TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:33 am

ELECTION 2016
The Normalization of Donald Trump Began in '1984': How George Orwell's Newspeak Has Infected the News Media
The mainstream media has been complicit in a dangerous rebranding of Trump, his associates and their views.
By Chauncey DeVega / Salon November 21, 2016

The poet Maya Angelou wisely observed that, “When people show you who they are, believe them the first time.”

In keeping with his fascist and authoritarian beliefs, during the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump threatened to sue members of the news media he did not like, offered conspiracy theories that “the media” were somehow unfairly maligning his campaign, called reporters “scum” and “disgraceful,” and made reporters the objects of mockery and violence at his rallies. Trump’s white nationalist supporters and other deplorables responded in kind, yelling the Nazi chant “’lügenpresse” and “Jew-S-A” in roaring approval during his campaign events.

President-elect Donald Trump is continuing his war on the free press with enemies lists, a proposed expansion of slander and libel laws and threats to bar critics in the news media access to his administration. This should not be a surprise. In the United States, the Fourth Estate is supposed to serve as a guardian for democracy, a type of watchdog that helps the public make informed decisions, and sounds the alarm on unchecked power and threats to the Constitution and the values it embodies.

In this moment of crisis, the American corporate news media has been presented with a critical choice: It can normalize Trump’s radical and dangerous anti-democratic behavior or it can stand up against it.

Already, too much of the media seem to be doing the former.

Many decades ago, George Orwell foreshadowed the abuse of language and truth that we have seen in 2016.

Donald Trump was able to defeat Hillary Clinton because he combined white racism with narratives of “economic insecurity”. While the impact of “economic insecurity” on the election outcome is very much in dispute, Trump was transparent in his efforts to use white rage and bigotry as a way to win the White House. There were many moments when the mainstream corporate American news media could have recoiled in disgust at Trump’s antics and tried to hold him accountable, but instead they chose to wait for a great “pivot” in his behavior that never came.

The American corporate news media also helped to legitimize the white nationalists and white supremacists at the core of Trump’s base — and now his key advisers — by allowing them to rebrand themselves as the “alt right.”

The media has been complicit in this new marketing technique.

Language is power. The American corporate news media played along and instead of speaking specifically about the actual beliefs, norms, and values of the so-called “alt right” they treated it as just a difference of opinion, one located within a wide range of acceptable attitudes and beliefs in American politics. This is Orwell’s warning and wisdom about political language come true:

Political language — and with variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists — is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.

Stephen Bannon sits at the center of the “alt right” cabal of white supremacists and white nationalists. He is the former editor of the Right-wing news propaganda site Breitbart.com. Under his direction, Breitbart became a clearing house for white supremacist and white nationalist views.

Bannon is also one of president-elect Trump’s most important advisers and reportedly will serve as his “chief strategist.” With few exceptions, the American corporate news media has willingly participated in the repackaging and normalizing of Bannon’s, and by extension, Trump’s abominable politics. Instead of calling attention to Bannon’s white supremacist and white nationalist beliefs and affiliations, many of the most influential news outlets have deflected and chosen to describe him in far more agreeable terms. Slate’s Jeremy Stahl has compiled the following examples:

New York Times: “Trump’s Choice of Stephen Bannon Is Nod to Anti-Washington Base”

New York Times: “New Strategist in White House a Provocateur From the Fringe”

BBC: “The combative site serves up an anti-establishment agenda that critics accuse of xenophobia and misogyny.”

New York Times: “A fierce chorus of critics denounced President-elect Donald J. Trump on Monday for appointing Stephen K. Bannon, a nationalist media mogul…”

ABC: “Steve Bannon: Donald Trump’s Controversial Senior Counselor and Alt-Right Hero”

CBS: “Behind the scenes, Bannon is one of the most powerful people in the Trump’s inner circle, but he’s also one of the most controversial.”

This is what Orwell callled “Newspeak”: obfuscating language used to disorient the public, thus preventing them from fully grappling with the reality of what is actually taking place. Orwell warns about the power of Newspeak in the classic novel “1984”:

“Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thought-crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. . . . The process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there’s no reason or excuse for committing thought-crime. It’s merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won’t be any need even for that. . . . Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?”

Newspeak leads back to the most basic forensic question: Why is the American corporate news media normalizing Donald Trump?

During the 2016 presidential campaign, the mainstream media gave Trump the equivalent of at least $ 3 billion in free advertising. CNN’s executives have estimated that Trump was worth at least $1oo million in ad revenue to their network. Ultimately, the normalization of Donald Trump is a function of financial and material concerns. It is also a reflection of fear about being denied access to the Trump administration as well as a reminder of how the powerful all too often work with one another against the interests of the American people. Media theorist Noam Chomsky explains the symbiotic and faux adversarial relationship between the corporate news media and political elites in the following way:

“Because of their services, continuous contact on the beat, and mutual dependency, the powerful can use personal relationships, threats, and rewards to further influence and coerce the media. The media may feel obligated to carry extremely dubious stories and mute criticism in order not to offend their sources and disturb a close relationship. It is very difficult to call authorities on whom one depends for daily news liars, even if they tell whoppers.”

As I have written about previously here at Salon, the sum effect of these forces is a feeling of disorientation and confusion among the American people. They know something is deeply wrong but do not have the language to fully describe it. Conservatives drag the issue space farther and farther to the right even though their policies are unpopular among huge swaths of the American public. The Right-wing news entertainment disinformation machine can argue that Trump (and other Republicans) has a “mandate”, when in reality he lost the popular vote and is the least popular newly elected President in the last 20 years. Surrendering to this narrative, the Democrats and the so-called “liberal news media” will chase Republicans and movement conservatives farther to the right. The result is that radical and extreme politics are (again) made normal and what appears to be the middle is actually much farther to the right — and more out of step with the desires of the American people — than it was before.

In response to such forces, what should people of conscience to do in these challenging times, a nadir in American politics and culture known as the Age of Donald Trump?

The American corporate news media is a business fueled by advertising revenue. Boycotts can and should be used against those news media outlets that normalize Donald Trump’s presidency and policies. There are online resources that can help with such a strategy.

Independent and citizen’s journalism should be a priority. Donate to and otherwise give support to those journalists, writers, reporters, websites, filmmakers, and others who are dedicated to “speaking truth to power.”

On Trump’s inauguration day, those who oppose him should participate in a consumer strike by refusing to shop or do any other business. They should also stay home from work and instead attend protests and rallies.

In the age of Citizens United, America is fully in the grips of a kleptocracy. This has undermined democracy and freedom. A much-discussed internal memo from Citigroup in 2006, described the plutocrats’ concerns about growing wealth and income inequality and the threat it poses to them. The memo highlighted something that all people of conscience who believe in a true “We the People” democracy should never forget:

Our whole plutonomy thesis is based on the idea that the rich will keep getting richer. This thesis is not without its risks. For example, a policy error leading to asset deflation, would likely damage plutonomy. Furthermore, the rising wealth gap between the rich and poor will probably at some point lead to a political backlash. Whilst the rich are getting a greater share of the wealth, and the poor a lesser share, political enfranchisement remains as was — one person, one vote (in the plutonomies). At some point it is likely that labor will fight back against the rising profit share of the rich and there will be a political backlash against the rising wealth of the rich.

The American people—approximately 75 percent of the electorate—that did not vote for Donald Trump possess the strength of numbers…and if they organize properly, significant resources at their command.

Donald Trump, like other authoritarians, is trying to create his own reality. He is doing this with the help of a compliant American corporate news media. This is Trump’s artificial reality; it is not the world as it actually exists. To protect American democracy requires that we reject the normalization of president-elect Donald Trump and his politics. Trump is a cancer in American political life. We must not “give him a chance” to prove himself as Donald Trump has already spent months and years demonstrating his radical and dangerous political beliefs.http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/n ... ected-news


NOVEMBER 23, 2016
Artists in Trump World
by JOHN ESKOW

Photo by Angela N. | CC BY 2.0
Man, that guy from Hamilton was over-acting!

This is why a lot of us have never felt comfortable with Broadway shows. It was great to see that actor go after Mike Pence at curtain-call, but his technique was fingernails-on-blackboard bad. In theater parlance it’s called “indicating”—like, when you say “all of us…ALL of us,” and you make an exaggerated arm-sweep gesture to clobber everyone over the head with the ALL-of-us-ness of it. When you attack the Mike Pences of this world—and I hope it happens every day, a thousand times—it should not be in those mellifluous, operatic tones. It should be harsh, raw, gutty, and unforgiving…

…like Green Day at the American Music Awards.

I never liked punk rock. I came of age as a musician in an era when proficiency was admired—Mike Bloomfield, Sonny Rollins, Merle Haggard—not as an end in itself, but as one vital weapon in the armory. I liked much of The Clash’s stuff, but the Sex Pistols/Ramones thing always left me cold, so Green Day has never been on my playlist. But seeing them chant “No Trump! No KKK! No fascist USA!” Sunday night was absolutely exhilirating.

The Hamilton and Green Day incidents—along with Alec Baldwin’s caricature of Trump on SNL—are the first Fort Sumter shots of a civil war that will last four years, like the first one. (Trump has a good chance of dying in office from natural causes—he’s a morbidly-obese 70-year-old man who never exercises, subsists on McDonald’s and ice-cream, and is prone to impotent rage—but I’m afraid Pence is around for the long haul.) How should actors, musicans and writers—what Shelley called “the unacknowledged legislators of the world”—express their rage, disgust, and rebellion against this Fascism With A Sunlamped Face?

I respect Steve Van Zandt’s contary opinion—that everyone should be welcomed into the house of art, and that the rage should be expressed in the art itself, and not by ad hominem attacks on a specific audience member. If he’d never done more than write and produce Sun City, the great anti-apartheid anthem, Van Zandt’s earned a voice in this debate. If I understand him correctly, he’s saying that we should fight and win these battles within the art, and not on its periphery. But I think he’s wrong here, because Pences and Trumps never play fair with art iself.

Case in point: the theme song to Celebrity Apprentice was “For the Love of Money,” the wonderful Holland-Dozier-Holland composition performed by the mighty O’Jays. Few popular songs have ever been as agressively anti-Donalad-Trump as that one, whose lyrics actually include the line “money is the root of all evil.” But when Trump and his producers adopted it as their theme, they simply cut that line out, leaving a six-second gap in Eddie Levert’s vocal that no-one seemed to notice. (Happily, the O’Jays have since taken out a cease-and-desist order preventing any further Trump use of the song.)

In Trump World, you can distort a work of art into its exact, Orwellian opposite simply by snipping out a lyric that offends you. So it won’t be enough to attack these sick frauds with our music, our books, and our plays. We have to attack them with our entire being—fighting clean whenver possible, but fighting dirty when needed. Letting them know that whenever they come to us for escapist entertainment they are likely to feel our rage instead.

To paraphrase Che Guevara, we must “create two, three many Green Days.”

No Trump!

No KKK!

No fascist USA!

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/11/23/ ... ump-world/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby Nordic » Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:38 pm

8bitagent » Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:36 am wrote:
Nordic » Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:39 am wrote:Please, the old left/right paradigms have been destroyed. The game board has been flipped over and the pieces thrown everywhere. The Democratic Party has become as right wing and corrupt as the GOP ever did, since the neocons took over the COUNTRY back in 2000. The two parties basically merged and became one especially during the last 8 years. Some group behind the scenes got tired of these Zionist Armageddon-bound nut jobs running the country and managed to trick them right out of power using Trump as the decoy figurehead trickster. Now everything has changed. It's a Big Deal. Right/left means nothing now. Tulsi Gabbard saw tight through the Obama/neocon schtick and went public with it so she's the new face of the "other" party. (She's still an Israel Firster). The Trumpites are old school Paleoconservative who actually are tired of seeing he country run by Israel and Saudi Arabia and sold for parts by the PTB. Perhaps they didn't want to go to war with Russia, knowing what a disaster that would be.

Everything is changing. Kill your old attachments to what you think right and left are because it's all obsolete now.



Didn't it feel like, using the tired old "left-right" marker, there was a tacit co-existence during the Bush era ? Now it seems so much of the conspiracy world has either gone full neo-Nazi, or explicitly right wing...I don't even see the slightest hint of a leftist or progressive presence in the para-political world(and Im a vocal critic of the campus crusader SJW leftist stuff)

Across social media I can't seem to square how millions of American students are beyond pissed about Trump lately, and (rightfully) of the DAPL Dakota protest backlash...yet can't seem to be angry or care
about President Obama coordinating with Saudi Arabia to commit mass war crimes in Saudi Arabia. Or what Obama, Mccain and Clinton did in Libya in 2011. I too have long been against the US/West/Israel/Saudi globalist war program, but I also have been critical of bullshit Russia has done internally. But, Tulsi and Trump are correct in saying that a hot war with Russia would be the worst thing imaginable in this current era.

What really gets me hopping mad is when isolationism is lumped in with neo-Nazism. As if not wanting to "liberate" and bomb the hell out of countries is now fascism. Maybe you're right, there is no left and right. Just insanity, and insanity plus(as I'd say)



Exactly. And now, to lump everyone still critical of the corrupt right wing Dems as members of the "alt-right" is just stupid. They're straining desperately to continue to divide us 50-50 somehow. And with the hatred of Trump it's working pretty well for them. But it could suddenly swing in the "they're all corrupt" directlion and if it does they are FUCKED. Which would be a cathartic and wonderful thing. DAPL seems to be waking people up, with Obama sitting on his silver plated ass doing nothing while innocent people are getting treated like Palestinians.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:07 pm

OMG!!

The Flynn of Education

DeVos’s brother is Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater


Trump picks billionaire Betsy DeVos, school voucher advocate, as Education Secretary

President-elect Donald Trump calls out to the media as he and Betsy DeVos pose for photographs at Trump National Golf Club Bedminster clubhouse in Bedminster, N.J., Saturday, Nov. 19, 2016. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster) (Carolyn Kaster/AP)
By Emma Brown November 23 at 1:53 PM
President-elect Donald Trump intends to name Betsy DeVos, a conservative activist and billionaire philanthropist who has pushed forcefully for private school voucher programs nationwide, as his nominee for education secretary, according to a person close to DeVos.

Trump’s pick underlines his promises on the campaign trail to put “school choice” — the expansion of taxpayer-funded charter schools and vouchers for private and religious schools — at the center of his efforts on education.

His embrace of DeVos, a Michigan power broker and major donor to the GOP and its candidates around the country, shows a willingness to look outside his circle of loyalists. DeVos donated money to Republican primary contenders Carly Fiorina and Jeb Bush before throwing her support behind Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.). She was never an enthusiastic Trump supporter, telling the Washington Examiner in March that she considered him an “interloper” who “does not represent the Republican Party.”

She had warmer words for Trump on Wednesday. “I am honored to work with the President-elect on his vision to make American education great again. The status quo in ed is not acceptable,” DeVos tweeted Wednesday afternoon, before any official announcement was made. “Together, we can work to make transformational change to ensure every student has the opportunity to fulfill his or her highest potential.”

Teachers unions and other proponents of public schools immediately decried DeVos’s nomination as a catastrophic attack on public education. Some conservative groups are also likely to be unhappy; they have argued that choosing DeVos signals that Trump is wavering on his vehement opposition to the Common Core State Standards.

Here are the people whose names have been floated for Trump’s Cabinet VIEW GRAPHIC
DeVos, 58, has not said much about the Common Core, the set of math and reading guidelines adopted by most states. But she has ties to several pro-Common Core organizations, including as a member of the board of the Foundation for Excellence in Education, started by former Florida governor and Republican presidential contender Jeb Bush.

“President-elect Trump rightly slammed Governor Jeb Bush for his support of Common Core on the campaign trail,” said Frank Cannon, president of the American Principles Project, in a statement Wednesday warning Trump not to pick Devos. “Betsy DeVos would be a very Jeb-like pick.”

DeVos, a former chairwoman of the Michigan Republican Party, and her husband Dick DeVos, an heir to the Amway direct-sales fortune, co-founded the Windquest Group, which invests in technology and manufacturing. They have poured millions of dollars into lobbying for voucher programs across the country.

[Quality controls lacking for D.C. school voucher program]

Betsy DeVos serves as chairman of the American Federation of Children and its associated 527 action fund, a platform she has used to support candidates who endorse vouchers and charter schools — and to attack candidates who don’t.

While hers is hardly a household name, she has helped change the landscape of education across the country. Three decades ago, there were no state voucher programs. Now, according to the advocacy group EdChoice, about 400,000 children in 29 states are going to private schools with the help of public dollars, some via vouchers and others through derivative programs, such as tax-credit scholarships or education savings accounts.

DeVos is working toward a scenario in which “all parents, regardless of their Zip code, have had the opportunity to choose the best educational setting for their children,” she told Philanthropy magazine in 2013. “And that all students have had the opportunity to fulfill their God-given potential.”

Lily Eskelsen García, president of the National Education Association, said that DeVos has “consistently pushed a corporate agenda to privatize, de-professionalize and impose cookie-cutter solutions to public education.”

“Her efforts over the years have done more to undermine public education than support students,” García said.

Research on the impact of voucher programs shows mixed results.

Several recent studies have found that voucher recipients’ math and reading test scores decline after they transfer from public to private schools. But other studies have found that voucher recipients are more likely to enroll in and complete college than their counterparts who attend public schools.

Pro-voucher advocates see in the Trump administration an extraordinary opportunity to advance the cause on a national scale, giving more parents the ability to use tax dollars to pay for private schools.

The president-elect has proposed redirecting $20 billion in federal spending toward a grant program to states for expanding vouchers and charter schools. He has also said he wants to use the bully pulpit of the presidency to persuade states to devote another $110 billion toward vouchers — enough, he has said, for every child living in poverty to have a scholarship of $12,000 toward the school of his or her choice.

[Pence accomplished in Indiana what Trump wants for national education]

While charter schools have won bipartisan support during the past two decades, vouchers remain a politically polarizing issue, with most Democrats — including President Obama — opposing them, arguing that they drain public schools of needed resources and send taxpayer dollars to unaccountable private schools.

Vouchers also send money to religious schools, a fact that has provoked not just political resistance but also a series of legal challenges in state courts. Vouchers and tax credits “force all Americans to pay for religion, whether they believe in that faith or not. That’s fundamentally wrong,” Barry Lynn, executive director for Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, said in 2010.

Critics of voucher programs fear that the Trump administration could wield federal dollars to dramatically undermine teachers unions and weaken the civic institution of public education, redirecting dollars from public schools to private institutions that don’t have the same obligation to serve all students — including those who are needy or have learning disabilities.

DeVos has donated to and worked with many groups advocating for charter schools and voucher programs. She has also given to several Christian schools and conservative policy think tanks, such as the American Enterprise Institute.

She and her husband, the 2006 Republican nominee for Michigan governor, have also made substantial gifts in support of the arts.

Betsy DeVos served on the board of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts from 2004 to 2010, departing by giving $22.5 million to support training for arts leaders. That program, the DeVos Institute of Arts Management, is now based at the University of Maryland.

[Kennedy Center gets $22.5 million gift from DeVos family]

DeVos and her husband are major GOP donors who, during the 2016 cycle, gave a total of $2.7 million to the GOP and to Republican candidates and political action committees; they made no donations to Democrats, according to an analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics.

DeVos’s brother is Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater, one of the most profitable private security firms during the Iraq War. Blackwater came under intense scrutiny after the company’s guards shot and killed 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad in 2007; four guards were convicted on charges related to the massacre. Prince has since left the company, which is now called Academi.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/ed ... story.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:46 pm

Trump Selling $149 ‘Make America Great Again’ Christmas Ornament
Image
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/11/23/ ... -ornament/


Top Democrats Press GAO To Investigate ‘Chaotic’ Trump Transition
Two lawmakers question if there is even a dividing line between Trump’s presidency and his business ventures.
11/23/2016 11:40 am ET

Laura Barron-Lopez
Congressional Reporter, The Huffington Post
WASHINGTON ― Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) urged the Government Accountability Office Wednesday to look into President-elect Donald Trump’s tumultuous transition.

Cummings, the ranking member on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, sent a letter to the GAO with Warren, pointing to conflicts of interest with Trump’s business, his family and use of taxpayer funds for the transition.

“We are concerned about reports of ‘disarray’ within a ‘chaotic’ transition, and ask that your review address several concerns, including conflicts of interest related to business holdings of Mr. Trump and his family; potential violations of protocol and security precautions related to Mr. Trump’s communications with foreign leaders,” the lawmakers wrote.

Trump’s behavior during and after the campaign, the lawmakers said, “raise[s] questions about the use of taxpayer funds during the transition.”

The letter points to comments that Trump is reportedly no longer interested in running his company, but is still involved in business meetings. Last week, Trump met with three Indian business partners and his children, who are expected to run the Trump Organization. It also remains unclear if Trump asked Argentinean President Mauricio Mauri to handle a permitting issue with a project in Buenos Aires.

“At this point, it is not clear if the line between Mr. Trump’s Presidency and his and business ventures is blurred ― or entirely nonexistent,” Warren and Cummings said.

The two lawmakers also questioned if the president-elect understands the meaning of a blind trust. Federal officials have sometimes put their assets into such a trust to prevent conflicts of interest; Trump, by contrast, has said his children would run his business.

“The Ethics in Government Act explicitly prohibits Mr. Trump’s children from managing such a trust,” the letter says. “To date, there has been no information released to the public indicating that Mr. Trump has prepared a blind trust.”

The lawmakers also want to know if the sporadic conversations Trump has had with foreign leaders in the weeks since the election have been on secure phone lines. And a number of Trump’s surrogates who are expected to work with government agencies on the transition have yet to begin their work.

“Has Mr. Trump conducted Trump Organization business during the transition? Have his family members maintained appropriate distance between the business of the Trump Organization and the presidential transition?” Cummings and Warren ask in the letter. “Has the ‘disarray” within Mr. Trump’s transition team affected his ability to effectively serve the American public beginning on January 20, 2017?”

On Tuesday, Trump told The New York Times that the law is on his side when asked about his conflicts of interest, implying that it’s not illegal for him to have them because he’s the president.

“The president can’t have a conflict of interest,” he said.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/don ... 6055ffa96b
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby slomo » Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:02 pm

seemslikeadream » 22 Nov 2016 10:47 wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Yh0jAxOxGE

Trump Believes in Eugenics, According to Trump's Biographer
So presidential!
Donald Trump
BY SAMMY NICKALLS
SEP 28, 2016

The Frontline documentary "The Choice" premiered this week on PBS, and it proves that Trump is pretty much an orange, sniffily pro-eugenics asshole.

In the documentary, Trump biographer Michael D'Antonio explains that Trump was raised to believe that success is genetic, and that some people are just more superior than others:

"The family subscribes to a racehorse theory of human development. They believe that there are superior people and that if you put together the genes of a superior woman and a superior man, you get a superior offspring."
Huffington Post also took the liberty of compiling a whole bunch of times Trump suggested that genes are the main factor behind brains and superiority. Here are just a few choice quotes from good ol' Trump:

"All men are created equal. Well, it's not true. 'Cause some are smart, some aren't."
"When you connect two racehorses, you usually end up with a fast horse."
"Secretariat doesn't produce slow horses."
"Do we believe in the gene thing? I mean, I do."
"I have great genes and all that stuff which, I'm a believer in."
Oh, good.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/ne ... iographer/

Funny thing about eugenicists.... the whole worldview is centered on the idea of "good" genes. But anybody literate in biology knows that there isn't any such thing. There are organisms that are (genetically) better adapted to a specific environment or niche, but the adaptation is niche-dependent. When somebody says they want a society with "good" genes, the natural question should be "good for what?"
User avatar
slomo
 
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby Nordic » Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:16 pm

Good for being healthy, strong, and able to reproduce repeatedly.

Seriously, that's what it's about.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby 82_28 » Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:41 pm

Let's see one of his boys get out on the football field, basketball court, etc. Let's see him or any of them write something not ghost written. Yeah, good genes.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby Burnt Hill » Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:56 pm

Nordic » Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:16 pm wrote:Good for being healthy, strong, and able to reproduce repeatedly.

Seriously, that's what it's about.


And in practice eugenics would make those traits unlikely.
So is that really what it's all about?
User avatar
Burnt Hill
 
Posts: 2584
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: down down
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:39 pm

the eugenics guy has been turning down intelligence briefings
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:04 am

Nordic » Wed Nov 23, 2016 12:38 pm wrote:
8bitagent » Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:36 am wrote:
Nordic » Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:39 am wrote:Please, the old left/right paradigms have been destroyed. The game board has been flipped over and the pieces thrown everywhere. The Democratic Party has become as right wing and corrupt as the GOP ever did, since the neocons took over the COUNTRY back in 2000. The two parties basically merged and became one especially during the last 8 years. Some group behind the scenes got tired of these Zionist Armageddon-bound nut jobs running the country and managed to trick them right out of power using Trump as the decoy figurehead trickster. Now everything has changed. It's a Big Deal. Right/left means nothing now. Tulsi Gabbard saw tight through the Obama/neocon schtick and went public with it so she's the new face of the "other" party. (She's still an Israel Firster). The Trumpites are old school Paleoconservative who actually are tired of seeing he country run by Israel and Saudi Arabia and sold for parts by the PTB. Perhaps they didn't want to go to war with Russia, knowing what a disaster that would be.

Everything is changing. Kill your old attachments to what you think right and left are because it's all obsolete now.



Didn't it feel like, using the tired old "left-right" marker, there was a tacit co-existence during the Bush era ? Now it seems so much of the conspiracy world has either gone full neo-Nazi, or explicitly right wing...I don't even see the slightest hint of a leftist or progressive presence in the para-political world(and Im a vocal critic of the campus crusader SJW leftist stuff)

Across social media I can't seem to square how millions of American students are beyond pissed about Trump lately, and (rightfully) of the DAPL Dakota protest backlash...yet can't seem to be angry or care
about President Obama coordinating with Saudi Arabia to commit mass war crimes in Saudi Arabia. Or what Obama, Mccain and Clinton did in Libya in 2011. I too have long been against the US/West/Israel/Saudi globalist war program, but I also have been critical of bullshit Russia has done internally. But, Tulsi and Trump are correct in saying that a hot war with Russia would be the worst thing imaginable in this current era.

What really gets me hopping mad is when isolationism is lumped in with neo-Nazism. As if not wanting to "liberate" and bomb the hell out of countries is now fascism. Maybe you're right, there is no left and right. Just insanity, and insanity plus(as I'd say)



Exactly. And now, to lump everyone still critical of the corrupt right wing Dems as members of the "alt-right" is just stupid. They're straining desperately to continue to divide us 50-50 somehow. And with the hatred of Trump it's working pretty well for them. But it could suddenly swing in the "they're all corrupt" directlion and if it does they are FUCKED. Which would be a cathartic and wonderful thing. DAPL seems to be waking people up, with Obama sitting on his silver plated ass doing nothing while innocent people are getting treated like Palestinians.


While I am encouraged seeing so many young people who otherwise were supporting the un-Democratic instalation of Hillary even tho she lost *now* supporting the DAPL protestors....
it's becoming thread bare apparent Obama could stop the brutality in Dakota at any moment. Spines crushed, arms being blown off...doesn't matter to these corporate whores.
My anger at the left doesn't come from their opposition to Trump, who may very well continue doing horrible stuff; but in this lovingly blind praise of Obama who quarterbacked the Bush/Cheney playbook.
and if the left wants to cite civil rights....Cheney was for gay marriage long before Hillary and Obama
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Nov 24, 2016 8:43 am

Steve Bannon created a 'nonpartisan charity' to funnel money from billionaires to Breitbart

By Mark Sumner
Wednesday Nov 23, 2016 · 2:20 PM CST

Donald Trump and Steve Bannon have more in common than just denying their connection to white supremacists: they both broke charity laws for their own benefit.

Donald Trump’s chief White House strategist Stephen K. Bannon accepted $376,000 in pay over four years for working 30 hours a week at a tiny tax-exempt charity in Tallahassee while also serving as the hands-on executive chairman of Breitbart News Network.
The charity, called the Government Accountability Institute, lists itself with the IRS as an independent, nonpartisan operation. But not only were they delivering a full-time salary to Bannon, they were also paying out to at least two other Breitbart reporters—while drawing their funds from the same people who installed Bannon in Trump’s campaign.

During the same four-year period, the charity paid about $1.3 million in salaries to two other journalists who said they put in 40 hours a week there while also working for the politically conservative news outlet, according to publicly available documents filed with the Internal Revenue Service.
It’s what Trump did in using money from the Trump Foundation for personal gain—except even worse.

Bannon launched the institute in 2012, shortly after taking the helm of Breitbart. He sought tax-exempt status from the IRS by describing the institute as an education group to help the United States and other countries maintain a “higher quality of life” through “promotion of economic freedom,” according to IRS filings.
Bannon actually created this “nonpartisan charitable institute” for the express purpose of paying himself and other writers at the extremely partisan, and absolutely for profit, Breitbart News. The money for the institute came from a pair of conservative funds, Donors Trust and the Mercer Family Foundation. The same groups were also major contributors to the Trump campaign and behind Bannon’s move to take the position of Trump’s campaign CEO.

Neither the GAI nor Breitbart are independent organizations. Both are part of intentionally confusing webs of PACs, “charities” and organizations funded by a handful of billionaires.

The institute’s communications strategist, Wynton Hall, a conservative writer and activist, received $600,000 in pay from 2012 through 2015.

In its filings, the institute told the IRS that Hall worked 40 hours a week there. He has worked at Breitbart as a writer and social-media chief, and in 2013 was promoted to managing editor. Hall did not respond to a request for comment.
It’s clear that GAI isn’t a “nonpartisan” organization, and that it has violated IRS rules. However, with Donald Trump able to name the IRS director the odds of anything being done about the Bannon and the Mercers violating both the spirit and the letter of the law seem unlikely.

The institute’s president, secretary and treasurer is Peter Schweizer, a prominent conservative writer and at-large editor for Breitbart. He received $778,000 in salary from the institute for 2012 through 2015, the IRS filings show.
Not only with Schweitzer writing for Breitbart and supposedly doing a 40-hour week for the GAI, this is the period in which he wrote the book Clinton Cash.

It’s clear that the “work” Bannon, Hall, and Schweizer did for GAI was simply—nothing at all. Except cashing the checks. The GAI seems to exist for no other reason than allowing conservative billionaires to funnel money into the “alt right” without dirtying their hands by directly paying Nazis.

Steve Bannon may be providing the “platform” for white supremacy. The Mercer Family Foundation is providing the funding.
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/11 ... -Brietbart


There is a lot more to the Trump Argentina story
Foreign press reports—available only in Spanish—reveal a tangled web of family, business, and power.


Donald Trump and Mauricio Macri’s methods of communication raise ethical red flags. CREDIT: AP Photo/Adam Peck
Like other international leaders, who were “blindly dialing into Trump Tower” following Donald Trump’s upset victory, Argentinian President Mauricio Macri had no idea how to contact the new president-elect of the United States. Macri asked his entire cabinet if anyone knew someone who could “urgently” connect him with the soon-to-be head of state.
They would have plenty to discuss: Macri was reportedly quite anxious to talk to Trump to ensure the cooperation that existed under President Obama on intelligence sharing, combating drug trafficking, scientific research, and other areas would continue. The two men — both heirs to real estate fortunes before entering politics — also have a decades-long history of personal and professional tension.
But the future U.S. president wasn’t an easy man to reach. Trump rejected the State Department’s help in fielding calls from around the world, and chose instead to wing it on unsecured phone lines.
Argentine press reported that it was Felipe Yaryura, the Trump family’s lead business partner in Argentina, who connected Macri’s Foreign Minister Susana Malcorra with Donald Trump’s son Eric. Yaryura was asked directly if he set up the call, but “completely avoided answering.” Malcorra also refused to answer in a recent press conference when asked if the businessman served as the conduit between the two governments.
Eric Trump, both a key player in the president-elect’s transition team and the family’s real estate empire, told the Argentine government that his father was too busy to talk to Macri, and that Trump would reach out when his schedule permitted.
It wasn’t until November 14 that Trump carved out time for the South American leader. They spoke for 15 minutes. Prominent Argentine journalist Jorge Lanata reported that this call included a request from Trump that Macri help him secure the necessary permits to build a long-awaited downtown Buenos Aires Trump tower. Talking Points Memo was the first U.S. outlet to pick up the accusation, which both Macri and Trump swiftly denied.
Yet Reuters later confirmed that Ivanka Trump — who is a key player in the family business — was also on the call. The very next day, the investment group building the $100 million Trump-branded tower in Buenos Aires announced that they were moving full speed ahead, and that they “just barely need to take care of a few administrative details.”
U.S. media has largely breezed past the story. But foreign press reports paint a complicated picture of the relationship between the Argentine government, Trump’s Argentine real estate partners, and the emerging Trump administration. Those reports lend further support to the existing evidence that Trump and his adult children are leveraging the presidency to advance their business interests.
“Planets are aligning.”
On election night, Trump’s victory reportedly shocked the mogul himself as much as it did the media and most of the nation. Yaryura, the Argentinian investor working on building a Trump Tower in Buenos Aires, was at his Manhattan victory party that night, and told the newspaper La Nación that he had a “very emotional, intense moment” with the new president-elect. He added that he breakfasted with Ivanka, Eric, and Don Jr. the following morning, where they spoke about how Trump’s presidency would improve his company’s brand worldwide, and in Argentina in particular.
“You see how the planets are aligning?” Yaryura asked. “Macri is looking for investment in Argentina, and we are looking to get into foreign products. This is the moment.”
Trump has been attempting break into the South American real estate market for many years, and in 2012 made his “debut” with a coastal tower in Uruguay financed by Argentine investors. The company said at the time that their goal was to “bring the Trump brand to Buenos Aires.”
It was a difficult goal to accomplish under the leftist government of Christina Kirchner, who was much more critical of multinational corporations than Macri is. Trump set his sights several years ago on a prime location in Argentina’s capital, but as of this September, he had still not gotten the government permits necessary to begin construction.
After speaking with Macri, however, the prospects for a Trump Tower in Buenos Aires appear to have improved considerably. “They showed confidence that the construction would begin on 9 de Julio Avenue next year,” La Nación reported after talking to Yaryura and Trump’s other partners in the venture. Now, the only hurdle for the project now is approval from the Buenos Aires city government, whose mayor Horacio Rodriguez Larreta is a close ally of Macri’s.
Past and future conflicts
Donald Trump and Mauricio Macri have known each other for decades. According to a book written by Macri’s father Franco, Trump threw a tantrum after losing a round of golf to Mauricio Macri and broke his friend’s golf clubs one by one.
In 1979, the elder Macri tried buy a majority share in one of Trump’s Manhattan real estate projects, and ended up losing $30 million when the deal fell through. When the younger Macri was kidnapped and held for ransom in 1991, his father briefly suspected that Donald Trump was the “true intellectual author” of the crime.
Macri — a right-wing politician with little governing experience who took office last December — openly supported Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election, saying earlier this year: “It would be hard to work with someone who would want to build walls.” His Foreign Minister Malcorra said Trump was “more closed, more isolationist and xenophobic.” Prominent Argentinian journalists are now voicing concerns that their government needs to quickly make amends with Trump, saying their only hope is that he was too busy to read up on what the Macri Administration said about him.
Spokespersons for both Macri and Donald Trump have thrown cold water in reports that Trump used the diplomatic phone call to push for a permit for his Buenos Aires development. Macri’s administration called the allegations “absolutely untrue,” while Trump’s transition spokesman Jason Miller said they were “baseless claims.”
Yet the participation of Ivanka Trump as well as the ensuing confident announcements from the tower’s developers raise serious questions about the blurred lines between Trump’s international business empire and international relations. Ivanka’s presence in a meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe raised similar red flags that the family is attempting to use political power to advance their financial interests.
The president-elect sees no such conflicts of interest in his complex tangle of business, diplomatic, and family relationships. While campaigning earlier this year, Trump promised to cut ties with his corporation, saying in a debate: “I wouldn’t ever be involved because I wouldn’t care about anything but our country, anything.”
In a meeting with the New York Times editorial board on Tuesday, however, Trump made a complete reversal. He asserted that there was no problem with mixing his corporate interests with his plans to govern. “The law is totally on my side,” he said. “The president can’t have a conflict of interest.”
Trump is correct that the law banning federal employees from participating in matters in which they or their immediate family have a financial interest in the outcome does not apply to the president or vice president.
But the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause bars him from accepting “any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.”
Legal experts told ThinkProgress that if Macri helps Trump secure the permits for his Buenos Aires project, it could be considered an unconstitutional gift under the Emoluments Clause.
https://thinkprogress.org/there-is-a-lo ... .4w14jfc7a
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby stefano » Fri Nov 25, 2016 12:47 pm

Faith In Humanity Restored! After These Students Were Defrauded Out Of Their Life Savings, Donald Trump Helped By Giving Them $25 Million
Posted Nov. 23, 2016

Anyone who’s had doubts over Donald Trump’s claims that he’s fighting to better the lives of ordinary Americans can put their suspicions to rest, because the president-elect just put his money where his mouth is. Over the weekend, Trump generously paid out $25 million of his own money to help out thousands of people who’d been defrauded of their life savings through a vicious bait-and-switch scheme.

Turns out that not only does the guy have a big wallet, but he’s got a big heart, too.

After hearing about a devastating scam in which over 6,000 hardworking Americans—many of them elderly or of modest means—were pressured into paying up to $35,000 a piece to attend courses that falsely promised to impart the secrets of becoming a successful real estate investor, our next commander in chief knew he had to do something to make it right. While other politicians might respond to such flagrant injustices with empty words of comfort or vague promises for reform, Trump gave out millions of his own money to ease the suffering of those who’d been conned by predatory corporate hucksters.

What’s even more amazing is that Trump didn’t seem to want any credit or praise for this benevolent deed. While he could’ve gone on Twitter and boasted about how he swooped in to rescue thousands of decent Americans who’d been heartlessly exploited of their hard-earned money by greedy elites, he chose to humbly deflect attention from his selfless act, opting instead to tweet about the musical Hamilton and lavish praise on newly hired members of his Cabinet.

No matter what you think about Donald Trump, you have to admit this is a beautiful gesture.

While the president-elect often modestly declines to disclose details about his personal philanthropy, you might be surprised to learn that this act of kindness is merely the latest in a long history of giving to his fellow man in his time of need. Here are just a few examples of his extraordinary generosity throughout his impressive career:

In 2007, he gave a large sum of money to 48 workers at a golf resort in Florida to help get them back on their feet after it was discovered that their employer had been stealing their wages.
In 1991, he handed out $200,000 to ease the pain of African-American and female workers at a New Jersey casino who, as a part of a toxic culture of discrimination, were barred from interacting with high rollers who came in to gamble.
In 2009, he gave money to more than 100 prospective condo owners who lost their investments in a failed resort venture due to gross financial mismanagement.
Just last year, he offered financial support to a woman who’d been unjustly fired from her job at a Florida hotel simply for being pregnant.
In 1999, Trump spread some of his wealth to a group of 200 undocumented Polish laborers who were forced to work on a New York construction project for long, brutal hours with little to no pay.
In 1997, he opened up his wallet to assist an African-American casino worker who, in a workplace climate rife with racial discrimination, was routinely denied job opportunities on account of his race.

These incredible displays of compassion represent just a few of the 100-plus known instances in which our future president has generously shared his fortune with people who have been egregiously victimized by the soulless corporate powers that be. If Trump’s long history of charitable kindness in the face of oppression is any indicator of how he’ll lead our country, then we might just be entering a new era of unprecedented fairness and prosperity.

Faith in humanity restored!
User avatar
stefano
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Nov 26, 2016 10:39 am

How Did an Alleged Russian Mobster End Up on Trump's Red Carpet?
And here's a coincidence: The guy was indicted for being part of a global gambling ring run out of Trump Tower.

DAVID CORN AND HANNAH LEVINTOVASEP. 14, 2016 5:00 AM


Vyacheslav Prokofyev/Zuma
How did an alleged and notorious Russian mobster connected to an illegal international gambling ring run out of Trump Tower end up as a special guest at a Donald Trump event in Moscow in 2013? This may be one of the odder questions of the already-odd 2016 presidential campaign.

On April 16, 2013, federal agents burst into a swanky apartment at Trump Tower in New York City as part of a larger raid that rounded up 29 suspected members of two global gambling rings with operations allegedly overseen by a supposed Russian mob boss named Alimzhan Tokhtakhounov. The Russian was not nabbed by US law enforcement. Since being indicted in the United States a decade earlier for allegedly rigging an ice skating competition at the 2002 Olympics, he had been living in Russia, beyond the reach of Western authorities. And this new gambling indictment did not appear to inconvenience Tokhtakhounov. Seven months after the bust, he was a VIP attendee at Donald Trump's Miss Universe 2013 contest held in Moscow. In fact, Tokhtakhounov hit the red carpet within minutes of Trump. An alleged crime lord who was a fugitive from American justice was apparently a celebrity guest at Trump's event.

During the 2016 race, Trump's associations with Russia have sparked assorted controversies. He has praised Russian leader Vladimir Putin and made a series of contradictory remarks regarding his relationship with the autocrat. (In July, Trump said he had never spoken to Putin, but in a 2014 video, he claimed he had.) Trump has insisted on the campaign trail, "I have nothing to do with Russia." Yet he has a long history of attempting—and generally failing—to forge deals in that country. And Trump has been surrounded by campaign aides—including onetime campaign chairman Paul Manafort—with close and lucrative business ties to Russia and Putin allies.

Contrary to his claim of having nothing to do with Russia, Trump did pull off one major deal there: staging the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in the nation's capital. At the time, Trump co-owned the contest with NBC. The event landed him in the company of Tokhtakhounov and other high-profile Russians. And Trump hoped it would also bring him close to Putin. Months before the contest, he tweeted, "Do you think Putin will be going to The Miss Universe Pageant in November in Moscow - if so, will he become my new best friend?"

Putin didn't show up, but, according to Russian media accounts and photos of the event, Tokhtakhounov did. He was part of a crew of wealthy and powerful Russians who, according to a press report, were treated as VIPs. Also present were Vladimir Kozhin, a top government official and member of Putin's inner circle (who the following year would be hit with US sanctions in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine) and Aras Agalarov, a Russian billionaire oligarch close to Putin with whom Trump wanted to develop a high-rise in Moscow. (Agalarov played a role in drawing the beauty contest to Moscow; it was held in a concert hall owned by his family business empire, and his son, a middling pop star, performed at the pageant.) After the event, Trump boasted to the New York Post, "Almost all of the oligarchs were in the room."

Asked how Tokhtakhounov came to be part of the red-carpet crowd at the event, a spokeswoman for Miss Universe, which Trump sold in 2015, said she was not familiar with his name.

In a phone interview with Mother Jones, Tokhtakhounov initially said he had not attended the beauty pageant. After being told that there were photos and media reports showing that he had been there, he acknowledged that he had been present at the glitzy gathering. But he denied that he had been a VIP and said he had purchased his own ticket. Tokhtakhounov also said he had no interaction with Trump at the event.

The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

Alimzhan Tokhtakhounov's tale is an intriguing story of sports, Hollywood stars, poker, and alleged crime. The indictment filed by Preet Bharara, the US attorney in Manhattan, which triggered the 2013 raid, identified Tokhtakhounov as a vory v zakone—or a vor—a Russian term for a select group of the highest-level Russian crime bosses. A vor receives tributes from other criminals, offers protection, and adjudicates conflicts among other crooks. The indictment charged that Tokhtakhounov used his "substantial influence in the criminal underworld" to protect a high-stakes illegal gambling ring operating out of Trump Tower. He sometimes deployed "explicit threats of violence and economic harm" to handle disputes arising from this gambling operation. The indictment noted that in one two-month period he was paid $10 million by this outfit for his services.

The operations of the gambling scheme were handled by two other men: Vadim Trincher and Anatoly Golubchik. The indictment alleged that they and others ran "an international gambling business that catered to oligarchs residing in the former Soviet Union and throughout the world," used "threats of violence to obtain unpaid gambling debts," and "employed a sophisticated money laundering scheme to move tens of millions of dollars…from the former Soviet Union through shell companies in Cyprus into various investments and other shell companies in the United States." According to the US attorney, their enterprise "booked sports bets that reached into the millions of dollars" and laundered approximately $100 million.

Trincher, a dual citizen of the United States and Israel, was a championship professional poker player who had purchased a Trump Tower apartment located directly below an apartment owned by Donald Trump. In 2009, Trincher had paid $5 million for the posh pad. Two years later, he and his wife had reportedly hoped to hold a fundraiser in the apartment for Newt Gingrich's presidential campaign, but they had to cancel the event because of the presence of mold caused by a water leak. During one court hearing, the US attorney's office said that Trincher, then 52 years old, directed much of the racketeering enterprise from this Trump Tower apartment. "From his apartment, he oversaw what must have been the world's largest sports book," Assistant US Attorney Harris Fischman remarked. "He catered to millionaires and billionaires."

The indictment also targeted an associated gambling ring operated by Trincher's son Illya, Hillel Nahmad, the son of a billionaire art dealer, and others. (Nahmad also reportedly owned the entire 51st floor of Trump Tower.) This crew managed a high-stakes betting operation and money-laundering shop. The indictment charged another Trincher son named Eugene and several others with running illegal high-stakes poker rooms in and around New York City. This group included Molly Bloom, who had previously earned a reputation as an organizer of private poker games for celebrities, including Leonardo DiCaprio and Tobey Maguire. Following the raid, the New York Daily News reported that a witness told the paper that "games held by the crew in a Trump Tower apartment…[were] poker 'on steroids,' with cameos by movie and sports stars, including A-Rod."

Shortly after the indictment was issued, Tokhtakhounov told a Russian television channel that the case against him was "yet another fairy tale from the Americans." He claimed the prosecutors had included him in the indictment "to give the situation significance." He acknowledged that he knew two of the defendants and had placed bets with them. "Of course, in conversation," he added, "I might have given them advice on how to do things better."

Tokhtakhounov was trying to depict himself as a victim unfairly targeted by the United States. In 2002, he was indicted for allegedly fixing skating matches at the Salt Lake City Olympics. (The feds believed he had rigged events so that Russians would take home a gold and a French pair would win another gold—and he would pocket a French visa.) He was arrested in Italy, but soon Tokhtakhounov, who denied the charges, was let go and made his way back to Russia.

Something of a celebrity in Russia, Tokhtakhounov has engaged in various enterprises. He once owned casinos in Moscow. He claimed to be an organizer of pop concerts and fashion shows. He represented a modeling association, and he wrote novels. He lived in a high-end apartment building in Moscow and kept a palatial country house outside the city. He is currently wanted by Interpol for conspiracy to commit wire fraud, bribery conspiracy, wire fraud, and "bribery in sport contests."

A year following the Trump Tower raid, Trincher and Golubchik, after pleading guilty, were each sentenced to five years in prison. Each man was ordered to forfeit more than $20 million in cash, investments, and property. (Trincher's sons, Nahmad, and Bloom also pled guilty.) Tokhtakhounov, the US attorney's office noted, remained a fugitive.

Trump has cited the 2013 Miss Universe contest as proof he possesses serious foreign policy experience. In May, he told Fox News, "I know Russia well. I had a major event in Russia two or three years ago, which was a big, big incredible event." And it provided the reality television mogul the opportunity to hobnob with a Putin crony who is now under US sanctions, various oligarchs who are chums with the Russian leader, and an alleged Russian mafioso accused by the US government of protecting a global criminal enterprise that operated directly below one of Trump's own apartments in Trump Tower. What a small world.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... rse-moscow
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Nov 26, 2016 5:19 pm

Jan. 4 1934 Green Bay Press-Gazette

Image

Some Fake News Publishers Just Happen to Be Donald Trump’s Cronies

Lee Fang
November 26 2016, 8:51 a.m.
THE EXTRAORDINARY PHENOMENON of fake news spread by Facebook and other social media during the 2016 presidential election has been largely portrayed as a lucky break for Donald Trump.

By that reckoning, entrepreneurial Macedonian teenagers, opportunists in Tbilisi and California millennials have exploited social media algorithms in order to make money — only incidentally leading to the viral proliferation of mostly anti-Clinton and anti-Obama hoaxes and conspiracy theories that thrilled many Trump supporters. The Washington Post published a shoddy report on Thursday alleging that Russian state-sponsored propagandists were seeking to promote Trump through fabricated stories for their own reasons, independent of the candidate himself.

But a closer look reveals that some of the biggest fake news providers were run by experienced political operators well within the orbit of Donald Trump’s political advisers and consultants.

Laura Ingraham, a close Trump ally currently under consideration to be Trump’s White House press secretary, owns an online publisher called Ingraham Media Group that runs a number of sites, including LifeZette, a news site that frequently posts articles of dubious veracity. One video produced by LifeZette this summer, ominously titled “Clinton Body Count,” promoted a conspiracy theory that the Clinton family had some role in the plane crash death of John F. Kennedy, Jr., as well as the deaths of various friends and Democrats.


The video, published on Facebook from LifeZette’s verified news account, garnered over 400,000 shares and 14 million views.

Another LifeZette video, picking up false claims from other sites, claimed that voting machines “might be compromised” because a voting machine company called Smartmatic, allegedly providing voting machines “in sixteen states,” was purchased by the liberal billionaire George Soros. Soros never purchased the company, and Smartmatic did not provide voting machines used in the general election.

One LifeZette article misleadingly claimed that the United Nations backed a “secret” Obama administration takeover of local police departments. The article referenced Justice Department orders that a select few police departments address patterns of misconduct, a practice that, in reality, long predates the Obama presidency, is hardly secret, and had no relation to the United Nations.

Another LifeZette article, which went viral in the week prior to the election, falsely claimed that Wikileaks had revealed that a senior Hillary Clinton campaign official had engaged in occult rituals. Ingraham’s site regularly receives links from the Drudge Report and other powerful drivers of Internet traffic.

But LifeZette, for all its influence, pales in comparison to the sites run by Floyd Brown, a Republican consultant close to Trump’s inner circle of advisers. Brown gained notoriety nearly three decades ago for his role in helping to produce the “Willie Horton” campaign advertisement, a spot criticized for its use of racial messaging to derail Michael Dukakis’s presidential bid. Brown is also the political mentor of David Bossie, an operative who went to work for Trump’s presidential campaign this year after founding the Citizens United group. In an interview this year, Brown called Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway a “longtime friend.”

Brown now produces a flow of reliably pro-Trump Internet content through a company he owns called Liftable Media Inc., which operates a number of high-impact, tabloid-style news outlets that exploded in size over the course of the election. One of Brown’s sites, Western Journalism, is the 81st largest site in the U.S. with 13 million monthly unique page views, according to rankings maintained by the site Alexa. Another, called Conservative Tribune, is the 50th largest site with over 19 million monthly unique visitors.


Brown’s sites churn out bombastic headlines with little regard to the truth. One viral piece shared by Brown’s news outlets claimed that President Obama had redesigned the White House logo to change the American flag to a white flag, “a common symbol for surrender, which has many people wondering if Obama was trying to secretly signal to America’s enemies that he was surrendering.” The Facebook post touted the article with the line, “We all know Obama hates the United States, but what he just did to the White House logo is beyond the pale.”

As the fact-checking website Snopes was quick to note, it was no signal of surrender and the bleached white version of the White House logo, complete with a white flag, was not even an Obama creation. The white logo dates back to as early as 2003, under the Bush administration, which used it for official documents.

The Conservative Tribune and Western Journalism provide a steady stream of similarly deceptive, eye-catching headlines.

“BREAKING: Muslims Ordered to Vote Hillary,” is the headline for one election post that grossly mischaracterized a mundane article about a Pakistani American activist going to door to door to help Clinton’s campaign. “Obama Urges Illegal Immigrants to Vote Without Fear of Getting Caught,” blared Western Journalism, claiming that President Obama had suggested in an interview on issues facing Latino millennial voters that noncitizens could vote and “will never get caught if they do.” The article left out the part of the Obama interview in which he said noncitizens “can’t legally vote, but they’re counting on you to make sure that you have the courage to make your voice heard.”

The hits go on, with posts on a regular basis making claims ranging from the assertion that Clinton went on a “drug holiday” before the Las Vegas presidential debate to rumors that Obama’s birth certificate is under serious scrutiny.

Thanks to views sourced largely to referrals from Facebook, Brown’s websites now outrank web traffic going to news outlets such as the Wall Street Journal, CBS News, and NPR, according to data compiled by Alexa. Both Western Journalism and Conservative Tribune are certified by Facebook as bonafide news providers.

Trump’s relationship with one particularly influential online news site with a history of fabricated stories couldn’t be much closer. Steve Bannon, the chairman of Breitbart News, took a leave of absence from the organization to become the chief executive officer of Trump’s presidential campaign and has been tapped to serve as Trump’s chief strategist in the White House. Trump himself regularly promoted Breitbart stories, including a tweet used to justify his campaign to prove Obama was not born in the U.S.

Breitbart News blends commentary and journalism with inflammatory headlines, in many cases producing fake stories sourced from online hoaxes. The site once attempted to pass off a picture of people in Cleveland celebrating the Cavaliers as a massive Trump rally. The site furiously defended Trump’s false claim that “thousands” of Muslims in New Jersey were “cheering” the 9/11 attacks, a claim that multiple fact-checking organizations have thoroughly debunked.

Other conservative content farms, including WorldNetDaily, maintained ties to the Trump election effort. Campaign finance records show that Great America PAC, a Trump-backing Super PAC, paid WND, known as the largest purveyor of Obama birth certificate conspiracy theories, for “online voter contact.”

The surge of fake news has been much commented on in the mainstream media — and its effect on Trump’s election victory has been widely debated — with little mention of the purveyors close to the Trump campaign.

A Buzzfeed News article that came out shortly before the election famously traced more than 100 pro-Trump websites to young entrepreneurs in a single town in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, who discovered that the best way to generate clicks — at a fraction of a penny per click in ad revenue — is to get their politics stories to spread on Facebook. After the election, New Yorker editor David Remnick described President Obama as “talking obsessively” about that article, and quoted him bemoaning its significance. “[T]he capacity to disseminate misinformation, wild conspiracy theories, to paint the opposition in wildly negative light without any rebuttal, ” Obama said, “that has accelerated in ways that much more sharply polarize the electorate and make it very difficult to have a common conversation.”

The Washington Post interviewed Paul Horner, the “impresario of a Facebook fake-news empire,” who sounded somewhat aghast when he said, “I think Trump is in the White House because of me. His followers don’t fact-check anything — they’ll post everything, believe anything.”

Another Washington Post story described two Southern California slackers turning their website of made-up pro-Trump clickbait in a virtual goldmine. The New York Times profiled a fake news operation run by three brothers in Tbilisi, Georgia, who experimented with a variety of content, sometimes lifted from other sites, at other times made up from whole cloth, finding that pro-Trump material was the most popular, and therefore the most profitable.

Finally, a Washington Post story this week alleged a Russian government role in spreading fake news to help Trump. But its sources were not remotely credible. For instance, it cited a list that characterized as “routine peddlers of Russian propaganda” a number of well-established and well-respected websites including Truthdig, a site published by award-winning journalist and long-time Los Angeles Times columnist Robert Scheer, Naked Capitalism, and Truth Out.

The growth of fake news isn’t confined to Trump or to conservative sites. A number of left-wing political sites have trafficked in demonstrably false stories, including deceptive pieces stoking fear about vaccines. Earlier this year, when critics called for Clinton to release the transcripts of her three paid speeches to Goldman Sachs, as well as to other interest groups, Daily News Bin, a new liberal website specializing in viral hits, published a piece titled, “Video surfaces of Hillary Clinton’s paid speech to Goldman Sachs, and it’s completely harmless.” The video embedded in the piece, however, was not one of Clinton’s paid speeches; it was a public event sponsored by Goldman Sachs. The article was shared over 120,000 times.

“We live in a time when people don’t care about facts,” said Judy Muller, professor of journalism at the University of Southern California.

During the last three months of the campaign, Buzzfeed News found that the top 20 best-performing hoax stories related to the election had more Facebook engagement than the 20 best-performing stories from major news outlets.

Facebook has responded to the recent outcry over fake news websites with promises to crack down on obvious phony sites. Many critics are still worried that Facebook is not doing enough to counter outright lies promoted by the platform; meanwhile, others are concerned that such efforts risk suppressing critical information.

Muller said that if Ingraham is nominated by Trump to be his spokesperson to the press, she will have to distance herself from her growing Facebook content empire.

But the demand for fake news is unlikely to subside.

A recent study by Stanford University researchers found that students have difficulty discerning between fake content, corporate sponsored advertorial content posing as journalism, and legitimate news.

“People only care about opinions that support their own biases,” said Muller. “So they’re not reading other people’s facts, they’re not checking the facts, and they don’t want to know — and that’s the scariest development to me.”
https://theintercept.com/2016/11/26/lau ... lifezette/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: TRUMP is seriously dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Nov 26, 2016 5:31 pm

Potential Conflicts Around the Globe for Trump, the Businessman President
By RICHARD C. PADDOCK, ERIC LIPTON, ELLEN BARRY, ROD NORDLAND, DANNY HAKIM and SIMON ROMERONOV. 26, 2016

Image
Trump Tower in the Makati City district of Manila is being developed by Donald J. Trump’s business partner Jose E.B. Antonio, who has just been named the Philippines’ special trade envoy to the United States. Credit Hannah Reyes Morales for The New York Times
MANILA — On Thanksgiving Day, a Philippine developer named Jose E. B. Antonio hosted a company anniversary bash at one of Manila’s poshest hotels. He had much to be thankful for.

In October, he had quietly been named a special envoy to the United States by the Philippine president, Rodrigo Duterte. Mr. Antonio was nearly finished building a $150 million tower in Manila’s financial district — a 57-story symbol of affluence and capitalism, which bluntly promotes itself with the slogan “Live Above the Rest.” And now his partner on the project, Donald J. Trump, had just been elected president of the United States.

After the election, Mr. Antonio flew to New York for a private meeting at Trump Tower with the president-elect’s children, who have been involved in the Manila project from the beginning, as have Mr. Antonio’s children. The Trumps and Antonios have other ventures in the works, including Trump-branded resorts in the Philippines, Mr. Antonio’s son Robbie Antonio said.

“We will continue to give you products that you can enjoy and be proud of,” the elder Mr. Antonio, one of the richest men in the Philippines, told the 500 friends, employees and customers gathered for his star-studded celebration in Manila.



Mr. Antonio’s combination of jobs — he is a business partner with Mr. Trump, while also representing the Philippines in its relationship with the United States and the president-elect — is hardly inconsequential, given some of the weighty issues on the diplomatic table.

Among them, Mr. Duterte has urged “a separation” from the United States and has called for American troops to exit the country in two years’ time. His antidrug crusade has resulted in the summary killings of thousands of suspected criminals without trial, prompting criticism from the Obama administration.

Situations like these are already leading some former government officials from both parties to ask if America’s reaction to events around the world could potentially be shaded, if only slightly, by the Trump family’s financial ties with foreign players. They worry, too, that in some countries those connections could compromise American efforts to criticize the corrupt intermingling of state power with vast business enterprises controlled by the political elite.

“It is uncharted territory, really in the history of the republic, as we have never had a president with such an empire both in the United States and overseas,” said Michael J. Green, who served on the National Security Council in the administration of George W. Bush, and before that at the Defense Department.


The Trump Brand Around the World
Donald J. Trump has business interests in at least 20 countries, in addition to extensive
hotel and real estate holdings in the United States, according to an analysis of his
financial disclosure report. Each dot represents a city where he has at least one enterprise.

U.A.E.
Argentina
Azerbaijan
Bermuda
Brazil
Canada
China
Dominican Republic
Britain (Scotland)
Indonesia
India
Ireland
South Korea
St. Martin
Panama
Philippines
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Turkey
Uruguay
U.S.
The globe is dotted with such potential conflicts. Mr. Trump’s companies have business operations in at least 20 countries, with a particular focus on the developing world, including outposts in nations like India, Indonesia and Uruguay, according to a New York Times analysis of his presidential campaign financial disclosures. What’s more, the true extent of Mr. Trump’s global financial entanglements is unclear, since he has refused to release his tax returns and has not made public a list of his lenders.

In an interview with The Times on Tuesday, Mr. Trump boasted again about the global reach of his business — and his family’s ability to keep it running after he takes office.

“I’ve built a very great company and it’s a big company and it’s all over the world,” Mr. Trump said, adding later: “I don’t care about my company. It doesn’t matter. My kids run it.”

In a written statement, his spokeswoman, Hope Hicks, said Mr. Trump and his family were committed to addressing any issues related to his financial holdings.

“Vetting of various structures and immediate transfer of the business remains a top priority for both President-elect Trump, his adult children and his executives,” she said.

But a review by The Times of these business dealings identified a menu of the kinds of complications that could create a running source of controversy for Mr. Trump, as well as tensions between his priorities as president and the needs and objectives of his companies.

In Brazil, for example, the beachfront Trump Hotel Rio de Janeiro — one of Mr. Trump’s many branding deals, in which he does not have an equity stake — is part of a broad investigation by a federal prosecutor who is examining whether illicit commissions and bribes resulted in apparent favoritism by two pension funds that invested in the project.

Several of Mr. Trump’s real estate ventures in India — where he has more projects underway than in any location outside North America — are being built through companies with family ties to India’s most important political party. This makes it more likely that Indian government officials will do special favors benefiting Mr. Trump’s projects, including pressuring state-owned banks to extend favorable loans.

In Ireland and Scotland, executives from Mr. Trump’s golf courses have been waging two separate battles with local officials. The most recent centers on the Trump Organization’s plans to build a flood-prevention sea wall at the course on the Irish coast. Some environmentalists say the wall could destroy an endangered snail’s habitat — a dispute that will soon involve the president of the United States.

And in Turkey, officials including President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a religiously conservative Muslim, demanded that Mr. Trump’s name be removed from Trump Towers in Istanbul after he called for a ban on Muslims entering the United States. More recently, after Mr. Trump came to the defense of Mr. Erdogan — suggesting that he had the right to crack down harshly on dissidents after a failed coup — the calls for action against Trump Towers have stopped, fueling worries that Mr. Trump’s policies toward Turkey might be shaped by his commercial interests.

Mr. Trump has acknowledged a conflict of interest in Turkey. “I have a little conflict of interest because I have a major, major building in Istanbul,” he said during a radio interview last year with Stephen K. Bannon, the Breitbart News executive who has since been designated his chief White House strategist. “It’s a tremendously successful job. It’s called Trump Towers — two towers, instead of one. Not the usual one. It’s two.”

These tangled ties already have some members of Congress — including at least one Republican representative — calling on Mr. Trump to provide more information on his international operations, or perhaps for a congressional inquiry into them.

“You rightly criticized Hillary for Clinton Foundation,” Representative Justin Amash, Republican of Michigan, said in a Twitter message on Monday. “If you have contracts w/foreign govts, it’s certainly a big deal, too. #DrainTheSwamp”

David J. Kramer, who served as assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor during the Bush administration, said Mr. Trump’s financial entanglements could undermine decades of efforts by Democratic and Republican presidents to promote government transparency — and to use the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act to stop contractors from paying bribes to secure government work abroad.

“This will make it a little harder to be able to go out and proselytize around these things,” Mr. Kramer said.

Even if Mr. Trump and his family seek no special advantages from foreign governments, officials overseas may feel compelled to help the Trump family by, say, accelerating building permits or pushing more business to one of the new president’s hotels or golf courses, according to several former State Department officials.

“The working assumption on behalf of all these foreign government officials will be that there is an advantage to doing business with the Trump organization,” said Michael H. Fuchs, who was until recently deputy assistant secretary at the bureau of East Asian and Pacific affairs. “They will think it will ingratiate themselves with the Trump administration. And this will significantly complicate United States foreign policy and our relationships around the world.”

At the same time, Mr. Fuchs said, American diplomats in countries where Mr. Trump’s companies operate, fearful of a rebuke from Washington, may be reluctant to take steps that could frustrate business partners or political allies.

Another question is, who will be responsible for security at the Trump Towers around the world, especially in the Middle East, which terrorism experts say may now become more appealing targets as symbols of American capitalism built in the name of the president?

What is clear is that there has been very little division, in the weeks since the election, between Mr. Trump’s business interests and his transition effort, with the president-elect or his family greeting real estate partners from India and the Philippines in his office and Mr. Trump raising concerns about his golf course in Scotland with a prominent British politician. Mr. Trump’s daughter Ivanka, who is in charge of planning and development of the Trump Organization’s global network of hotels, has joined in conversations with at least three world leaders — of Turkey, Argentina and Japan — having access that could help her expand the brand worldwide.

Mr. Trump, in the interview with The Times on Tuesday, acknowledged that his move to the Oval Office could help enrich his family. He cited his new hotel a few blocks from the White House, which the Trump Organization has urged diplomats to consider patronizing when in town to meet the president or his team.

Federal law does not prevent Mr. Trump from taking actions that could benefit him and his family financially; the president is exempt from most conflict-of-interest laws. But the Constitution, through what is called the emoluments clause, appears to prohibit him from taking payments or gifts from a foreign government entity, a standard that some legal experts say he may violate by renting space in Trump Tower in New York to the Bank of China or if he hosts foreign diplomats in one of his hotels.

“I mean it could be that occupancy at that hotel will be because, psychologically, occupancy at that hotel will be probably a more valuable asset now than it was before, O.K.? The brand is certainly a hotter brand than it was before. I can’t help that, but I don’t care,” Mr. Trump said, adding, “The only thing that matters to me is running our country.”

Robert D. Blackwill, a former National Security Council member who also served as ambassador to India during the Bush administration, said Mr. Trump still had a chance to demonstrate that he could manage these challenges once he was sworn in.

“Let’s listen and not prejudge,” said Mr. Blackwill, a Republican who was so critical of Mr. Trump that he endorsed Hillary Clinton. “I want to see what he does as president.”

Image

Mr. Trump’s project in Rio de Janeiro. Anselmo Henrique Cordeiro Lopes, a Brazilian federal prosecutor, has opened an investigation into $40 million in investments made by two relatively small pension funds in the Trump Hotel Rio weeks before the American election. Credit Lianne Milton for The New York Times
BRAZIL

Nation Under Pressure, Ventures Under Scrutiny

Donald Trump Jr., the president-elect’s oldest son, gushed with triumphalism when he announced a deal in 2014 to attach the family name to the Trump Hotel Rio de Janeiro, a lavish 171-room beachfront project featuring cavernous suites with private plunge pools and a 4,000-square-foot nightclub.

“This is an exciting time to develop our first project in South America and the perfect location to do so,” the younger Mr. Trump (his brother Eric is also involved in the family business) said at the time.

But just two years later, the venture is embroiled in a criminal investigation in Brazil, pointing to unfulfilled promises that are casting a pall over both the Trump business empire and the president-elect in their dealings in Latin America’s largest country.

Anselmo Henrique Cordeiro Lopes, a crusading federal prosecutor in the capital, Brasília, opened an investigation into $40 million in investments made by two relatively small Brazilian pension funds in the Trump Hotel Rio weeks before the American election.

The Trump hotel inquiry is looking at why the funds — Serpro, which invests on behalf of retirees of a state-controlled information technology firm, and Igeprev, which manages the pensions of public employees of the sparsely populated Tocantins State — put so much of their capital into the venture, which is owned by Mr. Trump’s Brazilian partner, LSH Barra.

Back in 2014, the hotel might have seemed like a good deal. Brazil was about to host the World Cup soccer tournament that year, while Rio was preparing to be the venue for the 2016 Summer Olympics. At the same time, Rio, the nerve center of Brazil’s energy industry, had been bolstered by large offshore oil discoveries.

But Brazil’s economy began to weaken in 2014, undermined by falling commodities prices, colossal graft scandals and political instability that culminated in the ouster this year of President Dilma Rousseff, who was replaced by her vice president, Michel Temer. The result: Brazil is still grappling with its most severe economic crisis in decades.

The hotel officially opened for the Olympics, but months later remains unfinished. The top floors of the property, whose design evokes a futuristic pyramid, are closed. Parts of the hotel still resemble a construction site, including the second floor, where pleasure-seekers were supposed to mingle in a nightclub overlooking the Atlantic.

The examination of the project by Mr. Lopes, the federal prosecutor, has already found a series of “highly suspicious” potential irregularities warranting a criminal investigation, according to court documents. “It is necessary to verify if the favoritism shown by the pension funds to LSH and the Trump Organization was due to the payment of illicit commissions and bribes,” Mr. Lopes said in documents filed in October.

In his filings, Mr. Lopes said the size of the hotel investments relative to the overall holdings of the small pension funds reflected a highly unusual level of risk, especially for an unfinished venture that failed to capitalize fully on the demand for accommodations during the Olympics. Going further, Mr. Lopes positioned the inquiry within a broader investigation of public pension funds, pillars of the Brazilian economy that often work in tandem with large state-controlled banks and energy companies.

Mr. Trump first took interest in a Rio hotel venture in 2012, when Ivanka Trump was having lunch in Florida with Paulo Figueiredo Filho, a businessman who is a grandson of João Figueiredo, the last autocrat of Brazil’s 21-year military dictatorship, which ended in 1985. The younger Mr. Figueiredo spearheaded the hotel venture until recently.

In a statement, Mr. Trump’s Brazilian partner, LSH, said it was innocent of any wrongdoing in connection with the investments by the pension funds, and was cooperating with the criminal inquiry.

Alan Garten, the Trump Organization’s general counsel, said in a statement issued Friday that the investigation was not targeting Mr. Trump or his company — given that it does not own the hotel — and “has no knowledge whatsoever regarding any governmental inquiry.”

The investigation of the Trump projects is unfolding at an awkward time for the Brazilian authorities. Foreign Minister José Serra, Brazil’s top diplomat, publicly declared in July that a Trump presidency would be a “nightmare.” Although President Temer has formally congratulated Mr. Trump on his victory in a letter, he is still among world leaders who have not yet spoken by telephone with the president-elect.

Even if Brazil’s executive branch actively tries to seek warmer relations with Mr. Trump, officials will face obstacles if they try to quell the investigation. Brazil differs from some other countries in Latin America where presidents can easily exert pressure on prosecutors and judges, with the judiciary steadily growing more independent.

“Brazilian diplomats could try to avoid the problem of referring to the investigation when dealing with the Trump administration, but that’s about all they can do,” said Maurício Santoro, a political scientist at the State University of Rio de Janeiro. “This is something that could hang over relations between the two countries for years.”

Image

Trump Tower Mumbai is one of five Trump Organization projects in India, a country where connections between developers and officials are common. Credit Asmita Parelkar for The New York Times
INDIA

Potential Pitfalls in Dual Roles

On the other side of the world, Donald Trump Jr. had other projects he was pushing.

In 2012, he flew into Mumbai for a brief meeting with the state’s chief minister at that time, hoping to salvage a residential tower representing the Trump Organization’s first planned project there. He was hoping the chief minister, Prithviraj Chavan, would intervene on his behalf to get the permission needed.

The participants recall the meeting differently: Mr. Trump’s partner, Harresh Mehta of Rohan Lifescapes, said development regulations had changed, leaving the project in limbo, and they hoped Mr. Chavan could formalize a policy so that the project could continue. Mr. Chavan said that in a 30-minute meeting, Mr. Trump and his partner were “requesting a concession that could not be given.”

By the end of the meeting, in any case, it was fairly clear that the younger Mr. Trump’s presence had not worked any magic. The project was shelved soon after.

“He thought the name was so big, we would bend backwards to satisfy him, but that was not the case,” Mr. Chavan said.

Kalpesh Mehta, managing partner of Tribeca Developers of Mumbai, the Trump Organization’s development partner in India, confirmed that Donald Trump Jr. had met with the chief minister, but disputed the claim by Mr. Chavan that he had sought a special favor.

“The notion that a request was made by Donald Jr. to waive any regulations is absolutely false,” Mr. Mehta said in the statement, which was issued Friday. “The Trump Organization does not get involved in the regulatory aspects and/or interacting with government officials related to its projects in India.”

This example, analysts here say, points to a potentially serious ethical hazard for a United States president who is also a real estate mogul in India, with five projects underway. Mr. Trump was operating much like other developers in India, who cozy up to politicians — officially or unofficially — to push projects through the bureaucracy.

Often, they must obtain as many as 60 permissions and building permits from government officials, including bureaucrats “whose main goal in life is to attract rent,” said Saurabh Mukherjea, the chief executive of institutional equities at Ambit Capital, a leading investment bank in India.

One of Mr. Trump’s projects, Trump Towers Pune, is in fact under investigation by local authorities after another builder alleged that one of its permits was fraudulent. Panchshil Realty has disputed that accusation, saying the permit in question was not required for the construction. The very nature of the country’s real estate business, however, underscores larger concerns about potential damage to American efforts to discourage corruption in business abroad.

In India, real estate is the main vehicle politicians and businessmen have used to invest so-called black money, on which taxes have not been paid. In cities, where land is scarce and extraordinarily valuable, special favors from top political leaders can lead to windfall profits, and negotiations between developers and officials are informal affairs.

It is so routine for developers to pay bribes at every step of the approval process that many bureaucrats have informal rate sheets showing exactly how much must be paid to each official.

Politicians not only pressure the bureaucracy to approve their pet projects, sometimes even when they are against local regulations, they also squeeze government banks to give out favorable loans.

Top officials might “think in some way the U.S. president will help them,” and “can put in a friendly word with the banks” to extend loans for around 8 percent interest, rather than the characteristic 15 percent, said Vikas S. Kasliwal, the chief executive officer and vice chairman of Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure.

“If the son goes himself, if the son is willing to go and meet the prime minister of India, or the urban development minister, that is a very big thing,” he said. “They will think the president is meeting them.”

Image

Donald J. Trump’s real estate partners from India met with him in New York on Nov. 15 as the presidential transition was underway.
Another pitfall is that Donald Trump’s partners in major projects are, in some cases, politicians themselves. Most major Indian developers have some sort of alignment, direct or indirect, with regional political leaders, who can assist in acquiring the necessary permits.

Mr. Trump’s first projects in India, which are expected to increase in number over the next year, follow this pattern: His partner for Trump Towers Pune is Panchshil Realty, owned by a family that has a close and longstanding family relationship with one of the state’s most powerful politicians, Sharad Pawar, the head of the small but influential Nationalist Congress Party. (Mr. Trump was photographed — in an image distributed on Twitter but since taken down — with executives from Panchshil Realty on Nov. 15.) Mr. Pawar’s daughter, Supriya Sule, a member of Parliament, holds a 2 percent share in Panchshil’s parent company, she said in an interview.

Mr. Trump’s partner in the Trump Tower Mumbai is the Lodha Group, founded by Mangal Prabhat Lodha, vice president of the Bharatiya Janata Party — currently the governing party in Parliament — in Maharashtra State. The Lodha Group has already negotiated with the United States government; it announced a landmark purchase of a property, known as the Washington House, on tony Altamount Road, from the American government for 3.75 billion rupees, almost $70 million.

His partner in an office complex in Gurgaon, near New Delhi, is IREO, whose managing director, Lalit Goyal, is the brother-in-law of a Bharatiya Janata member of Parliament, Sudhanshu Mittal. Mr. Mittal, in an interview, has denied having any connection with the real estate company.

Suraj Hegde, the secretary of the All India Congress Committee, a national body of Indian National Congress party members, said he was troubled by the dual roles Mr. Trump and his family would play in Indian affairs — particularly given real estate’s important role in India’s fast-growing economy, and the clout the United States has on the world stage.

“Basically this is the globalization of lobbying across countries, which then tries to establish monopoly over real estate,” Mr. Hegde said in an interview. He added that he was already calling for an independent parliamentary investigation of such maneuvers, including Mr. Trump’s real estate ventures in India.

“Establishing monopoly at the cost of small players by business connections to Mr. Trump is very worrisome,” he said. “This is not at all healthy for a democracy.”

Image

The Trump Towers Istanbul. One contains offices, the other luxury apartments, with a shopping mall connecting them. Credit Monique Jaques for The New York Times
TURKEY

Mixing Business, Politics and Islam

Mr. Trump’s business interests in Turkey are emblematic of two weighty contradictions for a businessman turned politician.

As a candidate, Mr. Trump railed against moving American jobs overseas and promised to do something about it. As a businessman, he invested in a partnership with a furniture company here, making luxury furniture in the firm’s factory in western Anatolia and selling it in the United States and worldwide — a partnership that apparently remains active.

Mr. Trump the candidate inveighed against Muslims and threatened at least a temporary ban on their entering the United States. Mr. Trump the businessman has in recent years had some of his biggest expansions overseas, including in Muslim countries like Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and even Azerbaijan.

One of the most visible Muslim-world symbols of that contradiction is in the bustling commercial district of Sisli, on the European side of Istanbul, where a pair of cantilevered modernist towers, nearly 40 stories high, bear Mr. Trump’s name.

Turkey’s leader, Mr. Erdogan, visited Trump Towers Istanbul — one holds luxury apartments and one office space, with a shopping mall connecting the two — after their completion in 2012, with Mr. Trump and Ivanka Trump appearing as part of the celebration the next day.

“We look forward to this being the first of many world-class developments undertaken together in Istanbul and throughout Turkey,” Mr. Trump said in a statement issued during the visit.


Donald and Ivanka Trump visited Istanbul in 2012 after the completion of Trump Towers Istanbul. YouTube
Beyond real estate, there is the Trump Organization’s 2013 partnership with Dorya International, a luxury furniture maker with a factory in Manisa Province, near the city of Izmir, to build pieces sold under the Trump Home Collection.

But the presidential campaign demonstrated how the goals of his business and politics ventures can come into direct conflict, particularly once Mr. Trump in December proposed barring Muslims from entering the United States, implying that all Muslims might pose a terrorist threat.

“We regret and condemn Trump’s discriminatory remarks,” Bulent Kural, the manager of the Trump Towers Mall, wrote in an email to a reporter at the time, as he announced that the mall was considering removing Mr. Trump’s name. “Such statements bear no value and are products of a mind that does not understand Islam, a peace religion, at all. Our reaction has been directly expressed to the Trump family. We are reviewing the legal dimension of our relation with the Trump brand.”

Mr. Erdogan weighed in on the issue, too, saying, “The ones who put that brand on their building should immediately remove it.”

Mr. Trump’s next move helped re-establish his standing. After a failed coup in Turkey in July, he defended Mr. Erdogan’s crackdown on dissidents, saying in an interview with The Times that the United States has to “fix our own mess” before trying to alter the behavior of other nations.

“I don’t think we have a right to lecture,” Mr. Trump said in the interview. “Look at what is happening in our country,” he added, referring to violence in the United States. “How are we going to lecture when people are shooting policemen in cold blood?”

In between his two remarks — one infuriating the president of Turkey, the other comforting him — the calls for the renaming of the Trump Towers Mall ended. But much more is at stake in relations between the United States and Turkey than a shopping mall and two skyscrapers.

Image

Mehmet Ali Yalcindag, Mr. Trump’s business associate at Trump Towers Istanbul, with Ivanka Trump and Mr. Trump. Credit Trump Organization, via PR Newswire
Turkey is a key player in United States efforts to combat the Islamic State in the Middle East, and sits next door to Syria as the United States has armed rebel groups in an attempt to remove Syria’s president, Bashar al-Assad, from power.

The recent post-election telephone call between Mr. Trump and Mr. Erdogan suggests that business and political roles will continue to be mixed.

According to a Turkish journalist, Amberin Zaman, writing in the independent online news outlet Diken, Mr. Trump told the Turkish leader that he and his daughter — who participated in the call — admired both Mr. Erdogan and Mehmet Ali Yalcindag, Mr. Trump’s business associate in the towers, whom he called “a close friend.”

Ms. Zaman, a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, said no government officials had disputed her account of the conversation. “I’m of the opinion they were quite happy for this to be published,” she said. A spokeswoman for Mr. Trump declined to comment about the call.

Jennifer Harris, who served on the staff of the National Intelligence Council and on the State Department’s policy planning staff, said the twin hats that Mr. Trump and his family would be wearing in Turkey would almost certainly complicate the jobs of American diplomats there.

“It makes me wonder if the Trump administration will use the power of the state to help political or business allies and hurt political adversaries and business rivals,” she said.

Image

Jose E.B. Antonio, Mr. Trump’s partner on a tower project in Manila, second from left, with his sons at a company celebration there on Thursday. Credit Hannah Reyes Morales for The New York Times
THE PHILIPPINES

What Stance Toward Duterte?

President Duterte’s antidrug campaign has led to the summary deaths of thousands of suspected criminals at the hands of police and vigilantes since he took office June 30. The killing has been condemned by human rights activists — and the Obama administration.

In August, Elizabeth Trudeau, a State Department spokeswoman, said the United States was “very deeply concerned” about reports of “extrajudicial killings by or at the behest of government authorities of individuals who are suspected to have been in drug activity in the Philippines.” She added, “We have also made our concerns known.”

The question now, former State Department officials say, is just what kind of a stand the Trump administration will take as Mr. Trump and his family balance their personal and financial ties with foreign policy demands.

Mr. Antonio first met Mr. Trump casually in the 1990s and has been his business partner in the Philippines for five years. President Duterte named him special envoy to the United States as the Philippines angrily pushed back at President Obama for criticizing his deadly campaign. At the time of the appointment, Mrs. Clinton was leading in the polls in the United States presidential election.

Mr. Duterte has made clear that he does not appreciate American meddling in his country’s domestic affairs.

“I am a president of a sovereign state, and we have long ceased to be a colony,” Mr. Duterte told reporters in early September, before a scheduled meeting in Laos with Mr. Obama that never took place. “I do not have any master except the Filipino people, nobody but nobody.”

Mr. Duterte handpicked Mr. Antonio as his intermediary with the United States, said his press secretary, Ernesto Abella, because of his business success, his previous experience as a special envoy to China and the Philippine president’s “deep intuition about people.” The appointment will be advantageous for the Philippines, Mr. Abella added, because Mr. Trump already knows Mr. Antonio.

Even before Mr. Trump has been sworn in, Mr. Antonio flew to New York and visited Trump Tower, where he met with Mr. Trump’s children, who are executives at the Trump Organization — which oversees the president-elect’s real estate ventures. This was a business trip, not a diplomatic one, Robbie Antonio, Mr. Antonio’s son and the managing director of the family business, said in an interview.

Image

Donald Trump Jr., left, and Eric Trump, right, with the elder Mr. Antonio, spoke with reporters as work on the Manila project got underway in 2012. Credit Pat Roque/Associated Press
The two families are considering new ventures as they finish work on the Trump Tower in Makati City, a financial center within metropolitan Manila that is one of the country’s wealthiest enclaves and home to many of the nation’s elite.

The $150 million tower — one of the tallest in the Philippines — is on the gritty side of Makati about two blocks from Manila’s most notorious red-light district, where it is common to see prostitutes soliciting business and people sleeping on sidewalks. Completion, originally scheduled for this year, is now expected in 2017. About 240 of the 260 units have been sold, said Kristina Garcia, the director for investor relations.

“We are bringing Trump to the Philippines because we believe that Trump exemplifies the best quality of real estate anywhere in the world,” Mr. Antonio said in a 2011 video promoting the project — in which Mr. Antonio is identified as “ambassador” and Mr. Trump also appears. “It also exemplifies luxury and it exemplifies exclusivity.”

In the interview at the celebration in Manila on Thursday evening, Robbie Antonio said he had little doubt of his father’s priorities: He will put the Philippines’ interests above those of his company. “It is for the good of the country now,” he said.

But Mr. Fuchs, who helped oversee United States relations with the Philippines as the deputy assistant secretary of state until early this year, said he was deeply troubled by Mr. Trump’s overlapping priorities, particularly given the long list of globally significant issues in play with the Philippines. These include planned joint military exercises in the South China Sea, the fight against militant Islamic groups based in the country’s southern islands, and the human rights abuses taking place.

“What we already have is a blurring of the lines between official and business activities,” Mr. Fuchs said. “The biggest gray area may not be a President Trump himself advocating for favors for the Trump Organization. It’s the diplomats and career officers who will feel the need to perhaps not do things that will harm the Trump Organization’s interests. It is seriously disturbing.”

Image
Doughmore Bay as seen from the Trump International Golf Links on the west coast of Ireland. Credit Paulo Nunes dos Santos for The New York Times
IRELAND and SCOTLAND

Over a Tiny Snail, Big Concerns

The vertigo angustior snail is only two millimeters long. But it punches above its weight.

The endangered little snail has helped stall Mr. Trump’s plans to build a sea wall to protect the coastline along his Trump International Golf Links course on the west coast of Ireland, in County Clare.

Environmentalists, as well as surfers, list a host of concerns about the proposed wall, particularly its potential impact on sand dunes. Along with the snails, a patch of the dunes near the course is protected by European Union rules. But Mr. Trump’s organization has said the golf resort development might be dead in the water without the sea wall, and many locals welcome the business and the jobs it brings.

The battle is likely to be decided next year in front of a national planning board, in the weeks or months after Mr. Trump is inaugurated on Jan. 20, several people said.

The planning board was overhauled in the 1980s to insulate it from political meddling, and it now has the confidence of environmentalists. But there is little precedent for the Trump situation, which could involve a public hearing.

“They can be long, they can be lively, and a lot of things could be aired,” said Sean O’Leary, the executive director of the Irish Planning Institute, which represents the majority of the country’s professional planners.

He noted that the national planning board had considered a development proposed by a politician before, but that was a holiday home that the Irish president wanted to build.

“The scale is slightly different,” he said.

Local officials have said the Trump Organization needs to resubmit its application by the end of the year. In a statement, the Trump Organization said it was “considering all potential coastal protection options at present” and would be in contact with the local authority before Christmas. The snail, the statement said, “is thriving on the site.”

“Its only material threat is that presented by coastal erosion,” it added.


A video by the Trump Organization advertising its golf course in Scotland. YouTube
Certainly, Mr. Trump’s golf courses in Scotland and Ireland have remained at the fore in the president-elect’s mind, even in recent days. Shortly after his election, he urged a group of “Brexit” campaigners led by Nigel Farage, the head of the U.K. Independence Party, to fight against wind farms in Britain. Wind farms have been a favorite target of Mr. Trump’s in both Britain and Ireland, where he has railed against proposed installations as a potential blight on the views from his resorts.

After a spokeswoman for Mr. Trump initially denied that the matter had been raised with Mr. Farage’s group, Mr. Trump conceded during his interview with The Times this past week that “I might have brought it up.”

Tony Lowes, an activist who runs a group called Friends of the Irish Environment, said Mr. Trump had once called him because Mr. Lowes’s group also happened to oppose a proposed wind farm near Mr. Trump’s Irish course on environmental grounds.

“He certainly hates wind farms, that’s for sure,” Mr. Lowes said about the call.

His group decided against working with Mr. Trump, and is now a leading opponent of his planned sea wall.

“The dune system will not be able to develop naturally,” Mr. Lowes said. “It will be starved of the sand it needs to develop and evolve and it will die.” He added, “The whole system there is alive and mobile and moving, and the wall is intended to stop that.”

Mr. Trump’s representatives have advanced a number of rationales for the sea wall, with the most straightforward being that they simply want to buffer the land from a continuing erosion problem. The proposal has previously attracted attention because an environmental-impact statement submitted by Mr. Trump’s team highlighted the risks of climate change and its influence on “coastal erosion rates.” That was a noteworthy claim, since Mr. Trump has called global warming a hoax perpetrated “by and for the Chinese.”

The Irish government has zealously courted Mr. Trump. When he visited the course in 2014, he was greeted on the airport tarmac in Shannon with a red carpet, a harpist, a violinist and a singer whose voice cut through the runway clamor.

Malachy Clerkin of The Irish Times called it “a preposterous welcome” and “the worst kind of forelock-tugging.”

Many locals, however, support Mr. Trump’s development. Hugh McNally, the owner of Morrissey’s Bar in Doonbeg Village, about two miles from the course, said the issue had been “sensationalized by the media” because of the Trump connection.

“I’ll give you an example,” he said. Roche, the Swiss pharmaceutical company, announced last year that it would close a plant in nearby Clarecastle, causing the loss of more than 200 jobs. “If someone told them you’d save those jobs by building any wall, everyone would do it,” he said. “The only reason people are objecting here is because of Trump.”

Image
A red-carpet welcome for Donald J. Trump, on a visit to his Ireland golf course in 2014. Credit Niall Carson/PA, via Associated Press
THE WORLD

A Transition and a Business Plan

Mr. Trump’s family appears to have been preparing for the transition to the Oval Office and ways to capitalize on it both in the United States and around the globe.

In April, even before Mr. Trump had secured the Republican nomination, his business moved to trademark the name American Idea for use in branding hotels, spas and concierge services, according to the United States Patent and Trademark Office. It was one of more than two dozen trademark applications that Mr. Trump and members of his family filed in the United States and around the world while he was running for president.

The applications offer a glimpse of where the Trumps may intend to focus their business endeavors. Last month, representatives of the Trump Organization in Indonesia, where Mr. Trump has been pursuing two hotel deals, filed trademark registrations for use of the Trump name in connection with hotel management. Similar filings have been made in Mexico, Canada and the European Union.

Ivanka Trump has filed at least 25 trademark registrations for her brand of clothing, cosmetics and jewelry in the United States, Canada, the European Union and Mexico since the beginning of the year, mostly recently in October. Mr. Trump’s wife, Melania, filed an American trademark application for a line of jewelry in August.


As he prepares for the presidency, Mr. Trump has made at least one concession so far, he said in the interview with The Times this past week.

“In theory, I can be president of the United States and run my business 100 percent, sign checks on my business,” Mr. Trump said, before later adding, “but I am phasing that out now, and handing that to Eric Trump and Don Trump and Ivanka Trump for the most part, and some of my executives, so that’s happening right now.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/us/po ... iness.html
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests