TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby Nordic » Wed Nov 02, 2016 3:20 am

The "left" ignores this because they're not the left. They are a brand that hates Republicans. Hillary could do anything, literally anything, and as long as the Repubs came out against it, these fake "leftists" you mention would support it. I mean, how many more atrocities can she back? We can't even make hyperboles about slaughtering children because she's already done that and publicly advocates for slaughtering more. She's fine with her husband's 26 trips on the Lolita Express. She's a fucking monster. She's a grotesque joke of a human being.

But they think Republicans hate her so LETS SUPPORT HER.

Which is even more stupid than you can imagine because at this point REPUBLICANS SUPPORT HER. The worst on the unmentionables. Even Glen fucking Beck supports her!!

People are out of their fucking minds.

This is how strong "branding" is with people. The advertisers know it. That's why they spend trillions of dollars on it.

Like I said Edward Bernays is accepting congratulations from Satan himself, dancing in hell. He won.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Nov 02, 2016 3:54 am

So much for the "strong" evidence of Russians puppeteering Trump
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/01/politics/ ... index.html


FBI investigations into Trump-Russia ties yield little
The FBI has been conducting multiple investigations of alleged connections between Russia and Donald Trump, his presidential campaign or its backers. But none so far have yielded proof of criminal connections between the parties.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby Nordic » Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:00 am

Clearly the FBI has been infiltrated by commie KGB agents.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:07 am

Nordic » Wed Nov 02, 2016 3:00 am wrote:Clearly the FBI has been infiltrated by commie KGB agents.


It's official. The Democrats have turned into Glenn Beck.

"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby Nordic » Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:17 am

8bitagent » Wed Nov 02, 2016 3:07 am wrote:
Nordic » Wed Nov 02, 2016 3:00 am wrote:Clearly the FBI has been infiltrated by commie KGB agents.


It's official. The Democrats have turned into Glenn Beck.




Yeah! Just look at Carville going off about the "KGB". The DNC has turned into what Fox News used to be.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby Iamwhomiam » Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:30 am

8bitagent » Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:07 am wrote:
Nordic » Wed Nov 02, 2016 3:00 am wrote:Clearly the FBI has been infiltrated by commie KGB agents.


It's official. The Democrats have turned into Glenn Beck.


Pathetic. Nearly content-free whining. Less than 1 minute of 6.

Nordic, do you not believe the Russians, unlike us, are not at all engaged in cyberwarfare against us?
Completely incredible to be so naive.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby Nordic » Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:49 am

Iamwhomiam » Wed Nov 02, 2016 3:30 am wrote:
8bitagent » Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:07 am wrote:
Nordic » Wed Nov 02, 2016 3:00 am wrote:Clearly the FBI has been infiltrated by commie KGB agents.


It's official. The Democrats have turned into Glenn Beck.


Pathetic. Nearly content-free whining. Less than 1 minute of 6.

Nordic, do you not believe the Russians, unlike us, are not at all engaged in cyberwarfare against us?
Completely incredible to be so naive.



Why would you believe it? Because Hillary Clinton told you? :lol2:
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby Iamwhomiam » Wed Nov 02, 2016 5:10 am

So now you claim I believe in Hillary. You've really lost it this election cycle, Nordic. I've said nothing about whether the Blaze broadcast was believable or not. Don't put words in my mouth. My comment stated most clearly my complaint: there is not very much content to the cut-off mid-sentence short video.

Do you interpret this video as truly informative of anything, aside the mockery by the three?

And how is this, "Why would you believe it? Because Hillary Clinton told you?" an answer to my question, "Nordic, do you not believe the Russians, unlike us, are not at all engaged in cyberwarfare against us?"
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby Jerky » Wed Nov 02, 2016 7:22 am

THE MEDIA NARRATIVE IS THAT HILLARY IS CORRUPT, SO WHAT THE HELL IS DONALD TRUMP?!
Heather Digby Parton

The fallout from Friday’s bombshell announcement by James Comey, the FBI’s director, that his agency had found emails potentially relating to the investigation of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified information continued to shake up the presidential race on Monday. There were hours of excited speculation about how it was going to affect the race and whether Comey’s reputation was damaged.

And there was lots and lots of breathless punditry about the “email scandal” without anyone perceiving a necessity to define it since it’s taken on a life of its own.

If you do need a primer on why that issue is so compelling to the news media, this piece by Matthew Yglesias at Vox is a good place to start. In a study by Harvard’s Shorenstein Center of the two campaigns’ media coverage during their respective party conventions, Clinton’s email scandal was the single most reported issue, with CNN vastly outpacing any other network or newspaper in its overwhelming attention to the issue.

And this was after the FBI had decided that no charges of mishandling classified information were warranted. Since Comey took it upon himself to publicly scold Clinton like an errant child, the news media naturally treated the event as if the words had come down from Sinai and condemned her as if she had been found guilty anyway.

One of the major rationales for the ceaseless coverage of the issue is the prospect of a Clinton presidency being burdened by the necessity of dealing with a full-blown witch hunt by Republican-led House committees investigating her alleged conflicts of interest. Oddly enough, the media can barely spare a moment to contemplate the overwhelming conflicts of interest and legal exposure that a President Donald Trump would bring to the White House.

As Media Matters laid out on Monday, Trump is currently facing 75 different civil lawsuits for matters including fraud, breach of contract, nonpayment, sexual harassment and defamation. He has three pending Trump University fraud suits and is suspected of perpetrating a “pay-for-play” scheme with Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi and possibly others to shut down a state investigation into the same fraudulent enterprise.

Just last week Trump was ordered to appear in federal court on Dec. 16 for a status conference in a civil lawsuit brought by a woman who accused him of raping her when she was 13. (According to the latest blockbuster investigative piece by Kurt Eichenwald in Newsweek, Trump has destroyed emails and other documents in circumvention of court orders for decades.)

Everyone knows that last month Donald Trump was revealed on tape bragging about sexually assaulting women and that shortly thereafter women began to come forward by the dozen to allege the same. A number of such women are now represented by legal counsel, a problem with which a President Trump would surely have to deal. (The Supreme Court set that precedent with former president Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones case.) One can only imagine how many others might come forward.

And I have written before about the literal impossibility of Trump extricating himself from the Trump Organization’s foreign entanglements. He would have massive conflicts of interest all over the globe, no matter how much Trump and his family try to divest themselves from the business — which they have no intention of doing. American foreign policy would be held hostage to the president’s business interests, and that’s assuming we even knew what those interests were.

The only thing we do know is that Trump has dealings with shady characters in various countries around the world that would greatly complicate American national security and its relationship to its allies. At the moment he has refused to give any information about his foreign holdings and media outlets have been strangely passive about asking him about it. This is all he’s said about this extremely important topic:

If I become president, I couldn’t care less about my company. It’s peanuts. I want to use that same — up here, whatever it may be — to make America rich again and to make America great again. I have Ivanka and Eric and Don sitting there. Run the company, kids. Have a good time. I’m going to do it for America. . . . I would put it in a blind trust. Well, I don’t know if it’s a blind trust if Ivanka, Don and Eric run it. But — is that a blind trust? I don’t know. But I would probably have my children run it with my executives. And I wouldn’t ever be involved because I wouldn’t care about anything but our country — anything.

Now there’s this evolving issue of possible Russian involvement in the election on behalf of Trump’s candidacy. A flurry of conflicting stories came out yesterday, obviously leaked by warring FBI factions. One reported that the FBI had opened a preliminary investigation into the relationship between Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and former adviser Carter Page and pro-Russian interests.

Slate published an intriguing piece by Franklin Foer about computer experts who reportedly found possible direct connections between the Trump campaign and a Russian bank suspected of being a front for the government. David Corn of Mother Jones came out with a piece about a former intelligence officer finding evidence that Trump has been cultivated by the Russian government for years. And the Atlantic published a chilling report from Mike Lofgren about Russians’ influence on the far right in Europe and how their interference on behalf of Donald Trump was seen as a way of boosting the alt-right.

The New York Times quoted other anonymous FBI sources saying they’ve determined that the Russian government simply wanted to interfere with the election but had no preferred candidate. (This is an odd conclusion considering that the Russians appear to have targeted only the Democrats. So one has to wonder whether the Times’ FBI source is a Republican.) Coincidentally, a video has surfaced from 2013 in which Donald Trump says he knows Vladimir Putin very well, although he now says he’s never met the Russian president.

All of this raises a question The Washington Post’s Paul Waldman raised two months ago: How is it possible that Clinton’s email brouhaha has marked her as thoroughly corrupt and dishonest, while Trump’s monumentally nefarious past, present and future are overlooked? Waldman’s assumption is probably the correct one: The narratives were set early in the campaign cycle, with Trump being the bigoted, crazy one and Clinton being the corrupt one. That’s just how the media frames the contest.

They got it wrong. Yes, Trump is the crazy, bigoted one. He’s also a misogynist and worse. But he’s also the corrupt one, perhaps even more than most of us who had already understood that ever imagined. Considering that partial list of conflicts, misdeeds and legal entanglements I just laid out, a President Trump is unimaginable.

(references and video at link)
http://www.salon.com/2016/11/01/in-the- ... ald-trump/
User avatar
Jerky
 
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:28 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Nov 02, 2016 7:25 am

^^^^^

As Media Matters laid out on Monday, Trump is currently facing 75 different civil lawsuits for matters including fraud, breach of contract, nonpayment, sexual harassment and defamation. He has three pending Trump University fraud suits and is suspected of perpetrating a “pay-for-play” scheme with Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi and possibly others to shut down a state investigation into the same fraudulent enterprise.

Just last week Trump was ordered to appear in federal court on Dec. 16 for a status conference in a civil lawsuit brought by a woman who accused him of raping her when she was 13. (According to the latest blockbuster investigative piece by Kurt Eichenwald in Newsweek, Trump has destroyed emails and other documents in circumvention of court orders for decades.)



Anonymous Warns Russian Hackers Targeting US Election

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLGOBB-hElE
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Nov 02, 2016 8:04 am

What Do You Do When You Can't Think About Anything Else?
Eight days.

BY CHARLES P. PIERCE
OCT 31, 2016

Browsing the Intertoobz Monday morning, I noticed that my pal Billy Keane, bon vivant, raconteur, newspaper columnist, and pubkeeper, had written about the big hole that the Irish government has dug in William Street in Listowel, which is where Billy keeps the pub opened by his father, the late, great John B. Keane. (Most of my family hails from what we like to call the Greater Listowel Metropolitan Area, as do many of your men, the sheep.) Apparently, the hole, which is aimed at bringing natural gas to the town, has become quite the tourist attraction, as Billy points out.

From the Independent:

People around here are obsessed with potholes. There are about 20,000 votes in potholes, if the last election is anything to go on. Right now the hole is the only show in town. We talk of little else. How long will it take? How deep will they go? What if they hit rock? Will they find the lost Black and Tans? People marvel at the diggers with sharp teeth like a great white shark and men in hard hats are treated like superstars. Business should be really quiet but it's not. Every day people walk up and down the street for a look into the hole. It catches hold of you this looking into holes. So far no one has fallen in. I was chatting with a few Americans the other day in the pub. Nice people they were but naive. "What's going on with the road?" they asked…The biggest pipe in the trenches is bringing in natural gas which is great news. There's a great chance of industry. But people speak only of the hole.
People speak only of the hole.

After 18 months, I think I've found my bumper sticker for the 2016 presidential campaign.

People Speak Only Of The Hole: Vote For Somebody '16.

I am perilously close to perishing for the desire of wanting somebody to win the presidency on the merits. I am tired of polls and micro-analytics based on splitting the electorate into bite-sized pieces. And I am tired of pundits who don't know dick about the people for whom they claim to be speaking. (Hi, Joe! Mika! Good ta see ya!) And I am tired of surrogates, all of them, and not just the crazy ones that speak for El Caudillo del Mar-A-Lago, but all the people dealing in arguments and talking points and bullshit that passed their sell-by dates sometime around last Memorial Day.

I hate what happened to Donna Brazile at CNN on Monday, and Jeff Zucker has to be the biggest chickenshit since the invention of poultry. But what happened to Brazile—and what seems to be completely unlikely to happen to Corey Lewandowski—is perfectly in tune with the entire campaign, especially that part involving the Republican nominee. The Republican Party—and the empty suits of the conservative movement within it who had such a free ride for decades until their own monster started chasing it across the ice floes—was as incapable of controlling its nominee as its nominee is incapable of controlling himself. And he's managed to scare an entire television news network—and, arguably, the Federal Bureau of Investigation—into doing his bidding.

Jason Chaffetz, one step removed from being a backbencher from Utah, is being treated like a serious person because, in the context created for this election by the Republican Party's ineptitude, he is what passes for a serious person. The problem isn't that a vulgar talking yam has sown distrust in the major institutions of democracy. The problem is that it was so easy for him to do it. (Jesus, a rogue element in the FBI? Russian ratfcking? Fletcher Knebel died too soon.) This is a nightmare of their own making, and ours.

My sympathies are well known. But this has passed beyond that. The country, in its attempt to elect its next president, has become a dangerous laughing-stock to the rest of the world. The country, in its attempt to govern itself, has made itself look ridiculous. To itself.

Now, with a week left, what's going to happen is anybody's guess. I still think Hillary Rodham Clinton wins, more easily in the Electoral College than in the popular vote. I also think at least two Senate races are going to go to recounts. If those two things happen, I think the Republican establishment and its endless supply of money, lawyers, and all around vandals will drop their presidential nominee like a hot rock, and throw everything they have at the job of keeping the Senate. That's where the bloodbath will be, with Trump likely howling like grim death from offstage. Were I Maggie Hassan, I'd lay in some Kevlar.

Just as in the middle of William Street, the country has an infrastructure problem. Its physical plant is falling apart. (You think Mike Pence realizes that, if it weren't for the stranglehold that FAA regulations have on the airline industry, his campaign jet would have ended up in the drink last week? You think he cares?) But the infrastructure of democracy is going to pieces as well. Its institutions are rusting and creaking and people are proclaiming more loudly than usual of their obsolescence, which is never a good thing because, given the state of our democratic infrastructure, what comes after them could be infinitely worse. More from Billy Keane:

The man who knows everything is always looking in. He's looking for "ancient artefacts" like the long lost Listowel Cross hidden in the hole by forgetful or killed monks when the Vikings were attacking them. So far there is no sign of the Listowel Hoard. It's just stones and earth. This is the first infrastructure project in years. The holes are a novelty and the men who work down the holes and drive the machines are celebrities. They work very hard and I'm beginning to think that what I do isn't really work at all. The workers work into the night. The street is open for business as the footpaths are grand. Come to Listowel to see the hole and the shops.
It's entertaining as hell. So, people tell me, is dogfighting. But it is by god depressing and more than half-foul on its best day, and we haven't seen anything close to a best day since the conventions recessed themselves. Instead, people walk out toward the voting booth. The polls are open for business and the footpaths there are grand. But people only look toward the hole because that's all they've been asked to look toward for two years. People only look toward the hole because that's what they've been conditioned to look towards, that's where they've been told, over and over again, the treasures of their country lay hidden.

People speak only of the hole.

It's all many of them have left.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/po ... xhaustion/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Nov 02, 2016 9:10 am

The Ku Klux Klan makes it official, endorses Donald Trump saying 'Make America Great Again'

Image


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/11/1 ... reat-Again



This is the portrait of Donald Trump that his charity bought for $20,000

Image

Trump Crashed A 1996 Children’s Charity Event, Performed The Macarena, And Never Donated A Cent
http://uproxx.com/news/donald-trump-cra ... ity-event/


Processed Views Artists Make Donald Trump From Junk Food

Image
http://www.westword.com/restaurants/pro ... od-8417758
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:35 am

The one place on earth where Donald Trump’s campaign is perfectly coordinated: Israel
Israelis wave flags and hold signs during a rally, sponsored by Republicans Overseas Israel
Image
Now if they were running the US campaign... (AP Photo/Tsafrir Abayov)

WRITTEN BY

Miriam Berger

On a recent Saturday night in Jerusalem the “Trump in Israel” campaign was in its element. All it took to attract a rowdy crowd to a voter registration drive was a table of made-in-Israel Trump hats and t-shirts stationed outside a bar popular among young Americans. Within a few hours, as recorded Trump speeches played, tens of 18-year-old Americans on gap years had registered to vote, eagerly shouting “Build the Wall” and sporting their new swag.
Frieda Shannah, 18, from New York, had initially stopped to watch the spectacle, not to register. She and her family and friends all supported Trump because they opposed Hillary Clinton and her Israel policies. “I feel like this whole thing is rigged. I feel like my vote doesn’t count,” she said.
“I really want a hat,” she added.
A few minutes later she had one, having decided to register after all.
The general bizarreness of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign (it has spent more on hats than on polling) is also on full display in Israel. While in America the campaign has been notoriously disorderly, with far fewer field offices and get-out-the-vote campaigns than previous Republican candidates, in Israel it has a highly motivated and coordinated core group of Republican and right-wing supporters who are mobilizing to elect Trump—even though anti-Semitic and xenophobic sentiments in America have risen along with him.
Unlike the Democrats Abroad in Israel group, who are more decentralized, have no budget or offices, and are all volunteers, Republicans in Israel raises money, courts media attention, and has seven part-time offices and more than five paid political consultants to keep up the momentum.
iVoteIsrael, a non-partisan voter registration group, estimates there are about 200,000 eligible American voters in Israel; by one estimate some 60,000 of those live in West Bank settlements (which are considered illegal under international law). In America Jews generally vote Democrat, and most are supporting Hillary Clinton. Israelis, according to a poll taken in October (before the release of a recording of Trump bragging about sexually assaulting women) preferred Clinton to Trump by a wide margin, too. But many Americans in Israel, and in particular those in the West Bank, may be more likely to support Trump, given his support for the settler movement and his opposition to last year’s nuclear deal with Iran.
The Trump in Israel campaign manager, Tzvika Brot, is a political consultant with ties to Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu and his conservative Likud Party. Brot joined the campaign in a paid capacity right after the Republican National Convention in July. Since then, they’ve organized about 10 public events with the press; opened seven offices, including one in a West Bank settlement; and, on October 26, held a rally in Jerusalem that included short recordings from Trump and the vice-presidential nominee, Mike Pence.
Brot estimates the campaign has around 100 volunteers, about 60%-70% of whom are American citizens. (Brot himself is not.) Board members and other supporters offer office space rent-free. Brot said phone banks or street canvassing efforts happen nearly every day, often led by 20- to 25-year-old male volunteers. The strategic team is now about 10 people, including a spokeswoman, volunteer chief, social media consultants, and liaison with the ultra-orthodox Haredi community.
Brot has read about how disorderly Trump’s campaign in America is and contrasts it with the Israeli one. “That’s something we’re very proud of,” he says.
The campaign seems also to be better, and more loudly, organized than Hillary Clinton’s campaign in Israel. Part of the reason is that while Republicans in Israel and the local Trump campaign are in touch with their US counterparts, they are legally and financially separate entities. Republicans in Israel is a registered non-profit in Israel, which, says Marc Zell, its founder and chairman, enables it to raise money from Americans and Israelis in Israel. In contrast, Democrats in Israel is associated with the Democratic National Committee and party, and can’t raise money because of federal election regulations.
The Clinton campaign doesn’t have paid staff or consultants, or a specific campaign manager for Israel (the Democrats Abroad regional chair for the Middle East and Europe, Merrill Oates, is based in Hungary and he said internal elections to officially fill positions in Israel had not been held in several years) or paid staff or consultants. Audrey Zada, its social media administrator and strategist, is a 27-year-old Israeli-American from Ohio who works on Holocaust studies at Israel’s Haifa University.
She says the campaign has about 150 volunteers, of whom 40-50 are active daily, and four core organizers including herself. It has held three general meetings with volunteers, four phone and email banking events, and about 20 registration events around Israel.
The Democrats have also intentionally not courted media attention; with limited resources, Zada said, they want to focus on voters. For journalists reporting on the campaigns in Israel, however, they’ve been notoriously difficult to reach and return calls, in contrast to the Republicans and Brot, who frequently invite the press to events and respond at any hour.
There has been some controversy over the Israeli Trump campaign’s funding, though. After its most recent event in Jerusalem, which was coordinated with the Trump campaign in America, several campaign finance experts questioned the legality of the donations, Haaretz reported (paywall). Zell and Brot declined to say how much money they’ve raised and who’s donated, though they said the backers don’t include Sheldon Adelson, an Israeli-American casino mogul and Republican backer. (On the other hand, Adelson’s Israeli newspaper, Yisrael Hayom, has fully supported Trump since he gained the nomination.)
Zell was at the Republican National Convention this year, where he supported a significant change to the party’s Israel platform: removing support for the two-state solution and instead deferring to Israel to determine negotiations, as many right-wing Israelis prefer. Zell, who lives in a West Bank settlement, is not worried about the support Trump receive from anti-Semites like former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke. “You can’t blame Trump for who supports him,” he said, adding that he fears communists who support Clinton.
Back at the Trump voter registration in Jerusalem, Kyle Harris, 18, from Nevada, stopped to sign up—but said he plans to vote for Clinton, not Trump. “I just like the hat,” he said. “It’s cool.”
http://qz.com/825207/the-one-place-on-e ... ed-israel/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby JackRiddler » Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:47 am

How is it that the Ku Klux Klan hears what Trump says better than Nordic and 8bitagent? He's not transmitting in an ultrahigh frequency. My reception has been flawless, and I understand why the KKK has endorsed him. Do you?
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:59 am

Proud day in America when one can share their vote with the KKK

Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 163 guests