Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
OP ED » Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:39 pm wrote:The Cherokee half of my family wishes they thought of building a wall about 500 years ago.
What if Jesus comes back during the Trump administration?
Freitag » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:43 am wrote:DrEvil » Tue Nov 15, 2016 1:15 pm wrote:Freitag » Wed Nov 16, 2016 12:00 am wrote:seemslikeadream » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:53 am wrote:campaigned differently.....would that mean more or less racism?
Can you drop the act already? Just admit that the "racist" thing was standard political smear tactics. Or is that your story and you're sticking to it? In that case it's going to be a long 8 years for you.
No, it wasn't a smear tactic. Among other things (like getting endorsed by the fucking Klan, which should have a been a big hint), wanting to ban all Muslims from the country is blatantly racist. I don't think you personally are a racist, but you voted for one and helped put him in the White house. Hope it was worth it.
Do you understand that it's possible to arrive at the same conclusion from different tracks? Person A wants illegal immigrants deported because they are a flaming racist. Person B wants them deported because they're a drain on public services, undermine our legal immigration system, on principle, whatever. These people want the same thing, but for different reasons. One set of reasons is deplorable, the other isn't. It's like if you voted to re-elect Obama because of the economic recovery, shared social values, etc. etc. But then someone else voted for him because they're on welfare and they know democrats give them more free stuff. Same conclusion, different tracks, one deplorable and one not. Quit assigning deplorable thought processes to people for wanting things that there is a legitimate argument for. Both Left and Right have fringe elements.
OP ED » Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:39 pm wrote:The Cherokee half of my family wishes they thought of building a wall about 500 years ago.
Freitag » Tue Nov 15, 2016 8:27 pm wrote:seemslikeadream » Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:23 pm wrote:Freitag » Tue Nov 15, 2016 8:13 pm wrote:seemslikeadream » Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:07 pm wrote:they aren't different perspectives ...both are racist
So, to you, there's no non-racist reason a person might be against illegal immigration?
I don't know you tell me.....but what would the reason be for a person to believe a fact that was proven false?
so what would a non racist reason for being against illegal immigration?
You're making my point. You assume anyone opposing illegal immigration must be a racist because you can't imagine any other reason they would oppose it. Do you even believe a nation has the right to determine who does and does not enter into it? Are borders, themselves, racist to you?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests