Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
barracuda » Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:21 pm wrote:Those same things overlap with hetero behavior, only moreso by several orders of magnitude. Christ.
tapitsbo » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:29 pm wrote:uh, that would involve replaying a discussion that's already amply accessible from many different sources
where do you get "orders of magnitude" from, though?
guruilla » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:40 pm wrote:barracuda » Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:21 pm wrote:Those same things overlap with hetero behavior, only moreso by several orders of magnitude. Christ.
And yet. No one is trying to defend creepy references to child exploitation by saying, "It's just part of heterosexual culture."
tapitsbo » 19 Dec 2016 15:42 wrote:Actually I'm pretty sure some people on this board were defending e.g. Woody Allen's creepiness right? lol
maybe I'm mistaken.
guruilla » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:40 pm wrote:barracuda » Mon Dec 19, 2016 4:21 pm wrote:Those same things overlap with hetero behavior, only moreso by several orders of magnitude. Christ.
And yet. No one is trying to defend creepy references to child exploitation by saying, "It's just part of heterosexual culture." How about you at least try to make a point when you are "making a point"? Jeez Louise.
tapitsbo » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:46 pm wrote:Obviously proportion would seem relevant than quantity.
tapitsbo » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:50 pm wrote:Depends on what you're trying to say here?
I'm saying it's more relevant to what guru and slomo have been talking about.
What doesn't shake out, what way, barracuda?
guruilla » Mon Dec 19, 2016 9:40 pm wrote:And yet. No one is trying to defend creepy references to child exploitation by saying, "It's just part of heterosexual culture."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests