Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

[seemslikeadream]

tell it to this lady

“At the same time he’s destroyed a stretch of coastline in Scotland to build a golf course for the super rich,” he continues. “The numbers are very very small, he’s losing millions of pounds every year and for what?

[Luther Blissett]

I added it to the Prediction Data Dump: only conservative justices from here on out.

I weep for how difficult life will be for women under Clinton's patriarchal Supreme Court appointees.

Green font? I have color blindness.

But there's other stuff, like dada posted above.

Not really. Which progressives does she bolster? Does she look up to Henry Kissinger? Did she appoint Tim Kaine to VP?

[seemslikeadream]

Gobsmacked: Nazi Golf Balls For the Greatest Par Three In the World

[MacCruiskeen]

Lena Dunham has just done everything in her power to ensure victory for Trump.

That's...something. She's a repulsive human being. Her passive aggressive air of superiority and entitlement is nauseating. And her much lauded show 'White Girls' is complete and utter shite.

Seriously, Rory: If Trump has any political nous at all, he'll push that video for all it's worth - without comment. It'll easily persuade at least a million 'undecideds' in his favour.

ON EDIT: SLaD, during the temporary absence of "American Dream", you're doing an equally fine job of destroying what remains of this discussion board.

[seemslikeadream]

yea yea yea you've been predicting that forever...get a clue

it's always someone else's fault isn't it Mac?


All the right wing crap is doing a fine job of that

that is what is ruining this board right wing bullshit crappolla ...coming right from the republican party



why by pointing out what a fuck head Trump is?




What do you think of what he did to Scotland?

Pushing the fucker Trump is what is ruining this board

Why don't you offer him a home in Scotland and get him the fuck out of the US?

[Grizzly]

[seemslikeadream]

Martin Walsh for the Conservative Daily Post reports,

Conservatives Run With Sketchy Conspiracy Website’s Utterly Baseless Claim Clinton Wanted To "Drone" Assange

and True Pundit!!!!

Wikileaks and some conservative outlets are running with a claim that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton openly speculated about targeting Wikileaks founder Julian Assange with a drone strike. But the report in question comes from an anonymously-sourced article from “True Pundit,” a fringe conspiracy website that even conservatives have criticized.

On October 2, True Pundit posted an article claiming that during a meeting of “State’s top brass” in 2010 to discuss how to deal with Wikileaks, Clinton asked of Assange, “Can’t we just drone this guy?” The site only attributes the comment to anonymous “State Department sources. ”The fact-checking website Snopes looked into the True Pundit article and found their claim “unproven,” pointing out that the source of their purported Clinton quote was “a vague and anonymous reference that does not yield to verification.” (It’s also unclear why multiple sources with knowledge of this supposed incident that took place in a meeting of senior State Department staff would choose to leak them to a minor conspiracy blogger rather than a credible news outlet. )

RT, the international news network owned by the Russian government, picked up the True Pundit story. Wikileaks’ official Twitter account also promoted the story, as did Trump allies Alex Jones and Roger Stone. FoxNews.com cited the Wikileaks tweet in its report on Assange rescheduling the time of a proposed address this week.

True Pundit’s supposed scoop comes on the heels of months of laughable articles forwarding conspiracies about Clinton.

The site wrote that anonymous “NYPD sources” had told them that during the recent Commander-In-Chief Forum, Clinton was “sporting a mini earbud wired to receive stealth communications from her campaign handlers.” (That conspiracy was picked up by the Trump campaign, along with Alex Jones, the Drudge Report, and Fox’s Sean Hannity)

The site also promoted a YouTube video claiming to show Clinton “using hand signals to trigger Lester Holt” during the presidential debate. (This claim was held up by Fox News as an example of conspiracy theories that came out of the debate.)

True Pundit claimed that during the debate there was a “medical episode played off by Hillary Clinton’s frozen smile, shaking head and upper torso with her eyes closed” during which “a concerned Donald Trump can be seen mouthing the word ‘seizure’ to his family and campaign advisors.”

In August, True Pundit offered “an unprecedented reward of $1 Million (One Million Dollars US) for Clinton’s true medical records” and said Clinton was rumored “to be suffering from a plethora of medical ailments” including dementia, post-concussion syndrome, Parkinson’s Disease, a brain tumor, brain injury, and complex partial seizures.

Conservative blogger Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit, no stranger to oddball conspiracy content, noted, “TruePundit may be a hoax website” (though he still devoted an article to promoting the claim about the Assange drone strike).

Heat Street, a conservative website run by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., also described the Assange drone story as a “conspiracy theory.”

Conspiracy theorist Paul Joseph Watson of Alex Jones’ Infowars initially described the True Pundit story as “iffy,” but after Wikileaks posted it said, “thought this was a fake story, until Wikileaks tweeted it out.”

https://mediamatters.org/shows-and-publ ... rue-pundit

[Rory]

http://www.inquisitr.com/3672706/hillar ... -and-more/

The Hillary Clinton email investigation has rocked this year’s election with its timing, but it’s about to be rocked even more, that is if a report by online news source True Pundit is legitimate.

The right-wing publication claim the new emails have exposed the Clintons for being involved in such atrocities as child sex crimes, child exploitation, sexual slavery, money laundering, perjury and obstruction of justice to name a few.

FBI: We are moving towards a Hillary Indictment pic.twitter.com/Cn67Ixph1T

— Jack Posobiec ???????? (@JackPosobiec) November 3, 2016

The laptop that authorities needed to officially begin the renewed Hillary Clinton email investigation was recently confiscated from Anthony Weiner through a search warrant. This was just a couple of days ago, and already the device has revealed hundreds of thousands of potentially incriminating emails, and according to a New York Police Department whistleblower who spoke with True Pundit, the content of some of those emails is enough “to put Hillary and her crew away for life.”

“NYPD sources said Clinton’s ‘crew’ also included several unnamed yet implicated members of Congress in addition to her aides and insiders.”

The NYPD officers working the Hillary Clinton email investigation say they are prepared to disclose their findings to the public if the FBI or Justice Department do not make necessary preparations to indict the former First Lady and her accomplices.

“‘What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach,’ the NYPD Chief said. ‘There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that.'”

According to the Chief, FBI Director James Comey did not reopen the Hillary Clinton email investigation because he wished to skew the election in Donald Trump’s favor, but rather Comey was compelled to rekindle the case due to the alarming contents of the emails contained within Weiner’s laptop.

Sources indicate that close Clinton aide Huma Abedin, along with her estranged husband Anthony Weiner, are currently seeking out immunity agreements.

“If they don’t cooperate they are going to see long sentences,” claims a federal investigator.

In addition to Weiner and Abedin, a number of Congressional members and one Democratic U.S. senator look to be involved in the newly discovered Clinton crimes.

The new emails include evidence that the Clintons, along with several American politicians, took numerous trips to the U.S. Virgin Islands by way of convicted child sex predator Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 aircraft. Epstein has his own island there, which has been nicknamed “Orgy Island” and “Sex Slave Island.” The reason for these nicknames? Ostensibly, Epstein runs a sex slavery operation in which the world’s elite come to sample male and female minors.

From the evidence the FBI has garnered so far, it’s clear that Hillary flew to the Virgin Islands with Epstein at least six times, while Bill Clinton accompanied the pedophile predator upwards of 20 times.

The Clintons could, of course, claim ignorance of Epstein’s illicit activities if indicted, but thanks to Virginia Roberts, a woman who came forward as one of Jeffrey’s sex slave victims in early 2015, “[Bill] Clinton stayed in one of the many villas on Epstein’s US Virgin Islands estate — where group sex was a ‘regular occurrence.'”

According to Page Six, Roberts also said that the Boeing 727 was decked out with a specially-designed bed where passengers could engage in “kinky, high altitude romps.”

If what Roberts says is true, it’s unlikely the Clintons were oblivious to the underage sex crimes taking place around them.

Additional findings from the revived Hillary Clinton email investigation include the fact that the former Secretary of State and Huma Abedin exchanged reams of emails, many of which contained highly sensitive government-related material, through the website anthonyweiner.com. Weiner reportedly used this website for his own campaign purposes, though the email addresses used therein were not well-known throughout Washington.

From what the FBI now knows about these new emails, it appears numerous people had access to top secret government documents exchanged through an unsecured server via Weiner’s laptop, though it’s not yet clear if these individuals were aware of it or not.

“At one point, FBI sources said, Abedin and Clinton’s classified and top secret State Department documents and emails were stored in Weiner’s email on a server shared with a dog grooming service and a western Canadian bicycle shop.”

It looks as if Clinton and Abedin broke cyber-security protocol habitually. For one thing, Weiner had access to top secret State Department material even though he was not in a position to legally be in that position. Also, any company or individual who was involved in the maintenance of anthonyweiner.com had unrestricted access to thousands upon thousands of classified emails.

There’s really no telling how many people were given a free pass into information of which only those in the highest of governmental positions are supposed to see.

It’s possible the reopened Hillary Clinton email investigation could lead to the end of the woman who so hopes to be the next U.S. president, but that’s what many people thought the first time around. What do you think? Is she going down, or will she prevail? Let us know what you think in the comments below.

[seemslikeadream]

The Hillary Clinton email investigation has rocked this year’s election with its timing, but it’s about to be rocked even more, that is if a report by online news source True Pundit is legitimate.
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/3672706/hillar ... DioDYBX.99




same old right wing crappolla ...ain't gonna change if it is all from the same right wing crappolla source

The site wrote that anonymous “NYPD sources” had told them that during the recent Commander-In-Chief Forum, Clinton was “sporting a mini earbud wired to receive stealth communications from her campaign handlers.” (That conspiracy was picked up by the Trump campaign, along with Alex Jones, the Drudge Report, and Fox’s Sean Hannity)

[MacCruiskeen]

why by pointing out what a fuck head Trump is?

What do you think of what he did to Scotland?

Oh for fuck's sake.... I love it. I hope he turns the entire Isle of Skye into his own personal neon-lit 24-hour 1800-hole golf course. (Ecology is bunk.) I want to see Edinburgh Old Town razed to the ground and replaced with a hundred Trump Towers. (History is bunk.) Donald will Make Scotland Great again. (Truth is bunk.) I love his greed. (Socialism is bunk.) I adore his orange complexion. (Beauty is bunk.) I worship the ground he tramples on. I love his attitude to women. (Feminism is bunk.) He is a fine upstanding honest businessman, a wonderful human being, and a role model for men everywhere. That is why I want to have his babies. PS I am also a Kremlin spy and a huge fan of Russian oligarchs. It is all part of my secret Trumpite-Communist plot. (But don't tell anyone. )

Now kindly stop spamming this board.

[seemslikeadream]

i would if you would stop...hard to keep up with all the right wing crap being posted here...it's not spamming it's calling out all the right wing bullshit being posted here

[Novem5er]

I think there might only be one or two posters who are actively pushing for Trump.

I think most people are either A ) defending at least some Trump supporters as being rather normal people (aka, not vile racists), or B) voicing concern about Hillary Clinton.

To point A): SLAD you are using the actions of a small group of people (violent racists) to paint tens of millions of other people in a negative light. That's very similar to a white supremacist using the actions of violent street gangs to justify hating millions of other black people. It's bigotry either way.

To point B): let's fast-forward to January 2017 when Clinton is sworn in as president. What then? Do we bite our tongues and avoid criticizing her because it will only fuel the rise of the next GOP candidate in 2020? Or are we safe to criticize her once she's taken office? I think it's best to wait until after someone has taken action before criticizing them . . . which is exactly what people have done with Hillary. She has an existing record and we are criticizing it.

It's not that most people here are promoting Trump. It's that we are already setting ourselves up to be the opposition to a Clinton administration. You know, like people here have opposed the Bush administration and then the Obama administration over the last 8 years. Isn't that what RI does?

[seemslikeadream]

I have already said many times here..I am waiting for the impeachment and President Kaine

and have already asked Womby for one impeachment thead

[Luther Blissett]

I think Clinton might be better than Kaine though…

[Novem5er]

I have already said many times here..I am waiting for the impeachment and President Kaine

So the difference between your dislike of Clinton and our dislike of Clinton is merely a matter of timing. That's actually great