Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
And I am not talking only about gun-toting hillbillies here, I am talking about the local, state and county authorities, who often care much more about what their local constituents think and say than what the are up to in DC. If a coup is staged against Trump and some wannabe President à la Hillary or McCain gives the order to the National Guard or even the US Army to put down a local insurrection, we could see what we saw in Russia in 1991: a categorical refusal of the security services to shoot at their own
seemslikeadream » Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:32 pm wrote:Grizzly did you hear Jeb Bush is the one that hired the guy that compiled the dossier?
have you been reading the Election thread?
French far right leader Le Pen visits Trump Tower but no Trump talks
French far-right presidential candidate Marine Le Pen was seen at Trump Tower on Thursday, but a spokesman for President-elect Donald Trump said she did not meet with him or his team.
"No meetings with anyone," transition spokesman Sean Spicer said. "It's a public building."
Le Pen, whose National Front party holds anti-immigrant and anti-European Union views, was seen entering an elevator at the building, according to a Reuters witness, but she did not speak to reporters gathered there.
George Lombardi, a Trump friend who lives in Trump Tower, told reporters that he had coffee there Thursday with Le Pen, who he said he has known for 20 years. He said Le Pen did not request a meeting with Trump.
A day earlier, Lombardi said, they attended a party with people they believe might raise money for her campaign, including business people and diplomats.
"This is a perfectly privately encounter that she had with some friends of ours," Lombardi said. "Some people had been asking to meet her a long time ago, and she just happened to be here because I happen to live here."
Le Pen, who is currently projected to lose a runoff with conservative former prime minister Francois Fillon in next May's election, has struggled to raise money for her campaign both in France and abroad.
She has also sought to burnish her credentials with foreign appearances. Her staff in April announced that she would go to Britain to campaign for that country's exit from the European Union but she ended up not going after being shunned by the Brexit campaign.
Le Pen was seen at Trump Tower with Lombardi, Louis Aliot, her partner and vice president of National Front, and Ludovic De Danne, her international affairs adviser.
Her staff confirmed her visit to New York, characterizing it as a private trip.
"She took two days to have a break," campaign director David Rachline said.
Trump Tower has been the site of a series of meetings between Trump, a Republican, and business and political leaders as he assembles his administration ahead of his Jan. 20 inauguration. It also has become a tourist destination since Trump's surprise November election victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton.
The group Human Rights Watch mentioned both Trump and Le Pen in a report warning that the rise of populist leaders threatens global human rights. It cited Trump's victory as well as Britain's move to leave the European Union led by Nigel Farage, who Trump has praised.
Le Pen is expected to earn enough votes in the first round of presidential voting in April to enter a second round election set for May 7.
Last summer Le Pen told a French magazine that if she were American, she would vote for Trump rather than Clinton. A week after Trump's victory, Le Pen said she, Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin "would be good for world peace."
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-t ... SKBN14W2EO
Turkey’s press-critical president lauds Trump for putting CNN reporter ‘in his place’
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politic ... -1.2945265
10 times Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks directly disputed him
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... f5ff30b715
HOW TRUMP COULD KILL THE INVESTIGATION OF JAMES COMEY’S ACTIONS
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk ... ys-actions
The Trump Story the Media Dare Not Utter
They sacrificed democracy for ratings.
By Thom Hartmann / AlterNet January 11, 2017
The media are engaged in an orgy of navel-gazing about the Trump presidency, but they're totally, utterly, absolutely, no-way-in-hell willing to gaze at their own navel.
Did Russian hackers revealing that Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile had put their thumb on the scale over at the DNC against Bernie cause Trump to win? Did he win because working white men are “angry”? Did he win because Hillary failed to campaign in the critical Rustbelt swing states? Did he win because of the Russians' media operations? Is he going to be president because so many people are so upset with “gummint”?
These (among others) are the memes that you'll find virtually every hour on TV news. But have you ever, anywhere (other than Free Speech TV), seen a TV conversation about the role the media itself played in getting Trump elected, and why they did it?
The numbers are easy to find online Trump got between $2 and $3 billion in free media coverage, while Hillary struggled to break into the evening news, and Bernie was largely ignored until the final months of the Democratic primary.
And it's not a secret: Les Moonves, the Executive Chairman and CEO of CBS, said, as reported by the Hollywood Reporter about Trump's candidacy: "It may not be good for America, but it's damn good for CBS." He added: “Donald's place in this election is a good thing. … Man, who would have expected the ride we're all having right now? ... The money's rolling in and this is fun... I've never seen anything like this, and this going to be a very good year for us. Sorry. It's a terrible thing to say. But, bring it on, Donald. Keep going.”
The networks – whose first priority since Reagan killed the Fairness Doctrine is profitability rather than informing the public – are no doubt salivating about the next 4 years of daily eruptions from the White House. They're clearly betting The Donald Trump Reality Show - POTUS Version will provide an ongoing revenue stream, whereas a Hillary presidency would merely have been competent and boring, and thus not as profitable for the media.
Which raises an important question in this post-Fairness Doctrine, post-consolidation media landscape in the United States.
The media is the only industry that's mentioned in our Constitution, because the Founders and Framers, as much as they may have hated the coverage they were getting from newspapers (see Jefferson), believed that a “free” and vibrant press would serve as a check on the 3 branches of government: a Fourth Estate, if you will.
In a letter about Shay’s Rebellion, which some argued was incited by newspapers, Thomas Jefferson wrote:
“The people are the only censors of their governors; and even their errors will tend to keep them to the true principles of their institution. To punish these errors too severely would be to suppress the only safeguard of the public liberty. The way to prevent these irregular interpositions of the people is to give them full information of their affairs, through the channel of public papers, and to contrive that those papers should penetrate the whole mass of the people.
“The basis of our government being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide, whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.”
Had TV existed in 1783, Jefferson would have probably expressed similar sentiments about it.
As Jefferson wrote in 1786 to his close friend Dr. James Currie, “Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.”
But ever since Ronald Reagan functionally stopped enforcing the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and killed off the FCC's Fairness Doctrine, leading to an explosion of acquisitions and mergers, and Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996, leading to an even more startling concentration of media in a very few hands, freedom of the press in America has become as much an economic as a political issue.
This is problematic, because no democracy can survive when most of the media has a sole commitment to profit with little consideration for the public good.
The Trump presidency is virtually entirely a product of our modern for-profit, highly-consolidated media.
As such, now may be an important time to reconsider how that media – particularly TV – is “free” (from corporate boards' profit interests) with regard to ownership and programming.
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trump-tv-ratings
Chaffetz threatens to subpoena federal ethics watchdog over Trump criticism
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/j ... ump-233575
NEWS & POLITICS
Ethics Watchdog Blasts Trump's 'Wholly Inadequate' Plan to Eliminate Conflicts of Interest
The head of the federal Office of Government Ethics demands the president-elect divest completely from private businesses.
By Alexandra Rosenmann / AlterNet January 12, 2017
President-elect Donald Trump's feud with reporters during his much-anticipated press conference overshadowed what was supposed to be its main focus: a plan to eliminate his worldwide conflicts of interests.
"They want a president to run the country... I could actually run my business and run government at the same time. I don't like the way that looks, but I would be able to do that if I wanted to," Trump said in the January 11 press conference.
"My two sons are going to be running the company. They are going to be running it in a very professional manner," Trump promised.
Trump’s attorney, Sheri Dillon, also addressed Trump's plans for handling his extensive business empire.
"The president-elect has also already disposed of all of his investments in publicly traded or easily liquidated investments," Dillon said.
The trust will hold both liquid assets as well as Trump's preexisting, illiquid assets, including Trump-owned properties, hotels and goods.
"Through instructions in the trust agreement, President-elect Trump first ordered that all pending deals be terminated. This impacted more than 30 deals, many of which were set to close by the end of 2016. As you can well imagine, that caused an immediate financial loss of millions of dollars, not just for President-elect Trump but also for Don, Ivanka and Eric," continued Dillon.
Dillon also pointed out that the trust agreement imposes strict restrictions on new deals. But for ethics watchdog Walter Shaub, it's simply "meaningless.”
“The ethics program starts at the top,” the head of the federal Office of Government Ethics said at a Brookings Institution forum in Washington.
Shaub called Trump’s plan “wholly inadequate" and demanded Trump divest completely from his 500 private businesses.
"The president-elect is now entering a world of public service. He's going to be asking his own appointees to make sacrifices. So, no, I don't think the divestiture is too high a price to pay to be the president of the United States of America," Shaub said.
Trump's predecessors have generally liquidated their personal assests in a blind trust. This month, he will become the wealthiest president in U.S. history.
Watch:
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politi ... s-interest
Nordic » Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:38 am wrote:seemslikeadream » Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:32 pm wrote:Grizzly did you hear Jeb Bush is the one that hired the guy that compiled the dossier?
have you been reading the Election thread?
So? Jeb Bush is a neocon, from a of neocons.
McCain was involved too. One of the main neocon henchmen.
Trump does Poor imitation of Tin-Pot Dictator at “Press Conference”
By Juan Cole | Jan. 12, 2017 |
By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –
In his first news conference in months, president-elect Donald J. Trump engaged in a series of petulant tirades. For anyone like myself, who has lived under dictators in the global South, his performance was unpleasantly reminiscent of their authoritarian publicity techniques.
Instead of letting a wide range of reporters attend, he limited their spots so that he could pack the hall with his own supporters. Those supporters were the ones applauding, and since the cameras were not turned on the audience, television viewers may have thought the cheers came from reporters. This effect was intended. There are some allegations that some of the Trump supporters in attendance were actually part of a rent-a-crowd, a common technique among Middle Eastern dictators. And then there was the typical technique of painting dissidents and critics as themselves authoritarian. Innocent Japanese were interned during WWII on unsupported charges that they were imperialists. Members and former members of the 50,000-strong Communist Party in the US were accused of trying to take over the US government. Trump on Wednesday characterized the leak of the intelligence report as “Nazism,” as though he were a victim of an authoritarian genocide being perpetrated by a web news site. The charge is ironic, as Rula Jebreal pointed out:
1. Disagreement is treason. Trump’s spokesman slammed Buzzfeed for publishing the annex to the US intelligence report on Russian hacking of the US election, complaining that it was false and not verified by the intelligence agencies. I said yesterday that I found the dossier unconvincing. But Buzzfeed’s conviction that the document was of public interest and the at the public should be able to see and judge it for themselves can be argued about. Buzzfeed did not certify it as true. Trump essentially put them on trial for treason. As for inaccuracy, Trump and his people want a monopoly on it. Let’s remember that Trump denied for years that President Obama was born in the United States, that he keeps saying that the murder rate in the US has risen (it has fallen dramatically since the 1990s), that he denies that humans burning hydrocarbons causes climate change, that he says that unemployment is 42%, and that there are 30 million undocumented workers in the US (it is about 11 million and has fallen). His campaign allies at the Neo-Nazi Breitbart rag accused Hillary Clinton (edited by Steve Bannon) of practicing voodoo and/or of being part of a pedophilia ring run from a Washington, DC pizzeria. At least the report on Trump’s having been compromised by Russian intelligence on his escapades in Russia actually exists.
2. Divide and rule. Trump tried to single out Buzzfeed for publishing the document and CNN for reporting that it was part of the intelligence community’s report by denouncing them as “fake news” and refusing them the opportunity to question him. He instead allowed the white supremacist Breitbart (a chief producer of fake news from its inception) to toss him a softball. Creating disfavored and favored news outlets is a typical authoritarian move. Trump is punishing CNN to create an incentive for other news outlets to treat him with kid gloves, and he is hoping the other reporters will climb over the prostrate bodies of the Buzzfeed and CNN journalists on their way up to White House access. The reporters and news organizations will have to stick together to overcome this tactic. Trump is also trying to legitimize his buddy Steve Bannon’s Neofascist monstrosity, Breitbart, by favoring it over CNN in public. (The Breitbart reporter suggested that Trump crack down on all those mainstream ‘fake news’ outlets, which is sort of like a wine-seller arguing for prohibition). Incidentally, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper confirmed CNN’s story later in the day. CNN did not publish the two pages of salacious material and were treated completely unjustly by Trump.
3. The Big Lie. Trump contradicted the US intelligence community, which maintained that Russian hackers also broke into the servers of the Republican National Committee but declined to leak those documents– in contrast to the way they treated the Hillary Clinton campaign. Trump said, “had they broken into the Republican National Committee, I think they would’ve released it just like they did about Hillary . . .” But they did and they didn’t. Trump continues to manufacture his own reality, in his own interests. (If the Russians treated their hacked information differently, some would argue, that his how they threw the election to Trump. He wants to deny that he had any help and so denies the facts of the case.)
4. Weasel words. Aware of arguments being made that he is beholden to Russian financial concerns, Trump said “As a real estate developer, I have very, very little debt. I have assets that are — and now people have found out how big the company is, I have very little debt — I have very low debt. But I have no loans with Russia at all.” This assertion is disingenuous because he might have partnerships or Russian investors without categorizing that money as “loans.” In fact, Trump owes at least $300 million to creditors, and if you total up the debts held by all the companies in which he has at least a 1/3 stake, the debts may come to $1.5 billion! One of the New York City buildings he has a part ownership of carries a $950 million debt, some of which is held by the Bank of China. Trump may presently have no Russian creditors or projects (and his finances are so Byzantine that it is impossible to know), but that does not rule out his having Russian partners or investors in US or European projects. As for investments inside Russia, he certainly has tried. Contrary to what he said, he has tried on several occasions to build Trump Towers in Russia. The deals collapsed, but not for lack of trying. in 2008 he made $54 million on a sale of a Florida mansion for $95 million to a Russian billionaire. That’s a suspiciously large profit in Florida in 2008, and there have been questions about Russian or former Soviet Union businessmen laundering money through joint ventures with Trump. Trump also had a $30 million deal to put on a Miss Universe pageant in Moscow in 2013 and wanted to invited and befriend Vladimir Putin.
5. Substituting spectacle for substance. Trump had one of his attorneys put on a dog and pony show about how he will handle his finances during his presidency, implying that he thereby put to rest the worries about his business conflicts of interest. No one who knows about the pertinent laws appears in the least convinced that Trump’s proposals resolved these issues. The attempt to use smoke and mirrors to finesse this matter is typical of authoritarian regimes, who deny their own corruption via public spectacle and the strong-arming of critics. The big piles of Manila folders were apparently empty and just for show.
Empty and just for show will be some of the words inscribed on the tombstone of Trump’s presidency.
——
Related video:
PBS: “Donald Trump’s first press conference as president-elect”
http://www.juancole.com/2017/01/imitati ... rence.html
On Thursday night, MSNBC’s signal abruptly froze during a broadcast of Hardball with Chris Matthews and repeated the word “Russia” over and over.
As Mediaite.com reported, the broadcast froze just as Washington Post columnist David Ignatius was saying the word “Russia,” which was repeated over and over during the freeze.
On Thursday, C-SPAN’s broadcast of proceedings in the U.S. House of Representatives got bumped off the air during an anti-Trump speech by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA). C-SPAN’s signal was replaced by approximately 10 minutes of programming from Russia Today, the English language cable network owned by the Russian government.
C-SPAN blamed “an internal routing error” for the glitch in an afternoon statement.
Mediaite also said that on Thursday, “(T)he lights mysteriously went out during the confirmation hearing for Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) while he was being vetted by the Senate Intelligence Committee.”
The topic of conversation during the temporary blackout was the role Russian hackers may have played in the outcome of the 2016 U.S. election.
On Thursday night, MSNBC’s signal abruptly froze during a broadcast of Hardball with Chris Matthews and repeated the word “Russia” over and over.
justdrew wrote:I think we're looking at a Hitler style takeover. In a year this country will be unrecognizable.
seemslikeadream » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:26 pm wrote:On Thursday night, MSNBC’s signal abruptly froze during a broadcast of Hardball with Chris Matthews and repeated the word “Russia” over and over.
yes I was watching at the time and that did happen
Agent Orange Cooper » 13 Jan 2017 12:33 wrote:justdrew wrote:I think we're looking at a Hitler style takeover. In a year this country will be unrecognizable.
We've been living under an effigy of Hitler at least since the full-on, literally Nazi-backed military coup in 1963. We are just now finally on the verge of breaking free of it and I can hardly believe people are so delusional to miss this, and are in fact clinging to their fascist overlords. It's like a collective stockholm syndrome.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests