is Jim in World Series Chicago. Great to have you on the program, sir. Hello.

CALLER: Thanks, Rush. I appreciate it. I think I can connect a few the dots here for you on the FBI investigation. Let me give you a little background just very quickly. Your question: Why now for the FBI? WikiLeaks has been releasing these emails and they have been progressively getting worse as they have been going along. But, as you recall, they've only been about Hillary. They haven't been her emails, and that's been the big thing, not her personal emails. Now, there's a guy on Twitter, he's a genius, Kim Dotcom. I sent you an email link of his stuff.

Two days ago, he released a tweet, sent it to Trump, to Gowdy, and Sean Hannity saying how they could -- how he could -- access Hillary Rodham Clinton's email. Step one, go to NSA.gov. Step two, contact Mike Rogers. Number three, ask Mike to go here and input this selector, her email address. He claims that all seven years of emails will be on there in the NSA spy cloud in Utah. He said that the Congress or Senate can get these with a subpoena.

I tweeted out to Senator (sic) Chaffetz I think what was gonna happen is that the Kim Dotcom... These emails were gonna come out showing Hillary's emails. I think that the Obama administration got wind of it, realized that their last chance to get ahead of this would be to have Comey come down now and say, "Hey, we just looked in someplace. We didn't know they were there. She bleached it from her computer," and to get ahead of this... Give you a little background, Kim Dotcom, the entertainment industry alleged because of his mega upload --

RUSH: Hold a minute. We're getting in the weeds here. Your theory is that Comey came forward today why?

CALLER: Because this guy, Kim Dotcom, he's on Twitter --

RUSH: No, no. I know Kim Dotcom has directed everybody to Hillary Clinton's 33,000 emails. So is your theory that Kim Dotcom has enabled people to find Hillary Clinton's 33,000 emails, the Obama administration knows the jig is up, and, to protect themselves, they're sending Comey out to take her out? Is that what you're saying?

CALLER: Well, the jig is going to be up. In other words, if they didn't front load it to come out now, they were gonna release -- Assange, WikiLeaks -- Hillary's emails next week, the actual emails. So I think they're coming out ahead of time saying, "Hey, we just found this place we didn't look at before. The FBI didn't have access to the NSA," or whatever they're gonna say, "and now this is the new stuff, we actually found her actual emails, Hillary's actual emails," which as you know, we haven't seen. We've only seen everybody else's about her. So I think we're just getting ahead of it, realizing the jig is up.

RUSH: Okay, getting ahead for what reason? To protect her, to throw her overboard, to protect Obama? For what reason?

CALLER: I think it's to protect Obama.

RUSH: Protect Obama.

CALLER: He had to cut her off because --

RUSH: So you think that this is about throwing Hillary overboard to protect Obama?

CALLER: Correct, because they realize that WikiLeaks had her emails. They were gonna come out, so they needed to get ahead of the story before the public sees those emails.

RUSH: Okay. Let me take it from here, since I know exactly what you're talking about. We've got a break coming up, but I will translate this. He knew he was under a time crunch here; he was trying to get a lot of things in when he knew it was limited time. We'll take a break. I will come back and I will tell you what his theory is involving Kim Dotcom -- a massive hacker, one of the greatest hackers in the history of hackery -- and Hillary's 33,000 emails (that are somewhere), and Julian Assange claiming that his next dump will get her arrested.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Okay. Let me bring you up to speed on the allegations or the suggestions made by our last caller. Kim Dotcom, if you want to know who this guy is, think Napster times 100. Kim Dotcom established essentially a company, an outfit, a company called Megaupload. He was accused of costing the entertainment industry $500 million by putting unlicensed content on the Megaupload site. Movies, music, TV shows, you know, the stuff that when you play a DVD or a digital copy there's a giant FBI warning that you could go to jail for 15 lifetimes if you copy it.

That's what he did, $500 million of fraud. The legal case does involve -- even though he's a citizen of New Zealand. He was born in West Germany. The United States got involved in his pursuit and was instrumental in him losing everything. He is an accomplished hacker. His real name is Kim Schmidt. He was born in 1974. He founded this file hosting service called Megaupload. He was accused of criminal copyright infringement and tons of other charges: money laundering, racketeering, wire fraud by the U.S. Department of Justice.

In January of 2012 the New Zealand police raided his home in Auckland, New Zealand, placed him in custody in response to the U.S. -- he's not a U.S. citizen. He ended up losing practically everything because, in his view, of the United States. So he reportedly has a relationship with Julian Assange that they have common ground, and that is exposing the high and mighty and bringing them down.

Now, Kim Dotcom, I first got wind of this two nights ago in a super-secret phone call. Kim Dotcom, the caller was right. In all of these Podesta emails there's not a single Hillary Clinton email in the bunch, if you have noticed. It's Podesta emailing everybody, the DNC, everybody in the Hillary campaign, but there are no Hillary Clinton emails in this Podesta dump. We are at -- what's the number? We're at 50,000 or 30,000 Podesta emails. This guy was a prolific emailer.

There are tens of thousands of them so far, and none of them are Hillary's. Remember, she had 60,000 on her server. She turned 30,000 of them over and said the other 30,000 were nobody's business 'cause they're about yoga and her daughter's wedding and wedding registry and reception and stuff like that. Along comes, to get to the short version of the story, Kim Dotcom alleging he knows where those 33,000 emails are.

They were not destroyed. Hillary may think they were, but they are somewhere in the hands of the National Security Agency, the NSA. And he was offering anybody who cared a way to get them. He was offering people a route. He was claiming he knew how to get them. So our caller's theory is that that's what the FBI has now become aware of, is Hillary's emails that they were led to believe had been destroyed, Hillary deleted them, remember, with a cloth. She wiped the server. "Oh, you mean like with a cloth?" she said. Then we later learned that the bleach bunch did it. But they're there.

And if they're there, if they're somewhere, there's something in them she doesn't want anybody to see. Along comes Kim Dotcom who's got an axe to grind with the U.S. government, the Obama administration. He knows Assange. So the people -- nobody knows -- this is all speculation. What's going on here is that Kim Dotcom has worked with Assange and is really the hacker. It's not the Russians.

Vlad has nothing to do with it, and furthermore, the fact that the Russians have nothing to do with this and Obama and Hillary are running around blaming 'em is really irresponsible and playing with fire. You blame the Russians for interfering in a U.S. election when they're not doing it and you expect 'em just to look the other way and claim, "Well, it's politics. We know how the Americans do it." This is not the way Putin reacts. Putin does not react to being falsely accused of doing things like this, and he's not happy about it. It's irresponsible for Obama and the Democrats to be doing this.

Assange has now said that he's got tons more emails coming next week and that what's coming next week will get her arrested. As I say, I was getting bits and pieces of this as far back as two nights ago. So we get this caller who wants to talk about it, and I'll share with you what I know. I can't vouch for any of this, other than who Kim Dotcom is and has the ability to do this. Whether he actually knows where Hillary's emails are and can direct people to it, somebody knows whether that's true or not.

But Assange is saying what he's saying. And Assange has said it's not the Russians that are giving him this data. And it's true that all this data does not have one Hillary Clinton email in it. At some point Assange claims that what you're gonna see will be Hillary Clinton emails, and in the middle of all this is when Comey comes along and says, "You know what? We've come across additional emails, may reopen the investigation." So it puts all of this in a different light.

So our caller was suggesting maybe Obama, the Democrats, it's now time to throw her overboard to protect themselves by not standing in the way of the FBI doing its investigation and conclusion, 33,000 emails. I don't even want to go there. That's caller speculation, and anybody can call here and say anything, and it could end up being right, but that's generally the kind of speculation I try to avoid throughout my entire career. I have no idea. We just have to watch all this play out.

Something is clearly going on. This is unprecedented for the FBI to apparently close an investigation, reopen it with, what, 11 days left before an election. It's bombshell stuff and the Democrats are not happy.

END TRANSCRIPT
User avatar
Freitag
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby RocketMan » Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:48 am

We're posting Rush Limbaugh transcripts now? Ffffuuuuu...
-I don't like hoodlums.
-That's just a word, Marlowe. We have that kind of world. Two wars gave it to us and we are going to keep it.
User avatar
RocketMan
 
Posts: 2813
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:02 am
Location: By the rivers dark
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Freitag » Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:59 am

RocketMan » Fri Oct 28, 2016 8:48 pm wrote:We're posting Rush Limbaugh transcripts now? Ffffuuuuu...


Haha God forbid someone have a different political orientation than you.

As for the information actually contained within the post: it's a good summary of the Kim Dotcom connection I'd alluded to earlier.
User avatar
Freitag
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby RocketMan » Sat Oct 29, 2016 4:59 am

Freitag » Sat Oct 29, 2016 10:59 am wrote:
RocketMan » Fri Oct 28, 2016 8:48 pm wrote:We're posting Rush Limbaugh transcripts now? Ffffuuuuu...


Haha God forbid someone have a different political orientation than you.

As for the information actually contained within the post: it's a good summary of the Kim Dotcom connection I'd alluded to earlier.


That's so very American, explaining someone's revulsion of Rush Limbaugh by "political orientation"... He's a broken down propagandist, broadcasting repeating-loop male-chauvinist, racist agit-prop from the deepest, darkest 90s.

Just referring to him is fatal for one's credibility.
-I don't like hoodlums.
-That's just a word, Marlowe. We have that kind of world. Two wars gave it to us and we are going to keep it.
User avatar
RocketMan
 
Posts: 2813
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:02 am
Location: By the rivers dark
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Sat Oct 29, 2016 10:14 am

Would be hilarious if Weiner's insatiable pervy obsession leads to Trump winning the presidency

A British tabloid story is the reason for Hillary Clinton’s new FBI nightmare

This is the sentence, published in September by the Daily Mail, that led to Hillary Clinton's new FBI woes: "Anthony Weiner carried on a months-long online sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl during which she claims he asked her to dress up in 'school-girl' outfits for him on a video messaging application and pressed her to engage in 'rape fantasies.'"
By the time of that report, Weiner's sexting relapse had been exposed weeks earlier by the New York Post, which published messages that the former New York congressman exchanged with a "40-something divorcee." The New York Post story prompted Weiner's wife, top Clinton aide Huma Abedin, to announce she was leaving her husband, but it did not suggest criminal behavior.

The Daily Mail's follow-up story, however, alleged that Weiner had traded sexually explicit messages with an underage girl and caught the FBI's attention. As The Washington Post noted Friday, in the process of investigating Weiner, the FBI examined a computer shared by Weiner and Abedin and happened upon emails deemed relevant to the agency's earlier probe of the way Clinton and aides handled classified information during Clinton's tenure as secretary of state.
Thus we have Friday's news that the FBI is renewing its inquiry into Clinton's use of a private email server. All because of story in a British tabloid.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... nl_az_most
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Novem5er » Sat Oct 29, 2016 10:39 am

I'm going to defend Freitag, here, about the Rush transcript. I deplore Rush and have never listened to his show. I agree with everything RocketMan labeled him as, above.

BUT it was a good summary of the Kim Dotcom case and a possible connection to the recent email reveal. I hadn't heard before that Kim Dotcom had anything to do with Wikileaks, the DNC, or Hillary Clinton. I have to admit that it is an interesting coincidence and theory . . . even if it ends up being a right-wing wet dream.

Looking at Kim Dotcom's twitter feed, he's denying that he's hacked anyone. He says that he's been indicted and is free under bail (i.e. he's not about to go jeopardizing his future freedom by admitting to hacking anyone right now). He's using his own court case to explain that the NSA has all of Hillary's email and that there is no excuse for the FBI (or Congress) to not have access to them.

Kim Dotcom ‏@KimDotcom Oct 26
I know where Hillary Clintons deleted emails are and how to get them legally @TGowdySC @seanhannity @realDonaldTrump. 100% true. Retweet.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cvt90Q8UAAA6iUc.jpg

Kim Dotcom ‏@KimDotcom Oct 26
I know how X-Keyscore works because NSA/GCSB used it to obtain my emails in my White House driven copyright case. Evidence in my court file.


Kim Dotcom ‏@KimDotcom Oct 26
Prime Minister of New Zealand apologized for unlawfully spying on me (google it), utilizing NSA X-Keyscore. NSA has the Clinton emails 100%.


https://twitter.com/KimDotcom
User avatar
Novem5er
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests